TYNDP 2017 Presentation 23 January 2017 - Brussels TYNDP 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tyndp 2017 presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TYNDP 2017 Presentation 23 January 2017 - Brussels TYNDP 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Brussels 23 January 2017 TYNDP 2017 Presentation 23 January 2017 - Brussels TYNDP 2017 Presentation 1. Role of TYNDP 2. Gas in the EU today and tomorrow 3. EU gas infrastructure - further needs? 4. Achieving the internal gas market is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TYNDP 2017 Presentation

23 January 2017 - Brussels

Brussels – 23 January 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. Role of TYNDP
  • 2. Gas in the EU – today and tomorrow
  • 3. EU gas infrastructure - further needs?
  • 4. Achieving the internal gas market is at hand

2

TYNDP 2017 Presentation

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Role of TYNDP
  • 2. Gas in the EU – today and tomorrow
  • 3. EU gas infrastructure - further needs?
  • 4. Achieving the internal gas market is at hand

3

TYNDP 2017 Presentation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

3rd Package regulatory framework for Gas

Directive 2009/73/EC Regulation EC No 715/2009 (or “Gas Regulation”) Regulation EC No 714/2009

Unbundling –

separation of transmission from supply to customers

ACER ENTSOG European Network of Transmission Operators for Gas Agency for the Co-operation of European Energy Regulators

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

TYNDP is developed bi-annually

> The task is defined by Reg. (EU) 715, Reg. (EU) 347 and Reg. (EU) 2015/703 > The European Commission approved the Cost-Benefit Analysis Methodology applied to TYNDP > ACER monitors TYNDP and issues a formal Opinion on TYNDP

TYNDP: an ENTSOG regulatory task

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Role of TYNDP

Third Package

Assess the infrastructure for

secure, competitive and sustainable gas supply to EU consumers: Further infra needs? Frame

possible futures

Stakeholder engagement ACER and European Commission

Assess projects

as a whole: Do they mitigate the infrastructure needs?

TYNDP

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Thorough stakeholder involvement

2 stakeholder workshops Data transparency

towards stakeholders

Interaction with project promoters

Assumption and scenario building Data collection Jan-16 Apr-16 Jul-16 Oct-16 Jan-17 Assessment and editing Consult. ACER Op. Apr-17 Draft TYNDP Final TYNDP Early results fed to the PCI process

5 stakeholder working sessions

TYNDP is a highly inclusive and transparent process

slide-8
SLIDE 8

An EU-wide perspective

8

TYNDP it’s…

Sustainability Security of supply Market integration

Competition

An in-depth assessement of the gas infrastructure along the Union core energy policy objectives

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

TYNDP in the wider TEN-E framework

PCI list PCI selection process

EC + Regional Groups Projects submitted to PCI call Projects labelled PCI

Selection process

TYNDP

ENTSOG Projects submitted to TYNDP

Frame the future Assess infra needs Assess projects

> TYNDP is an input to the process for selecting Projects of Common Interest (PCI)… > …and just the starting point for projects

Every 2 years Call for grants

EC

Projects selected for grants

Studies Works

Investment request

NRAs

Mature PCI projects

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 1. Role of TYNDP
  • 2. Gas in the EU – today and tomorrow
  • 3. EU gas infrastructure - further needs?
  • 4. Achieving the internal gas market is at hand

10

TYNDP 2017 Presentation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

EU Energy consumption Today…

EU28 Energy Consumption – EC PRIMES data

Heating and cooling is 50% EU Energy demand, significantly covered by Gas Gas provides >20% EU Energy Consumption

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

EU28 Energy consumption – EC PRIMES data

EU energy consumption … and tomorrow

40% CO2 savings Energy efficiency 27% Renewables

Multiple paths to EU targets

2030

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Gas consumption

* January 2017 up to 18th January

Demand during cold spells does not follow annual volume trends. The gas infrastructure is designed to cope with peak demand situations.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

GWh/d

Gas demand 2015 Electricity demand 2015

14

Gas consumption

Peak demand for which the infrastructure is prepared

Gas covers higher and more volatile energy demand than electricity. Peak demand is a major driver for designing the gas infrastructure.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Scenarios set the range of possible futures needed to test the infrastructure

15

Scenarios

…not forecasts, not visions

Near Mid Far

Scenarios

Vision Forecast

Frame the future

Today

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Stakeholder feedback supported a range of demand scenarios

Scenarios frame the possible futures

Slow Progression Blue Transition Green Evolution EU Green Revolution

Frame the future

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Scenarios Characteristics

Slow Progression: Little stimulus to change the energy sector radically from what is seen today. Coal is above gas in the merit order for power generation and the economy cannot support effective decarbonisation. Blue Transition: Gas focussed solutions to the EU energy transition, making use of existing infrastructure. Gas substitutes coal in the power sector, develops rapidly for mobility and continues to dominate the heating sector. Green Evolution: Favourable economic conditions enable national decarbonisation plans to progress. Gas supports RES development, green gases contribute to the reduction of CO2 and efficient devices reduce demand. EU Green Revolution: Goes beyond the national plans to takes a coordinated European perspective on the energy transition, provided through global climate agreements, accelerating the characteristics seen in Green Evolution.

Frame the future

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Scenario Characteristics

Frame the future

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Gas demand – historic and scenarios

Frame the future

Scenarios set the range of possible futures

On target scenario Off target scenario

Scenario data is country specific and builds on national expertise

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

ENTSOG Scenarios compare to other scenario sources

Gas demand – Scenarios 2030

Frame the future

1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000 7 000 Gas Demand 2005 Gas Demand 2015 EU Ref 2016 EUCO 2030 Slow Progression Blue Transition Green Evolution EU Green Revolution 450ppm Current Policies New Policies

TWh/y

ENTSOG Scenarios retained for assessment

World Energy Outlook 2016 European Commission

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

CO2 savings

EU CO2 targets = 40% reductions

Frame the future

Gas displacing coal for power generation strongly impacts on CO2 savings

CO2 savings in 2030 – overall power sector and gas end-user demand

slide-22
SLIDE 22

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Today Slow Progression Blue Transition EU Green Revolution / Green Evolution

Renewable Gases as part of Europe indigenous production (%) - 2030

22

Renewables

Frame the future

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Slow Progression Blue Transition EU Green Revolution / Green Evolution

Annual electricity demand covered by RES (%) - 2030

Renewables gases

> A potential still to be explored

Renewables generation

> TYNDP scenarios align with ENTSO-E TYNDP 2016

> 45 to 60% renewable share

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Multiple energy mixes achieve the EU Energy efficiency target The target can be met with both…

Energy Efficiency

Frame the future

…decreasing gas demand

> Better efficiency of gas heating > Electrification of heating

…increasing gas demand

> More efficient gas-fired generation replacing coal generation > Gas mobility displacing oil demand

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 1. Role of TYNDP
  • 2. Gas in the EU – today and tomorrow
  • 3. EU gas infrastructure - further needs?
  • 4. Achieving the internal gas market is at hand

24

TYNDP 2017 Presentation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

The existing infrastructure

> Diversified pipeline imports > LNG terminals > Underground storages in most EU countries > A well-developed transmission network

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Highly resilient existing gas infrastructure

High cross-border capacities >100% of EU demand High import capacities High storage capacity 20% of the annual demand

1 000 GW 850 GW 1 100 TWh

High deliverability Key asset to cover winter demand and to provide flexibility

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

TYNDP assesses the gas infrastructure against the Union energy policies

Is further infrastructure needed?

Sustaina- bility Security of supply Market integration

Compe- tition

Are they achieved with the existing infrastructure and FID projects?

Yes

No further infrastructure needs

No

TYNDP assesses further infrastructure development

> FID projects + advanced projects > FID projects + 2nd PCI list projects

Assess needs Existing + FID = Low infra level Exist.+FID + Advanced = Advanced infra level Exist.+FID + PCI 2nd list = PCI infra level

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Sustainability

Developing and integrating renewable sources of energy is key for a low-carbon future

> It will challenge the power system > Today’s EU gas infrastructure - with existing power plants - is already able to complement renewable generation and integrate renewable gases.

