september 20 2017
play

SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 Audio recordings are made of this meeting NOISE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 Audio recordings are made of this meeting NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 1: Review and Approval of July 19, 2017 Meeting SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 Minutes NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 2: MSP FairSkies


  1. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 Audio recordings are made of this meeting

  2. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 1: Review and Approval of July 19, 2017 Meeting SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 Minutes

  3. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 2: MSP FairSkies Presentation SEPTEMBER 20, 2017

  4. Noise Oversight Commi/ee: MSP FairSkies Coali/on Goals Steve Kittleson Kevin Terrell September 20 th 2017

  5. What do we want? Less noise No surprises

  6. What concerns us? MSP noise is increasing MSP FairSkies Coalition | 3

  7. How do we know this? MSP FairSkies Coalition | 4

  8. What concerns us? MSP noise is increasing FAA on noise impact is “arbitrary and capricious” MSP FairSkies Coalition | 5

  9. How do we know this? “The pe''oners argue that the FAA’s approval of the new flight routes was arbitrary and capricious... We agree.” * * City of Phoenix v. Huerta and FAA. The court decided unanimously on the merits of the case. The sole dissent addressed only the MSP FairSkies Coalition | 6 ques@on of @meliness in filing the case

  10. What we don’t want PHX A result of FAA’s NextGen implementa@on NYC LGA MSP PopulaPon exposed to 55 dB DNL Noise* Any of that to 2010 370,000 happen here Pre NextGen 774,000 2016 AKA outdated NEPA processes used against us Post NextGen * Analysis of FAA data obtained through FOIA and Port Authority Part 150 MSP FairSkies Coalition | 7 We also are not asking for addi@onal mi@ga@on, further out than 60 dB DNL

  11. How to succeed? 1. Agree on the problem 2. Baseline with meaningful and readily available data 3. Set improvement goals 4. Collaborate to reach goals MSP FairSkies Coalition | 8

  12. Anatomy of a problem MSP FairSkies Coalition | 9

  13. Is this a problem? A bad trend at MSP Hiding noise with 55 dB DNL What’s past is prologue 2012 proposal for MSP NextGen departures Impact of 55 dB DNL 2012 NextGen flight path increases 30% in two years 110% increase in people exposed to 55 dB DNL noise post NextGen flight path MSP FairSkies Coalition | 10

  14. Baseline: Today’s view “The Annual Noise Contour Report does not include popula'on counts.” The FAA repor@ng standard would show only a couple thousand people impacted by 65 dB DNL MSP FairSkies Coalition | 11

  15. Baseline: A beZer view Interna@onal standards (55 dB DNL) show the impact of noise is far larger & is growing drama@cally MSP FairSkies Coalition | 12

  16. Baseline: A new view Nx (N70) single event map • “The FAA’s proposal would increase by 300% the number of aircraB flying over twenty-five historic neighborhoods...The idea that a change with these effects would not be highly controversial is “so implausible” that it could not reflect reasoned decisionmaking.” • “In short, the FAA had several reasons to an'cipate that the new flight routes would be highly controversial: The agency was changing routes that had been in place for a long /me ...The air traffic in some areas would increase by 300% ” MSP FairSkies Coalition | 13

  17. A baseline to prepare us 1. A 55 dB DNL contour 2. A 55 dB DNL NEM 3. An N65 contour 4. An N65 NEM Ø NOC/MAC staff sugges@ons? Ø Data-driven decisions based on ci@zen expecta@ons MSP FairSkies Coalition | 14

  18. 3. Set goa ls Target Amsterdam: NOC suggesPon: Reduce the popula'on impacted by 55 dB DNL noise from MSP by 50% by 2025 AND ensure it’s fairly distributed ? Amsterdam Schipol vs. MSP - 16% more planes than MSP - 9 vs. 11 miles from downtown - Similar, but denser popula@on - 54% fewer people significantly impacted by 55 dB DNL noise MSP FairSkies Coalition | 15

  19. 4. Collaborate AlternaPves Voice of CiPzen 1. Noise Oversight? 1. Noise Reduc@on 2. City reps on NOC have many 2. Directly integrate a Voice of Ci@zen stakeholders, not just residents “listening post” onto the NRC. Several possible models exist: 3. Industry-City / 6-6 split on NOC: - School Board “student” rep who Few ci@zens we talk to deem this to applies and is selected be fair, reasonable or as providing - Appointed Ombudsman ci@zens a true voice in the process - Elected/seconded by ci@zen Ø These concerns undermine the groups (e.g. LAX Roundtable) legi@macy and effec@veness of the - Other? NOC in the eyes of concerned ci@zens 3. Use that direct VOC to beZer Ø Ci@zens need a “seat at the table” in understand community standards order to effec@vely collaborate and enhance NRC’s legi@macy MSP FairSkies Coalition | 16

