o VXDTF effects due to L3 displacement R. Fr uhwirth, J. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

o vxdtf effects due to l3 displacement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

o VXDTF effects due to L3 displacement R. Fr uhwirth, J. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comparisons o VXDTF effects due to L3 displacement R. Fr uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener Institute of High Energy Physics Austrian Academy of Sciences December 18, 2015 R. Fr uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 1 HEPHY Wien


slide-1
SLIDE 1

comparisons

  • VXDTF effects due to L3 displacement
  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener

Institute of High Energy Physics Austrian Academy of Sciences

December 18, 2015

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 1 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration

slide-2
SLIDE 2

comparisons

new geometry only

momentum [GeV/c]

1 −

10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Efficiency vs momentum

Efficiency p 0.919SVDr23538L3DisplacementpT438MeV340RMSbetaGamma1007.82wRMS751.86 Efficiency pT 0.922SVDr23538L3DisplacementpT438MeV340RMSbetaGamma1007.82wRMS751.86

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 2 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration

slide-3
SLIDE 3

comparisons

new vs old geometry - deviation in momentum

seed momentum [GeV/c]

1 −

10 1 difference in efficiency 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of p Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of p

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 3 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration

slide-4
SLIDE 4

comparisons

new vs old geometry - deviation in T momentum

seed transverse momentum [GeV/c]

1 −

10 1 difference in efficiency 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 T

Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of pT Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of p

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 4 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration

slide-5
SLIDE 5

comparisons

new geometry only

[degree] Φ seed angle in 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 efficiency 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Φ Efficiency of

0.919SVDr23538L3DisplacementpT438MeV340RMSbetaGamma1007.82wRMS751.86 φ Efficiency

Φ Efficiency of

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 5 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration

slide-6
SLIDE 6

comparisons

new vs old geometry - deviation in φ

[degree] Φ seed angle in 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 difference in efficiency 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1

Φ Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of Φ Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 6 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration

slide-7
SLIDE 7

comparisons

new geometry only

[degree] θ seed angle in 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 efficiency 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Φ Efficiency of

0.920SVDr23538L3DisplacementpT438MeV340RMSbetaGamma1007.82wRMS751.86 θ Efficiency

Φ Efficiency of

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 7 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration

slide-8
SLIDE 8

comparisons

new vs old geometry - deviation in θ

[degree] θ seed angle in 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 difference in efficiency 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1

θ Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of θ Difference (new/old) in Efficiency of

  • R. Fr¨

uhwirth, J. Lettenbichler, T. Madlener 8 HEPHY Wien & BELLE Collaboration