October 17, 2018 Presentation of Results T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 2 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

october 17 2018
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

October 17, 2018 Presentation of Results T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 2 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Our Lady of Mercy Facilities Stewardship Summary October 17, 2018 Presentation of Results T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 2 3 About T HE S TONE H OUSE G ROUP 7 Conceptual Philosophies 11 Campus Metrics 19 Project Goals and Scope 21


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Our Lady of Mercy – Facilities Stewardship Summary Presentation of Results October 17, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

 3  7  11  19  21  54  74

About THE STONE HOUSE GROUP Conceptual Philosophies Campus Metrics Project Goals and Scope Facilities Conditions Assessment (FCA) Space Study Energy Discussion Questions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Who we are… Who we serve…

About THE STONE HOUSE GROUP

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE ARE…

4

Bethlehem, PA Washington, D.C. Facilities Consulting Firm Strengthening mission and distinctive needs of academic, not-for-profit, and corporate institutions 300+ Clients Served 150+ Education Clients 1999 Year Founded

slide-5
SLIDE 5

THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE SERVE…

5

  • Shorecrest Preparatory

School

  • Pace Academy
  • Georgetown Day School
  • Wilmington Friends School
  • Bullis School
  • Notre Dame Preparatory

School

  • Carolina Friends School
  • Holton-Arms School
  • St. Alban’s School
  • The Lab School of

Washington

  • St. Patrick’s Episcopal Day
  • Wilmington Friends School
  • St. Paul’s School
  • The Lawrenceville School
  • The Hotchkiss School
  • The Pingry School
  • Garrison Forest School
  • Rutgers Preparatory School
  • Riverdale Country School
  • Stuart Country Day School
  • The Wardlaw-Hartridge

School

  • Miss Porter’s School
  • Brooklyn Friends School
  • Far Hills Country Day

School

  • Deerfield Academy
  • Episcopal School of Dallas
  • Greenwich Academy
  • National Presbyterian

School

  • St. Andrew’s School
  • Sichuan Province Schools in

Chengdu, China

  • Antilles School (USVI)
  • Princeton University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Sweet Briar College
slide-6
SLIDE 6

THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE SERVE…

6

5,959,000 1,971,888 13,690,550 1,431,335 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 Colleges/Universities Gov/Public Independent Schools Other GSF Client Type

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CONCEPTUAL PHILOSOPHIES

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Management Effort

8

BUILDING STEWARDSHIP

Management Effort Value Management Effort

Environmental Stewardship

Cycle Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Modernization Capital Construction

Add Value

Fundraising Identity Environmental Programs

Performance

Improve Management

Master Plan Utility Plan Space Utilization Study Life Cycle Cost Analysis

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MASTER PLANNING INPUTS & OUTPUTS

A Facilities Stewardship Plan provides an important piece of the overall Campus Master Plan for Facilities Stewardship as depicted in the figure below, Master Planning – Inputs & Outputs.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MASTER PLANNING INPUTS & OUTPUTS

A Facilities Stewardship Plan provides an important piece of the overall Campus Master Plan for Facilities Stewardship as depicted in the figure below, Master Planning – Inputs & Outputs.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Building Inventory Understanding Building Age Enrollment by Division Gross Square Feet per Student Operations Housekeeping Trades Operating Budget

CAMPUS METRICS

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BUILDINGS SURVEYED – GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF)

12

Total GSF = 88,300 (GSF information is estimated)

45,000 25,000 8,000 6,300 4,000 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 School Building Church Building Parish House Rectory 9320 Mercy Hollow Ln GSF Building

slide-13
SLIDE 13

BUILDING AGES (ORIGINAL VS RESET)

13

GSF Shown in Reset Range Range as Percentage of Total GSF

SHG defines a reset age as the age when a building’s major MEP and Envelope systems have had major renovations since the date of original construction. Of the 88,300 GSF of building space surveyed, 65% has an age of more than 20 years. Although there have been some replacement and upgrade projects through the years, it could not be determined if any of the buildings have had holistic renovations.

6,300 25,000 57,000 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Less than 10 11 to 20 More than 20

GSF Age Range (Years) Less than 10 7% 11 to 20 28% More than 20 65%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

BENCHMARKING GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) PER STUDENT

14 14 15 13 22 15 22 17 22 24 20 18 17 5 10 15 20 25 30 Pre-K3 Pre-K4 H Pre-K4 B K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 # of Students Division 2018/2019 Enrollment = 219

slide-15
SLIDE 15

100 200 300 400 500 600

GSF/Student

GSF PER STUDENT

Surveyed Institutions

Bullis Chestnut Hill Academy Georgetown Day School Indian Creek School Kent Place La Salle College HS New Canaan Country School Germantown Academy Landon

  • St. Patricks '11
  • St. Patricks '12

Marymount Moorestown Friends National Cathedral National Presbyterian Notre Dame Prep '10 Notre Dame Prep '11 Pingry Rutgers Prep Springside

  • St. Patrick's

The Field School Williams Montgomery School

Average for surveyed day schools 283 GSF per student

BENCHMARKING GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) PER STUDENT

15 Total GSF = 88,300 (estimated) Current Enrollment = 219 Church and School Buildings Only School Building

403 205

slide-16
SLIDE 16

HOUSEKEEPING GSF/FTE

16

48,500 37,825 31,229 31,022 29,091 28,972

27,169

26,673 23,527 22,189 19,888 15,066

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000

Independent Schools Abington Friends Chatham Chestnut Hill Academy Far Hills School Gettysburg College Hotchkiss School Indian Creek Lab School Lawrenceville School Metet School Milton Hershey School Pingry School Riverdale Rutger's Prep

  • St. Paul's for Girls

Springside School Taft School Town Trinity School Walnut Hill School

GSF/FTE Our Lady of Mercy

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TRADES GSF/FTE

17

128,172 97,354 83,687 64,158 61,515 50,000 40,741 33,099 30,885 29,433 28,333 26,690

20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000

Independent Schools Abington Friends Canterbury Chatham Chestnut Hill Academy Far Hills School Gettysburg College Hotchkiss School Indian Creek Lawrenceville School Marymount School Meret School Milton Hershey School Pingry School Riverdale Rutger's Prep Springside School

  • St. Hilda & Hugh's
  • St. Paul's (Md)
  • St. Paul's for Girls

Taft School Town School Trinity School Walnut Hill School

GSF/FTE Our Lady of Mercy

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OPERATING BUDGET $/GSF

18

$3.38 $2.47 $2.35 $2.84 $4.36 $5.29 $2.31 $2.67 $2.18 $1.92 $4.01 $2.59 $2.87 $3.81 $2.82 $1.52 $2.44 $1.78 $2.22 $1.66 $2.56 $2.32 $1.87 $1.66 $1.39 $2.63 $1.39 $2.41 $3.32 $1.24 $0.00 $2.13 $1.12 $0.57 $1.34 $0.00 $0.95 $0.26 $0.62 $0.56 $1.44 $0.61 $0.26 $0.31 $0.00 $0.99 $0.19 $0.66 $0.40 $0.86 $9.86 $11.67 $10.45 $8.78 $8.28 $8.32 $7.67 $8.17 $8.29 $7.40 $6.45 $6.44 $6.78 $5.07 $5.75 $5.10 $4.97 $5.91 $5.33 $5.36 $3.25 $4.17 $4.05 $3.29 $3.08 $0.00 $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00 $12.00 $14.00 $16.00 $18.00 $20.00

Utilities Planned Maintenance Daily Service

$/GSF

$7.96 $10.46 $9.13 $9.92 $15.86 $13.61 $10.66 $14.93 $8.06 $9.97 $15.54 $13.88 $11.97 $9.50

OLOM

$15.21 $7.02 $6.80 $6.69 $6.57 $5.33 $7.86 $8.02 $12.11

$11.04

$5.36

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PROJECT GOALS

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Facilities Conditions Assessment (FCA) Space Study Energy Review

PROJECT SCOPE

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Process Terms Definitions What’s In / What’s Out

FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT (FCA) - OVERVIEW

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

TYPICAL FCA PROCESS

22

Planning Visit

  • Determine

Project Schedule

  • Initial Data

Collection

Inspections

  • Room by Room
  • AE, AI, MEP

, ADA, Life Safety

  • Begin

Database

Costing

  • RS Means
  • Field

Knowledge

  • Construction

Cost Data

  • Institutional

Data

QA

  • Internal Review
  • Institutional

Assessment Review

Analysis

  • Review Projects

& Costing

  • Complete Draft

FCA Database

  • Complete Draft

Presentation, Institutional Review

Present Findings

slide-23
SLIDE 23

TYPICAL FCA PROCESS

23

FCA Inspections Existing Surveys

Integrated FCA Database

Operations: Project Selection Priorities Planning Overlap with Program Changes Financial: Catch Up Keep Up Reserve Funding Benchmarking

Inputs Outputs

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FCA TERMS & DEFINITIONS

24 Preventive Maintenance & Daily Service:

Routine tasks performed frequently and funded through the annual operating

  • budget. They are

essential to the use of the buildings but do not add to the asset value of the institution.

Cycle Maintenance:

The process of assuring that building components are replaced at or near the end of their useful lifecycles. Documented as depreciation on an institution’s financial records, these cycles exceed a single year and may even span decades.

Deferred Maintenance:

Accumulates when cycle maintenance is left undone, due to limited financial or physical (labor, materials, time)

  • resources. Significant

deferred maintenance can erode the physical assets of the institution and may eventually render buildings unusable and their systems nonfunctional.

Modernization:

The process for improving facilities. It may be driven by changing programs, code and safety requirements, or the impact of technology.

Safety / Statutory:

These are Modernization projects recommended specifically because of a safety requirement.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FCA TERMS & DEFINITIONS

25

Immediate exposure; should be completed within one year High priority; should be completed in

  • ne to two years

Priority; should be completed in three to five years Planned; should be completed in six to ten years

Priority 1* Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3

slide-26
SLIDE 26

FCA PROJECTS – WHAT’S IN? WHAT’S OUT?

26

What’s Out? What’s In?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Snapshot - FCA Database Data by Priority Data by Maintenance Category Data by Maintenance Type Need by Building Indices Gap Analysis Select Project Write-ups

FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT - FINDINGS

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

*It is important to note that THE STONE HOUSE GROUP priced all projects using current dollars, taking into account location factors, and excluded inflation. SHG also used institutional cost estimates where applicable. Replacement projects were status quo unless otherwise noted.

FCA DATABASE

28

Record er Proj # Bldg Floor Room Category Trade Object Action Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost

  • Est. Age

Est Life Priority Impact MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Living Room AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 620 $7 $4,340 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Living Room AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 620 $3 $1,550 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Living Room AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 620 $2 $1,240 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 155 $7 $1,085 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 155 $3 $388 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 155 $2 $310 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Linen Closet AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 55 $7 $385 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Linen Closet AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 55 $3 $138 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Linen Closet AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 55 $2 $110 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bathroom 1 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 40 $3 $100 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bathroom 1 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 40 $2 $80 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bathroom 1 MEP Plumbing Sink fixtures Replace ea 1 $180 $180 2 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 80 $7 $560 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 80 $3 $200 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 80 $2 $160 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Storage Rm Safety / Statutory Fire Safety Smoke Detection Install ea 1 $200 $200 1 Safety / Statutory

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Priority 1* Immediate Priority 1 1-2 Years Priority 2 3-5 Years Priority 3 6-10 Years

IDENTIFIED NEED BY PRIORITY

29

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

Priority 1, $779,298, 19% Priority 2, $614,645, 15% Priority 3, $2,707,830, 65% Priority 1*, $38,550, 1%

slide-30
SLIDE 30

IDENTIFIED NEED BY PRIORITY

30

Church Buildings ($2,363,632) School Building ($1,776,690)

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

Priority 1, $152,598, 7% Priority 2, $388,145, 16% Priority 3, $1,801,090, 76% Priority 1*, $21,800, 1% Priority 1, $626,700, 35% Priority 2, $226,500, 13% Priority 3, $906,740, 51% Priority 1*, $16,750, 1%

slide-31
SLIDE 31

IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE CATEGORY

31 Architectural Exterior, $848,190, 21% Architectural Interior, $848,542, 21% Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, $2,120,490, 51% Safety/Statutory, $18,100, 0% Grounds, $305,000, 7% Electrical

  • Lighting repairs
  • Wiring
  • Keypad System
  • Generator
  • Chair lift

Mechanical

  • Gym RTU
  • Trane DX Units
  • AHU’s
  • BAS Upgrade
  • Trane Chiller

Plumbing

  • Restroom Fixtures
  • Hot Water

Heaters

  • Various Pumps
  • Water Fountains

Safety / Statutory

  • Stage Access
  • Fire Safety
  • Arch. Ext & Grounds
  • Windows
  • Playground
  • Roof Systems
  • Asphalt
  • Water Proofing
  • Arch. Interior
  • Carpet
  • Painting
  • Flooring
  • Carpentry

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

slide-32
SLIDE 32

IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE CATEGORY

32

Church Buildings ($2,363,632) School Building ($1,776,690)

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

Architectural Exterior, $592,990, 25% Architectural Interior, $423,542, 18% Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, $1,039,000, 44% Safety/Statuto ry, $3,100, 0% Grounds, $305,000, 13% Architectural Exterior, $255,200, 14% Architectural Interior, $425,000, 24% Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, $1,081,490, 61% Safety/Statuto ry, $15,000, 1% Grounds, $0, 0%

slide-33
SLIDE 33

IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE TYPE

33 Deferred Maintenance, $71,650, 2% Cycle Maintenance, $3,785,472, 91% Modernization, $257,700, 6% Daily Serv/Safety, $25,500, 1%

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

slide-34
SLIDE 34

IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE TYPE

34

Church Buildings ($2,363,632) School Building ($1,776,690)

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

Deferred Maintenance, $17,750, 1% Cycle Maintenance, $1,672,740, 94% Modernization, $70,200, 4% Daily Serv/Safety, $16,000, 1% Deferred Maintenance, $53,900, 2% Cycle Maintenance, $2,112,732, 89% Modernization, $187,500, 8% Daily Serv/Safety, $9,500, 1%

slide-35
SLIDE 35

IDENTIFIED NEED BY TRADE

35

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

Carpentry, $141,310 , 3% Masonry, $27,000 , 1% Painting, $372,442 , 9% Roofing, $130,000 , 3% Flooring, $36,800 , 1% Plumbing, $61,440 , 1% Windows, $577,250 , 14% Special, $204,000 , 5% Electrical, $71,350 , 2% Mechanical, $1,987,700 , 48% Carpeting, $364,630 , 9% Fire Safety, $600 , 0% Paving, $165,000 , 4%

slide-36
SLIDE 36

IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING

36 $1,776,690 $1,177,900 $440,000 $282,350 $240,600 $222,783 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 School Building Church Building Campus Parish House 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane Rectory

Priority 2

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

slide-37
SLIDE 37

IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING BY PRIORITY

37 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 School Building Church Building Campus Parish House 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane Rectory Priority 3 Priority 2 Priority 1 & 1*

Priority 2

$1,776,690 $1,177,900 $440,000 $282,350 $240,600 $222,783

Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322

slide-38
SLIDE 38

IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING ($/GSF)

38 $60 $39 $35 $35 $18 $13

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70

9320 Mercy Hollow Lane School Building Rectory Parish House Church Building Grounds

Identified Need ($) / GSF Building

slide-39
SLIDE 39

$64.95 $56.74 $54.59 $48.52 $46.89 $39.48 $36.91 $35.56 $31.05 $30.47 $26.98 $26.29 $24.30 $23.51 $19.86 $14.62

$0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $/GSF

Institutional Average - $36.03

INDICES

23

Institutions Surveyed Bullis School Pace School Delbarton Pingree School Delaware Valley Friends Riverdale Country School Garrison Forest Rutgers Preparatory School Georgetown Day School

  • St. Patrick's Episcopal School

Hotchkiss School Stuart Country Day School Indian Creek Upland Country Day School Lab School Westtown School LaSale College High School Whitby School Moorestown Friends School Williams School National Presbyterian School Wilmington Friends School

Church and School Buildings Only Church Buildings Only School Building

slide-40
SLIDE 40

GAP ANALYSIS

40

$0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10

Funded Need 2% Replacement 3% Ops Budget

Identified Need = 2% of Replacement Value over 10 Years = 3% of Operating Budget over 10 years =

$4,140,322 $1,755,000 $6,181,000

slide-41
SLIDE 41

The following slides are a sampling of the

  • verall projects that have been identified during

this Facilities Conditions Assessment.

Select Project Write-ups

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • Water infiltration issue
  • Temporary solution is unsightly and likely does not address problem
  • Recommend investigate presence of exterior moisture barrier/waterproofing; install

9320 Mercy Hollow Lane 42

Priority 1 $50,000

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • Main Entry
  • Concrete Sidewalk
  • Consider replacement of concrete at main entry points and pathways

Campus 43

Priority 1 $50,000

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Flat Roof section over dining and kitchen
  • Welded copper sheet
  • Ongoing leaks into spaces below; flashing along transition has pulled away, likely causing moisture penetration
  • Consider repairs

9320 Mercy Hollow Lane 44

Priority 1 $10,000

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • The hatch to the lift station has a coating over it to keep out odor
  • OLOM pays for semi-annual service to pump out lift station apparently due to controls not working
  • It is very likely that odor would not be present if controls worked to properly pump out station; strongly

recommend bringing a mechanical contractor on board to diagnose and repair any issues

Church Sewage Ejector Station 45

Priority 1* $5,000

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • A back storage room at Parish House has two 5-ton split AC units serving an area more suited to

a 2-ton unit

  • Recommend shutting off and locking out one unit
  • Further recommend replacing working unit with a smaller unit as the existing unit ages (~$3,000

for a properly sized unit)

Parish House Storage Room AC Units 46

Priority 1* $500

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • Peerless boiler serving gym area radiators will need replacement in 1-3 years
  • Hot water radiators are a very efficient for heating, so recommend keeping this system in place
  • However, strongly recommend replacing existing unit with a modern, condensing boiler for vastly

improved efficiency, and thus cost savings

Gym Boiler 47

Priority 1 $15,000

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Church building ancillary rooms (music, chapel, basement meeting room) are served by

MagicAire dx units

  • Units are beginning to age, estimate that they will need replacement in 3-6 years
  • Alternate to replacing in-kind, consider consolidating these units in a distributed air, VAV system

Church AC Units 48

Priority 2 $25,000

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • Cooling for school is mainly served by many RTU’s, each serving a single zone
  • This design is very inefficient and equipment is aging
  • Strongly recommend a centralized variable volume system or VRF-based

system, instead of replacing RTU’s in kind as they begin to fail

School Building Cooling 49

Priority 2 $125,000

slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • AHU’s in attic serve admin areas, hallway, etc
  • These systems are beginning to age and will need replacement in roughly the same time frame

as the RTU’s

  • Consider adding these areas to the distributed air, VAV (or VRF) system that would replace RTU’s

School Attic AHU’s 50

Priority 2 *Cost included with RTU’s above

slide-51
SLIDE 51
  • Existing Johnson controls system is aging
  • A more modern system will improve user comfort, reduce utility bills, provide

better energy and equipment tracking, and have an up-to-date graphics interface

Controls Upgrade 51

Priority 3 $125,000

slide-52
SLIDE 52
  • Main church cooling is served by one air-cooled chiller with a remote evaporator
  • Consider installing a redundant chiller, as we have seen examples of facilities

spending large amounts of money when their only source of cooling breaks down

Redundant Cooling 52

Priority 3 $75,000

slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • OLOM does not have an emergency generator
  • Recommend installing generator to prevent forced closure of schools
  • Can be sized for load only at school

Generator 53

Priority 3 $25,000

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Space Inventory Observations

Space Study

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

PURPOSE

55

 An integral piece of any Master Planning phase  Study will help to inform strategic decisions and assessing future goals such as:  Identity  Growth  Enrollment  Facilities  Academic Programs  Capital Project Strategy Space has an important relationship with each of these goals… …and may help to answer:  Does Mercy have enough space?  Are spaces in the right places?  Are spaces configured properly?  Are there shifts in pedagogy or policy that would change how spaces are used?  How should funding be prioritized in addressing space modernizations?

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

SPACE INVENTORY

APPROACH

Space information collected and organized:

 Follow standards set forth in Facilities Inventory &

Classification Manual by U.S. Department of Education

 Building and School Name (or Region)  Building’s Room Number and Local Name  Square footage  Useable Area Identification (FICM as standard)  Use Category (ie. Classroom, Laboratory, Office, General

Use, Support Room, Health Care, Circulation, Mechanical

 Functional Category (ie. Instruction, Academic

Support/Service, Student Services)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING SPACE IDENTIFICATION

slide-58
SLIDE 58

SPACE STUDY DATABASE (SNAPSHOT)

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING SPACE IDENTIFICATION

45,000 41,635 3,365 31,543 10,092

slide-60
SLIDE 60

GROSS & NET AREA

Area Square Footage Gross Square Feet 45,000 Net Square Feet 41,635 % of GSF 93%

Definitions:

Gross Square Feet is the total square footage of the building including exterior walls. Net Square Feet is the total square footage less the structural area (walls, chases, etc) Non-assignable Area is all areas of a building not available for assignment to an occupant or for specific use, but necessary for the general operation of a building. This includes circulation, janitorial, restroom and utility/mechanical spaces Assignable Area is all areas of a building assigned to, or available for assignment to, an occupant or specific use.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Building Service Area Circulation Area General Use Area Office Support Room Classroom Health Care

VISUALIZING EXISTING PROGRAM LAYOUT

Laboratory Mechanical Area Study Facilities

slide-62
SLIDE 62

PROGRAM ANALYSIS

Lounge, Enrichment, AD

Building Service Area Circulation Area Classroom General Use Area Health Care Laboratory Mechanical Area Office Study Facilities Support Room

Restrooms, Kitchen, Storage, Facilities Corridors, Alcoves, Vestibules, Lobbies Stage, Gymnasium, Kennedy Room Art Classroom, Maker Space, TV Room Library

slide-63
SLIDE 63

BREAKING DOWN NET USABLE AREA

63

Net Assignable Area (31,543 SF) Non-Assignable Area (10,092 SF)

Classroom, 11,230 General Use, 12,115 Office, 1,783 Laboratory, 2,395 Study Facilities, 1,870 Health, 220 Support, 793 Mech/Uncla ssified, 1,137

Building Services, 3,375 Circulation, 6,717

Net Usable Area 41,635 Structural 3,365 Gross Square Feet 45,000

slide-64
SLIDE 64

OBSERVATIONS

64

Space Observation

Classrooms Not Dynamic; Mostly sized for more than 40 students; Unsightly Storage/Coat Rooms; Need more flexible seating; Consider multiple smaller classrooms for 15+ students Science / Labs Need to consider program enhancements; more space, adequate shelving, displays casework and outlets Music Consider space options for storage and teaching; Currently using cart to move about the building with little to no storage for equipment (PreK to 8); Consider using under-utilized room between Kennedy Room and Art Display Areas Consider identifying locations for art and athletic displays and adequate lighting; Currently the trophy case is in the rear corridor away from the Gymnasium, and Art does not have sufficient space Offices Most of the faculty use their classrooms as their office space; does this work for Mercy? No privacy rooms School Counselor Currently, the School Counselor office is in the far corner of the School Building; this is not ideal for multiple reasons; Consider using space closer to Admin/Reception Suite Storage There does not appear to be adequate storage facilities and the dedicated storage room adjacent the Gym is not being utilized to its full potential; much of the material appears to be unused; Could this space be used for another purpose? Consider reconfiguring spaces closer to the cafeteria for tables/chairs Safety / Security Need dedicated location for table / chair storage; currently utilizing adjacent hallways which is creating a safety hazard should an emergency be recognized while tables are blocking corridor space for egress; Main Entrance - consider constructing interior vestibule to have visitors flow into reception office, rather than into an open corridor without properly checking into main office.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

OBSERVATIONS – SCHOOL COUNSELOR

65

Currently, the School Counselor has an

  • ffice in the far corner of the School

Building.

slide-66
SLIDE 66

CONSIDERATIONS – SCHOOL COUNSELOR

66

Consider under-utilized office space in Admin/Reception Suite for office and meeting space closer to heart of building

slide-67
SLIDE 67

OBSERVATION – MAIN ENTRY

67

A person gains access through intercom, but then is free to walk into building without barrier wall.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

CONSIDERATION – MAIN ENTRY

68

Consider constructing interior vestibule that directs traffic into the main office for proper identification. The FCA includes such a project in the database.

slide-69
SLIDE 69

OBSERVATION – MUSIC STORAGE

69

Currently, the Music Teacher utilizes a cart to move about the school with no touch-down location.

slide-70
SLIDE 70

CONSIDER – MUSIC STORAGE

70

Consider utilizing the under-utilized bookroom adjacent Kennedy Room

slide-71
SLIDE 71

OBSERVATIONS – SAFETY / FLOW

71

Students sometimes need to use the back corridor to use spaces inside the Church for Music. Also, although the garden courtyard is not used regularly, students are still able to access.

slide-72
SLIDE 72

CONSIDERATIONS – SAFETY / FLOW

72

In the near-term, identify a dedicated room for music. For safety purposes, the corridor door leading into the courtyard must remain unlocked should a student be locked inside the courtyard. This becomes a safety risk if someone forgets to lock at end of the day. Future considerations to renovate this approximately 3,000 SF area into usable space to alleviate the safety risk, insect infestation issue, and provide usable space.

slide-73
SLIDE 73

OBSERVATIONS

73

  • Alignment of Divisions (Grades are spread out throughout building)
  • Dedicated area of School for Pre-K Division
  • Future Expansion Considerations
  • Provide needed program space
  • Could trigger synergies with centralizing and right-placing Specials
  • Provide efficient flow for Facilities who currently traverse the gym during classes
  • Could provide more suitable locker space, instead of area adjacent second

entrance

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Energy Discussion

74

slide-75
SLIDE 75

$1.57 $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00

BENCHMARKING – ENERGY $/GSF

75 OL Mercy

Average for surveyed day schools $2.02 / GSF

Independent Schools

Abington Friends Academy of Notore Dame Agnes Irwin Ancillae-Assumption Buckingham Friends Bullis School Cedar Grove Chestnut Hill Concept School Cornerstone Christian Country Day School Delaware County Christian Delaware Valley Friends Fairville Friends Friends Central Friends School Friends Select Georgetown Day Germantown Friends Garrison Forest Green Tree Gwyneed Mercy Haverford Hill Top Prep KHLT LaSalle Marymount Mervy Vocational Moorestown Friends Moravian Academy National Presbyterian Newtown Friends Nightingale PA School for the Deaf Pen Ryn Phila Montgomery Christian Philadelphia School Pingry School Quajker School

  • RiverdaleSt. Bail

Saint David's Springside

  • St. Albans
  • St. Hilda & Hugh's
  • St. Paul's (Md)

Town Trinity UNited Friends Upattinas School Villa Joseph Marie West Chester Friends West Hill School Whitby School

  • St. Patrick's Episcopal Day School

Sidwell Friends OL Mervy Maret

slide-76
SLIDE 76

73 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

BENCHMARKING – MBTU/GSF

2 OL Mercy

Average for surveyed day schools 69 MBTU / GSF

Independent Schools Abington Friends Academy of Notre Dame Agnes Irwin Ancillae-Assumption Buckingham Friends Cedar Grove Chestnut Hill Cornerstone Christian Country Day School Delaware County Chr. Delaware Valley Friends Friends Central Friends School Friends Select Georgetown Day Germantown Friends Garrison Forest Green Tree Gwyneed Mercy Haverford Hill Top Prep LaSalle Lansdowne Friends Marymount Mercy Vocational Moorestown Friends Moravian Academy National Presbyterian Newtown Friends PA School for the Deaf Pen Ryn Phila Montgomery Chr. Pingry School Quaker School Riverdale St. Bail Rutgers Prep United Friends Upattinas School Villa Joseph Marie West Chester Friends Whitby School Sidwell Friends

  • St. Pat’s Episcopal

Maret OL Mercy

Note: this includes gas and electric; the church is at 77 MBTU / GSF for electrical ONLY

slide-77
SLIDE 77

$607.59 $0.00 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00 $500.00 $600.00 $700.00 $800.00

BENCHMARKING – ENERGY $/STUDENT

77

Average for surveyed day schools 498 $ / Student Independent Schools Springside Marymount Chestnut Hill Bullis National Presbyterian LaSalle College Moorestown Friends

  • St. Patrick’s

Sidwell Maret OL Mercy

OL Mercy

slide-78
SLIDE 78

BENCHMARKING – ELECTRICITY VS. GAS

78

$9.53 $36.94 $0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00

Gas Electricity

Energy Source $ / MMBTU

slide-79
SLIDE 79

BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENERGY CONSUMPTION (MMBTU)

79 3,479 , 56% 2,684 , 44%

Gas Electricity

slide-80
SLIDE 80

BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENERGY COST

80 $99,146 $33,158

Electricity Gas

slide-81
SLIDE 81

HEATING LOAD PROFILE

81

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Church / School Parish

slide-82
SLIDE 82

RELATIVE ELECTRICAL COST

82

$1,921 $76,136 $3,470 $17,619

Rectory Church Parish School

slide-83
SLIDE 83

RELATIVE ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION (KWH)

83

30,947 570,781 58,677 126,841

Rectory Church Parish School

slide-84
SLIDE 84

COOLING LOAD PROFILE

84

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000

Rectory Church Parish School

slide-85
SLIDE 85

COOLING LOAD PROFILE COMPARISON

 Normal cooling load

peaks in summer months and tails off in winter

 The data for OLOM

does not suggest a winter decrease

85

slide-86
SLIDE 86

BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (LBS CO2)

86

407,102

652,942

Gas Electricity

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Discussion Points

87

 Fuel-burning furnace at Rectory not captured

 Move to natural gas in the future

 Campus electrical consumption

 Cooling load profile  Church is 77% of electrical costs

 School cooling via RTU

 Age of RTU’s

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Energy Conservation Measures (ECM)

88

 Retro-Commissioning  Master plan includes modern cooling system for

school

 Update BAS

 Commissioning

 Upgrade lighting to LED

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Questions

Thank You!

89