Northern California WateReuse Chapter Meeting How Much Can an - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

northern california watereuse chapter meeting how much
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Northern California WateReuse Chapter Meeting How Much Can an - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Northern California WateReuse Chapter Meeting How Much Can an Indirect Potable Project Change? Pure Water Monterey A Groundwater Replenishment Project August 22, 2014 1 Salinas River Basin Internal Board Seawater Intrusion Goal: No Monterey


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Northern California WateReuse Chapter Meeting How Much Can an Indirect Potable Project Change?

Pure Water Monterey A Groundwater Replenishment Project

August 22, 2014

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Seaside Groundwater Basin Adjudicated Salinas River Basin Seawater Intrusion Carmel River SWRCB Order 95-10 and CDO Area of Special Biological Significance Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Internal Board Goal: No Wastewater Discharge No State or Federal Water Available

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000

Today 2015 2018 2021

Acre Feet per Year

Year

Carmel River Seaside Basin 5-Year Average Demand Last Year’s Demand

Water Cliff The Supply Gap

Legally Available Water Supply

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Water Supply Portfolio

Los Padres Dam / Carmel River Seaside Basin Local Water Projects Aquifer Storage And Recovery Groundwater Replenishment Desalination Project

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Severe time limit
  • Water purveyor is private company
  • California Public Utilities Commission
  • MRWPCA is a wastewater district
  • CEQA before feasibility study
  • Special interest groups
  • Financing before WPA
  • Three groundwater basins and multiple

aquifers

Complications

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Historic Drought

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

GWR Project Primary Objectives

  • Reduce Carmel River pumping by 3,500 AFY and

reduce desal size

  • To accomplish primary objective, GWR needs to:

– Commence operation by start of 2017 – Be cost effective – Comply with public health regulations

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Source water – diversion, collection, conveyance

to RTP

  • Treatment –Advanced Water Treatment Plant &

concentrate disposal

  • Product water conveyance – pump stations &

pipelines

  • Injection – deep injection and vadose zone wells,

backflush facilities

  • Extraction – Water purveyor facilities needed to

convey GWR water to customers

8

GWR Project Components

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Proposed Project Source Waters

  • Secondary effluent
  • Produce wash water
  • Stormwater and urban dry weather runoff
  • Farm Ditches--Agricultural Tile Drain and Ag

Runoff Water

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Salinas Ponds – Produce Wash Water (Then)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Salinas Ponds – Produce Wash Water (Now)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Lake El Estero - Stormwater

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Blanco Drain – Ag Drainage Water

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Reclamation Ditch - Salinas

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tembladero Slough - Castroville

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Severe water restrictions looming
  • Declining wastewater flows
  • Developing New Interruptible Rate for new water

sources

  • Partnerships
  • Public outreach
  • Surpassing FAT

Our Project is Complicated

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Salinas Sewage Pump Station

slide-19
SLIDE 19

MRWPCA Proposed Groundwater Replenishment Project Phasing

F/F CEQA Technical

2015 2014 2013 2016

F/F CEQA Technical

REGULATORY PERMITTING & ENGINEERING REPORT REGULATORY PERMITTING CDPH/SWRCB Construction REGULATORY PERMITTING CDPH/SWRCB

Updated 6/16/14

PILOT PLANT & WELL TESTING EIR Scoping: Project Understanding, Notice of Preparation, and Public Meeting Admin Draft Facility Plan Final Facilities Plan Report Start Up CPUC Hearings & Workshops

  • Dec. 2016

Water Quality Sampling & Shunt Tests Public Review of Draft EIR Respond to Comments Source Water Rights & Purchase Agreement Final EIR Certify EIR and Approve GWR 30% Design Mobilization & Final Design IAP Meetings SRF & Title XVI Funding Coordination Internal Draft Facilities Plan & Feasibility Study Reports Technical Reports for Admin Draft EIR Facility Testing

  • Dec. 2014

Pilot Test Start & Monitoring Well Install Outreach Meetings Internal Draft Facilities Plan & Technical Reports and Admin Draft EIR Preparation 2nd Admin/ Screen- check Draft EIR Prep Product Water Conveyance, Injection Well Easements and Design Refinements Scoping Report Technical Team Prepares Conceptual Design Information

  • Source Water
  • Treatment
  • Product

Water Conveyance

  • Groundwater

Injection

  • Cal Am

Distribution Project Description & Alternatives

  • Source Water
  • Treatment
  • Product Water

Conveyance

  • Groundwater

Injection

  • Cal Am

Distribution

Background Development & Investigations Alternative Analysis Report SRF & Title XVI Applications Feasibility Study Report RFP for Design & Build CPUC Determination Construction July 2015 CPUC Settlement Hearings

Facilities & Feasibility Reports Facilities & Feasibility Reports

Product Water Conveyance, Injection Well Design, Siting Complete CPUC Desal ADEIR Sections

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Groundwater Replenishment

Project Restart Project Report for CDPH Pilot Tests 10% Design Cost Estimate Dec 2014 CPUC Testimony Joint Agreements CEQA

DELAYED

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Brine Mixing

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

O3 UF

(inside-

  • ut)

MF

(outside-in)

RO

(2-stage)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Contaminants of Emerging Concern - CECs

Secondary Effluent Ag Wash Water Ag Drain Water

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Dr. Pierre Mukheibir –

One Water Approach

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Facilitators Guide to Participatory Decision Making – Sam Kaner

Anxiety and Shutdown Uncertainty and Chaos Breakthrough

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Minimize Danger – Maximize Reward

David Rock – Your Brain at Work

slide-28
SLIDE 28

SCARF Definitions

  • Status – importance to others
  • Certainty – predicting the future
  • Autonomy – Control over events
  • Relatedness – Safety with others
  • Fairness – Fair exchanges between people

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

SCARF Threats

  • Reduces capacity to make decisions
  • Reduces ability to solve problems
  • Reduce ability to colloborate
  • Err on the side of pessimism

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

SCARF Rewards

  • Larger Group means better memory/knowing
  • Creates a more insightful experience for group
  • More and Better Ideas
  • Creates a larger field of vision

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

SCARF – A Winning Formula

  • Status – be aware of what you say and do to bring

safety to the status of others

  • Certainty – be very clear and consistent in

messaging

  • Autonomy – No micromanaging, commit to

engaging others in the decision making process

  • Relatedness – help to create a feeling of inclusion

and sense of belonging

  • Fairness – Transparency is non-negotiable

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Questions?