Near-urban Agriculture: Challenges & Opportunities Countryside - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

near urban agriculture challenges opportunities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Near-urban Agriculture: Challenges & Opportunities Countryside - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Near-urban Agriculture: Challenges & Opportunities Countryside Workshop November 27, 2007 Town of East Gwillimbury Elbert van Donkersgoed P. Ag. ( Hon.) Executive Director Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee Outline 1.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Near-urban Agriculture: Challenges & Opportunities

Countryside Workshop November 27, 2007 Town of East Gwillimbury

Elbert van Donkersgoed P. Ag. ( Hon.) Executive Director Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Action Committee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Near-urban Agriculture 2

Outline

  • 1. Challenges/opportunities of near-urban

agriculture

  • 2. The market for local food
  • 3. Rethinking the Countryside’s Future
  • 4. The market for local food
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Near-urban Agriculture 3

The Challenges faced by Near- urban Agriculture

  • Complaints from non-farm residents about farm practices
  • Lack of affordable land to purchase
  • Shortages of rental land
  • Loss of local farm services
  • Loss of farm community
  • Problems with moving equipment on congested roads —

every road a commuter road

  • Trespassers
  • No maintenance of infrastructure (water, drainage)
  • Protected farmland — BUT
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Near-urban Agriculture 4

The Advantages of Near-urban Agriculture

There is more change happening in near-urban agriculture than in heartland agriculture

  • Value of production per acre is higher
  • Average farm size is smaller, more divers
  • More opportunity for direct sales, farm shops and pick-

your-own operations

  • Shorter distance to a growing number of farmers’

markets — demand is not being met

  • A large population with a growing interest in local food

and concern about food miles

  • More opportunity agri-tourism
  • More opportunity culinary tourism, locality food
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Near-urban Agriculture 5

Near-urban production per acre is higher

2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 Dollars per Acre Ontario Durham York Peel Halton

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Near-urban Agriculture 6

Near-urban production per acre is higher

2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 Dollars per Acre

Ontario GTA Durham York Peel Halton

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Near-urban Agriculture 7

Importance of the Food Sector to the Economy

  • Food Industry is Canada’s & Toronto’s 2nd

largest manufacturing sector

  • Over $16 Billion of Sales in Toronto alone
  • Directly employs over 50,000 people in GTA

who would not readily find employment elsewhere

  • 12% of the Industrial Workforce
  • Growth of more than 5% per annum
  • Agriculture is among the highest productivity

gains of all economic sectors

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Near-urban Agriculture 8

Ontario is food import dependent — growing gap

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2202 2004 2006 Exports Imports

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Market for Locally Grown Food

Ipsos- Reid, November 2006

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Near-urban Agriculture 10

What would you say are the benefits of buying locally grown fresh fruit and vegetables?

41 43 44 45 46 48 50 53 70 71 41 43 43 44 48 46 52 54 73 72

20 40 60 80

Preserves green belts Environmentally friendly Safer No chemical/synthetic pesticides Healthier Not genetically modified Are cheaper Taste better Supports family farmers Help your local economy

Canada Ontario

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Near-urban Agriculture 11

When buying food in the past six months, how often did you buy locally grown food when it was available?

20 38 42 16 38 45

10 20 30 40 50

Rarely/Never Sometimes Always/Ususally

Canada Ontario

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Rethinking the Near-urban Countryside's Future

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Near-urban Agriculture 13

  • 1. New Developments in Locally

Grown Food

  • Farm Fresh brochures/listings on municipal websites
  • Savour Ontario Trade — B-to-B, culinary
  • Edible Toronto launched
  • World Food Day — celebration led by Alphabet City —

mayor read proclamation

  • Climate Change Action Plan

– Enviro-Food Working Group

  • Food Strategy for Toronto

– The State of Toronto’s Food

  • Speed dating at the Royal
  • GTA AAC at the Royal
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Near-urban Agriculture 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Near-urban Agriculture 15

  • 1. New Developments in Locally

Grown Food

  • Homegrown Ontario — branding Ontario meat

– Alliance = Ontario Pork, Ontario Veal Association and the Ontario Sheep Marketing Agency

  • Agricultural Working Group

– Population profile = food demand profile

  • Update of the GTA Agricultural Profile — 2006 Census
  • BMPs for Culinary Tourism
  • Producing and Marketing Ethnic Food, Nov 27-29
  • TORC Forums: Capturing Local Food Opportunities,

December 4 & 6

  • Locality food??
  • Frequent buyers loyalty card??
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Near-urban Agriculture 16

  • 2. Locally Grown as Community

Economic Development

  • Pent up consumer demand for locally

grown

  • It is not enough to create a venue for

farmers

  • Farmers’ markets and farm shops need

a festive and cultural atmosphere to break away from the “cheap food “past

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Near-urban Agriculture 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Near-urban Agriculture 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Near-urban Agriculture 19

  • 3. Ethnic & Cultural Diversity =

Opportunity

  • Producing and Marketing Ethnic Food, Nov 27-29

– New Markets, New Products, New Farmers – University of Guelph, FarmStart, Ontario Institute of Agrologists, GTA AaC – Bill Sciarappa, Extension Specialist for Ethnic Growers, Rutgers

  • Encouraging researchers to explore the market for ethnic

and culturally diverse food

  • TRCA, Rouge Park considering some of their land for

agriculture

  • FarmlandLink, MarketLink
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Near-urban Agriculture 20

  • 3. Immigrants as % of Total
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Near-urban Agriculture 21

  • 4. Small Farm Enterprise Zones

Issue/Opportunity

– Average size of farms embedded in the LOCAL food system are smaller, more divers and produce more per acre

Action

– Encourage smaller farms – Modify 100 acre minimum – Small farm enterprise zones

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Near-urban Agriculture 22

  • 5. Taxation of On-farm Value-

added Activities

  • Recognize that getting an agricultural product market

ready requires much more than primary production

  • What has to be done to access the big box store regional

distribution system: shelf ready

  • Necessary post harvest handling — take out the field

heat

  • Two regions in the GTA have moderated farm property

tax rates

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Near-urban Agriculture 23

  • 6. Mixed Use Agricultural Zones

Issue/Opportunity

– Primary agricultural production on many existing farm parcels no longer sustains a farm family – Raw material production does not sustain a countryside economy

Action

– Need to allow a greater variety of economic development on a farm to support a family—Primary production by itself is not enough – Encourage a full range of preparing product for market – Encourage a greater mix of uses on existing farms – Cluster developments

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Near-urban Agriculture 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Near-urban Agriculture 25

  • 7. Rethink Agriculture’s

Relationship to Environment

Issue/Opportunity

– Environmental Farm Plans – Nutrient management Act – Sourced Water Protection Act – Greenbelt Act – Provincial Policy Statement (planning) – Society wants more environmental initiatives — legislating to get them but most money spent on one- time changes — cost share

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Near-urban Agriculture 26

  • 7. Rethink Agriculture’s

Relationship to Environment

  • Entry Level Stewardship in the UK
  • Requires a basic level of environmental management
  • Payment of £30 per hectare, per year across the whole

farm

  • Over 50 options to choose from to cover all farming

types

  • Five year agreements with automatic payments sent out

every six months.

  • Farm Environmental Record
  • Whole farm, annual payment, voluntary
  • Followed by Higher Level Stewardship
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Near-urban Agriculture 27

http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/schemes/ els/handbook/default.htm

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Near-urban Agriculture 28

  • 7. Rethink Agriculture’s

Relationship to Environment

  • Charlie Huntersmart
  • Farm manager, College Farm
  • Royal Agricultural College at Cirencester
  • 3,000 acres College Farm
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Near-urban Agriculture 29

  • 8. Enjoying Nature and Taking

Home its Abundance

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Near-urban Agriculture 30

Dominick Ackland, Manager

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Near-urban Agriculture 31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Near-urban Agriculture 32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Near-urban Agriculture 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Near-urban Agriculture 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Near-urban Agriculture 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The Market for Locally Grown Food

Environics 2007 Survey

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Near-urban Agriculture 37

Q22) How often do you buy locally grown fruits, vegetables, or meats? Do you buy them…

Key Differences:

  • Women (57%) are more likely than

men (51%) to buy locally grown fruits, vegetables or meats at least weekly.

  • Post grads (62%) are more likely than

those with high school or less (50%) to buy them at least once a week.

  • Those with unaided awareness of the

Greenbelt (62%) and those who live in the Greenbelt (58%) are more likely to say they buy locally grown fruits, vegetables or meats at least weekly.

  • Regionally, those in Toronto (60%) are

the most likely to say they buy them at least weekly.

Less often, 11% Never, 3% More than

  • nce a week,

12% Once a week, 43% Monthly, 12% Every 2-3 weeks, 17%

2007 Not offered at grocery 29 Not convenient 21 Don't know/care if it is 12 Too expensive 8 Get at 8 Don't know 25

Why never? (n= 21)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Near-urban Agriculture 38

Key Differences:

  • Those aged 18-29 are more likely to

say it makes no difference (38%).

  • Those with unaided awareness of the

Greenbelt (91%) are even more likely to agree that they prefer to buy locally grown fruits, vegetables and meats.

  • Toronto residents are less likely to say

they prefer locally-grown fare (70%), with more saying it doesn’t matter (28%)

Q28) Which of the following statements do you agree with most?

I prefer to buy locally grown fruits, vegetables and meats – 79% It makes no difference to me whether the fruits, vegetables or meats are locally grown or imported – 18% I prefer to buy imported fruits, vegetables and meats – 1% Don’t know – 1%

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Near-urban Agriculture 39

Key Differences:

  • Women (39% and 38%) are more likely to

strongly agree to both, as are those aged 50+ (41%, 41%).

  • Those with children at home are less likely

to strongly agree with either (26%, 31%)

  • There is only a modest correlation with

income on this item, with 31%/35% of those with household incomes below $40,000 agreeing, compared to 38%/37%

  • f those with incomes above $80,000.
  • Those who live in rural areas are more

likely to strongly agree that they would be willing to pay more for locally-grown fruits/vegetables (42%) and meat (42%).

  • Regionally, those in Dufferin-Peel-Halton

are more likely to strongly agree with both (40%, 40%).

  • Those who see the Greenbelt as an

important source of food are more likely to strongly agree with both (43%, 45%).

34% 38% 14% 12% 35% 36% 14% 11%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fruits & Vegetables Meats

Strongly disagree Somewhat disagree Somewhat agree Strongly agree

Q29) I would be willing to pay more for… that were locally grown or raised

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Near-urban Agriculture 40

Q30) Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree that locally grown food… ?

Key Differences:

  • Women are more likely to strongly

agree that locally grown food is fresher (77%) and tastes better (58%).

  • Those who live in the Greenbelt are

more likely to see that locally grown foods support the Greenbelt (65%).

  • Those in rural areas are more likely to

strongly agree that it preserves farmland (75%), is fresher (79%) and tastes better (63%).

85% 13% 1% 1% 82% 15% 2% 1% 74% 21% 3% 1% 70% 24% 3% 1% 61% 26% 6% 3% 57% 33% 3% 2% 53% 32% 8% 2% 47% 39% 7% 2% 46% 36% 11% 2% 15% 37% 31% 10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

S u p p

  • r

t s l

  • c

a l f a r m e r s S u p p

  • r

t s t h e l

  • c

a l e c

  • n
  • m

y I s f r e s h e r P r e s e r v e s f a r m l a n d R e d u c e s t r a n s i t G H G e m i s s i

  • n

s S u p p

  • r

t s t h e G r e e n b e l t T a s t e s b e t t e r I s e n v i r

  • n

m e n t a l l y f r i e n d l y I s h e a l t h i e r I s c h e a p e r Strongly disagree Somewhat disagree Somewhat agree Strongly agree

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Near-urban Agriculture 41

Key Differences:

  • Those aged 18-29 are more likely to

say they rarely (17%) or never (9%) check food labels.

  • Post-grads (61%) and those earning

incomes over $80,000 (62%) are more likely to say they always do.

  • Those with unaided awareness of the

Greenbelt (67%) and those who live in rural areas (60%) are more likely to say they always check food labels.

  • Regionally, those in Dufferin-Peel-

Halton are more likely to always check (59%) while those in Grey-Bruce are less likely (48%).

Q31) How often do you check food labels that describe where fruits, vegetables and meats are grown or sourced from?

Always, 54% Sometimes, 34% Never, 5% Rarely, 7%

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Near-urban Agriculture 42

Q32) Food products can have labels describing where the food originated from,

  • r how it was grown or raised. Please indicate whether each of the

following would make you much more likely, somewhat more likely, or just as likely to buy the product.

55% 30% 13% 2% 44% 33% 20% 4% 40% 33% 24% 3% 28% 35% 31% 5% 27% 34% 31% 8% 20% 35% 39% 6% 18% 32% 41% 9% 18% 31% 35% 16% 12% 23% 38% 26% 8% 28% 56% 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

L

  • c

a l l y G r

  • w

n F

  • d

l a n d O n t a r i

  • F

a r m F r e s h G r e e n b e l t G r

  • w

n F r e e R a n g e G r

  • w

n i n t h e G T A O r g a n i c S u s t a i n a b l y G r

  • w

n S m a l l c a r b

  • n

f

  • t

p r i n t U s e d b y m a n y t

  • p

c h e f s DK/NA Just as likely Somewhat more likely Much more likely

Key Differences:

  • Women are more likely to say that

‘Locally Grown (59%)’ and ‘Farm Fresh (44%)’ would make them much more likely to buy the product.

  • Those aged 50+ say they would be much

more likely to buy products with labels that say ‘Locally Grown (58%)’, ‘Foodland Ontario (48%)’ and ‘Farm Fresh (45%)’.

  • Those living in the Greenbelt are more

likely to say they would be much more likely to buy products with the ‘Greenbelt Grown’ label (32%).

  • Those who see the Greenbelt as a very

important source of food are more likely to say they would be much more likely to buy products with a ‘Greenbelt Grown’ label (42%)

  • Rural respondents are more likely to say

they would be much more likely to buy products that have the labels ‘Locally Grown (63%), Foodland Ontario (52%)’, and ‘Farm Fresh (51%)’.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Near-urban Agriculture 43

A) I would buy more locally grown foods if my retailer offered more of them B) Governments should provide incentives for schools, hospitals and other public institutions to purchase and serve locally-grown food C) If restaurants indicated on their menus which items were prepared with locally grown fruits, vegetables and meats, I would be more likely to order those than choose non-locally-grown items D) I would be more likely to buy locally grown fruits, vegetables and meats if they had a label indicating they were grown in the Greenbelt E) Governments should make it mandatory for schools, hospitals, and other public institutions to use a minimum percentage of locally- F) Retailers should not sell imported food when locally grown and raised foods are in-season

Q36) Please indicate whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with each of the following

66% 25% 6% 2% 59% 26% 8% 6% 49% 31% 12% 6% 43% 38% 12% 6% 40% 29% 13% 16% 32% 25% 22% 19%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

A ) B u y i f r e t a i l e r s

  • f

f e r B ) G

  • v

' t i n c e n t i v e s f

  • r

s c h

  • l

s , e t c . C ) C h

  • s

e i f r e s t a u r a n t s i n d i c a t e d D ) C h

  • s

e i f l a b e l s i n d i c a t e G r e e n b e l t E ) G

  • v

' t m a n d a t

  • r

y f

  • r

s c h

  • l

s , e t c F ) R e t a i l e r s n

  • t

s e l l i n s e a s

  • n

Strongly disagree Somewhat disagree Somewhat agree Strongly agree

Key Differences:

  • Women are more likely than men (72% vs.

58%), and those 50+ are more likely than those aged 18-29 (72% vs. 47%) to strongly agree that they would be more likely to buy locally grown foods if their retailers offered more of them.

  • Those who live in rural areas are more likely to

strongly agree that they would buy more locally- grown foods if retailers offered them (75%), and if restaurants indicated them on their menus (58%).

  • Those living in the Greenbelt (50%), those aged

50+ (49%), immigrants (48%), and those with household incomes of less than $40,000 (48%) are more likely to strongly agree that they would buy more locally-grown foods if they had a label indicating they were grown in the Greenbelt.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Near-urban Agriculture 44