  20. Will you... If not, why not? Decision Ways to help improve our community 1. Produce a 55 dB DNL contour? Yes No 2. Publish a 55 dB DNL NEM? Yes No 3. Produce an N65 contour? Yes No 4. Publish an N65 NEM? Yes No 5. Establish a goal to reduce noise? Yes No 6. Enhance the NOC with greater Yes No stakeholder (ci@zen) representa@on? MSP FairSkies Coalition | 17

  21. Next steps 1. NOC to review this proposal 2. Integrate into the work plan 3. Collaborate to reduce noise MSP FairSkies Coalition | 18

  22. Less Noise No Surprises Meaningful data Collaborative plan

  23. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 3: Review of Monthly Operations Reports: July and SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 August 2017

  24. 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 MSP OPERATIONS 0 SEP-13 35,167 36,734 Operations 37,665 NOV-13 33,758 34,270 JAN-14 33,048 29,772 MAR-14 36,227 33,827 JULY 2017 MAY-14 34,377 35,659 JUL-14 37,306 36,689 SEP-14 33,085 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) Nighttime Operations 34,595 NOV-14 31,256 2,346 32,613 JAN-15 31,371 29,038 MAR-15 35,119 32,686 MAY-15 33,409 35,542 JUL-15 37,132 36,885 SEP-15 32,887 33,969 NOV-15 31,896 32,356 Operations 38,511 JAN-16 31,597 30,020 MAR-16 34,966 33,293 AUGUST 2017 MAY-16 34,331 36,750 JUL-16 37,880 37,887 SEP-16 34,052 34,906 NOV-16 32,102 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) Nighttime Operations 33,103 JAN-17 31,868 2,213 29,825 MAR-17 36,235 33,971 MAY-17 35,407 36,292 JUL-17 37,665 38,511

  25. 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 MSP OPERATIONS 500 0 SEP-13 1,090 1,179 Operations 37,665 NOV-13 1,163 1,585 JAN-14 1,404 1,250 MAR-14 1,725 1,527 JULY 2017 MAY-14 1,562 1,915 JUL-14 1,901 1,737 SEP-14 1,317 1,422 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) Nighttime Operations NOV-14 1,375 1,547 2,346 JAN-15 1,511 1,487 MAR-15 1,967 1,854 MAY-15 1,766 2,010 ARR JUL-15 2,127 2,029 DEP SEP-15 1,573 1,625 NOV-15 1,632 1,840 Operations 38,511 JAN-16 1,871 1,804 MAR-16 2,124 1,874 MAY-16 1,870 AUGUST 2017 2,421 JUL-16 2,977 2,629 SEP-16 1,755 1,817 NOV-16 1,787 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) 2,152 Nighttime Operations JAN-17 1,910 2,213 1,639 MAR-17 2,441 2,143 MAY-17 2,019 2,264 JUL-17 2,346 2,213

  26. RUNWAY USE JULY 2017 AUGUST 2017 NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW 31% 54% 7% 32% 42% 16% M N S 70% 50% 50% 54% 60% 42% 50% 40% 30% 32% 31% 31% 20% 29% 10% 0% SEP-13 NOV-13 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17

  27. CARRIER JET FLEET MIX JULY 2017 AUGUST 2017 37% 38% 60% 59% 3% 3% NARROWBODY RJ WIDEBODY 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% SEP-13 NOV-13 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17

  28. 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 MSP COMPLAINTS 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Operations per Complaint COMPLAINTS 0 16,293 SEP-13 8,894 2.3 7,321 NOV-13 5,510 5,314 JAN-14 4,974 4,070 MAR-14 7,939 New Locations 7,855 JULY 2017 145 MAY-14 7,444 9,629 JUL-14 11,501 12,139 LOCATIONS SEP-14 11,138 9,075 Average 557 29 NOV-14 6,264 5,227 JAN-15 6,054 6,977 MAR-15 9,974 Median 9,676 3 MAY-15 8,720 12,827 JUL-15 11,664 12,475 Operations per Complaint SEP-15 12,222 COMPLAINTS 9,244 16,727 NOV-15 6,955 2.3 5,913 JAN-16 5,547 7,594 MAR-16 13,196 10,040 MAY-16 11,063 New Locations AUGUST 2017 12,227 157 JUL-16 10,878 12,035 SEP-16 10,831 9,983 LOCATIONS NOV-16 7,241 Average 6,318 615 27 JAN-17 7,457 12,012 MAR-17 13,244 13,907 MAY-17 12,559 Median 14,618 3 JUL-17 16,293 16,727

  29. MSP COMPLAINTS JULY 2017 AUGUST 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 16,293 557 16,727 615 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.3 145 29 3 2.3 157 27 3 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 SEP-13 NOV-13 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17

  30. MSP COMPLAINTS JULY 2017 AUGUST 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 16,293 557 16,727 615 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.3 145 29 3 2.3 157 27 3 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 SEP-13 NOV-13 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend