JANUARY 18, 2017 Audio recordings are made of this meeting NOISE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Audio recordings are made of this meeting

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

Item 1: Review and Approval of November 16, 2016 Meeting Minutes NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

Item 2: NOC Community Co-Chair Nomination and Election NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

Item 3: Review of Monthly Operations Reports: November and December, 2016 NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

MSP COMPLAINTS

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

NOVEMBER DECEMBER 6,846 5,939 NOVEMBER DECEMBER 398 379

2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2013 2014 2015 2016 COMPLAINTS

2015 2016 November 6,955 7,244 December 5,913 6,318

NOVEMBER DECEMBER 304 183 MSP COMPLAINT LOCATIONS NOVEMBER DECEMBER 24 34 AVERAGE COMPLAINT PER LOCATION

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

177 130 184 281 380 718 624 847 654 391 283 184 178 170 392 432 490 584 716 792 638 362 205 219 263 270 389 416 523 745 849 1079 866 530 445 374 295 439 756 657 971 723 639 596 496 416 304 183 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2013 2014 2015 2016 COMPLAINT LOCATIONS

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

2015 2016 112,699 116,958 MSP ANNUAL COMPLAINTS 2015 2016 2,805 2,711 MSP ANNUAL COMPLAINT LOCATIONS

6,054 5,547 6,976 7,594 9,974 13,196 9,676 10,040 8,720 11,063 12,827 12,227 11,664 10,878 12,475 12,037 12,222 10,834 9,243 9,985 6,955 7,244 5,913 6,318 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 Complaints

2015 2016

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

36.1% 47.5% 55.5 61.5% 66.2% 69.6% 72.7% 75.3% 77.6% 79.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Households

TOP 100 COMPLAINT LOCATION CONTRIBUTIONS TO TOTAL

MSP COMPLAINTS 116,958

36.1% 47.5% 55.5 61.5% 66.2% 69.6% 72.7% 75.3% 77.6% 79.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Households

TOP 100 COMPLAINT LOCATION CONTRIBUTIONS TO TOTAL

TOTAL MSP AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2015 2016 402,285 410,887

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

2015 2016 November 31,896 32,102 December 32,356 33,103

31,371 29,033 35,119 32,686 33,409 35,542 37,132 36,885 32,887 33,969 31,896 32,356 31,597 30,020 34,966 33,293 34,331 36,750 37,880 37,887 34,052 34,906 32,102 33,103 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2015 2016

Source: Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Finance Department Monthly Passenger and Operations Reports

OCTOBER NOVEMBER 3,099,547 2,780,548 MSP PASSENGERS

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: October and November 2016

NOV 92 OCT 98

60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV 2013 2014 2015 2016 PASSENGERS

MSP AIRLINE PASSENGERS

AVERAGE PASSENGER PER FLIGHT

FLEET MIX COMPOSITION

NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 2016

DAYTIME COMPOSITION

NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 2016

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

DAY 61,266 94.0% NIGHT 3,939 6.0%

MANUFACTURED STAGE 3/4 57% REGIONAL JET 43%

NOVEMBER NIGHT TIME Scheduled Actual 1,190 1,685

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH 22:30 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 OTHER 90 126 23 10 4 1 1 71 AIR CARRIER 243 168 456 462 105 110 29 7 10 2 11 2 37 4 340 311 CARGO 7 4 1 1 12 12 40 45 63 67 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

DECEMBER NIGHT TIME Scheduled Actual 1,428 2,042

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH ACT SCH 22:30 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 OTHER 176 130 48 22 6 3 2 29 AIR CARRIER 240 138 506 533 214 176 76 8 32 12 49 12 370 405 CARGO 14 2 3 3 5 3 1 7 1 41 69 54 80 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

DECEMBER NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

NOVEMBER NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS

RUNWAY 17 NOVEMBER DECEMBER CARRIER JET DEPARTURES (PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE) 5,566 (99.3%) 4,150 (99.1%)

Noise Abatement Procedures – Runway 17 Departure

98.0% 98.5% 99.0% 99.5% 100.0% JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 RUNWAY 17 DEPARTURE PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE

RUNWAYS 12L AND 12R NOVEMBER DECEMBER CARRIER JET DEPARTURES (PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE) 2,956 (95.1%) 2,475 (94.9%)

Noise Abatement Procedures – Eagan-Mendota Heights Departure Corridor

80% 85% 90% 95% 100% JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 EAGAN - MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR COMPLIANCE

CROSSING USAGE NOVEMBER DECEMBER NIGHT TIME (23:00 – 06:00) 164 (42%) 115 (54%) DAY TIME (06:00 – 23:00) 2,792 (32%) 2,360 (28%)

Noise Abatement Procedures – Crossing-in-the-Corridor

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

EAGAN -MENDOTA HEIGHTS CROSSING PROCEDURE USAGE

Cross Day Cross Night

Noise Abatement Procedures – Runway Use System (RUS) November Count Percent Arrivals on 30L, 30R, and 35 8,939 27.85% Departures on 12L, 12R, and 17 9,185 28.61% Use of RUS High-Priority Runways 18,124 56.46% December Count Percent Arrivals on 30L, 30R, and 35 9,681 33.43% Departures on 12L, 12R, and 17 6,243 21.56% Use of RUS High-Priority Runways 15,924 54.99%

9,072 9,987 7,676 5,888 8,187 9,030 9,640 9,384 6,841 7,257 8,939 9,681 7,289 5,751 10,463 11,069 10,369 10,385 10,947 11,256 11,123 11,090 9,185 6,243 51.8% 52.4% 51.9% 50.9% 54.1% 52.8% 54.4% 54.5% 52.8% 52.6% 56.5% 55.0% 40% 42% 44% 46% 48% 50% 52% 54% 56% 58% 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2016 RUS PERCENTAGE MSP OPERATIONS

USE OF MSP RUS HIGH-PRIORITY RUNWAYS

ARRIVALS 30L, 30R, 35 DEPARTURES 12L, 12R, 17 RUS

Noise Abatement Procedures – Runway Use System (RUS)

NOVEMBER ARRIVALS

20.02% 24.32% 29.46% 21.49% 4.69% 26.16% 19.62% 24.25% 24.80% 5.18% 22.70% 31.63% 26.81% 18.87% 0.00% 15.04% 35.82% 36.93% 9.53% 2.53% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 12L 12R 30L 30R 35 TOTAL MORNING TRANSITION EVENING TRANSITION NIGHT COUNT

Noise Abatement Procedures – Runway Use System (RUS)

NOVEMBER DEPARTURES

13.2% 7.1% 37.0% 17.8% 24.9% 15.2% 22.3% 24.3% 18.9% 19.3% 28.4% 20.6% 10.9% 19.2% 20.8% 19.8% 36.5% 4.3% 24.5% 14.9% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 12L 12R 17 30L 30R TOTAL MORNING TRANSITION EVENING TRANSITION NIGHT COUNT

Noise Abatement Procedures – Runway Use System (RUS)

DECEMBER ARRIVALS

13.4% 17.7% 36.3% 28.3% 2.8% 14.4% 14.1% 33.7% 37.4% 12.8% 21.3% 34.7% 31.2% 7.7% 21.1% 54.4% 15.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 12L 12R 30L 30R 35 TOTAL MORNING TRANSITION EVENING TRANSITION NIGHT COUNT

Noise Abatement Procedures – Runway Use System (RUS)

DECEMBER DEPARTURES

9.7% 6.5% 26.6% 27.2% 28.3% 4.7% 13.8% 15.5% 41.6% 20.9% 11.7% 12.9% 9.6% 35.3% 30.5% 9.9% 19.3% 0.3% 45.2% 24.1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 12L 12R 17 30L 30R TOTAL MORNING TRANSITION EVENING TRANSITION NIGHT COUNT

2016 MSP AIRCRAFT

OPERATIONS

Item 3: Review of Operations Report Summary: November and December 2016

Arrivals Departures 205,586 205,301

Item 4: Update on Converging Runway Operations – Kurt Mara, FAA Traffic Management Officer NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

Rwy 30L and 35 Virtual Intersection Point

Rwy 30L and 35 Virtual Intersection Point

Both Rwy 30L and 30R with 35 Virtual Intersection Point

Item 5: Noise Program Communication Enhancement Plan Update NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

Item 5: Noise Program Communication Enhancement Plan Update

• Recommendations garnered from stakeholder interviews

are leading to modifications to quarterly Public Input Meetings beginning in 2017, beginning with a name change

• “Listening Sessions”.
• Listening Sessions will be as follows:
• Winter Listening Session – January 25, 2017 at 7:00 pm

at the MAC General Offices

• Spring Listening Session – April 26, 2017 at 7:00 pm

location TBD

• Summer Listening Session – July 26, 2017 at 7:00 pm

location TBD

• Fall Listening Session – October 25, 2017 at 7:00 pm

at the MAC General Offices

“Through consultation with external convening and communication experts to obtain stakeholder feedback, we will facilitate dialogue that builds a shared understanding of the circumstances and is committed to creative collaboration and effective communication.”

• Meeting agendas and presentations will be posted on

macnoise.com in advance of each meeting.

• A meeting announcement will be sent through the

macnoise.com latest news subscription service.

• The meeting will begin with hearing from each of the

individuals in attendance.  What is your name?  Where do you live and for how long?  What would you like to get from this meeting?

• MAC staff will go through a short presentation and
• pen the floor to a two-way dialogue. When possible,

responses will be provided at the meeting with a commitment to follow up to questions needing further research.

• Staff will no longer post written questions and

responses on the website.

Item 6: Evaluate Steeper Glide Slopes for Aircraft Arrivals NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017 The 2017 NOC Work Plan includes an investigation into steeper glide slopes at MSP.

Item 6: Evaluate Steeper Glide Slopes for Aircraft Arrivals

• The Instrument Landing System (ILS) is comprised of a glide

slope (vertical guidance) and a localizer (lateral guidance).

• International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) set the

international glide slope standard at 3 

• Some airports use a higher glide slope for terrain

and/or obstacle clearance. Two international airports evaluated and/or implemented steeper glide slopes for noise reduction purposes:

• Frankfurt Airport uses a 3.2 glide slope on its newest

runway, opened in 2011.

• London Heathrow conducted a 6-month trial of a 3.2  glide

slope.

Item 6: Evaluate Steeper Glide Slopes for Aircraft Arrivals

Frankfurt Airport Began in 2011 with simulator tests for 3.0, 3.2 and 3.5 glide slopes for its newest runway. Results showed a 3.2  glide slope allowed aircraft to be up to 246 feet higher when they intercepted the ILS. Glide slopes at or above 3.5 required procedural changes in gear and flap deployment, reducing or negating noise benefit gained from the higher glide path. In October 2012, Frankfurt began operationally testing the 3.2 glide slope by installing two independent ILS systems for each end of the runway (4 ILS’s) at the cost of $3.3 million. The 3.2 glide slope angle is only used for high-visibility conditions (Category I approaches). It is still necessary to maintain the ability for 3.0 glide slopes for low visibility approaches. A two-year test was conducted and noise data was collected by 7 noise monitors, recording noise reductions between 0.56 and 1.5 dBA, unlikely to be perceptible on the ground. In December 2014, the 3.2 glide slope became standard for the new runway at Frankfurt Airport.

Item 6: Evaluate Steeper Glide Slopes for Aircraft Arrivals

London Heathrow Airport Completed a 6-month trial of a 3.2 glide slope angle in August 2016. The airport amended their existing RNAV approaches, changing the angle to 3.2 all the way to the runway. This allowed aircraft to continue flying a 3.0 approach during low visibility conditions. During the trial 2,469 arrivals out of 112,229 flew the 3.2 glide slope (2.2%). The height improvements during the trial were lower than mathematically expected due to temperature effects on the RNAV approaches Air Traffic controllers and pilots responded that the 3.2  RNAV approach did not make a difference in the ability to manage the aircraft speed, increase the number of go-arounds, nor did it increase work load. Noise data was collected and reduction ranged from -1.4 dBA to +0.1 dBA, depending on the location of the noise monitor, with an average of -0.5 dBA reduction. Heathrow’s long-term plan is to incorporate a 3.2 glide slop in their proposal for redesigning the Heathrow airspace.

Item 6: Evaluate Steeper Glide Slopes for Aircraft Arrivals

The chart below shows what the ideal mathematical trajectory would be for MSP between a 3.2 and a 3.0 glide slope. At 6 miles from the runway end (approximately over St. Louis Park on the 12s; Inver Grove Heights on the 30s and Apple Valley on 35), aircraft would be approximately 128 feet higher in altitude.

21 43 64 85 106 128 149 170

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Altitude (Feet Mean Sea Level) Distance from Runway (Nautical Miles)

Ideal Mathematical Altitude Gain

3.2 Degree Glide Slope 3.0 Degree Glide Slope

Item 7: Second Amendment to the Consent Decree Update NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

Item 8: Public Comment NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017

Item 9: Announcements

Next NOC meeting March 15, 2017 @ 1:30 PM MAC General Offices 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 18, 2017