It is fundamental to take a holistic approach to the energy system

Assess needs

Gas Infrastructure

BIOMETHANE

Power to Gas

Gas mobility Gas to power

Electricity Infrastructure

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

While the overall infrastructure is well developed… pipe and LNG import capacities, transits, interconnections …the situation remains very contrasted from one country to the next

Market integration

Assess needs

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Security of supply

Already achieved: Resilience to extreme temperature Resilience to disruption of Algerian, Libyan and Norwegian supply sources Further infrastructure needs: To mitigate Belarus route disruption risk in North-East Europe To mitigate Ukrainian route disruption in South-East Europe To mitigate largest national infrastructure unavailability (N-1 risk) in specific countries

Assess needs

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Security of supply

Resilience to supply disruption

LNG Norway Algeria Libya Russia

Assess needs

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Security of supply

Case of Ukraine route disruption

60% 60%

South-East Europe would face demand curtailment

2017

6%

2020 - FID projects

Peak demand situation

FID projects significantly mitigate the situation by 2020 Further mitigation requires projects from the 2nd PCI list

2030 - FID + 2nd PCI list projects

Assess needs Assess projects

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Security of supply

N-1 case: unavaibility of largest national infra

Peak demand situation

Countries with N-1 < 100% would face demand curtailment FID and Advanced projects partly mitigate the situation by 2020 Further mitigation requires projects from the 2nd PCI list

Assess needs Assess projects

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Competition

Already achieved Most of Europe can access diversified supply sources Hub price convergence actually observed most of the time, especially in Western Europe Further infrastructure needs To ensure more diversified access to supply sources – in the Baltics, South-East Europe and Iberian Peninsula To lift high dependence to a specific supply source

Assess needs

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Competition

EU supply needs

Whole year

EU current indigenous production is declining, leading to increased supply needs for 2 out of the 3 scenarios Access to new supply sources would contribute to maintain supply diversification

Assess needs

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Competition

Supply diversification

Whole year

Several areas have a significant access to only 1 or 2 supply sources

+

Number of sources countries can access

FID and Advanced projects ensure access to at least 3 supply sources in Baltics and South-East EU For Iberian peninsula 2nd PCI list projects allow further diversification

Assess needs Assess projects

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Supply diversification

Irreducible dependence to Russian supply

Irreducible dependence to Russian supply

Finland and Eastern Europe have limited alternatives to Russian supply Advanced projects improve access to other sources by 2020 2nd PCI list projects ensure homogenous situation across EU countries

2017

85%

14% Situation could deteriorate post-2020 if Lithuania Klaipeda LNG terminal would cease operating Assess needs Assess projects

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Supply diversification

Irreducible dependence to LNG supply

38% 38% 27%

Irreducible dependence to LNG supply

Iberian peninsula and south of France have limited alternatives to LNG supply FID projects improve the situation by 2020 2nd PCI list projects would further improve the situation post-2020

Assess needs Assess projects

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • 1. Role of TYNDP
  • 2. Gas in the EU – today and tomorrow
  • 3. EU gas infrastructure - further needs?
  • 4. Achieving the internal gas market is at hand

39

TYNDP 2017 Presentation

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

When will projects materialise?

The necessary projects are to be commissioned in the coming years

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

At which costs?

BEMIP NSI West Southern Gas Corridor (SGC) NSI East

Total cost: 45 bn€ (FID and Advanced) Including large-scale import projects (TANAP, TAP and Nord Stream 2): 24 bn€, based on publicly available data. BEMIP: Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan NSI West / East: North South interconnections West / East Large-scale import projects

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

The gas infrastructure is already well developed

  • It is close to achieve the EU internal gas market
  • It is ready to support a low-carbon future

Assessing if further infrastructure is needed requires energy scenarios covering a range of possible futures The energy situation is not the same all over Europe

  • In specific areas, further infrastructure is still needed
  • The necessary projects are to be commissioned in the coming years

And still:

  • Stakeholder are welcome to take part to the TYNDP public consultation (until 3 February):

http://www.entsog.eu/events/entsog-tyndp-2017-public-consultation#welcome

  • More on TYNDP:

http://www.entsog.eu/publications/tyndp#ENTSOG-TEN-YEAR-NETWORK-DEVELOPMENT- PLAN-2017

Conclusion

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Thank You for Your Attention

ENTSOG -- European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas Avenue de Cortenbergh 100, B-1000 Brussels EML: WWW: www.entsog.eu Céline Heidrecheid – System Development Business Area Manager James Gudge – System Develoment Adviser Celine.heidrecheid@entsog.eu James.gudge@entsog.eu