NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018 Audio recordings are - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

JANUARY 24, 2018

Audio recordings are made of this meeting

ITEM 1

REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 15, 2017 MEETING MINUTES

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

ITEM 2

REVIEW OF MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORTS: NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2017

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

MSP OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2017 32,268 1,789

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

DECEMBER 2017 33,098 2,119

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

33,048 29,772 36,227 33,827 34,377 35,659 37,306 36,689 33,085 34,595 31,256 32,613 31,371 29,038 35,119 32,686 33,409 35,542 37,132 36,885 32,887 33,969 31,896 32,356 31,597 30,020 34,966 33,293 34,331 36,750 37,880 37,887 34,052 34,906 32,102 33,103 31,868 29,825 36,235 33,971 35,407 36,292 37,665 38,511 33,313 35,027 32,268 33,098 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

NOVEMBER 2017 32,268 1,789

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

DECEMBER 2017 33,098 2,119

Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

MSP OPERATIONS

1,404 1,250 1,725 1,527 1,562 1,915 1,901 1,737 1,317 1,422 1,375 1,547 1,511 1,487 1,967 1,854 1,766 2,010 2,127 2,029 1,573 1,625 1,632 1,840 1,871 1,804 2,124 1,874 1,870 2,421 2,977 2,629 1,755 1,817 1,787 2,152 1,910 1,639 2,441 2,143 2,019 2,264 2,346 2,213 1,551 1,807 1,789 2,119 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 ARR DEP

MSP OPERATIONS

2012 Operations 421,153 2013 Operations 430,308 2014 Operations 408,454 2015 Operations 402,290 2016 Operations 410,887 2017 Operations 413,480 2012 Night Ops 15,902 2013 Night Ops 16,877 2014 Night Ops 18,682 2015 Night Ops 21,421 2016 Night Ops 25,081 2017 Night Ops 24,241

382,960 385,476 418,486 444,202 459,405 469,040 485,480 491,273 482,872 510,420 522,253 501,252 507,322 508,162 540,727 531,947 475,633 453,566 449,972 432,604 435,583 435,076 424,928 431,573 411,760 404,374 412,898 415,703

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

SOURCE: FAA OPSNET SOURCE: MACNOMS

2017 RUNWAY USE

206,667

DEPARTURES RECORDED

50.1%

RUNWAYS 30L OR 30R

49.7%

RUNWAYS 12L, 12R OR 17

206,813

ARRIVALS RECORDED

56.9%

RUNWAYS 30L, 30R OR 35

42.9%

RUNWAYS 12L OR 12R

2017 FLOW BY HOURS

YEAR NORTH SOUTH MIXED 2014 44.82% 38.42% 6.82% 2015 36.17% 47.00% 8.37% 2016 33.53% 48.46% 10.22% 2017 40.33% 40.64% 10.78%

RUNWAY USE CHANGE (2016-2017)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 NARROWBODY 49.3% 44.7% 44.0% 44.7% 47.7% 52.8% 54.1% 57.3% RJ 48.7% 53.1% 53.9% 52.8% 49.4% 44.3% 42.9% 40.0% WIDEBODY 2.0% 2.2% 2.2% 2.6% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 2.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

2017 CARRIER JET USE

151,968

OPERATIONS

217,757

OPERATIONS

10,250

OPERATIONS

MSP COMPLAINTS

NOVEMBER 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 8,929 244

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

3.6 15 37 3 DECEMBER 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 7,184 187

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

4.6 11 38 4

NEW WEBSITE 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200

NOVEMBER 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 8,929 244

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

3.6 15 37 3 DECEMBER 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 7,184 187

Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median

4.6 11 38 4

MSP COMPLAINTS

4,974 4,070 7,939 7,855 7,444 9,629 11,501 12,139 11,138 9,075 6,264 5,227 6,054 6,977 9,974 9,676 8,720 12,827 11,664 12,475 12,222 9,244 6,955 5,913 5,547 7,594 13,196 10,040 11,063 12,227 10,878 12,035 10,831 9,983 7,241 6,318 7,457 12,012 13,244 13,907 12,559 14,617 16,293 16,727 15,282 10,844 8,929 7,184 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

2017 COMPLAINTS

149,055

MSP COMPLAINTS RECEIVED

1

AREAS WITH MORE THAN 50 COMPLAINTS PER DAY

1

AREAS BETWEEN 25 AND 50 COMPLAINTS PER DAY

8

AREAS WITH BETWEEN 10 AND 25 COMPLAINTS PER DAY

179

AREAS WITH 1 OR LESS COMPLAINT PER MONTH

2017 LOCATIONS

1,621

LOCATIONS FILED A COMPLAINT

3

AREAS WITH MORE THAN 30 LOCATIONS

11

AREAS WITH BETWEEN 21 AND 30 LOCATIONS

21

AREAS WITH BETWEEN 11 AND 20 LOCATIONS

368

AREAS 10 OR LESS LOCATIONS

2017 TOP 25 BY COUNT

101,761 (68%)

MSP COMPLAINTS RECEIVED

2017 TOP 10 BY COUNT

78,106 (52%)

MSP COMPLAINTS RECEIVED

2017 LOCATIONS

1,146 (71%)

FILED 10 OR LESS COMPLAINTS

SOUND MONITORING

NOVEMBER 2017 Time Above 49s

TA65 per operation

437h 46m

TA65

Count Above 2.58

N65 per operation

83,362

N65

DECEMBER 2017 Time Above 40s

TA65 per operation

365h 26m

TA65

Count Above 2.23

N65 per operation

73,949

N65

274 H 1 M 55 S 226 H 19 M 28 S 387 H 39 M 41 S 474 H 50 M 35 S 457 H 11 M 54 S 488 H 40 M 40 S 470 H 28 M 25 S 451 H 39 M 9 S 447 H 42 M 6 S 496 H 43 M 24 S 352 H 20 M 29 S 374 H 36 M 54 S 337 H 44 M 26 S 268 H 15 M 48 S 431 H 8 M 58 S 436 H 40 M 32 S 474 H 6 M 9 S 483 H 12 M 14 S 474 H 44 M 25 S 500 H 27 M 47 S 455 H 51 M 1 S 518 H 27 M 55 S 484 H 41 M 54 S 447 H 0 M 21 S 342 H 53 M 13 S 363 H 21 M 15 S 520 H 10 M 38 S 506 H 10 M 32 S 470 H 22 M 29 S 499 H 53 M 51 S 487 H 26 M 31 S 503 H 50 M 48 S 500 H 41 M 49 S 543 H 51 M 38 S 490 H 4 M 28 S 388 H 27 M 45 S 363 H 58 M 45 S 391 H 31 M 59 S 481 H 6 M 28 S 509 H 7 M 5 S 513 H 41 M 26 S 481 H 47 M 7 S 454 H 29 M 52 S 506 H 47 M 37 S 444 H 17 M 9 S 505 H 44 M 23 S 437 H 46 M 14 S 365 H 26 M 25 S JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

NOVEMBER 2017 Time Above 49s

TA65 per operation

437h 46m

TA65

Count Above 2.58

N65 per operation

83,362

N65

DECEMBER 2017 Time Above 40s

TA65 per operation

365h 26m

TA65

Count Above 2.23

N65 per operation

73,949

N65

SOUND MONITORING

56,503 48,182 77,407 87,098 88,231 95,138 92,242 92,018 85,993 90,830 68,060 75,415 68,112 56,930 83,155 82,744 89,774 93,827 95,333 97,919 89,765 95,859 89,373 85,909 70,344 70,424 98,466 94,149 91,967 98,244 99,132 101,693 96,602 101,946 92,096 77,125 74,224 75,454 93,252 95,553 97,238 95,365 94,436 98,847 87,883 95,472 83,362 73,949 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

ANNUAL RMT DATA

COUNT ABOVE (N65) TIME ABOVE (TA65)

2014

957,117

EVENTS

2014

4,902

HOURS

2015

1,028,700

EVENTS

2015

5,312

HOURS

2016

1,092,188

EVENTS

2015

5,617

HOURS

2017

1,065,035

EVENTS

2017

5,456

HOURS

NOISE ABATEMENT

NOVEMBER 2017 Runway 17 99.7% Corridor 97.0% RUS 54.1%

Arrive – 57% Depart – 51%

DECEMBER 2017

98.0% 98.5% 99.0% 99.5% 100.0% JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

Cross Day 25.2% Cross Night 45.0% Runway 17 98.8% Corridor 97.2% RUS 55.1%

Arrive – 72% Depart – 39%

Cross Day 31.2% Cross Night 33.8%

Runway 17 99.7% Corridor 97.0% RUS 54.1%

Arrive – 57% Depart – 51%

Cross Day 25.2% Cross Night 45.0% Runway 17 98.8% Corridor 97.2% RUS 55.1%

Arrive – 72% Depart – 39%

Cross Day 31.2% Cross Night 33.8%

80% 82% 84% 86% 88% 90% 92% 94% 96% 98% 100% JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

NOISE ABATEMENT

NOVEMBER 2017 DECEMBER 2017

Runway 17 99.7% Corridor 97.0% RUS 54.1%

Arrive – 57% Depart – 51%

Cross Day 25.2% Cross Night 45.0% Runway 17 98.8% Corridor 97.2% RUS 55.1%

Arrive – 72% Depart – 39%

Cross Day 31.2% Cross Night 33.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 DAY USAGE NIGHT USAGE

NOISE ABATEMENT

NOVEMBER 2017 DECEMBER 2017

Runway 17 99.7% Corridor 97.0% RUS 54.1%

Arrive – 57% Depart – 51%

Cross Day 25.2% Cross Night 45.0% Runway 17 98.8% Corridor 97.2% RUS 55.1%

Arrive – 72% Depart – 39%

Cross Day 31.2% Cross Night 33.8%

13,095 11,892 10,669 9,413 9,554 7,362 12,281 9,362 8,685 12,536 10,420 8,357 9,570 9,473 11,097 8,712 8,488 10,207 8,763 9,466 5,229 8,418 6,045 9,005 9,072 9,987 7,676 5,888 8,187 9,030 9,640 9,384 6,841 7,257 8,939 11,176 9,964 9,989 9,140 9,369 10,982 10,881 7,918 11,116 7,564 9,713 9,200 11,853 3,722 3,824 8,261 7,999 8,374 11,432 6,807 9,535 8,519 5,679 5,491 8,564 7,317 5,819 7,389 7,856 8,896 8,014 10,993 10,731 11,656 9,175 10,397 8,542 7,289 5,751 10,463 11,069 10,369 10,385 10,947 11,256 11,122 11,090 9,185 7,081 6,957 6,221 9,216 8,279 7,860 8,326 11,720 10,204 10,335 9,025 8,260 6,398

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 ARR DEP RUS

NOISE ABATEMENT

NOVEMBER 2017 DECEMBER 2017

NOISE ABATEMENT

94.4% 94.8% 94.1% 94.3% 93.5% 94.0% 94.5% 95.0%

CORRIDOR

99.7% 99.5% 99.5% 99.7% 99.4% 99.6% 99.8%

RUNWAY 17

31.3% 34.0% 32.9% 32.7% 51.4% 52.8% 45.8% 41.4% 0% 20% 40% 60%

CROSSING

NIGHT DAY

51.9% 52.5% 53.3% 53.3% 51% 52% 53% 54% 2014 2015 2016 2017

RUS

ITEM 3

UPDATE ON PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PBN RULING

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

Item 3: Update on Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport PBN Ruling

Background In August 2017, the DC Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the FAA vacate satellite- based (Performance Based Navigation – PBN) procedures at PHX for failing to follow environmental laws and involve stakeholders. In response to the court ruling, on November 30, 2017, the parties to the litigation jointly petitioned the court to accept a two-step plan they co-developed.

Item 3: Update on Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport PBN Ruling

Seeks Clarification The petition asks the Court to clarify the scope of its

• rder:
• Limit it to the 9 westbound RNAV departure

procedures at PHX which were the focus of the litigation  All other PBN departure and arrival procedures would remain operational

• Remand but not vacate the procedures

 Alter only the beginning of the departure routes, so planes would return to the RNAV procedure after the first leg of the departure (referred to as vector to RNAV procedure)

Item 3: Update on Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport PBN Ruling

Step 1 (short-term fix) the FAA would create new, temporary instructions for departures to the west that would route aircraft near the airport in a manner to approximate the routes prior to the implementation of RNAV departures. Step 2 (long-term fix) the FAA would develop new westbound RNAV departure procedures and consider routes that approximate the routes prior to the initial RNAV implementation near the

• airport. The FAA also would consider feedback on

procedures throughout the Phoenix area. The FAA will conduct community outreach, safety and environmental reviews during the two steps above.

Item 3: Update on Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport PBN Ruling

Recent FAA actions reinforces the points raised by the NOC and MAC to the FAA in 2014 in the NOC’s RNAV Resolution: a successful implementation of such RNAV flight procedures requires community outreach.

NOC RNAV Resolution

• Establishes “Extraordinary Circumstances” at MSP
• Provides strong message with all stakeholders aligned around a set of local expectations
• A foundational element for industry position on airport and community role
• Speaks to role/extent of community engagement and nature of analyses

ITEM 4

RESPONSE TO MSP FAIRSKIES REQUESTS

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

Item 4: Response to MSP FairSkies Requests

September 20, 2017 NOC Meeting representatives from MSP FairSkies addressed the Committee requesting that NOC/MAC:

• 1. Enhance the NOC with greater stakeholder (citizen) representation
• 2. Establish a goal to reduce noise
• 3. Produce a 55 dB and N65 NEM/Contour

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Enhance NOC with Greater Stakeholder (Citizen) Representation

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ORIGIN MASAC and NOC:

– MASAC disbanded in October 2001 – Blue Ribbon Panel was formed with members from Minneapolis, Eagan, Mendota Heights, Northwest Airlines, MBAA, and UPS. – Dr. John Brandl, Dean of University of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey Institute

• f Public Affairs was retained to review the MASAC issues and provide feedback

to Panel – In June 2002 the Blue Ribbon Panel published its report detailing the NOC framework and bylaws – First NOC meeting was June 23, 2003

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Enhance NOC with Greater Stakeholder (Citizen) Representation

NOC MISSION

Provide a balanced forum for the discussion and evaluation of noise impacts around Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport through the following functions:

– Identify, study and analyze airport noise issues and solutions – Provide policy recommendations or options to the MAC Planning, Development and Environment Committee and Full Commission regarding airport noise issues – Monitor compliance with established noise policy at MSP – Ensure the collection of information and dissemination to the public.

The above functions will be conducted in a manner that considers public and airport user concerns, taking into consideration public input/information from the following channels of communication:

– MAC Noise Program Office – MAC Noise Program Office Website – MSP Noise News newsletter – MAC noise complaint and information hotline – Governmental body official policy development processes – MAC public hearings – MAC informational meetings – Individual NOC members – MAC Planning, Development and Environment Committee – Metropolitan Airports Commission meetings

EXECUTING THE NOC MISSION

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Enhance NOC with Greater Stakeholder (Citizen) Representation

Identify, study and analyze airport noise issues and solutions – 320, 340, and 360 departure headings – Westside Cargo Engine Start Procedure – Runway 12L and 12R Arrival Study Provide policy recommendations or options to the MAC Planning, Development and Environment Committee and full Commission regarding airport noise issues – MSP LTCP and environmental review input – 64-60 DNL noise mitigation program – Second amendment to the Consent Decree – RNAV SID resolution – CRO environmental review resolution Monitor compliance with established noise policy at MSP – SIP annual report – Annual Noise Contour Report – Monthly reports – OPD Analysis Application Ensure the collection of information and dissemination to the public. – MACNOMS – Website and interactive reports – Communication Enhancement Plan:

• Noise basics videos and factsheets
• Listening sessions

CITIZEN INPUT GUIDING NOC ACTION

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Enhance NOC with Greater Stakeholder (Citizen) Representation

– 12L and 12R Arrival Study – Expert Presentation on Aircraft Arrival Landing Gear Extension Procedures – Investigate Noise Reduction Benefits from Vortex Generators on Airbus Aircraft – Analyze Trends in Wind and the Relationship to Aircraft Noise Complaints – Eagan-Mendota Heights Corridor Turboprop Analysis – Investigate Noise-Reducing Landscaping Options – Quantify Noise Reduction Benefits of Vortex Generators on Airbus Aircraft Arrivals at MSP – Evaluate Distant Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) Use at MSP – Develop a New, or Append to an Existing Monthly Report, Evaluation of the Eagan-Mendota Heights Corridor Turboprop Activity – Evaluate Steeper Glide Slopes for Aircraft Arrivals

Item 4: NOC Action – FairSkies Request: Enhance NOC with Greater Stakeholder (Citizen) Representation

Does the Committee feel that changes are needed to provide greater stakeholder (citizen) representation on the NOC?

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Noise Reduction Goal

CONTEXT: WHO REGULATES AIRCRAFT NOISE

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Noise Reduction Goal

CONTEXT: 1990 Airport Noise and Capacity Act

U.S. Congress Found That: – Aviation noise management is critical to the continued increase in airport capacity. – Community noise concerns led to uncoordinated and inconsistent restrictions on aviation that could impede the national air transportation system. – Local interests in aviation noise management shall be considered in determining the national interest. – A noise policy must be carried out at a national level. – Revenues controlled by the U.S. government can help solve noise problems and carry with them a responsibility to the national airport system. Results of 1990 ANCA: – All aircraft over 75,000 pounds to be Stage 3 by year 2000 – Availability of federal funds and PFCs tied to provisions on acceptability of access restrictions. – National program for the review of airport noise and access restrictions - 14 CFR Part 161

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Noise Reduction Goal

CONTEXT: FAR PART 161

Notice of Approval of Noise and Access Restrictions: – Broad view of what constitutes a restriction Major Components: – Cost v. benefit analysis – Extensive documentation and public notice – FAA approval of restriction – six major conditions

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Noise Reduction Goal

CONTEXT: FAR PART 161 Analysis

14 CFR § 161.305:

– Must provide “…..an analysis that supports, by substantial evidence, that the six statutory conditions for approval have been met for each restriction and any alternatives submitted.” – Cost v. benefit is a major component – use of FAR Part 150 Land Use Compatibility Criteria – Provides specific information/analyses requirements to demonstrate that various conditions are being met to establish statutory compliance

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Noise Reduction Goal

CONTEXT: FAR PART 161 ANALYSIS (CONT.)

14 CFR § 161.305 – Six Conditions: Condition 1: The restriction is reasonable, non-arbitrary, and nondiscriminatory. Condition 2: The restriction does not create an undue burden on interstate or foreign commerce. Condition 3: The proposed restriction maintains safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. Condition 4: The proposed restriction does not conflict with any existing Federal statute or regulation. Condition 5: The applicant has provided adequate opportunity for public comment on the proposed restriction. Condition 6: The proposed restriction does not create an undue burden on the national aviation system. Failure to Comply 14 CFR § 161.501(b): “Under no conditions shall any airport operator receive revenues or collect a passenger facility charge under section 1113(e) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 if the FAA determines that the airport is imposing any noise or access restriction not in compliance with the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 or this part.”

Item 4: Background – FairSkies Request: Noise Reduction Goal

CHARACTERISTICS OF WELL-SET GOALS – S.M.A.R.T. PRINCIPLE

Item 4: NOC Action – FairSkies Request: Noise Reduction Goal

Does the Committee wish to set a specific noise reduction goal, and if so, what should the goal be?

Item 3: NOC Action – FairSkies Request: NOC/MAC Publish 55 dB DNL and N65 Contours & NEMs

Does the Committee recommend publication of 55 dB DNL and N65 noise contours and NEMs?

During the meeting The Committee decided to delay the presentation

• f this report until its March 2018

meeting

ITEM 5

ANNUAL FLEET MIX AND NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS REPORT

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

Item 5: Annual Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

The 2018 NOC Work Plan includes an assessment of current fleet mix and nighttime

• perational trends.

At the November 2017 NOC meeting, MAC staff committed to incorporating suggestions from NOC members and develop a year-end Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report. The report includes updated 2017 data as well as the following additions:

• 2017 Carrier Jet Usage and Certificated Noise Levels chart
• Average Altitude for Aircraft Arrivals and Departures
• Percent Contribution to Nighttime Total included in the tables
• Noise Level Certification range included in the table
• Nighttime Operations by Origin and Destination tables
• Nighttime Operations by Hour
• 2017 Scheduled versus Actual Operations

Item 5: Annual Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 JAN-13 MAR-13 MAY-13 JUL-13 SEP-13 NOV-13 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17 MSP OPERATIONS THOUSANDS

MONTHLY CARRIER JET COUNTS BY TYPE

NARROWBODY WIDEBODY RJ

HUSHKIT BY YEAR: 2013 - 71, 2014 - 37, 2015 - 26, 2016 - 48, 2017 - 26

WIDEBODY TYPE 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 A124 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% A225 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% A300 0.03% 0.07% 0.07% 0.03% 0.03% A310 0.01% 0.01% 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% A330 0.75% 0.69% 0.73% 0.68% 0.80% A340 0.00% 0.05% 0.07% 0.06% 0.07% A350 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% A380 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% B742 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% B744 0.01% 0.08% 0.03% 0.01% 0.01% B748 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% B762 0.12% 0.14% 0.14% 0.14% 0.15% B763 0.55% 0.83% 0.74% 0.90% 0.49% B764 0.19% 0.21% 0.22% 0.24% 0.01% B767 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% B777 0.18% 0.10% 0.17% 0.18% 0.38% B7878 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% DC10 0.20% 0.19% 0.24% 0.13% 0.27% MD11 0.51% 0.54% 0.51% 0.61% 0.46% TOTAL 2.56% 2.92% 2.94% 2.98% 2.70%

A330 B763 MD11

Item 5: Annual Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

A319 / A320 B738 MD90

Item 5: Annual Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

NARROWBODY TYPE 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 A318 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% A319 5.98% 7.54% 7.91% 7.23% 6.77% A320 8.35% 9.61% 9.02% 9.89% 7.10% A320-NEO 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% 0.24% A321 0.47% 0.72% 0.84% 0.46% 0.53% B717 0.83% 0.59% 1.48% 2.36% 5.24% B72Q 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% B733 1.12% 0.75% 0.85% 0.67% 0.35% B734 0.04% 0.04% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% B735 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% B7377 4.43% 5.01% 4.83% 4.83% 5.03% B738 4.53% 5.62% 6.78% 7.82% 9.76% B739 0.13% 0.77% 2.81% 3.78% 5.03% B73Q 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% B737-MAX 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% B757 6.89% 6.47% 6.39% 5.80% 5.89% DC8Q 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% DC9Q 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MD80 4.03% 3.72% 3.52% 3.59% 2.47% MD90 7.84% 6.78% 8.25% 7.61% 8.83% TOTAL 44.66% 47.62% 52.73% 54.11% 57.29%

Item 5: Annual Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

REGIONAL JET TYPE 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BA46 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% CRJ 16.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% CRJ1 0.01% 0.10% 0.00% 0.13% 0.06% CRJ2 9.33% 21.40% 17.26% 17.14% 16.17% CRJ7 4.11% 4.23% 3.39% 2.75% 4.82% CRJ9 7.60% 10.96% 14.70% 13.71% 11.29% E135 1.30% 0.06% 0.09% 0.08% 0.07% E145 0.67% 1.85% 1.24% 0.22% 0.07% E170 13.22% 10.60% 7.37% 8.67% 7.04% E175 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% E190 0.40% 0.23% 0.25% 0.20% 0.47% F28 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% J328 0.03% 0.03% 0.02% 0.01% 0.01% TOTAL 52.77% 49.46% 44.33% 42.91% 40.01%

CRJ2 CRJ9 E170

STAGE 3 STAGE 4 STAGE 5 6.77% 7.10% 0.24% 0.53% 5.24% 0.35% 5.03% 9.76% 5.03% 0.01% 5.89% 2.47% 8.83% 16.17% 4.82% 11.29% 0.07% 0.07% 7.04% 0.47% 0.03% 0.80% 0.07% 0.01% 0.00% 0.15% 0.49% 0.01% 0.38% 0.01% 0.27% 0.46%

• 40
• 35
• 30
• 25
• 20
• 15
• 10
• 5

A319 A320 A320-NEO A321 B717 B737-300 B737-700 B737-800 B737-900 B737-MAX B757 MD80 MD90 CRJ2 CRJ7 CRJ9 E135 E145 E170 E190 A300 A330 A340 B744 B748 B762 B763 B764 B777 B7878 DC10 MD11 CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVEL BELOW STAGE 3 LIMITS (EPNDB)

2017 MSP CARRIER JET USAGE WITH CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVELS

NARROWBODY REGIONAL JET WIDEBODY

SOURCE: USAGE DATA: MACNOMS; NOISE CERTIFICATION DATA: EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY

CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVELS REPRESENTED AS A RANGE TO ACCOUNT FOR MULTIPLE CERTIFICATION VARIABLES (WEIGHT, MODEL, ENGINE TYPE, AIRFRAME CONFIGURATION, ETC)

CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVEL RANGE

Item 5: Annual Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

Item 5: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 JAN-13 MAR-13 MAY-13 JUL-13 SEP-13 NOV-13 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

FEET ABOVE MSP FIELD ELEVATION

AVERAGE ALTITUDE FOR AIRCRAFT ARRIVING TO MSP

NARROWBODY RJ WIDEBODY

MEASUREMENT POINT IS 3 NAUTICAL MILES FROM THE THRESHOLD OF THE ARRIVAL RUNWAY. FLIGHT TRACK DATA SOURCE CHANGED NOVEMBER 2013.

Item 5: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

MEASUREMENT POINT IS 3 NAUTICAL MILES FROM THE START OF TAKEOFF ROLL. FLIGHT TRACK DATA SOURCE CHANGED NOVEMBER 2013.

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 JAN-13 MAR-13 MAY-13 JUL-13 SEP-13 NOV-13 JAN-14 MAR-14 MAY-14 JUL-14 SEP-14 NOV-14 JAN-15 MAR-15 MAY-15 JUL-15 SEP-15 NOV-15 JAN-16 MAR-16 MAY-16 JUL-16 SEP-16 NOV-16 JAN-17 MAR-17 MAY-17 JUL-17 SEP-17 NOV-17

FEELT ABOVE MSP FIELD ELEVATION

AVERAGE ALTITUDE FOR AIRCRAFT DEPARTING FROM MSP

NARROWBODY RJ WIDEBODY

Item 5: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

73 70 45 48 43 46 51 59 69 66 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 AVERAGE DAILY OPERATIONS

AVERAGE DAILY NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS 10:30 PM - 6:00 AM

Item 4: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS BY RUNWAY

(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

BLUE: 2014 - 2016 AVERAGE BLACK: 2017

Item 4: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS BY AIRLINE TOP 15 BY COUNT

(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

2017 AIRLINE ID COUNT PERCENT OF AIRLINE OPERATIONS' OCCURRING AT NIGHT PERCENT OF CONTRIBUTION TO NIGHT TIME TOTAL DELTA DAL 5,896 4.10% 26.08% SUN COUNTRY SCX 3,735 17.80% 16.52% AMERICAN AAL 2,417 14.10% 10.69% SOUTHWEST SWA 2,234 12.70% 9.88% SKYWEST AIRLINES SKW 1,887 2.40% 8.35% UNITED UAL 1,248 14.40% 5.52% SPIRIT NKS 1,239 13.50% 5.48% UPS UPS 874 31.90% 3.87% REPUBLIC AIRLINES RPA 721 8.40% 3.19% FEDEX FDX 635 23.90% 2.81% ENDEAVOR AIR EDV 491 1.30% 2.17% FRONTIER AIRLINES FFT 420 18.40% 1.86% MESA AIRLINES ASH 323 9.10% 1.43% ALASKA ASA 298 19.20% 1.32% COMPASS CPZ 188 1.90% 0.83%

*AIRLINE OPERATIONS OCCURRING AT NIGHT REPRSENTS THE PERCENTAGE OF RESPECTIVE AIRLINE SCHEDULE THAT OCCURS AT NIGHT *CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL IS RESPECTIVE AIRLINE CONTRIBUTIONS TO OVERALL MSP NIGHT OPERATIONS

Item 4: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS BY AIRCRAFT TOP 15 BY COUNT

(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

AIRCRAFT CODE DESCRIPTION COUNT NOISE LEVEL CERTIFICATION

(EPNdB BELOW STAGE 3)

B738 BOEING 737-800 6,071 11.3 - 17.1 B757 BOEING 757-200 2,552 11.1 - 22.1 B7377 BOEING 737-700 2,549 11.6 - 19.8 A320 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A320 1,836 12.1 - 21.2 E170 EMBRAER 170 1,825 9.2 - 16.8 B739 BOEING 737-900 1,813 10.9 - 16.1 A319 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A319 1,166 12.9 - 22.2 CRJ9 CANADAIR REGIONAL JET CRJ-900 958 14.5 - 17.6 MD90 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS MD90 774 23.4 - 27.2 CRJ2 CANADAIR REGIONAL JET CRJ-200 601 26.5 - 30.6 B717 BOEING 717 535 19.2 - 23.0 A321 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A321 518 6.4 - 17.0 CRJ7 CANADAIR REGIONAL JET CRJ-700 418 14.5 - 17.6 MD11 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS MD11 384 12.8 - 17.9 A330 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A330 271 11.7 - 21.1

NOISE CERTIFICATION DATA SOURCE: EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY CUMULATIVE CERTIFICATED NOISE LEVELS REPRESENTED AS A RANGE BELOW STAGE 3 NOISE LEVELS TO ACCOUNT FOR MULTIPLE CERTIFICATION VARIABLES (WEIGHT, MODEL, ENGINE TYPE, AIRFRAME CONFIGURATION, ETC)

Item 4: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS BY ORIGIN AND DESTINATION TOP 15 BY COUNT

(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

MSP ARRIVALS

AIRPORT CODE ORIGIN AIRPORT COUNT LAX LOS ANGELES 1,343 LAS LAS VEGAS 1,338 SFO SAN FRANCISCO 1,101 PHX PHOENIX 1,029 DEN DENVER 928 ATL ATLANTA 881 ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 783 SEA SEATTLE 779 DCA WASHINGTON D.C. (REAGAN NATIONAL) 594 SDF LOUISVILLE 486 MEM MEMPHIS 460 DFW DALLAS/ FORT WORTH 381 PANC TED STAVENS ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL 354 MDW CHICAGO (MIDWAY) 348 CLT CHARLOTTE 347 MSP DEPARTURES AIRPORT CODE DESTINATION AIRPORT COUNT ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 534 ATL ATLANTA 473 CLT CHARLOTTE 361 IAH HOUSTON 322 DEN DENVER 305 PHX PHOENIX 232 TVF THEIF RIVER FALLS REGIONAL 189 FLL

• FT. LAUDERDALE

167 LAS LAS VEGAS 152 STL ST LOUIS 126 GFK GRAND FORKS 121 MSN MADISON 116 DLH DULUTH 104 MOT MINOT 104 GEG SPOKANE 102

Item 4: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS BY HOUR

(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

2,617 694 313 456 1,577 6,415 4,634 7,535

2017

2,191 760379 392 1,272 6,325 4,154 6,255

2013 - 2016 AVERAGE

Item 4: Annual MSP Fleet Mix and Nighttime Operations Report

(10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

SOURCE: MACNOMS FLIGHT TRACKING DATA FOR ACTUAL COUNT OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE (OAG), UPS AND FEDEX REPORTING FOR SCHEDULED COUNT OAG DOES NOT REPORT ALL MSP AIRLINE AND CARGO SCHEDULES. 4.4 0.1 0.00.5 2.3 13.2 5.9 17.4

AVERAGE DAILY SCHEDULED NIGHT OPERATIONS

7.2 1.90.9 1 4.3 17.6 12.7 20.6

AVERAGE DAILY ACTUAL NIGHT OPERATIONS

2017 NIGHTTIME SCHEDULED VERSUS ACTUAL OPERATIONS

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

ITEM 6

VORTEX GENERATOR NOISE MONITORING STUDY During the meeting The Committee decided to delay the presentation of this report until its March 2018 meeting

ITEM 7

SUPER BOWL COMMUNICATION PLAN UPDATE

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

ITEM 8

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018

ITEM 9

ANNOUNCEMENTS

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, 2018 Winter Listening Session Tuesday, January 30, 2018 @ 7:00 PM Mount Olivet Lutheran Church 5025 Knox Ave South Minneapolis, MN 55419 Next NOC Meeting Wednesday, March 21, 2018 @ 1:30 PM MAC General Offices