normal conducting magnets for rcs
play

Normal Conducting Magnets for RCS Holger Witte, Scott Berg, Paul - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Normal Conducting Magnets for RCS Holger Witte, Scott Berg, Paul Kovach, Mike Anerella Brookhaven National Laboratory Mauricio de Lima Lopes Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 5 December 2014 1 Design Concepts Dipole Requirements


  1. Normal Conducting Magnets for RCS Holger Witte, Scott Berg, Paul Kovach, Mike Anerella Brookhaven National Laboratory Mauricio de Lima Lopes Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 5 December 2014 1

  2. Design Concepts • Dipole Requirements – Good field region: 60x10 mm 2 – Aperture: 60x25 mm 2 – Ramp rate: 1 kHz – B > 1.5T • Aims – Minimize losses – (First pass on engineering) • Approach – Materials: intelligent combination of materials – Geometry excitation coil: minimize eddy current losses 5 December 2014 2

  3. Geometry Evolution New Old 150 3% SiFe Better suppression of eddy currents 6.5% SiFe Minimized yoke volume Coil 5 December 2014 3

  4. Materials - Core Losses 5 December 2014 4

  5. Lamination Thickness 5 December 2014 5

  6. Power Dissipation Yoke Average power dissipation: 1.57 kW/m 80 W/kg 20 W/kg 6.5%SiFe 3%SiFe 5 December 2014 6

  7. Old Geometry Field lines not parallel to current sheets: high current density in corners of current sheets 5 December 2014 7

  8. New Geometry Coil loss: 250 W/m Field lines parallel to current sheet (reduction of eddy current losses by 30%) 5 December 2014 8

  9. Power Loss Contributions Ring: 2.2 km 5 December 2014 9

  10. Field Quality Effect of eddy currents and hysteresis: Progress on the Dipole Magnet for a Rapid Cycling Synchrotron. TUPRO115, IPAC14. 5 December 2014 10

  11. Specs Machine Design 375-750 GeV Total Integrated Dipole Length 2200 m Beam repetition rate 15 Hz Yoke material 6.5%SiFe Pole material 3% SiFe Gap 25 mm Good field region (h x v) 60x10 mm^2 Peak field Bmax 1.75 T Field quality at Bmax 0.001 Ramp rate (equivalent frequency) 1000 Hz Power Loss Yoke (at 1.5T) 3.45 MW Power Loss Coil (at 1.5T) 0.55 MW Total Power Loss (at 1.5T) 4 MW Stored energy 4200 J/m Current per bus bar (4 bus bars) 15600 A*turns Average peak current density cable 16 A/mm^2 DC resistance single cable 1.77E-05 Ohm/m Voltage drop coil DC at 20 kA 0.353669 V/m Voltage required to drive current 866 V/m (max dI/dt = 98017690 A/s) L (four PS per magnet) 8.84 uH 5 December 2014 11

  12. Quadrupole • Required gradient: 3% SiFe about 30 T/m 6.5% SiFe Coil • Good field region – 60x10mm 2 • Frequency: 1 kHz • Pole: ‘ideal shape’ • Same design principles 5 December 2014 12

  13. Power Loss Quad Ring, 28 T/m: 1.16 MW 5 December 2014 13

  14. Field Quality 5 December 2014 14

  15. Conclusion • Concepts for normal conducting magnets – Combine strength of two materials – Eddy current heating well understood • Performance – Dipole field up to 1.75T – Gradient: 28.5 T/m • Power losses – Acceptable losses at 1000Hz • Future work – Minimize total loss (yoke + excitation coil) – Power Supply 5 December 2014 15

  16. Acknowledgements • The authors would like to acknowledge fruitful discussion and support from – Carsten Bach, Vacuumschmelze – Hironori Ninomiya, JFE Steel Corporation – Rob Riley, Fermilab – Don Summers, University of Mississippi – John Zweibohmer, Fermilab 5 December 2014 16

  17. Additional Slides 5 December 2014 17

  18. Superconducting Option • Wall plug power superconducting version? – Not easy to answer – not enough data • How good does a SC dipole have to be? • Break even for SC version: 0.9 W/m – Normal conducting loss: 550 kW (2.2 km) – P 300K = 250 W/m – P 4K : 0.9 W/m (Carnot efficiency 280) • Heat losses – Power leads: P 4K = 3-5 W (20 kA lead, CERN/NHMFL) • Need 8 for 2 m long magnet to keep voltage reasonable – Power loss conductor 5 December 2014 18

  19. Magnetic Energy Distribution Total: 4200 J/m (1.5T) Percentage of magnetic energy in blue area: 85% 92% 96% of magnetic energy are not in vicinity of coils 5 December 2014 19

  20. Excitation: Voltage Source Excitation voltage Current (integrated J) 5 December 2014 20

  21. Current Density across sheets 5 December 2014 21

  22. Power Supply • Required: 8m long dipoles • Challenge: voltage • Minimize inductance: 4 PS per dipole 5 December 2014 22

  23. FEA: Eddy Current Simulation • Technique developed ~10a ago • Pulsed high field magnets (60-100T) – Normal conducting solenoids – 10 ms pulse – Operate at 77K – DOI:10.1109/TASC.200 5.864485 5 December 2014 23

  24. FEA: Eddy Current Simulation • Technique developed ~10a ago • Pulsed high field magnets (60-100T) – Normal conducting solenoids – 10 ms pulse – Operate at 77K – DOI:10.1109/TASC.200 5.864485 • Verified experimentally Herlach et al. DOI:10.1109/TASC.2005.864269 5 December 2014 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend