Committee March 16, 2016 Audio recordings are made of this meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

committee
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Committee March 16, 2016 Audio recordings are made of this meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016 Audio recordings are made of this meeting Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016 Item 1: Review and Approval of January 20, 2016 Meeting Minutes Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016 Item 2:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Noise Oversight Committee

March 16, 2016

Audio recordings are made of this meeting

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 1: Review and Approval of January 20, 2016 Meeting Minutes

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 2: Nomination and Election of NOC Co-Chair

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 3: A Resolution Honoring Liz Petschel

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (NOC) RESOLUTION #01-2016 A RESOLUTION HONORING LIZ PETSCHEL FOR HER DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NOISE COMMUNITY

5 WHEREAS, the MSP Noise Oversight Committee is the primary advisory body to the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) on topics related to aircraft noise at MSP; and, WHEREAS, Liz Petschel has held a role in representing the City of Mendota Heights on the Noise Oversight Committee since 2004; and WHEREAS, Liz Petschel was elected to serve as the NOC Co-Chairperson by the Noise Oversight Committee Community Member Representation in 2013 and has demonstrated strong leadership in that role; and WHEREAS, Liz Petschel served on the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission from 1999 to 2011; and WHEREAS, throughout her years of service Liz Petschel has served the people of her city and the MSP airport noise community with fairness, compassion, dedication, and a willingness to help, she has earned the respect and admiration of fellow NOC members and the Metropolitan Airports Commission for her knowledge, experience, and leadership, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that we, the members of the Noise Oversight Committee of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, do hereby extend to Liz Petschel our sincere gratitude for her nineteen plus (19+) years of dedicated service to the airport noise community and wish her continued success, genuine happiness, and good health in the years to come.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 4: Review of Operations Report Summary January and February 2016

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2015 2016

January 6,054 5,547 February 6,976 7,586

MSP Complaints

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 HOUSEHOLDS COMPLAINTS COMPLAINTS HOUSEHOLDS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

2015 2016

January 263 295 February 270 438

MSP Complaint Locations

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

COMPLAINTS / HOUSEHOLDS COMPLAINT LOCATIONS

RATIO OF MSP COMPLAINTS TO HOUSEHOLDS

COMPLAINT LOCATIONS RATIO

*Ratio of complaints to locations for March and April 2011 was 99.4 and 87.4 respectively

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2015 2016

January 31,371 31,597 February 29,033 30,020

Total MSP Aircraft Operations

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

Year-to-Date MSP Aircraft Operations

Total

2016 60,404 2015 61,617

31,371 29,033 35,119 32,686 33,409 35,542 37,132 36,885 32,887 33,969 31,896 32,356 31,597 30,020 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2015 2016

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2015 2016 Regional Jet Modified Stage 3 Other Regional Jet Modified Stage 3 Other January 48.5% 0.0% 51.5% 45.7% 0.0% 54.3% February 47.1% 0.0% 52.8% 44.0% 0.0% 55.9%

Air Carrier Jet Fleet Composition

2015 2016 January 29,248 29,322 February 27,012 27,762

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

Air Carrier Jet Operations

2015 2016

January 1,511 1,871 February 1,487 1,804

Nighttime Operations

(10:30pm – 6:00am)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Source: Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Finance Department Monthly Passenger and Operations Reports

MSP Passenger Data

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Operations Passengers

Major Air Carrier Operations and Passengers

Passengers Operations

10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Operations Passengers

Regional Air Carrier Operations and Passengers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

JANUARY ARRIVALS JANUARY DEPARTURES

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

188 110 428 362 150 27 37 2 13 4 3 67 250 132 8 8 30 9 45 39

ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED 22:30 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 AIR CARRIER CARGO 200 1 59 30 23 16 5 1 1 233 236 12 1 1 ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED 22:30 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 AIR CARRIER CARGO

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FEBRUARY ARRIVALS FEBRUARY DEPARTURES

Technical Advisor’s Report Summary

175 127 411 357 139 88 41 31 8 74 260 153 10 9 31 31 46 56

ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED 22:30 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 AIR CARRIER CARGO 110 66 4 32 28 13 10 2 6 236 255 5 8 ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED ACT SCHED 22:30 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 AIR CARRIER CARGO

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Jan Feb Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departures 4,204 3,309

Runway 17 Departure Analysis Summary

Jan Feb Compliance with Runway 17 Departure Procedure 4,199 (99.9%) 3,294 (99.5%)

98.0% 98.5% 99.0% 99.5% 100.0% JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

RUNWAY 17 DEPARTURE PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Eagan-Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Summary

Jan Feb Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Procedures 2,512 2,014 Jan Feb Carrier Jets Remaining in the Corridor 2,459 (97.9%) 1,891 (93.9%)

80% 85% 90% 95% 100% JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

EAGAN-MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR COMPLIANCE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Crossing-in-the-Corridor Analysis Summary

Night Time (23:00 – 06:00) Jan Feb Carrier Jet Departures Crossing-in-the-Corridor 124 (35%) 97 (55%) Day Time (6:00 – 23:00) Jan Feb Carrier Jet Departures Crossing-in-the-Corridor 2,388 (34%) 1,917 (29%)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

RUS Report Summary January

November Count Percent Arrivals on 30L, 30R and 35 9,072 28.71% Departures on 12L, 12R and 17 7,289 23.07% Use of RUS High-Priority Runways 16,361 51.78%

RUS Report Summary February

December Count Percent Arrivals on 30L, 30R and 35 9,987 33.27% Departures on 12L, 12R and 17 5,751 19.16% Use of RUS High-Priority Runways 15,738 52.43%

50% 51% 52% 53% 54% 55% JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

USE OF RUS HIGH-PRIORITY RUNWAYS

slide-20
SLIDE 20

RUS High-Priority Runways RUS High-Priority Runways

RUS Report Summary January Departures RUS Report Summary January Arrivals

JANUARY 2016 JANUARY HISTORICAL

4 12L 12R 17 22 30L 30R 35 Total Operations Percent 0.00% 11.86% 6.01% 28.30% 0.02% 31.02% 22.79% 0.00% Nighttime Percent (10:30 P.M. - 6:00 A.M.) 0.00% 0.47% 0.91% 0.27% 0.00% 1.25% 0.85% 0.00% Morning Transition Percent (6:00 A.M. - 7:30 A.M.) 0.00% 0.81% 1.36% 1.75% 0.00% 2.48% 1.11% 0.00% Evening Transition Percent (9:00 P.M. - 10:30 P.M.) 0.00% 0.62% 0.79% 0.29% 0.00% 1.79% 1.44% 0.00% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 4 12L 12R 17 22 30L 30R 35 Total Operations Percent 0.00% 20.17% 22.44% 0.00% 0.00% 24.23% 22.25% 10.91% Nighttime Percent (10:30 P.M. - 6:00 A.M.) 0.00% 1.11% 1.54% 0.00% 0.00% 4.03% 1.41% 0.01% Morning Transition Percent (6:00 A.M. - 7:30 A.M.) 0.00% 0.67% 0.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.44% 0.90% 0.03% Evening Transition Percent (9:00 P.M. - 10:30 P.M.) 0.00% 0.55% 0.94% 0.00% 0.00% 1.64% 1.11% 0.27% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

RUS High-Priority Runways RUS High-Priority Runways

RUS Report Summary February Departures RUS Report Summary February Arrivals

FEBRUARY 2016 FEBRUARY HISTORICAL

4 12L 12R 17 22 30L 30R 35 Total Operations Percent 0.77% 9.41% 5.55% 23.38% 0.02% 35.12% 25.63% 0.12% Nighttime Percent (10:30 P.M. - 6:00 A.M.) 0.21% 0.39% 0.70% 0.40% 0.00% 1.14% 0.61% 0.02% Morning Transition Percent (6:00 A.M. - 7:30 A.M.) 0.01% 0.76% 1.03% 1.91% 0.00% 2.84% 1.55% 0.03% Evening Transition Percent (9:00 P.M. - 10:30 P.M.) 0.05% 0.97% 0.77% 0.47% 0.00% 1.75% 1.71% 0.01% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 4 12L 12R 17 22 30L 30R 35 Total Operations Percent 0.01% 15.41% 18.10% 0.00% 0.00% 26.67% 24.89% 14.93% Nighttime Percent (10:30 P.M. - 6:00 A.M.) 0.00% 0.87% 1.96% 0.00% 0.00% 4.22% 1.10% 0.41% Morning Transition Percent (6:00 A.M. - 7:30 A.M.) 0.00% 0.41% 0.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.74% 1.12% 0.13% Evening Transition Percent (9:00 P.M. - 10:30 P.M.) 0.00% 0.61% 1.14% 0.00% 0.00% 1.48% 1.08% 0.44% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 5: MSP Converging Runway Operations: Elaine Buckner, FAA Air Traffic Manager

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 6: MSP Draft 2035 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) Publication Update

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Item 6: MSP Draft 2035 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) Publication Update

After the FAA evaluation period is complete, the MAC will collect several months of actual runway use data and assessed whether adjustments are needed to runway use assumptions used to generate the 2035 LTCP noise contours. The MAC will continue to monitor FAA’s evaluation progress closely and update the NOC on the timeline after the FAA evaluation period is complete. Last August, the FAA began implementing procedures to comply with new rules for Converging Runway Operations (CRO) on Runway 30L and 35. The MSP LTCP was deferred to take into consideration the new procedures, as there was concern that they may lead to changes to how the FAA utilizes the runways in a northwest configuration. In January 2016, the FAA announced that it will also be implementing CRO procedures for Runway 30R and 35, which began on February 29, 2016. Beginning March 1, the FAA began an evaluation period for these procedures, which is estimated to last 5-6 months.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 7: 2015 MSP Annual Noise Contour Analysis

The First Amendment to the Consent Decree requires the MAC to prepare an annual noise contour analysis for MSP by March 1 of each year. On February 29, 2016 MAC staff completed the ninth Annual Noise Contour Report consistent with the requirements in the Consent Decree. The First Amendment to the Consent Decree establishes a three-consecutive year mitigation eligibility requirement, compared to the 2007 DNL forecast contours.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The MAC retained the services of HNTB for the preparation of the INM inputs. 2015 is the 3rd year of actual noise mapping to establish mitigation eligibility, per the First Amendment to the Consent Decree. The only residential properties that meet the mitigation eligibility criteria are located in the City of Minneapolis. Item 7: 2015 MSP Annual Noise Contour Analysis 483 single-family homes meet the 1st year of eligibility. 285 single-family homes meet the 2nd year of eligibility (all homes that met the 1st year in 2014 moved into the 2nd year in 2015). 137 single-family homes and 88 multi-family units meet the 3rd year of eligibility (all homes that met the 2nd year in 2014 moved into the 3rd year in 2015).

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Item 7: 2015 MSP Annual Noise Contour Analysis

Table 3.1 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2007 Mitigated Forecast vs. 2015 Actual Annual Total Operations Summary Operations Category 2015 Actual* 2007 Forecasted Scheduled Passenger Air Carrier (a) 367,778 523,472 Cargo 12,789 21,158 Charter 80 5,766 General Aviation (b) 20,898 28,846 Military 2,829 3,124 TOTAL 404,374 582,366 Notes: (a) Includes both air carrier and regional carrier operations (b) Includes both GA and non-scheduled air taxi operations * Based on actual 2015 MACNOMS data adjusted to match FAA ATADS data (to account for unavailable MACNOMS operations data).

The 2015 total operations number of 404,374 represents a 30.6% reduction from the 2007 forecast mitigated total

  • perations number.

The 2015 total operations are down 1.8% from the 411,760 number in 2014 . The average daily number of Modified (“hushkitted”) Stage 3 operations was down in 2015 over 99.9% from the 2007 forecast mitigated number. Nighttime operations in 2015 decreased by 16.6 average daily operations from the 2007 forecast mitigated number.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The 2015 actual noise contour is smaller than the 2007 forecast mitigated contour by 37.8% in the 60 DNL contour and 46.3% in the 65 DNL contour. The predominant contraction in the contours is driven by fleet mix changes – including a significant reduction in Modified (“hushkitted”) Stage 3 operations – and a reduction in total operations. The area where the 2015 actual noise contour extends beyond the 2007 forecast mitigated contour is attributed to nighttime runway use variances, particularly an increase in nighttime arrival operations on Runway 12R.

Item 7: 2015 MSP Annual Noise Contour Analysis

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Item 7: 2015 MSP Annual Noise Contour Analysis

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Item 7: 2015 MSP Annual Noise Contour Analysis

All single-family and multi-family homes achieving the 3rd year of eligibility this year will be mitigated in 2017. Single-Family Homes Those included in the mitigation area for the first time (red blocks) will be eligible for $14,000* of mitigation or $4,000* + central air conditioning (“Phase 2”). Those that moved from the Reimbursement area into the 2015 60-62 (orange blocks) will also be eligible for Phase 2 mitigation – less any MAC reimbursements previously paid. There are no homes in the 3rd year of eligibility that moved from Phase 2 mitigation into the 5dB Reduction Package (blue blocks). All 3rd year Multi-Family units are included in the mitigation area for the first time and will receive air conditioning units and/or an acoustical air condition cover.

*2007 dollar amounts – will be adjusted to current CPI

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Item 7: 2015 MSP Annual Noise Contour Analysis

Contour Comparison 2015 v. 2007 Contours 65 DNL = - 3,352 acres (46.3%) 60 DNL = - 5,936 acres (37.8%) 2015 v. 2014 Contours 65 DNL = + 404 acres (11.6%) 60 DNL = + 1,014 acres (11.6%) Total Nighttime Operations (average daily):

  • 2015 = 106.7
  • 2014 = 95.3

Runway 12R Arrivals (average daily):

  • 2015 = 123.6 day; 16.9 night
  • 2014 = 99.2 day; 14.5 night
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 8: FAA Reauthorization Update

U.S. Congressional leaders drafted and subsequently shelved a bill to extend the FAA authorization and to transfer Air Traffic Control services to a not-for-profit corporation (H.R. 4441 – Aviation Innovation, Reform, and Reauthorization Act). It is anticipated that Congress will pass a short-term (3 month) extension for FAA reauthorization, which is set to expire on March 31, 2016.

U.S. Senate intends to draft its own reauthorization bill to go to the Senate floor in April. Challenges exist for a long-term reauthorization bill, including a shortened legislative calendar in this election year, disagreement over budget resolution and ATC privitization.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Item 8: FAA Reauthorization Update Noise-related provisions pertinent to the MAC:

RNAV Departure Procedures would require the FAA Administrator to consider the feasibility of dispersal headings or other lateral track variations to address community noise concerns when proposing a new RNAV departure procedure,

  • r amending an existing procedure that would direct aircraft between the

surface and 6,000 feet above ground level over noise sensitive areas. Review and Notification of Categorical Exclusions Granted for Next Generation Flight Procedures would amend the CatEx 1 and CatEx2 sections of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and require the FAA Administrator to notify and consult with the airport operator regarding appropriate community involvement practices and to consider community engagement to inform the public of the new procedures as part of the process to apply a CatEx. Aircraft Noise Exposure would require the FAA to conduct a review of the relationship between aircraft noise exposure and its effects on communities around airports. Within 3 years, the FAA must submit a report to Congress to recommend revisions to the land use compatibility guidelines in the FAR Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program. Right to Privacy When Using Air Traffic Control Systems would require private aircraft registration numbers to be blocked from any flight track dissemination or display by the FAA at the request of a private aircraft owner or operator.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 9: Update on the FAA Stage 5 Noise Certification

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Item 9: FAA Stage 5 Noise Certification Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

FAA issued an NPRM January 14, 2016 Comment period open until April 13, 2016 Updated regulations bring Part 36 into alignment with already implemented ICAO standards These regulations will be met using current technology This NPRM does not have any language that would phase out Stage 3 or Stage 4 aircraft Applies to any aircraft manufacturer over 55,000 kg (121,254 pounds) seeking certification after December 31, 2017 Applies to aircraft under 55,000 kg seeking certification after December 31, 2020

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Item 9: FAA Stage 5 Noise Certification Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

NPRM aligns Part 36 with ICAO Standards

ICAO

Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 14

Part 36

Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5

In 2010 ICAO tasked the Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP) to study further reductions

slide-38
SLIDE 38

1969

  • Part 36

1976

  • Required

currently

  • perating

aircraft to comply with Part 36 noise limits by 1985 1990

  • ANCA

changed Part 36 to phase out large Stage 2 aircraft by December 31, 1999 2005

  • Stage 4

Noise Levels for all aircraft certified after 2006. 2012

  • All Stage 2

aircraft phased out by December 31, 2015 2016

  • Stage 5

Noise Levels introduced for newly certified aircraft

Item 9: FAA Stage 5 Noise Certification Evolution of FAR Part 36

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • 6.5 km from the brake release point, under the take-off

flight path Flyover

  • The highest noise measurement recorded at any point 450 m

from the runway axis during take-off Sideline

  • 2 km from the runway threshold, under the approach flight path

Approach

Item 9: FAA Stage 5 Noise Certification Noise Certification Reference Points

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Item 9: FAA Stage 5 Noise Certification Aircraft Noise Level Trends

Source: Airports Commission Final Report July 2015

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Item 9: FAA Stage 5 Noise Certification Aircraft Noise Level Trends

Source: United Technologies Corporation

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Noise Oversight Committee March 16, 2016

Item 10: Review of January 27, 2016 Public Input Meeting

On January 27, 2016 MAC Noise Program Office staff conducted the 1st Quarter 2016 Public Input Meeting. There were 8 people who attended the meeting and 2 individuals made

  • comments. The comments and associated responses can be found on the

MAC Noise Program’s website, accessible

  • n

the Internet at www.macnoise.com. Specifically, comments/questions focused on:

  • Tips for insulating a home against aircraft noise
  • How MSP noise issues compare to other airports

The next quarterly public input meeting will be April 27, 2016, 7:00 p.m., at the St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd, St. Louis Park, MN.