OBJECTIVE Expand the field of OI and UI through a ICT4D focus LLs - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overcoming barriers to Open and User

Innovation in Regional Development

OLLD 2017, ENOLL Krakow Patrizia Hongisto, Aalto University

OBJECTIVE

• Expand the field of OI and UI through a ICT4D focus
• LLs for OI Stakeholders and Users Orchestra>on in ICT4D
• LLs for sustaining Emergent collec>ve crea>vity, Reflec>ve/

Reflexive prac>ces, Rela>onal competences

• Is this possible in ICT4D?

QUESTIONS - I

• How can LL prac>ces aKain and sustain regional

development goals whether desired, or emergent?

– Organiza>onal and consumer research perspec>ves of sustaining emergent crea>on – Collec>ve interac>on towards user-driven development and innova>on

QUESTIONS - II

• What are the barriers to expected outcomes, e.i. to

provide a market for global par>cipa>ng companies, and to expand local entrepreneurial ac>vi>es

– Mul>-level goals nego>a>on – Ci>zens as individuals – Ci>zens as ‘working and living’ communi>es

INTERACTION AND RELATIONAL CAPABILITIES

• OI in regional development – a collec>ve of stakeholders

(incl. ci>zens)

• UI in regional development – a community, or groups, of

ci>zens who ‘ask, do, change’

• ICT4D – interna>onal development
• OUI – LL – ICT4D

FINDINGS

• Organiza>onal Barriers

– Pre-set organiza>onal objec>ves – Ins>tu>onal organiza>onal limits – Divergent goals and collabora>on – Prac>cal inclusion and methodological prac>ce

• Systemic considera>ons in ICT4D
• Mismatch between conceptual understanding of LL and

prac>ce in regional development

LL challenges in ICT4D

• Managerial view is primary for organiza>onal stakeholders

– doubts about open-ended processes – unease with redirec>ng interven>ons, funding complexi>es

• Rela>onal, collabora>ve and reflec>ve/reflexive ac>ons

indicate

– lacking communica>ve resources for interac>ons (methodological) – lacking prac>ce orienta>on (epistemological)

FRAMING

Push PlaBorms Pull PlaBorms Push-Pull NegoEaEons OPI4D

OPI4D

Use and demand co- designed Reflective Design Looping initiative coordinati

• n

Network ed, dynamic interacti

• ns

Meaning centric Participati

• n as

shared reflective process Practice situated focus Entrepre neur. social sustain. innovati

• n

Multi- layered incentiv es/ rewards

Open Participatory Innovation for Development

OPI4D

Use and demand are co- designed Reflective Design Initiatives

• f

looping coordinati

• n

Network ed, dynamic interacti

• ns

Meaning centric Participati

• n as

shared reflective process Practice and situated focus Entrepr eneur. social sustain. innovati

• n

Multi- layered incentives / rewards Demand Design Control Network Centre

Participation

Focus Innovation Rewards

Co-created w Uncertain w Anticipated Cyclic w Emergent w Top-down Multi- layered initiatives w De- centralized w Centralized Interdepen dent w Modular w Procedural Innovation centric w People centreic w Resource Negotiated w Open w Restricted Systemic w Innovation w Efficiency Sustainable w Rapid incremental w Limited Alternating intrinsic extrinsic w Positive sum Intrinsic w

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

• Research in and on LLs is needed to

– Understand meanings and efficiency in interac>ons and rela>onal reali>es in the prac>ce of LLs – Contribute (eg through ac>on research) to prac>ces in reaching reciprocal (business) opportuni>es – Produce valuable knowledge building prac>ces for a future where work, ‘a job’, either in developed or undeveloped environments, may have a changed meaning.

• OPI4D is one way to shape this knowledge.

THANK YOU

patrizia.hongisto@aalto.fi