Nearshore ecological status and changes: spatial and temporal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nearshore ecological status and changes spatial and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nearshore ecological status and changes: spatial and temporal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nearshore ecological status and changes: spatial and temporal variation in biological communities and implications for understanding the nearshore zone of Lake Tahoe Andrea Caires, Dr. Sudeep Chandra, Christine Ka Lai Ngai, John Umek, Dr.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nearshore ecological status and changes: spatial and temporal variation in biological communities and implications for understanding the nearshore zone of Lake Tahoe

Andrea Caires, Dr. Sudeep Chandra, Christine Ka Lai Ngai, John Umek, Dr. Barbara Hayford, Scott Hackley, Dr. John Reuter, Brant Allen

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Nearshore Lake Tahoe

Photo by J. Umek Photo by C. Ngai Photo by C. Ngai

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Nearshore Communities in Lake Tahoe

Photo by M. Wittmann Illustrated by S. Adler and L. Hennessy, funded by UC Davis TERC Photo by S. Hackley

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Importance of Nearshore Communities

  • Ecosystem function

– Sediment mixing, organic matter breakdown, nutrient processing, food web interactions

  • Interface between terrestrial and aquatic

environments

– Nutrient exchange, food web interactions

  • Anthropogenic values

– Recreation, aesthetic value

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Monitoring Efforts in Nearshore Lake Tahoe

  • Invertebrate Surveys

– “Hard substrate” collections: lake vacuum (2009) – “Soft substrate” collections: benthic dredge (2008-09) – Crayfish collections: minnow trapping (2009)

Photo by J. Umek

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Fish Surveys

– Nearshore minnow trapping and snorkel surveys – Marina electrofishing collections

Photos by C. Ngai Photo by J. Umek

Monitoring Efforts in Nearshore Lake Tahoe

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Algal Surveys

– Annual monitoring by TERC, UC Davis

Photo by S. Hackley

Monitoring Efforts in Nearshore Lake Tahoe

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Nearshore Community Spatial Patterns

* * * * * * * *

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Invertebrates Densities Driven by Periphyton?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Total Invertebrate Density vs. Chl a

*Relationship driven by:

  • Chironomidae (midges)
  • Ephemeroptera (mayflies)
  • Utacapnia tahoensis (endemic stonefly)
  • Gastropoda (snails)
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Total Invertebrate Richness vs. Chl a

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Crayfish CPUE vs. Chl a

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Minnow (Redside Shiner and Speckled Dace) CPUE vs. Chl a

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Native Minnow Distribution

10 20

CPUE (total catch/12h)

2009 June

Tui chub Tahoe Sucker Speckeled dace Redside

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Jul-99 Aug-03 Aug-06 Aug-07 Jul-08 Jul-09

Time (min)

  • No. fish captured

Native WW Non Native Shock Time (min)

Fish Composition in Tahoe Keys

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Marina vs. Non-marina Invertebrate Communities

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Historical vs. Contemporary Nearshore Communities

TERC State of the Lake 2010

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Historical vs. Contemporary Periphyton Communities

  • Elevated periphyton communities in Tahoe

City area since at least the 1960s

– Abrahamsson 1970 – California-Nevada-Federal Joint Water Quality Investigation of Lake Tahoe, July 1969 – June 1970 – Goldman 1970

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Historical vs. Contemporary Invertebrate Densities

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Historical vs. Contemporary Invertebrate Community Structure Shifts

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Historical vs. Contemporary Invertebrate Community Structure Shifts

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Historical vs. Contemporary Native Minnow Communities

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary

  • Hotspots of invertebrate and periphyton assemblages

– Hard Substrate: northwestern corner of the lake

  • Spring periphyton growth appears to have a positive

influence on invertebrate communities later in the season

  • Native minnow communities show a spatial pattern that

differs from periphyton and invertebrate patterns

  • Marinas support a higher abundance of invertebrates and

higher numbers of non-native fish species

  • Historical vs. contemporary community patterns

– Periphyton and invertebrates appear to show similar spatial patterns in contemporary and historical abundance – Shift in nearshore invertebrate community structure – Native fish declines

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Recommendations

  • Concurrent studies of nearshore

communities in order to better understand interactions between taxa

  • Studies of community composition change
  • ver time (emphasis on change in

taxonomic composition and associated implications)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Acknowledgements

Jason Barnes Robert Barnes Raph Townsend Marianne Denton Joe Sullivan Yasuko Nakano Jun Takai John Stefka Justin Tiano Cody Deane Sam Buffa

Funding:

California Tahoe Conservancy