NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE May 16, 2018 Audio recordings are made of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

May 16, 2018

Audio recordings are made of this meeting

ITEM 1

REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MARCH 21, 2018 MEETING MINUTES

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

ITEM 2

REVIEW OF MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORTS: MARCH AND APRIL 2018

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

MSP OPERATIONS

MARCH 2018 35,397 2,381

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

APRIL 2018 32,810 2,191

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

34,377 35,659 37,306 36,689 33,085 34,595 31,256 32,613 31,371 29,038 35,119 32,686 33,409 35,542 37,132 36,885 32,887 33,969 31,896 32,356 31,597 30,020 34,966 33,293 34,331 36,750 37,880 37,887 34,052 34,906 32,102 33,103 31,868 29,825 36,235 33,971 35,407 36,292 37,665 38,511 33,313 35,027 32,268 33,098 30,703 30,000 35,397 32,810 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18

MARCH 2018 35,397 2,381

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

APRIL 2018 32,810 2,191

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

MSP OPERATIONS

1,562 1,915 1,901 1,737 1,317 1,422 1,375 1,547 1,511 1,487 1,967 1,854 1,766 2,010 2,127 2,029 1,573 1,625 1,632 1,840 1,871 1,804 2,124 1,874 1,870 2,421 2,977 2,629 1,755 1,817 1,787 2,152 1,910 1,639 2,441 2,143 2,019 2,264 2,346 2,213 1,551 1,807 1,789 2,119 1,865 2,072 2,381 2,191 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18 ARR DEP

MSP OPERATIONS

39 44 47 27 35 62 30 38 45 39 32 39 46 39 46 50 43 42 45 44 42 40 49 41 37 37 39 37 50 47 35 36 41 30 57 39 46 37 29 32 37 33 32 36 60 7 102 48 35 37 31 26 18 34 34 31 42 44 26 22 24 33 34 27 35 71 40 37 37 37 27 48 37 31 34 30 35 25 32 34 46 32 35 43 27 37 37 28 33 34 37 22 34 67 85 39 33 32 24 51 32 32 40 34 57 1 68 42 31 33 37 36 13 34 33 23 37 31 35 15 30 26 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 MARCH APRIL

MSP NIGHTIME OPERATIONS

MARCH - APRIL 2018

NIGHT (10:30P - 11:59P) MORNING (12A-6A)

1.1” 3.5” 3.6” 1.8” 1.0” 1.5” 7.5” 1.2” 1.1” 11.1”

MAR-APR RUNWAY USE

34,124

ARRIVALS RECORDED

54.4%

RUNWAYS 30L, 30R OR 35

45.2%

RUNWAYS 12L OR 12R

34,083

DEPARTURES RECORDED

46.9%

RUNWAYS 30L OR 30R

51.3%

RUNWAYS 12L, 12R OR 17

2% 7% 9% 11%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18

M N S

RUNWAY USE

NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW

32% 53% 9%

NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW

42% 35% 11%

MARCH 2018 APRIL 2018 NORTH FLOW – 482 HOURS (37%) SOUTH FLOW – 582 HOURS (44%) MIXED FLOW – 129 HOURS (10%)

STAGE 3 STAGE 4 STAGE 5

13.7% 9.3% 13.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.4% 0.2% 5.8% 5.2% 0.4% 0.8% 0.0% 4.7% 0.0% 0.1% 4.7% 10.6% 7.7% 6.9% 0.3% 7.7% 0.1% 0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4%

• 40
• 35
• 30
• 25
• 20
• 15
• 10
• 5

CRJ2 CRJ7 CRJ9 E135 E145 E170 E190 A319 A320 A320NEO A321 B38M B717 B733 B734 B7377 B738 B739 B757 MD80 MD90 A300 A330 A350 B762 B763 B764 B777 B7878 DC10 MD11

CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVEL BELOW STAGE 3 LIMITS (EPNDB)

2018 MSP CARRIER JET USAGE WITH CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVELS

MAR - APR

REGIONAL JET NARROWBODY WIDEBODY

SOURCE: USAGE DATA: MACNOMS; NOISE CERTIFICATION DATA: EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY

CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVELS REPRESENTED AS A RANGE TO ACCOUNT FOR MULTIPLE CERTIFICATION VARIABLES (WEIGHT, MODEL, ENGINE TYPE, AIRFRAME CONFIGURATION, ETC)

CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVEL RANGE

CARRIER JET FLEET MIX

MSP COMPLAINTS

MARCH 2018 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 10,799 228

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

3.3 17 47 5 APRIL 2018 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 8,607 268

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

3.8 27 32 4

NEW WEBSITE 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200

MARCH 2018 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 10,799 228

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

3.3 17 47 5 APRIL 2018 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 8,607 268

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

3.8 27 32 4

MSP COMPLAINTS

7,444 9,629 11,501 12,139 11,138 9,075 6,264 5,227 6,054 6,977 9,974 9,676 8,720 12,827 11,664 12,475 12,222 9,244 6,955 5,913 5,547 7,594 13,196 10,040 11,063 12,227 10,878 12,035 10,831 9,983 7,241 6,318 7,457 12,012 13,244 13,907 12,559 14,617 16,293 16,727 15,282 10,844 8,929 7,184 5,834 6,018 10,799 8,607 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18

MARCH LOCATIONS

145

AREAS WITH AT LEAST 1 LOCATION AREAS WITH MORE THAN 10 LOCATIONS – 0%

2

AREAS WITH 6 – 10 LOCATIONS – 1.4%

8

AREAS WITH 4 OR 5 LOCATIONS – 5.5%

135

AREAS WITH 1 – 3 LOCATIONS – 93.1%

APRIL LOCATIONS

160

AREAS WITH AT LEAST 1 LOCATION

1

AREAS WITH MORE THAN 10 LOCATIONS – 0.6%

1

AREAS WITH 6 – 10 LOCATIONS – 0.6%

10

AREAS WITH 4 OR 5 LOCATIONS – 6.3%

148

AREAS WITH 1 – 3 LOCATIONS – 92.5%

TOTAL COMPLAINTS

195

AREAS WITH AT LEAST 1 LOCATION

13

AREAS WITH MORE THAN 300 COMPLAINTS – 6.7%

25

AREAS BETWEEN 60 AND 300 COMPLAINTS – 12.8%

60

AREAS BETWEEN 8 AND 60 COMPLAINTS – 30.8%

97

AREAS WITH LESS THAN 8 COMPLAINTS– 49.7%

TOP 10 LOCATIONS

FILED

11,930

(61.5%) COMPLAINTS DURING THE PREVIOUS 2 MONTHS

8 OF 10

LOCATIONS WERE IN THE TOP 10 FOR JANUARY / FEBRUARY DATA

241

(67.5%) LOCATIONS FILED 10 OR LESS COMPLAINTS

SOUND MONITORING

MARCH 2018 Time Above 43s

TA65 per operation

425h 9m

TA65

Count Above 2.43

N65 per operation

86,128

N65

APRIL 2018 Time Above 42s

TA65 per operation

381h 17m

TA65

Count Above 2.33

N65 per operation

76,429

N65

457 H 11 M 54 S 488 H 40 M 40 S 470 H 28 M 25 S 451 H 39 M 9 S 447 H 42 M 6 S 496 H 43 M 24 S 352 H 20 M 29 S 374 H 36 M 54 S 337 H 44 M 26 S 268 H 15 M 48 S 431 H 8 M 58 S 436 H 40 M 32 S 474 H 6 M 9 S 483 H 12 M 14 S 474 H 44 M 25 S 500 H 27 M 47 S 455 H 51 M 1 S 518 H 27 M 55 S 484 H 41 M 54 S 447 H 0 M 21 S 342 H 53 M 13 S 363 H 21 M 15 S 520 H 10 M 38 S 506 H 10 M 32 S 470 H 22 M 29 S 499 H 53 M 51 S 487 H 26 M 31 S 503 H 50 M 48 S 500 H 41 M 49 S 543 H 51 M 38 S 490 H 4 M 28 S 388 H 27 M 45 S 363 H 58 M 45 S 391 H 31 M 59 S 481 H 6 M 28 S 509 H 7 M 5 S 513 H 41 M 26 S 481 H 47 M 7 S 454 H 29 M 52 S 506 H 47 M 37 S 444 H 17 M 9 S 505 H 44 M 23 S 437 H 46 M 14 S 365 H 26 M 25 S 291 H 3 M 14 S 261 H 17 M 5 S 425 H 9 M 35 S 381 H 17 M 54 S MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18

MARCH 2018 Time Above 43s

TA65 per operation

425h 9m

TA65

Count Above 2.43

N65 per operation

86,128

N65

APRIL 2018 Time Above 42s

TA65 per operation

381h 17m

TA65

Count Above 2.33

N65 per operation

76,429

N65

SOUND MONITORING

88,231 95,138 92,242 92,018 85,993 90,830 68,060 75,415 68,112 56,930 83,155 82,744 89,774 93,827 95,333 97,919 89,765 95,859 89,373 85,909 70,344 70,424 98,466 94,149 91,967 98,244 99,132 101,693 96,602 101,946 92,096 77,125 74,224 75,454 93,252 95,553 97,238 95,365 94,436 98,847 87,883 95,472 83,362 73,949 61,097 57,731 86,128 76,429 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18

NOISE ABATEMENT

MARCH 2018 Runway 17 99.2% Corridor 89.6% RUS 52.8%

Arrive – 47% Depart – 58%

APRIL 2018

98.0% 98.5% 99.0% 99.5% 100.0% MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18

Cross Day 31.6% Cross Night 29.4% Runway 17 99.6% Corridor 87.4% RUS 52.9%

Arrive – 62% Depart – 44%

Cross Day 36.8% Cross Night 32.0%

Runway 17 99.2% Corridor 89.6% RUS 52.8%

Arrive – 47% Depart – 58%

Cross Day 31.6% Cross Night 29.4% Runway 17 99.6% Corridor 87.4% RUS 52.9%

Arrive – 62% Depart – 44%

Cross Day 36.8% Cross Night 32.0%

80% 82% 84% 86% 88% 90% 92% 94% 96% 98% 100% MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18

NOISE ABATEMENT

MARCH 2018 APRIL 2018

Runway 17 99.2% Corridor 89.6% RUS 52.8%

Arrive – 47% Depart – 58%

Cross Day 31.6% Cross Night 29.4% Runway 17 99.6% Corridor 87.4% RUS 52.9%

Arrive – 62% Depart – 44%

Cross Day 36.8% Cross Night 32.0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18 DAY USAGE NIGHT USAGE

NOISE ABATEMENT

MARCH 2018 APRIL 2018

Runway 17 99.2% Corridor 89.6% RUS 52.8%

Arrive – 47% Depart – 58%

Cross Day 31.6% Cross Night 29.4% Runway 17 99.6% Corridor 87.4% RUS 52.9%

Arrive – 62% Depart – 44%

Cross Day 36.8% Cross Night 32.0%

9,554 7,362 12,281 9,362 8,685 12,536 10,420 8,357 9,570 9,473 11,097 8,712 8,488 10,207 8,763 9,466 5,229 8,418 6,045 9,005 9,072 9,987 7,676 5,888 8,187 9,030 9,640 9,384 6,841 7,257 8,939 11,176 9,964 9,989 9,140 9,369 10,982 10,881 7,918 11,116 7,564 9,713 9,200 11,853 10,896 9,417 8,346 10,208 18,509 18,554 8,374 11,432 6,807 9,535 8,519 5,679 5,491 8,564 7,317 5,819 7,389 7,856 8,896 8,014 10,993 10,731 11,656 9,175 10,397 8,542 7,289 5,751 10,463 11,069 10,369 10,385 10,947 11,256 11,122 11,090 9,185 7,081 6,957 6,221 9,216 8,279 7,860 8,326 11,720 10,204 10,335 9,025 8,260 6,398 6,636 7,186 10,350 7,149

