nanostructures for design and
play

NANOSTRUCTURES FOR DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF PLASMONIC BIOSENSORS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIMULATION OF PERIODIC NANOSTRUCTURES FOR DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF PLASMONIC BIOSENSORS Niccol Michieli CNISM and Department of Physics and Astronomy G.Galilei - University of Padua Nanostructures Group LIGHT-MATTER INTERACTION


  1. SIMULATION OF PERIODIC NANOSTRUCTURES FOR DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF PLASMONIC BIOSENSORS Niccolò Michieli CNISM and Department of Physics and Astronomy «G.Galilei» - University of Padua Nanostructures Group

  2. LIGHT-MATTER INTERACTION BIOSENSORS Biosensor => transduce biological (and chemical) signal into • a set of useable informations (composition, concentration...) Light-matter interactions are the main physical • phenomena exploited to this aim. Particularly, Nanotechnology and Nanoscience • can yield important advantages: size of analytes: 0.1-1000 nm • energetic and roto-vibrational transitions => nanometric wavelenghts • • optical technology, sources and detectors (noble) metals nanostructures support coherent • free charges oscillations PLASMONICS

  3. LIGHT-MATTER INTERACTION BIOSENSORS Biosensors Labeled Label-free Specific Refractive Surface SERS Fluorescence ... ... Absorption index modification Light Light Localized Surface Hot Spots Management Management Plasmons Plasmos Nanotriangles Nanoholes

  4. PLASMONICS – SURFACE AND LOCALIZED PLASMONS Plasmons Surface Plasmons Localized Plasmons • Propagating modes Confined modes • Coupling by prism or grating • • Direct coupling • Poor Field Confinement Strong Field Confinement • Low absorption • High absorption • Extremely sensitive to • • Extremely sensitive to surrounding index changes (geometrically) small changes in surround

  5. SURFACE PLASMON POLARITONS • Wave equation (Helmhotz’s Equation) at metal -dielectric interface: 𝜖 2 𝑭(𝑨) 2 𝑭 = 𝟏 2 𝜁 − 𝑙 𝑦 + 𝑙 0 𝜖𝑨 2 Putting the Boundary Conditions, the dispersion relation results: • 𝜁 1 𝜁 2 𝑙 𝑦 = 𝑙 0 𝜁 1 + 𝜁 2 Direct coupling forbidden!! • • Coupling methods:

  6. LOCALIZED PLASMONS – QUASI-STATIC APPROXIMATION • Laplace Equation with Boundary Conditions: 𝛼 𝟑 𝝔 = 𝟏 Solutions given by a Spherical Harmonics Expansion: • ∞ 𝜚 𝑠, 𝜄 = 𝐵 𝑚 𝑠 𝑚 + 𝐶 𝑚 𝑠 − 𝑚+1 𝑄 𝑚 cos 𝜄 𝑚=0 Resulting Polarizability: • 𝛽 = 4𝜌𝑆 3 𝜁 − 𝜁 𝑛 𝜁 = −2𝜁 𝑛 Resonance!! 𝜁 + 2𝜁 𝑛 Resulting Electric Field in Quasi-Static (dipolar) Approximation: • 𝑙 2 𝒐 × 𝒒 × 𝒐 𝒇 𝒋𝒍𝒔 1 𝑠 3 − 𝑗𝑙 1 𝑠 2 𝒇 𝒋𝒍𝒔 𝑭 = 𝑭 𝟏 + + 3𝒐 𝒐 ∙ 𝒒 − 𝒒 4𝜌𝜁 0 𝜁 𝑛 𝒔 Far Field Near Field

  7. BEYOND QUASI-STATIC APPROXIMATIONS Exact solutions of the electromagnetic problem only exists for a few particular cases: Spherical isolated particles: Mie theory • Multipole expansion (quadrupoles, ottupoles,...) Ellipsoidal particles: Gans theory • • Spherical interacting particles: Generalized Multiparticle Mie (GMM) For all other geometries: Discretization (DDA, FEM, FDFD, FDTD) Typical observed features: 14 0.6 12 0.5 Extinction Efficiency 10 0.4 Reflectance 8 0.3 6 0.2 4 0.1 2 0 0.0 500 600 700 800 900 1000 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 Wavelength (nm) Angle (°)

  8. HOW TO EXPLOIT PLASMONICS FOR BIOSENSORS? Sensors Transmission/ Reflection SERS Extinction Resonances Propagating Hot Spots Modes Peaks Nano Triangles Nanohole Arrays

  9. NANOSTRUCTURES SELF-ASSEMBLY - NSL Nano Triangles 2a. 1. SiO 2 NS (30-1000 nm)

  10. NANOSTRUCTURES SELF-ASSEMBLY - NSL Nano Triangles 2a. 1. SiO 2 NS (30-1000 nm) Nano Hole Arrays 2b.

  11. 2D PERIODIC STRUCTURES: THE HONEYCOMB LATTICE All the structures taken in count are periodic, with a «honeycomb» lattice. The lattice can be decomposed in triangles or in exagons. • It can be seen as a sinlge plane of a HCP crystal. • The unit cell is a rhomb, which is one third of the unitary • exagon and is composed by two unit triangles.

  12. MODELS SETUP: SOLVING MAXWELL’S EQUATIONS BY FINITE ELEMENTS • The geometry of the model contains: the nanostructure itself  the substrate under the NS  the medium over the NS  PML domains to simulate  infinite semi-spaces. • The domain is then divided in finite elements (meshing) Dielectric functions of glass and metals • from experimental data (J&C,Palik) • Helmholtz equation (FT of the wave equation) is solved point by point for each frequency: 𝛼 2 𝐹 + 𝑙 2 𝐹 = 0

  13. NANOTRIANGLES • The unit cell contains 2 nanotriangles. These are placed in the centers of the two triangles forming the unit cell. • The tips of tips of the triangles are faced each-other. The exact shape of the monomer is determined by the technique • of deposition, the quantity of deposed metal, and by (optional) thermal annealing. Nanostructures have been modelized both as snipped prisms • and snipped thetrahedra.

  14. NANOTRIANGLES – RESONANCE TAYLORING The resonance position (and shape) is strongly dependent on the geometry of the triangles, interactions and surrounding media characteristics. To taylor the resonance, the following parameters are considered: The geometric properties of the structures used for • parametrization:  Lattice constant (dependent on PS nanospheres)  Triangles side and height (dependent on deposition parameters) Snipping of the tips (dependent on deposition and  annealing) Dielectric properties of environment have been considered • Presence of interfaces (substrates) •

  15. NANOPRISMS - GEOMETRY Aspect Ratio Closer Base 16 L=200 nm to 1 => Blueshift L=300 nm 14 h=30 nm Larger => Redshift h=45 nm Extinction Efficiency 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Wavelenght (nm) Base Prism: L=100 nm; h=10 nm; snip=10 nm, silver

  16. NANOPRISMS – GEOMETRY AND INTERACTION Single Snipping Interactions d=120nm c-c 14 d=240nm c-c 12 d=360nm c-c Extinction Efficiency exagon l=120nm 10 snip=20nm snip=30nm 8 6 4 2 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 Wavelength (nm) Base Prism: L=100 nm; h=10 nm; snip=10 nm, silver

  17. NANOPRISMS – SURROUNDING MEDIA/INTERFACE Air 2 ) -14 m 8 Silica Glass Quartz Glass 7 Extinction Cross Section (10 Silica Glass Interface 6 5 n=2.05 4 n=1.45 3 2 1 0 600 800 1000 1200 Wavelength (nm)

  18. NANOTRIANGLES – HOT SPOTS • Surface Enhanced Raman Spettroscopy (SERS) efficiency is strogly dependent on local field: = 𝐹 2 𝜕 𝑗𝑜 ∙ 𝐹 2 𝜕 𝑝𝑣𝑢 ≈ 𝐹 4 𝑇𝐹𝑆𝑇 = 𝐽 𝑇𝐹𝑆𝑇 𝐺 4 4 𝐽 0 𝐹 0 𝐹 0 • The presence of plasmonic hot spots can enhance Raman signal up to 14 orders of magnitude. • Given the strong dependance, almost all the signal comes from the narrow hot spot regions. To predict the experimental Enhancement Factor, an average over the whole surface is • needed. If the analytes are coupled to group that bound preferentially to metals (Sulphur groups), • the average can neglect the (low enhancement) glass surface.

  19. NANOTRIANGLES – HOT SPOTS Max(E)/E 0 1.0 Ave(E)/E 0 4 )/E 4 Ave(E 0 0.8 Normalized Values 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 400 600 800 1000 1200 Freespace incident Wavelenght (nm) 1E7 SERS Enhancement Factor 𝐹𝐺 = 1.5 ∙ 10 5 100000 1000 10 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Freespace incident Wavelenght (nm)

  20. NANOPRISMS - SENSITIVITY • Localized Plasmons => strong Near Field, decay ≈ 10 − 20 𝑜𝑛 Sensitivity close to the surface => also a monolayer shifts the resonance • • Simulation of the resonance for different thicknesses and geometries of functionalization Functionalization Functionalization Prism Prism T=5, Absorption 2 ) t=0nm T=10, Absorption -14 m t=1nm T=15, Absorption 1.0 4 t=2nm Extinction Cross Section (10 T=20, Absorption Absorption (Arb. Units) t=5nm T=30, Absorption 0.8 t=10nm 3 0.6 2 0.4 1 0.2 0 0.0 600 650 700 750 800 850 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Wavelenght (nm) Freespace incident Wavelenght (nm) 𝜇 𝑆 = 𝑏 − 𝑐 ∙ 𝑑 𝑈 𝜖𝜇 𝜖𝜇 Optimal Coupling to Plasmons => 𝜖𝑈 = 3.0 𝜖𝑈 = 5.8 𝜖𝜇 = −𝑐 ∙ ln (𝑑) 𝜖𝑈 𝑈=0 𝑈=0 𝑈=0

  21. NANOTRIANGLES - SUMMARY • The effects of the geometric properties of the nanostructure have been investigated. The resonance can be taylored by tuning 4 parameters: • Parameters Lattice Constant Side Lenght Height Snip/Shape Controlled by NS diameter Deposition setup Annealing Effect of Increase Redshift Redshift Blueshift Blueshift Less curvature and interaction Reason Larger Structures AR closer to 1 Optimization tips for the two applications: • Application SERS Refractive Index SENSING Lattice Constant Dependent on Raman Spectrum of Analytes Dependent on the desired position of resonance, once fixed other parameters Side Lenght Longest possible => better t-t coupling Height Low structures => higher avg field High structures => better coupling to func. Snip/Shape No snip, sharp edges => Hot Spots Moderate snip => more homogeneity Tips Collimation => longer sides, sharper Higher Aspect Ratio, Annilation to lower edges. Evaporation => homogeneity defects and strongest t-t coupling (no planets)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend