Our Lady of Mercy – Facilities Stewardship Summary Presentation of Results October 17, 2018
October 17, 2018 Presentation of Results T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 2 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
October 17, 2018 Presentation of Results T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 2 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Our Lady of Mercy Facilities Stewardship Summary October 17, 2018 Presentation of Results T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 2 3 About T HE S TONE H OUSE G ROUP 7 Conceptual Philosophies 11 Campus Metrics 19 Project Goals and Scope 21
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
3 7 11 19 21 54 74
About THE STONE HOUSE GROUP Conceptual Philosophies Campus Metrics Project Goals and Scope Facilities Conditions Assessment (FCA) Space Study Energy Discussion Questions
Who we are… Who we serve…
About THE STONE HOUSE GROUP
3
THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE ARE…
4
Bethlehem, PA Washington, D.C. Facilities Consulting Firm Strengthening mission and distinctive needs of academic, not-for-profit, and corporate institutions 300+ Clients Served 150+ Education Clients 1999 Year Founded
THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE SERVE…
5
- Shorecrest Preparatory
School
- Pace Academy
- Georgetown Day School
- Wilmington Friends School
- Bullis School
- Notre Dame Preparatory
School
- Carolina Friends School
- Holton-Arms School
- St. Alban’s School
- The Lab School of
Washington
- St. Patrick’s Episcopal Day
- Wilmington Friends School
- St. Paul’s School
- The Lawrenceville School
- The Hotchkiss School
- The Pingry School
- Garrison Forest School
- Rutgers Preparatory School
- Riverdale Country School
- Stuart Country Day School
- The Wardlaw-Hartridge
School
- Miss Porter’s School
- Brooklyn Friends School
- Far Hills Country Day
School
- Deerfield Academy
- Episcopal School of Dallas
- Greenwich Academy
- National Presbyterian
School
- St. Andrew’s School
- Sichuan Province Schools in
Chengdu, China
- Antilles School (USVI)
- Princeton University
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sweet Briar College
THE STONE HOUSE GROUP: WHO WE SERVE…
6
5,959,000 1,971,888 13,690,550 1,431,335 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 Colleges/Universities Gov/Public Independent Schools Other GSF Client Type
CONCEPTUAL PHILOSOPHIES
7
Management Effort
8
BUILDING STEWARDSHIP
Management Effort Value Management Effort
Environmental Stewardship
Cycle Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Modernization Capital Construction
Add Value
Fundraising Identity Environmental Programs
Performance
Improve Management
Master Plan Utility Plan Space Utilization Study Life Cycle Cost Analysis
8
MASTER PLANNING INPUTS & OUTPUTS
A Facilities Stewardship Plan provides an important piece of the overall Campus Master Plan for Facilities Stewardship as depicted in the figure below, Master Planning – Inputs & Outputs.
9
MASTER PLANNING INPUTS & OUTPUTS
A Facilities Stewardship Plan provides an important piece of the overall Campus Master Plan for Facilities Stewardship as depicted in the figure below, Master Planning – Inputs & Outputs.
10
Building Inventory Understanding Building Age Enrollment by Division Gross Square Feet per Student Operations Housekeeping Trades Operating Budget
CAMPUS METRICS
11
BUILDINGS SURVEYED – GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF)
12
Total GSF = 88,300 (GSF information is estimated)
45,000 25,000 8,000 6,300 4,000 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 School Building Church Building Parish House Rectory 9320 Mercy Hollow Ln GSF Building
BUILDING AGES (ORIGINAL VS RESET)
13
GSF Shown in Reset Range Range as Percentage of Total GSF
SHG defines a reset age as the age when a building’s major MEP and Envelope systems have had major renovations since the date of original construction. Of the 88,300 GSF of building space surveyed, 65% has an age of more than 20 years. Although there have been some replacement and upgrade projects through the years, it could not be determined if any of the buildings have had holistic renovations.
6,300 25,000 57,000 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Less than 10 11 to 20 More than 20
GSF Age Range (Years) Less than 10 7% 11 to 20 28% More than 20 65%
BENCHMARKING GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) PER STUDENT
14 14 15 13 22 15 22 17 22 24 20 18 17 5 10 15 20 25 30 Pre-K3 Pre-K4 H Pre-K4 B K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 # of Students Division 2018/2019 Enrollment = 219
100 200 300 400 500 600
GSF/Student
GSF PER STUDENT
Surveyed Institutions
Bullis Chestnut Hill Academy Georgetown Day School Indian Creek School Kent Place La Salle College HS New Canaan Country School Germantown Academy Landon
- St. Patricks '11
- St. Patricks '12
Marymount Moorestown Friends National Cathedral National Presbyterian Notre Dame Prep '10 Notre Dame Prep '11 Pingry Rutgers Prep Springside
- St. Patrick's
The Field School Williams Montgomery School
Average for surveyed day schools 283 GSF per student
BENCHMARKING GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) PER STUDENT
15 Total GSF = 88,300 (estimated) Current Enrollment = 219 Church and School Buildings Only School Building
403 205
HOUSEKEEPING GSF/FTE
16
48,500 37,825 31,229 31,022 29,091 28,972
27,169
26,673 23,527 22,189 19,888 15,066
10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000
Independent Schools Abington Friends Chatham Chestnut Hill Academy Far Hills School Gettysburg College Hotchkiss School Indian Creek Lab School Lawrenceville School Metet School Milton Hershey School Pingry School Riverdale Rutger's Prep
- St. Paul's for Girls
Springside School Taft School Town Trinity School Walnut Hill School
GSF/FTE Our Lady of Mercy
TRADES GSF/FTE
17
128,172 97,354 83,687 64,158 61,515 50,000 40,741 33,099 30,885 29,433 28,333 26,690
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000
Independent Schools Abington Friends Canterbury Chatham Chestnut Hill Academy Far Hills School Gettysburg College Hotchkiss School Indian Creek Lawrenceville School Marymount School Meret School Milton Hershey School Pingry School Riverdale Rutger's Prep Springside School
- St. Hilda & Hugh's
- St. Paul's (Md)
- St. Paul's for Girls
Taft School Town School Trinity School Walnut Hill School
GSF/FTE Our Lady of Mercy
OPERATING BUDGET $/GSF
18
$3.38 $2.47 $2.35 $2.84 $4.36 $5.29 $2.31 $2.67 $2.18 $1.92 $4.01 $2.59 $2.87 $3.81 $2.82 $1.52 $2.44 $1.78 $2.22 $1.66 $2.56 $2.32 $1.87 $1.66 $1.39 $2.63 $1.39 $2.41 $3.32 $1.24 $0.00 $2.13 $1.12 $0.57 $1.34 $0.00 $0.95 $0.26 $0.62 $0.56 $1.44 $0.61 $0.26 $0.31 $0.00 $0.99 $0.19 $0.66 $0.40 $0.86 $9.86 $11.67 $10.45 $8.78 $8.28 $8.32 $7.67 $8.17 $8.29 $7.40 $6.45 $6.44 $6.78 $5.07 $5.75 $5.10 $4.97 $5.91 $5.33 $5.36 $3.25 $4.17 $4.05 $3.29 $3.08 $0.00 $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00 $12.00 $14.00 $16.00 $18.00 $20.00
Utilities Planned Maintenance Daily Service
$/GSF
$7.96 $10.46 $9.13 $9.92 $15.86 $13.61 $10.66 $14.93 $8.06 $9.97 $15.54 $13.88 $11.97 $9.50
OLOM
$15.21 $7.02 $6.80 $6.69 $6.57 $5.33 $7.86 $8.02 $12.11
$11.04
$5.36
PROJECT GOALS
19
Facilities Conditions Assessment (FCA) Space Study Energy Review
PROJECT SCOPE
20
Process Terms Definitions What’s In / What’s Out
FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT (FCA) - OVERVIEW
21
TYPICAL FCA PROCESS
22
Planning Visit
- Determine
Project Schedule
- Initial Data
Collection
Inspections
- Room by Room
- AE, AI, MEP
, ADA, Life Safety
- Begin
Database
Costing
- RS Means
- Field
Knowledge
- Construction
Cost Data
- Institutional
Data
QA
- Internal Review
- Institutional
Assessment Review
Analysis
- Review Projects
& Costing
- Complete Draft
FCA Database
- Complete Draft
Presentation, Institutional Review
Present Findings
TYPICAL FCA PROCESS
23
FCA Inspections Existing Surveys
Integrated FCA Database
Operations: Project Selection Priorities Planning Overlap with Program Changes Financial: Catch Up Keep Up Reserve Funding Benchmarking
Inputs Outputs
FCA TERMS & DEFINITIONS
24 Preventive Maintenance & Daily Service:
Routine tasks performed frequently and funded through the annual operating
- budget. They are
essential to the use of the buildings but do not add to the asset value of the institution.
Cycle Maintenance:
The process of assuring that building components are replaced at or near the end of their useful lifecycles. Documented as depreciation on an institution’s financial records, these cycles exceed a single year and may even span decades.
Deferred Maintenance:
Accumulates when cycle maintenance is left undone, due to limited financial or physical (labor, materials, time)
- resources. Significant
deferred maintenance can erode the physical assets of the institution and may eventually render buildings unusable and their systems nonfunctional.
Modernization:
The process for improving facilities. It may be driven by changing programs, code and safety requirements, or the impact of technology.
Safety / Statutory:
These are Modernization projects recommended specifically because of a safety requirement.
FCA TERMS & DEFINITIONS
25
Immediate exposure; should be completed within one year High priority; should be completed in
- ne to two years
Priority; should be completed in three to five years Planned; should be completed in six to ten years
Priority 1* Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3
FCA PROJECTS – WHAT’S IN? WHAT’S OUT?
26
What’s Out? What’s In?
Snapshot - FCA Database Data by Priority Data by Maintenance Category Data by Maintenance Type Need by Building Indices Gap Analysis Select Project Write-ups
FACILITIES CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT - FINDINGS
27
*It is important to note that THE STONE HOUSE GROUP priced all projects using current dollars, taking into account location factors, and excluded inflation. SHG also used institutional cost estimates where applicable. Replacement projects were status quo unless otherwise noted.
FCA DATABASE
28
Record er Proj # Bldg Floor Room Category Trade Object Action Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost
- Est. Age
Est Life Priority Impact MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Living Room AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 620 $7 $4,340 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Living Room AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 620 $3 $1,550 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Living Room AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 620 $2 $1,240 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 155 $7 $1,085 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 155 $3 $388 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 1 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 155 $2 $310 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Linen Closet AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 55 $7 $385 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Linen Closet AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 55 $3 $138 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Linen Closet AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 55 $2 $110 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bathroom 1 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 40 $3 $100 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bathroom 1 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 40 $2 $80 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bathroom 1 MEP Plumbing Sink fixtures Replace ea 1 $180 $180 2 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Carpeting Carpet Replace sf 80 $7 $560 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Painting Walls Repaint sf 80 $3 $200 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Bedroom 2 AI Painting Ceiling Repaint sf 80 $2 $160 3 Cycle MH 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane LL Storage Rm Safety / Statutory Fire Safety Smoke Detection Install ea 1 $200 $200 1 Safety / Statutory
Priority 1* Immediate Priority 1 1-2 Years Priority 2 3-5 Years Priority 3 6-10 Years
IDENTIFIED NEED BY PRIORITY
29
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
Priority 1, $779,298, 19% Priority 2, $614,645, 15% Priority 3, $2,707,830, 65% Priority 1*, $38,550, 1%
IDENTIFIED NEED BY PRIORITY
30
Church Buildings ($2,363,632) School Building ($1,776,690)
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
Priority 1, $152,598, 7% Priority 2, $388,145, 16% Priority 3, $1,801,090, 76% Priority 1*, $21,800, 1% Priority 1, $626,700, 35% Priority 2, $226,500, 13% Priority 3, $906,740, 51% Priority 1*, $16,750, 1%
IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE CATEGORY
31 Architectural Exterior, $848,190, 21% Architectural Interior, $848,542, 21% Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, $2,120,490, 51% Safety/Statutory, $18,100, 0% Grounds, $305,000, 7% Electrical
- Lighting repairs
- Wiring
- Keypad System
- Generator
- Chair lift
Mechanical
- Gym RTU
- Trane DX Units
- AHU’s
- BAS Upgrade
- Trane Chiller
Plumbing
- Restroom Fixtures
- Hot Water
Heaters
- Various Pumps
- Water Fountains
Safety / Statutory
- Stage Access
- Fire Safety
- Arch. Ext & Grounds
- Windows
- Playground
- Roof Systems
- Asphalt
- Water Proofing
- Arch. Interior
- Carpet
- Painting
- Flooring
- Carpentry
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE CATEGORY
32
Church Buildings ($2,363,632) School Building ($1,776,690)
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
Architectural Exterior, $592,990, 25% Architectural Interior, $423,542, 18% Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, $1,039,000, 44% Safety/Statuto ry, $3,100, 0% Grounds, $305,000, 13% Architectural Exterior, $255,200, 14% Architectural Interior, $425,000, 24% Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, $1,081,490, 61% Safety/Statuto ry, $15,000, 1% Grounds, $0, 0%
IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE TYPE
33 Deferred Maintenance, $71,650, 2% Cycle Maintenance, $3,785,472, 91% Modernization, $257,700, 6% Daily Serv/Safety, $25,500, 1%
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
IDENTIFIED NEED BY MAINTENANCE TYPE
34
Church Buildings ($2,363,632) School Building ($1,776,690)
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
Deferred Maintenance, $17,750, 1% Cycle Maintenance, $1,672,740, 94% Modernization, $70,200, 4% Daily Serv/Safety, $16,000, 1% Deferred Maintenance, $53,900, 2% Cycle Maintenance, $2,112,732, 89% Modernization, $187,500, 8% Daily Serv/Safety, $9,500, 1%
IDENTIFIED NEED BY TRADE
35
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
Carpentry, $141,310 , 3% Masonry, $27,000 , 1% Painting, $372,442 , 9% Roofing, $130,000 , 3% Flooring, $36,800 , 1% Plumbing, $61,440 , 1% Windows, $577,250 , 14% Special, $204,000 , 5% Electrical, $71,350 , 2% Mechanical, $1,987,700 , 48% Carpeting, $364,630 , 9% Fire Safety, $600 , 0% Paving, $165,000 , 4%
IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING
36 $1,776,690 $1,177,900 $440,000 $282,350 $240,600 $222,783 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 School Building Church Building Campus Parish House 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane Rectory
Priority 2
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING BY PRIORITY
37 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 School Building Church Building Campus Parish House 9320 Mercy Hollow Lane Rectory Priority 3 Priority 2 Priority 1 & 1*
Priority 2
$1,776,690 $1,177,900 $440,000 $282,350 $240,600 $222,783
Total Identified Need $ 4,140,322
IDENTIFIED NEED BY BUILDING ($/GSF)
38 $60 $39 $35 $35 $18 $13
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70
9320 Mercy Hollow Lane School Building Rectory Parish House Church Building Grounds
Identified Need ($) / GSF Building
$64.95 $56.74 $54.59 $48.52 $46.89 $39.48 $36.91 $35.56 $31.05 $30.47 $26.98 $26.29 $24.30 $23.51 $19.86 $14.62
$0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $/GSF
Institutional Average - $36.03
INDICES
23
Institutions Surveyed Bullis School Pace School Delbarton Pingree School Delaware Valley Friends Riverdale Country School Garrison Forest Rutgers Preparatory School Georgetown Day School
- St. Patrick's Episcopal School
Hotchkiss School Stuart Country Day School Indian Creek Upland Country Day School Lab School Westtown School LaSale College High School Whitby School Moorestown Friends School Williams School National Presbyterian School Wilmington Friends School
Church and School Buildings Only Church Buildings Only School Building
GAP ANALYSIS
40
$0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
Funded Need 2% Replacement 3% Ops Budget
Identified Need = 2% of Replacement Value over 10 Years = 3% of Operating Budget over 10 years =
$4,140,322 $1,755,000 $6,181,000
The following slides are a sampling of the
- verall projects that have been identified during
this Facilities Conditions Assessment.
Select Project Write-ups
41
- Water infiltration issue
- Temporary solution is unsightly and likely does not address problem
- Recommend investigate presence of exterior moisture barrier/waterproofing; install
9320 Mercy Hollow Lane 42
Priority 1 $50,000
- Main Entry
- Concrete Sidewalk
- Consider replacement of concrete at main entry points and pathways
Campus 43
Priority 1 $50,000
- Flat Roof section over dining and kitchen
- Welded copper sheet
- Ongoing leaks into spaces below; flashing along transition has pulled away, likely causing moisture penetration
- Consider repairs
9320 Mercy Hollow Lane 44
Priority 1 $10,000
- The hatch to the lift station has a coating over it to keep out odor
- OLOM pays for semi-annual service to pump out lift station apparently due to controls not working
- It is very likely that odor would not be present if controls worked to properly pump out station; strongly
recommend bringing a mechanical contractor on board to diagnose and repair any issues
Church Sewage Ejector Station 45
Priority 1* $5,000
- A back storage room at Parish House has two 5-ton split AC units serving an area more suited to
a 2-ton unit
- Recommend shutting off and locking out one unit
- Further recommend replacing working unit with a smaller unit as the existing unit ages (~$3,000
for a properly sized unit)
Parish House Storage Room AC Units 46
Priority 1* $500
- Peerless boiler serving gym area radiators will need replacement in 1-3 years
- Hot water radiators are a very efficient for heating, so recommend keeping this system in place
- However, strongly recommend replacing existing unit with a modern, condensing boiler for vastly
improved efficiency, and thus cost savings
Gym Boiler 47
Priority 1 $15,000
- Church building ancillary rooms (music, chapel, basement meeting room) are served by
MagicAire dx units
- Units are beginning to age, estimate that they will need replacement in 3-6 years
- Alternate to replacing in-kind, consider consolidating these units in a distributed air, VAV system
Church AC Units 48
Priority 2 $25,000
- Cooling for school is mainly served by many RTU’s, each serving a single zone
- This design is very inefficient and equipment is aging
- Strongly recommend a centralized variable volume system or VRF-based
system, instead of replacing RTU’s in kind as they begin to fail
School Building Cooling 49
Priority 2 $125,000
- AHU’s in attic serve admin areas, hallway, etc
- These systems are beginning to age and will need replacement in roughly the same time frame
as the RTU’s
- Consider adding these areas to the distributed air, VAV (or VRF) system that would replace RTU’s
School Attic AHU’s 50
Priority 2 *Cost included with RTU’s above
- Existing Johnson controls system is aging
- A more modern system will improve user comfort, reduce utility bills, provide
better energy and equipment tracking, and have an up-to-date graphics interface
Controls Upgrade 51
Priority 3 $125,000
- Main church cooling is served by one air-cooled chiller with a remote evaporator
- Consider installing a redundant chiller, as we have seen examples of facilities
spending large amounts of money when their only source of cooling breaks down
Redundant Cooling 52
Priority 3 $75,000
- OLOM does not have an emergency generator
- Recommend installing generator to prevent forced closure of schools
- Can be sized for load only at school
Generator 53
Priority 3 $25,000
Space Inventory Observations
Space Study
54
PURPOSE
55
An integral piece of any Master Planning phase Study will help to inform strategic decisions and assessing future goals such as: Identity Growth Enrollment Facilities Academic Programs Capital Project Strategy Space has an important relationship with each of these goals… …and may help to answer: Does Mercy have enough space? Are spaces in the right places? Are spaces configured properly? Are there shifts in pedagogy or policy that would change how spaces are used? How should funding be prioritized in addressing space modernizations?
56
SPACE INVENTORY
APPROACH
Space information collected and organized:
Follow standards set forth in Facilities Inventory &
Classification Manual by U.S. Department of Education
Building and School Name (or Region) Building’s Room Number and Local Name Square footage Useable Area Identification (FICM as standard) Use Category (ie. Classroom, Laboratory, Office, General
Use, Support Room, Health Care, Circulation, Mechanical
Functional Category (ie. Instruction, Academic
Support/Service, Student Services)
57
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING SPACE IDENTIFICATION
SPACE STUDY DATABASE (SNAPSHOT)
58
59
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING SPACE IDENTIFICATION
45,000 41,635 3,365 31,543 10,092
GROSS & NET AREA
Area Square Footage Gross Square Feet 45,000 Net Square Feet 41,635 % of GSF 93%
Definitions:
Gross Square Feet is the total square footage of the building including exterior walls. Net Square Feet is the total square footage less the structural area (walls, chases, etc) Non-assignable Area is all areas of a building not available for assignment to an occupant or for specific use, but necessary for the general operation of a building. This includes circulation, janitorial, restroom and utility/mechanical spaces Assignable Area is all areas of a building assigned to, or available for assignment to, an occupant or specific use.
Building Service Area Circulation Area General Use Area Office Support Room Classroom Health Care
VISUALIZING EXISTING PROGRAM LAYOUT
Laboratory Mechanical Area Study Facilities
PROGRAM ANALYSIS
Lounge, Enrichment, AD
Building Service Area Circulation Area Classroom General Use Area Health Care Laboratory Mechanical Area Office Study Facilities Support Room
Restrooms, Kitchen, Storage, Facilities Corridors, Alcoves, Vestibules, Lobbies Stage, Gymnasium, Kennedy Room Art Classroom, Maker Space, TV Room Library
BREAKING DOWN NET USABLE AREA
63
Net Assignable Area (31,543 SF) Non-Assignable Area (10,092 SF)
Classroom, 11,230 General Use, 12,115 Office, 1,783 Laboratory, 2,395 Study Facilities, 1,870 Health, 220 Support, 793 Mech/Uncla ssified, 1,137
Building Services, 3,375 Circulation, 6,717
Net Usable Area 41,635 Structural 3,365 Gross Square Feet 45,000
OBSERVATIONS
64
Space Observation
Classrooms Not Dynamic; Mostly sized for more than 40 students; Unsightly Storage/Coat Rooms; Need more flexible seating; Consider multiple smaller classrooms for 15+ students Science / Labs Need to consider program enhancements; more space, adequate shelving, displays casework and outlets Music Consider space options for storage and teaching; Currently using cart to move about the building with little to no storage for equipment (PreK to 8); Consider using under-utilized room between Kennedy Room and Art Display Areas Consider identifying locations for art and athletic displays and adequate lighting; Currently the trophy case is in the rear corridor away from the Gymnasium, and Art does not have sufficient space Offices Most of the faculty use their classrooms as their office space; does this work for Mercy? No privacy rooms School Counselor Currently, the School Counselor office is in the far corner of the School Building; this is not ideal for multiple reasons; Consider using space closer to Admin/Reception Suite Storage There does not appear to be adequate storage facilities and the dedicated storage room adjacent the Gym is not being utilized to its full potential; much of the material appears to be unused; Could this space be used for another purpose? Consider reconfiguring spaces closer to the cafeteria for tables/chairs Safety / Security Need dedicated location for table / chair storage; currently utilizing adjacent hallways which is creating a safety hazard should an emergency be recognized while tables are blocking corridor space for egress; Main Entrance - consider constructing interior vestibule to have visitors flow into reception office, rather than into an open corridor without properly checking into main office.
OBSERVATIONS – SCHOOL COUNSELOR
65
Currently, the School Counselor has an
- ffice in the far corner of the School
Building.
CONSIDERATIONS – SCHOOL COUNSELOR
66
Consider under-utilized office space in Admin/Reception Suite for office and meeting space closer to heart of building
OBSERVATION – MAIN ENTRY
67
A person gains access through intercom, but then is free to walk into building without barrier wall.
CONSIDERATION – MAIN ENTRY
68
Consider constructing interior vestibule that directs traffic into the main office for proper identification. The FCA includes such a project in the database.
OBSERVATION – MUSIC STORAGE
69
Currently, the Music Teacher utilizes a cart to move about the school with no touch-down location.
CONSIDER – MUSIC STORAGE
70
Consider utilizing the under-utilized bookroom adjacent Kennedy Room
OBSERVATIONS – SAFETY / FLOW
71
Students sometimes need to use the back corridor to use spaces inside the Church for Music. Also, although the garden courtyard is not used regularly, students are still able to access.
CONSIDERATIONS – SAFETY / FLOW
72
In the near-term, identify a dedicated room for music. For safety purposes, the corridor door leading into the courtyard must remain unlocked should a student be locked inside the courtyard. This becomes a safety risk if someone forgets to lock at end of the day. Future considerations to renovate this approximately 3,000 SF area into usable space to alleviate the safety risk, insect infestation issue, and provide usable space.
OBSERVATIONS
73
- Alignment of Divisions (Grades are spread out throughout building)
- Dedicated area of School for Pre-K Division
- Future Expansion Considerations
- Provide needed program space
- Could trigger synergies with centralizing and right-placing Specials
- Provide efficient flow for Facilities who currently traverse the gym during classes
- Could provide more suitable locker space, instead of area adjacent second
entrance
Energy Discussion
74
$1.57 $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00
BENCHMARKING – ENERGY $/GSF
75 OL Mercy
Average for surveyed day schools $2.02 / GSF
Independent Schools
Abington Friends Academy of Notore Dame Agnes Irwin Ancillae-Assumption Buckingham Friends Bullis School Cedar Grove Chestnut Hill Concept School Cornerstone Christian Country Day School Delaware County Christian Delaware Valley Friends Fairville Friends Friends Central Friends School Friends Select Georgetown Day Germantown Friends Garrison Forest Green Tree Gwyneed Mercy Haverford Hill Top Prep KHLT LaSalle Marymount Mervy Vocational Moorestown Friends Moravian Academy National Presbyterian Newtown Friends Nightingale PA School for the Deaf Pen Ryn Phila Montgomery Christian Philadelphia School Pingry School Quajker School
- RiverdaleSt. Bail
Saint David's Springside
- St. Albans
- St. Hilda & Hugh's
- St. Paul's (Md)
Town Trinity UNited Friends Upattinas School Villa Joseph Marie West Chester Friends West Hill School Whitby School
- St. Patrick's Episcopal Day School
Sidwell Friends OL Mervy Maret
73 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
BENCHMARKING – MBTU/GSF
2 OL Mercy
Average for surveyed day schools 69 MBTU / GSF
Independent Schools Abington Friends Academy of Notre Dame Agnes Irwin Ancillae-Assumption Buckingham Friends Cedar Grove Chestnut Hill Cornerstone Christian Country Day School Delaware County Chr. Delaware Valley Friends Friends Central Friends School Friends Select Georgetown Day Germantown Friends Garrison Forest Green Tree Gwyneed Mercy Haverford Hill Top Prep LaSalle Lansdowne Friends Marymount Mercy Vocational Moorestown Friends Moravian Academy National Presbyterian Newtown Friends PA School for the Deaf Pen Ryn Phila Montgomery Chr. Pingry School Quaker School Riverdale St. Bail Rutgers Prep United Friends Upattinas School Villa Joseph Marie West Chester Friends Whitby School Sidwell Friends
- St. Pat’s Episcopal
Maret OL Mercy
Note: this includes gas and electric; the church is at 77 MBTU / GSF for electrical ONLY
$607.59 $0.00 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00 $500.00 $600.00 $700.00 $800.00
BENCHMARKING – ENERGY $/STUDENT
77
Average for surveyed day schools 498 $ / Student Independent Schools Springside Marymount Chestnut Hill Bullis National Presbyterian LaSalle College Moorestown Friends
- St. Patrick’s
Sidwell Maret OL Mercy
OL Mercy
BENCHMARKING – ELECTRICITY VS. GAS
78
$9.53 $36.94 $0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00
Gas Electricity
Energy Source $ / MMBTU
BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENERGY CONSUMPTION (MMBTU)
79 3,479 , 56% 2,684 , 44%
Gas Electricity
BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENERGY COST
80 $99,146 $33,158
Electricity Gas
HEATING LOAD PROFILE
81
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Church / School Parish
RELATIVE ELECTRICAL COST
82
$1,921 $76,136 $3,470 $17,619
Rectory Church Parish School
RELATIVE ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION (KWH)
83
30,947 570,781 58,677 126,841
Rectory Church Parish School
COOLING LOAD PROFILE
84
10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000
Rectory Church Parish School
COOLING LOAD PROFILE COMPARISON
Normal cooling load
peaks in summer months and tails off in winter
The data for OLOM
does not suggest a winter decrease
85
BENCHMARKING – CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (LBS CO2)
86
407,102
652,942
Gas Electricity
Discussion Points
87
Fuel-burning furnace at Rectory not captured
Move to natural gas in the future
Campus electrical consumption
Cooling load profile Church is 77% of electrical costs
School cooling via RTU
Age of RTU’s
Energy Conservation Measures (ECM)
88
Retro-Commissioning Master plan includes modern cooling system for
school
Update BAS
Commissioning
Upgrade lighting to LED