30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 JAN-18 MAR-18 ARR DEP RUS

NOISE ABATEMENT

MARCH 2018 APRIL 2018

ITEM 3

NOC BYLAW SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

Item 3: NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations

• In January, the NOC established a Bylaw Review Subcommittee in response to a

request from MSP FairSkies to “Enhance the NOC with greater stakeholder (citizen) representation”

• The following NOC members volunteered to participate:

– Alex Mason (Endeavor Air) – Dwayne Lowman (Council Member – City of Bloomington) – Capt. Gordy Goss (Delta Air Lines Chief Pilot) – Loren Olson (City of Minneapolis)

• The group established the following objective at its February 14 meeting:

Evaluate the Committee Meeting structure of the NOC Bylaws, identify

• pportunities for improved citizen input during meetings, and develop

recommended changes for consideration by the full NOC.

Item 3: NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations

The Subcommittee met on Feb 14 and April 4 and focused on the following sections of the NOC Bylaws: ARTICLE VIII Committee Meetings

• 4. Time and location of NOC meetings
• 5. Items added to future agendas
• 6. Public comment period at NOC meetings

Item 3: NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations

Subsection 4 - time and location of NOC meetings. The following ideas were discussed and received support from the Subcommittee:

• NOC members are strongly suggested to attend Listening Sessions when

able.

• Hold one evening meeting by the NOC each year (suggested November

for approval of the Work Plan).

• Changing the time and location of the NOC meetings should be further

evaluated in the future.

• The Subcommittee members agreed that this section of the Bylaws

should be amended to allow more flexibility for evening meetings.

Item 3: NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations

Subsection 5 – Items added to future agendas. The following ideas were discussed and received support from the Subcommittee:

• Due to the rigid and lengthy process for adding agenda items to

NOC meeting agendas, the Bylaws should be revised to allow some flexibility for the Co-Chairs to add items to upcoming meetings at their discretion.

Item 3: NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations

Subsection 6 – Public comment period at NOC meetings. The following ideas were discussed and received support from the Subcommittee:

• Remove the requirement in the Bylaws to have speakers sponsored by two (2)

members of the Committee.

• Model the public comment period after “Citizens to be Heard” at city

meetings using “I wish to speak” cards for individuals wishing to make a comment, then the acting Chairperson can make a final request for those wishing to speak who did not fill out a card.

• Move the comment period on the agenda to after the monthly operations

update report, however keep this specificity out of the Bylaws to allow flexibility on the agenda structure.

• The time for the public comment period should be extended from the current

fifteen (15) minutes to twenty (20) minutes with the ability to change it at the meeting by majority vote.

Item 3: NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations

Subsection 6 – Public comment period at NOC meetings. (Cont’d) The following ideas were discussed and received support from the Subcommittee:

• The time limit for individual speakers should continue to be three (3) minutes,

but there are some situations where the acting chairperson may need to allow additional time and that ability should be reflected in the Bylaws.

• The NOC members should have the ability to ask clarifying questions of the

speaker, if necessary.

• MAC Staff should provide the Co-Chairs with a prepared script to open up the

public comment period of the meeting. The script would cover the public comment guidelines, such as speaking into the microphone, stating name and address, the speaker’s comment time, and what the Committee does with comments.

• A section on the macnoise.com website should be created to provide public

comment period guidelines at NOC meetings so individuals wishing to speak know what to expect. This would include the steps individuals wishing to speak should go through to provide comment, what they can expect at the meeting, and what the Committee does with comments.

Item 3: NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations

• Proposed redline edits to the Bylaws were included in the

NOC Agenda Packet.

• The Subcommittee proposes to allow time for members to

deliberate the recommendations and come back with the action at the July 18, 2018 NOC meeting.

ITEM 4

EVALUATE MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION RUNWAY 12L DEPARTURE PROPOSAL

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

Item 4: Evaluate Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Runway 12L Departure Proposal

Item 4: Evaluate Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Runway 12L Departure Proposal

Item 4: Evaluate Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Runway 12L Departure Proposal

Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor History

• Preferential Runway system, established in 1969, affirmed the use of the

Corridor as the 1st priority for overflights.

• Corridor procedures were defined/implemented in 1974 and the existing

procedures were established in the mid-1980s.

• In the early 1990s, the MAC made two proposals for altering Corridor
• perations, which were evaluated in the Part 150 Update:

– Crossing-in-the-Corridor using low-demand flight tracks. These are runway heading for Runway 12L departures and a 105-degree heading for Runway 12R departures. This would place the departures near the middle of the Corridor near the 35E/494 interchange. These were included in the Noise Compatibility Plan and incorporated into the ATCT standard

• perating procedures.

– Moving the 090-degree northern boundary to 095. The Part 150 Update found this option would reduce the available headings from 3 to 2 off Runway 12L and was dismissed as it would significantly reduce runway capacity and increase delay.

Item 4: Evaluate Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Runway 12L Departure Proposal

Runway 12L Departure Operational Trends (2001-2017)

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Runway 12L

Rwy 12L/30R Closed for Repaving Southerly winds + CRO Rwy 17 / 35 Opens

Item 4: Evaluate Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Runway 12L Departure Proposal

Runway 12L & 12R Departure Operational Trends (2001-2017)

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Runway 12L Runway 12R

Rwy 12L/30R Closed for Repaving Southerly winds + CRO Rwy 17 / 35 Opens

Item 4: Evaluate Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Runway 12L Departure Proposal

Runway 12L, 12R, 17 Departure Operational Trends (2001-2017)

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Runway 12L Runway 12R Runway 17

Rwy 12L/30R Closed for Repaving Southerly winds + CRO Rwy 17 / 35 Opens

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

ITEM 5

REVIEW AND DISCUSS RUNWAY USE SYSTEM PRIORITIES

Item 5: Review and Discuss Runway Use System Priorities

Priority 1 (12L and 12R)

2017 Departures

Priority 2 (17)

• 31.0% all hours
• 6.3% at night

Priority 3 (Balanced Use of 4/22)

• 18.8% all hours
• 42.9% at night
• 0.1% all hours
• <0.1% at night

Priority 4 (30L and 30R)

• 50.1% all hours
• 50.7% at night

Item 5: Review and Discuss Runway Use System Priorities

Priority 1 (30L and 30R)

2017 Arrivals

Priority 2 (35) Priority 3 (Balanced Use of 4/22) Priority 4 (12L and 12R)

• 43.0% all hours
• 38.4% at night
• 6.4% all hours
• 3.3% at night
• 50.5% all hours
• 58.2% at night
• 0.1% all hours
• 0.1% at night

Item 5: Review and Discuss Runway Use System Priorities

Reporting the RUS under the Abatement tab of the Interactive Reports website macenvironment.org/reports/

Item 5: Review and Discuss Runway Use System Priorities

Traffic Demand Period Criteria

Demand Period Traffic Demand (Operations per 15-minute segment) RUS Status

Low Less than 3.5 Traffic levels allow for maximum flexibility in runway selection and RUS implementation, including the use of unique procedures such as Opposite Direction. Mid Between 3.5 and 15 Traffic levels allow for efficient selection of runways based on noise considerations, given requirements for runway crossings, capacity, etc.; moderate use of the RUS. High Greater than 15 The need to maintain operational capacity does not allow ATC flexibility in runway selection; limited use of the RUS.

Source: Table A-3 from Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)/Record of Decision (ROD); July 2003.

Item 5: Review and Discuss Runway Use System Priorities

7 2 1 1 4 18 29 83 56 70 75 72 50 78 63 71 76 52 89 52 89 38 36 21 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Average Operations per Hour

Average Hourly Traffic Demand, 2017: Total Operations Green = Low Demand Yellow = Mid Demand Red = High Demand

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

ITEM 6

UPDATE ON THE FAA’S SURVEY TO RE-EVALUATE NOISE MEASUREMENT METHODS

Item 6: Update on the FAA’s Survey to Re-Evaluate Noise Measurement Metrics

• May 2015 FAA announced it would begin updating the dose-

response relationship between noise exposure and the percentage of people who are highly annoyed

• This is a part of a larger effort by the FAA, which includes

studying the relationship between noise and sleep disturbance, cardiovascular health, and children’s cognitive learning

• FAA has indicated that the survey results are planned to be

released in Q2 2018, however they are still undergoing inter-agency review (DOD and HUD)

• The results will be released in the form of a report, covering

the purpose of the study, the scientific approach and the survey results

• FAA has stated that when the results will be released on their website and announced through

the federal register to begin the process of taking stakeholder feedback

• The release of the results will not include any discussion on implications to changing policy

Item 6: Update on the FAA’s Survey to Re-Evaluate Noise Measurement Metrics The survey

• A 12-question survey called the “Neighborhood Environmental Survey” was sent to residents around 20 airports

throughout 2016 and early 2017

• The FAA is not releasing the airports involved in the survey
• The methodology behind the wording of the question, the position of the question within the survey and the

selection of respondents were derived from and/or vetted through the International Committee on the Biological Effects of Noise (ICBEN), BTS, OMB, social scientists and a pilot project through ACRP

• Airports were selected using the following criteria

– Needed at least 100 annual jet operations – Needed at least 100 households in the 65 DNL – Needed at least 100 households in the 60-65 DNL

• The 20 final airports were determined using Balanced Sampling, which ensures the cohort of airports matches the
• verall 95 airports on the following factors:

– Geographic balance – Average temperature – Number of operations – % of nighttime operations – Fleetmix – Population in the vicinity of the airports

Item 6: Update on the FAA’s Survey to Re-Evaluate Noise Measurement Metrics The survey

• Residents were selected by running noise contours in 5 dB bands from DNL 50-70 using flight

data for the 20 airports

• Their response goal was to have at least 100 respondents per contour band for a total of 500

respondents per airport and a grand total of 10,000 respondents

• The FAA plans to use the Federal Register to publish a link to an FAA website to view the

detailed noise annoyance survey report

• FAA has built a new section of this website with information on the fundamentals of noise and

sound, community response to noise and history of noise: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/policy_guidance/noise/history/

ITEM 7

REVIEW OF THE SPRING LISTENING SESSION

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

Item 7: Review of the Spring Listening Session NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

On April 25, 5 residents attended the Spring Listening Session at the MAC General Offices. The attendees were from Minneapolis, Apple Valley and Eagan. The meeting was also attended by representatives from FAA air traffic, MAC Commission, and Minneapolis. MAC staff opened with an introduction and

• presentation. Slides are available at:

www.macnoise.com/sites/www.macenvironme nt.org/files/pdf/20180425_spring_1.pdf The open floor conversation focused on:

• Percentage of MD-80 and MD-90 aircraft
• perations
• MSP nighttime and early morning cargo
• perations
• Overall trends in operations, complaints and

noise

• Area Navigation (RNAV) procedures at MSP
• MAC Residential Noise Mitigation Program

ITEM 8

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

ITEM 9

ANNOUNCEMENTS

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 16, 2018

Summer Listening Session Tuesday, July 17, 2018 @ 7:00 PM Richfield City Hall

Next NOC Meeting Wednesday, July 18, 2018 @ 1:30 PM MAC General Offices