NICE a HUSUKS EXPERIENCE Navigating the Highly Specialised - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nice a husuk s experience
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NICE a HUSUKS EXPERIENCE Navigating the Highly Specialised - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NICE a HUSUKS EXPERIENCE Navigating the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme FindacureWorkshop 29 January 2016 INTRODUCTION aHUSUK Len Woodward A Founding Trustee of aHUSUK Not a patient No clinical background


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NICE – aHUSUK’S EXPERIENCE

Navigating the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme FindacureWorkshop 29 January 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

INTRODUCTION – aHUSUK

 Len Woodward  A Founding Trustee of aHUSUK  Not a patient  No clinical background  Professional Accountant  Used to be retired  1 of 4 Trustees who do all the work of the charity

slide-3
SLIDE 3

INTRODUCTION – aHUS AND ECULIZUMAB

 Atypical Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome (aHUS)  Uncontrolled Complement- innate immune system  Excessive clotting ,anaemia and renal failure or worse  Eculizumab  Complement inhibitor  Already approved for another condition Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haematuria  Drug also centre of a very public campaign for Dense Deposit Disease use

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DISCLOSURE “Of course we are delighted for every sufferer of aHUS and their families. But we also recognise something very important has just occurred. This is the first time NICE (HST) has evaluated a rare disease ultra-orphan drug. We are impressed with the committee’s approach and believe that NICE has demonstrated a vision, willingness and capability to devise a process for evaluation of other such complex technologies to address the needs of those who seek equity of access to treatments of their severe rare diseases.”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

AGNSS: BACKGROUND

 Advisory Group for NHS Specialised Services  Early 2011 - Alexion/Professor Tim Goodship sought for it to evaluate Eculizumab for aHUS  June 2011 - First aHUS Patients and Families Conference in Newcastle upon Tyne  Patients found out about aHUS, Eculizumab and AGNSS  Need for patient input and a patient organisation to do it

slide-6
SLIDE 6

AGNSS : TIMELINE(1)

Septembe r-October 2011

  • aHUSUK formed to give patient voice for the evaluation
  • Scoping meeting 5 weeks after formation

February 2012

  • Design of patient evidence submission
  • Experience Report –Spectrum of Patients

March – May 2012

  • Support from consultants to undertake and record

interviews

  • The Report- Consultants/Patient Voice Trustee
  • aHUSUK trustees approve draft
slide-7
SLIDE 7

PATIENT EVIDENCE SUBMISSION: EXPERIENCE REPORT - METHODS

 A piece of qualitative research about what it is like to live with aHUS  What the aHUS experience is like from on set to treatments ( living with dialysis)  Conducted by trustee for Patient Voice, Toucan Associates , aHUS patients , carers and families  Devised questions , recorded interviews , transcription and analysis  16 interviewees; spread of age , treatments , outcomes for patients  3 case studies of Eculizumab use

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Age/ gender Interviewee Patient/family experience Girl, 9 months Mother In remission after treatment with Eculizumab. Child Mother 4 children who died as a result of aHUS, 3 as babies, 1 at age 7. Boy, 2 years Grandmother In remission after plasma exchange. Grandmother lost 2 of her own children to aHUS as babies. Girl, 5 years Father Receiving dialysis at home, awaiting transplant, receiving Eculizumab. Girl, 7 years Mother Receiving plasma exchange and on long-term dialysis Boy, 13 years Mother In remission. Young female adult Patient and sibling (2 interviews) Has end stage renal failure and is receiving dialysis at home. Transplant failed. Working. Young female adult Patient and husband (3 interviews) Has end stage renal failure and is receiving dialysis at home. Transplant failed. Retired due to ill-health. Young female adult Patient/husband/daughter (3 interviews) Has end stage renal failure and is receiving dialysis in hospital. Transplant failed. Retired due to ill-health. Adult late onset – female Patient In remission after treatment with Eculizumab. Adult late onset - female Patient Has end stage renal failure and is receiving dialysis at home. Transplant failed.

Table 1: Characteristics of the interviewees

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PATIENT EVIDENCE SUBMISSION: EXPERIENCE REPORT - METHODS

 A piece of qualitative research about what it is like to live with aHUS  What the aHUS experience is like from on set to treatments ( living with dialysis)  Conducted by trustee for Patient Voice, Toucan Associates , aHUS patients , carers and families  Devised questions , recorded interviews , transcription and analysis  16 interviewees; spread of age , treatments , outcomes for patients  3 case studies of Eculizumab use  Identify common themes, general conclusions and relevant supporting quotations from interviewees  30 pages of evidence

slide-10
SLIDE 10

AGNSS : TIMELINE(1)

Septembe r-October 2011

  • aHUSUK formed to give patient voice for the evaluation
  • Scoping meeting 5 weeks after formation

February 2012

  • Design of patient evidence submission
  • Experience Report –Spectrum of Patients

March – May 2012

  • Support from consultants to undertake and record

interviews

  • The Report- Consultants/Patient Voice Trustee
  • aHUSUK trustees approve draft
slide-11
SLIDE 11

PATIENT EVIDENCE SUBMISSION: EXPERIENCE REPORT: OUTCOME

 Not as hard on the interviewees as was expected  Took up a lot of Patient Voice Trustee’s time.  The transcription of the recorded interviews is hard work  Finding adult male patients to participate in interviews difficult  Not only learned a lot about aHUS but also the methodology  http://ahusuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/aHUSUK-Experiences-Document.pdf

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AGNSS : TIMELINE (2)

June 2012

  • AGNSS MEETING
  • 5 minute presentation and Experience Report
  • 7 month wait begins to hear outcome
  • total unwillingness to tell us anything
  • Health and Social Care Act 2012 victims

January 2013

  • AGNSS recommended eculizumab for aHUS
  • Clinical and patient case made
  • Minister wanted advice on “affordability” from NICE
  • We were not happy!
slide-13
SLIDE 13

FROM AGNSS TO NICE

 “Affordability”, “Value for Money”, “Wise use of Resources”, “ Cost effectiveness”, “use of limited funds” - depended on who you wrote to.  No one mentioned “opportunity cost” “ Excessive Profits”

March 2013

  • Met NICE likely timeline/patient numbers/correct finance

professional

  • IFRs again -OK for children not for adults

April 2013

  • Clinical Priorities Advisory Group 1 – all new onsets in scope

July 2013

  • Clinical Priorities Advisory Group 2 – dialysis patients in scope

NICE

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NICE : TIMELINE (1)

July – September 2013

  • Scoping begins
  • Evidence submission: Experience Report with additional patients from Wales
  • Some amendment to NICE “form”
  • Patient Experts Chosen

November

  • December

2013

  • Receipt of evidence pre meeting (700 pages!)
  • First HST Committee Meeting
  • No presentation but patient submission accepted
  • “ compelling case for a call on NHS resources for an unmet need”

March 2014

  • Evaluation Consultation Document 1 ( delayed 1 week from original date notified)
  • Minded not to recommend – insufficient explanation of price and size of budget

resource needed and its impact on other National Specialised Services.

  • We were not happy !
slide-15
SLIDE 15

NICE: TIMELINE (2)

May 2014

  • Responded but mainly on matters finance- own financial model
  • Made a better stab at it even though unable to see key data

June-July 2014

  • Made efforts to get parties together to discuss price
  • Alexion willing they say, NICE do not
  • Found out about PPRS 2014 (PAS/Governance Tolerances/Rebates)
  • Delayed by a report on financial comparisons of eculizumab with other highly

specialised therapies

August 2014

  • Second HST Committee meeting
  • We were not happy
slide-16
SLIDE 16

NICE : TIMELINE (3)

September 2014

  • Evaluation Consideration Document 2 recommends with conditions
  • aHUSUK financial model acknowledged as nearer the mark
  • Doses and withdrawal introduced by aHUSUK featured as a condition
  • Cost per patient more affordable if not yet seen as more “affordable”
  • PPRS 2014

October – November 2014

  • Third HST Committee meeting
  • Final Evaluation Determination

January – April 2015

  • Final Guidance
  • Policy introduced by NHS England
slide-17
SLIDE 17

AHUSUK- CONCLUDING ADVICE

 Worth investing time in a qualitative research report about patient experience  Use consultant services if offered and you do not have administrative resources and you could benefit from an independent advisor  Presentation or no presentation at meeting – ambivalent, both work depends on you  Understand and accept the process project structure with “stages” and “products”  Recognise the bigger part that patient organisations can play in the quality review of those “products” including financial matters and specific clinical issues  It is evidence based and positive looking- for reasons to be minded to say “yes”  Use the support offered by the public involvement team it is a good relationship to have.  It helps confidence though to have a proven very clinically effective therapy – we had eculizumab!