no muon excess in eas at 100 pev results of eas msu
play

No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment Mikhail Kuznetsov In collaboration with S. Troitsky, G. Rubtsov, I. Karpikov (INR RAS) Yu. Fomin, N. Kalmykov, G. Kulikov and V. Sulakov (SINP MSU) Astropart.Phys. 92, 1 (2017)


  1. No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment Mikhail Kuznetsov In collaboration with S. Troitsky, G. Rubtsov, I. Karpikov (INR RAS) Yu. Fomin, N. Kalmykov, G. Kulikov and V. Sulakov (SINP MSU) Astropart.Phys. 92, 1 (2017) ICRC-2017, Busan, July 2017 Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

  2. Outline Motivation: study of muons in extensive air showers (EAS) The EAS-MSU experiment The method of muon excess description Results & Conclusions Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

  3. Motivation: study of muons in EAS Muon content of EAS as a tool for study the hadronic interactions at high energies. At highest energies ( E CR > 10 19 eV ) the presence of “muon excess” is well established. The cosmic-ray energy ∼ 10 19 eV correspond to ∼ 100 TeV LHC energy. The “muon excess” is the overabundance of muons in a real EAS comparing to high-energy hadronic models predictions. Published results for EAS muon content in various parameter regions Experiment X , E , eV E µ , r / r 0 θ µ excess g/cm 2 GeV 10 17 − 10 18 HiRes-MIA 860 � 0 . 85 � 10 N/A yes � 10 19 PAO 880 � 1 � 10 70 ◦ yes � 10 19 Yakutsk 1020 � 1 � 10 45 ◦ yes 10 15 − 10 17 13 ◦ mean IceTop 680 � 0 . 2 � 3 no For TA muon results see R. Takeishi poster on 18.07 Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

  4. EAS-MSU experiment 60 ○ ● 40 ○ ● ○ ● ○ ○ 20 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ○ ○ ○ ■ ■ ■ ○ ○ ○ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Y,m ■ ● ● ■ ■ 0 ■ ● ■ ■ ■ ○ ○ ● ■ ■ ● ○ ○ ■ ■ ○ ○ ○ ■ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ - 20 ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ● ○ - 40 ○ ● - 60 - 60 - 40 - 20 0 20 40 60 X, m 77 surface detectors with Geiger counters, 29 scintillators for timing Effective for EAS with ∼ 0 . 5 km 2 area 10 15 . 5 � E primary � 10 17 . 75 eV Underground muon detector ( E µ ≥ 10 GeV) ∼ 1500 days of operation (1982-1990) Total ∼ 10 6 EASes detected Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

  5. Monte-Carlo & reconstruction I Full Monte-Carlo simulation Yu. Fomin et al., JINST 11, T08005 (2016) CORSIKA (p + Fe primaries) + EGS4 + Fluka + QGSJetII 10 15 . 5 ≤ E primary ≤ 10 17 . 75 eV , dN dE ∼ E − 3 . 1 avg. of PDG 2014 spectra ⇓ C ++ code simulating the facility ⇓ Reconstruction with the same code as for data Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

  6. Monte-Carlo & reconstruction I Full Monte-Carlo simulation Yu. Fomin et al., JINST 11, T08005 (2016) CORSIKA (p + Fe primaries) + EGS4 + Fluka + QGSJetII 10 15 . 5 ≤ E primary ≤ 10 17 . 75 eV , dN dE ∼ E − 3 . 1 avg. of PDG 2014 spectra ⇓ C ++ code simulating the facility ⇓ Reconstruction with the same code as for data SD reconstruction parameters N e — number of charged particles All particle lateral distribution function S — shower age parameter (LDF) � � ( S + α ( r / r 0 ) − 2) θ, φ — shower zenith and ⇒ r ρ ( S , r ) ∼ N e · × r 0 azimuthal angle � � ( S + α ( r / r 0 ) − 4 . 5) r r 0 + 1 R — shower core distance from the array center r 0 ≃ 80 m — is the Moliere radius Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

  7. Monte-Carlo & reconstruction II Selection cuts 1 σ accuracy of the reconstruction for N e > 2 · 10 7 ( E MC � 10 16 . 5 eV for p / Fe mix ∆ ψ < 1 . 1 ◦ — arrival direction p-primaries) R < 240 m ∆ R < 5 . 7 m — axis position θ < 30 ◦ ∆ N e / N e < 0 . 17 — number of charged particles 0 . 3 < S < 1 . 8 The efficiency is � 95% Total exposure is 7 . 7 × 10 6 km s sr , 809 events selected Primary energy reconstruction 8.8 × × × × × + × × × × × × + × × × × × × + × × + × × × × × × × × × × + + + × × + × × + + × × × × × × + + + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + + + + + + × × × × + × × + + + + × + × + + 8.6 × × × × × × + × × × + + × + + + × + + + + + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + + + × × × × × × × × × × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × × × × × × × × + × + + + + For best fit p / Fe mix: × × × × × × × × × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + × × × × × + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + × × × + + + × × × × × × × × × × × × + × + + + + × × × × × × × × + + + + 8.4 × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + + × × × × × + × × × + + + + × × × + + + + + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + + + + + + + + + + × × × + × × + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + + + + × + × × × × + × × + × + × × × × × × × + × × × + × × × × + + × × + + + + + log( E / GeV ) = 0 . 65 + log 10 N e × × × × × + + + + + + + log 10 E / GeV × × × × × × × × × × × × ×× × × × × × × × × × × × × × + + × + + × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × + × + × × × + + + × × × + + × × × × + × + × + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + × × + + + + + × + × + + + 8.2 + × × × × × + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × + + + × × × × × + × + + + + + + + × × × × × × ×× × × × × × × + + + + + + + + × × × × × × × + × × × + + + + + + × + + × × × × × × × × + × × + × + + + × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + + × × × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × + × × × × × × × × × × × × × + × × × × × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × + × × × × × + × + × × + × × × × × × × + × × × × × + + + × + + + + + + + + ⇓ × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × + × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × × × × × × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × × × × × × + × + × + + × × × + + × + + 8.0 × × × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + × + + + × × × + + × + + + + + + + + × × × + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + ∆ E / E < 0 . 41 (1 σ ) + + + + + + + + + + + + 7.8 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 7.6 + + + + + + 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.4 log 10 ( N e ) Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

  8. Monte–Carlo: SD chemical composition Chemical composition from the fit of SD data over LDF S -parameter. � � ( S + α ( r / r 0 ) − 2) � � ( S + α ( r / r 0 ) − 4 . 5) r r ρ ( S , r ) ∼ N e · r 0 + 1 × r 0 Data vs. MC p and MC Fe Data fitted with MC p/Fe mix 400 500 400 300 numberof events numberof events 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 0.5 1.0 1.5 S S N p N Fe N p + N Fe = 43% , N p + N Fe = 57% Cf. the results of other experiments. KASCADE-Grande: 41% p , 59% Fe . Tunka-133: 49% p , 51% Fe . Mikhail Kuznetsov No muon excess in EAS at 100 PeV: results of EAS-MSU experiment

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend