OCD Talus and OATS: Gregory C Berlet MD, FRCS(C), FAOA Orthopedic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ocd talus and oats
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

OCD Talus and OATS: Gregory C Berlet MD, FRCS(C), FAOA Orthopedic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OCD Talus and OATS: Gregory C Berlet MD, FRCS(C), FAOA Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center Disclosures Consultant/Speaker Bureau/Royalties/ Stock: Wright Medical, Stryker, ZimmerBiomet, DJO, Plasmology 4 , Amniox Medical, United Orthopedic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

OCD Talus and OATS:

Gregory C Berlet MD, FRCS(C), FAOA Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • Consultant/Speaker Bureau/Royalties/

Stock: Wright Medical, Stryker, ZimmerBiomet, DJO, Plasmology4, Amniox Medical, United Orthopedic Group, Paragon 28, CrossRoads, Ossio

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OCD Talus: My Approach

Dictated by :

  • Symptoms of the patient
  • Mechanism of injury
  • Size of the lesion
  • Containment of the lesion
  • Previous treatment of the lesion
  • Corresponding damage to the tibia
slide-4
SLIDE 4

ISCRA

  • International Society on Cartilage

Repair of the Ankle (ISCRA)

  • Focus groups develop consensus with

the larger group participating in voting at the in person meeting

Consensus Meeting of ISCRA November 2017

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Our Patient

  • 21 year old athlete with a large OCD
  • With no history of injury, mechanical

alignment challenges we must consider this as an osteochondrosis

  • Focal alteration in subchondral bone

with subsequent cartilage compromise

  • Issues: Size (large), Bone compromise
slide-6
SLIDE 6

OCD Talus: My Approach

Dictated by :

  • Symptoms of the patient
  • Size of the lesion
  • Containment of the lesion
  • Previous treatment of the lesion
  • Corresponding damage to the tibia
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Outcomes: Microfracture OLT

Tol JL et al. 2000 –Meta-analysis 32 studies; 1966-1998 –Success of OLT surgeries:

  • Excision, curettage, drilling: 85%
  • Excision, curettage: 78%
  • Excision alone: 38%

Tol … van Dijk: : FAI 21(2), 2000

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results: OFAC

  • Retrospective review of 189 patients
  • Arthroscopy + Microfracture
  • MRI used to determine size
  • Review of clinical outcomes ( 37 mo avg)

Cuttica, Berlet et al: FAI 32(11), 2011

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results: OFAC

  • Direct correlation
  • f size to outcome
  • Linear relationship
  • f size of lesion to
  • utcome
  • MRI changes may

persist longer than expected

Cuttica, Berlet et al: FAI 32(11), 2011

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results: OFAC vs Tol

  • Average lesion size in Tol

= 7 mm

  • OFAC results deteriorated

after > 1 cm

  • Maybe size does matter
  • Strategy has to be size

dependent

  • CRITICAL SIZE DEFECT
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Critical Defect Size

Choi et al:

  • 120 ankles with talus microfracture
  • Failure defined as:

– Repeat surgery – AOFAS < 80 ( fair or poor result )

  • Defect size > 150 mm2 ( 7 mm )

– 80% failure rate ( p < .001)

Choi et al. AJSM 37(10) Oct 2009

slide-12
SLIDE 12

OATS: Indications

  • Primary cystic lesions

> 1cm

  • Revision primary

procedures with a lesion size >1 cm

  • Our patient = 1.3 cm

ISCRA 2017

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Theoretically address both bone and cartilage injury

Osteochondral Plug Transfer

cartilage bone

slide-14
SLIDE 14

OATS: Technique

  • A depth of 12-15 mm is the optimal

depth to drill the lesion and optimal length of the graft to harvest

  • Congruency of the implanted graft is

essential and care should be taken during surgery to achieve an articular surface as closely as possible to the native talus

ISCRA 2017

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ICRS 2009

Hangody:

– 1178 mosaicplasty over 10.5 years Talar Mosaicplasty: – Best outcomes of all indications – >90 % good to excellent – Addresses bone defect and cartilage

8th Annual Congress of International Cartilage Research Society 2009

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Plug Osteochondral Transfer

Imhoff et al:

  • Level 4 clinical series

– 32 patients – avg f/u 84 months – AOFAS, Tegner and VAS

  • Results: improvement of all parameters
  • Partial incongruity = poorer result
  • Primary better than revision cases

Imhoff et al, AJSM 39(7), 2011

slide-17
SLIDE 17

OATS: Auto vs Allograft

  • Cylindrical osteochondral allograft

plugs are preferred to autograft:

  • Contained lesions greater than 1.5 cm
  • Knee osteoarthritis
  • History of knee infection
  • Patients expressing concern about donor

site morbidity of the knee ISCRA 2017

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OATS: Source of Graft

  • Allograft plugs should be sourced from

the talus, as well as matched for size and side for reasons related to cartilage thickness, morphology and congruency

  • There is an absence of clinical evidence to

recommend in favor of or against the use

  • f decellularized osteochondral allograft

plugs

ISCRA 2017

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Graft Survival: Fresh Wins

  • Fresh osteochondral grafts have shown

viable chondrocytes >17 yrs

  • Sig decrease in viable chondrocytes by

day 28 ( 70% viability remains )

  • “ fresh osteochondral allografts should

not be used if older than 28 days, preferable to use grafts not older than 21 days”

Williams et al: JBJS 85A, 2003

ISCRA 2017

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Best Option for This Patient: OATS

  • Size Matters

– Patients lesion is 1.3 cm

  • ISCRA guidelines applied:
  • Autograft from knee (<1.5 cm)
  • 2 plugs intersecting
  • Plugs are flush
  • Biologic augmentation should be

considered

slide-21
SLIDE 21

THANK YOU