N-SIPI 2018 The NCAER Study Team August 3, 2018 1 Structure of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

n sipi 2018
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

N-SIPI 2018 The NCAER Study Team August 3, 2018 1 Structure of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Workshop on The NCAER 2018 State Investment Potential Index N-SIPI 2018 The NCAER Study Team August 3, 2018 1 Structure of Presentation 1. Background and scope of project 2. The six pillars of N-SIPI 3. Introduction to pillars 4. Overall


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Workshop on

The NCAER 2018 State Investment Potential Index

N-SIPI 2018

The NCAER Study Team August 3, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Structure of Presentation

  • 1. Background and scope of project
  • 2. The six pillars of N-SIPI
  • 3. Introduction to pillars
  • 4. Overall ranking under N-SIPI 2018 and

trends

  • 5. Perceptions pillar
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Background and Scope

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

The global context: growth and competitiveness

India is the third largest market in the world

GST was introduced in April last year. The average GST revenue in 2017–18 has been impressive, at Rs. 89,885 crore

India the fastest growing economy in the world in 2018 at 7.3 percent The Global Competitiveness Index ranks India at 40th place The World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business ranks India at 100th place

Global Trends in the Economic Policy Uncertainty Index (EPU)

0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.0 1200.0

Jan'14 Jan'15 Jan'16 Jan'17 Jan'18 June'18 India EPU Global EPU China EPU

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

N-SIPI and the World Bank/ DIPP Index

N-SIPI focuses on the policy and structural backdrop that determines business environment in a state. Ranks states on comprehensive score based on six pillars The World Bank/DIPP Index assesses procedures to facilitate ease of doing business and transactions. Ranks states based on the progress on a 405- point action plan on business reforms N-SIPI therefore complements the work

  • f the World Bank and

DIPP Both induce state level competitiveness and performance

slide-6
SLIDE 6

N-SIPI-The journey

  • There is a rising spirit of ‘competitive cooperative federalism’

entailing healthy competition among states in all spheres of business, including in the sphere of attracting investment

  • As a result, states are now vying with one other in their effort to

make it easier to do business and attract investment

  • NCAER’s initiative in this direction

– N-SIPI 2016 : NCAER formulated and presented the first State Investment Potential Index – N-SIPI 2017 : NCAER modified and presented the second State Investment Potential Index – N-SIPI 2018 :NCAER conducted a panel survey

Reliable, Consistent and Annual “Go-to” Index for policy- makers and business

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What’s new in N-SIPI 2018

Building on the success of N-SIPI 2016 and 2017, this third edition improves its methodology in ranking states

– A unique feature of N-SIPI 2018 is the inclusion of questions on GST and e-way bill in the perceptions survey to examine the impact of the new tax policy

  • n businesses and its implications for investment

in different sectors of the economy. – Makes survey methodology more robust.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Six pillars of N-SIPI

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction to the six pillars

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Pillar 1: Land

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 40 60 80 100 Industria ial l GS GSVA VA as s % % to

  • Tot

Total l GSVA VA Availability of Land for Industrial Purposes and Industrial GSVA AVAILABILITY Y OF LAND FOR OR INDUSTRIAL PU PURPOSES Ease of Land Acquisition and Stalled Industrial Projects 20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 Nu Number of Sta tall lled proj

  • jects

(hig higher valu alue impli lies less esser sta tall lled prpjects) Ease se of Lan and Acq cquis isition

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Rankings: Pillar 1 (land)

2018 Trend Top 6 states Telangana Madhya Pradesh Tamil Nadu Kerala Andhra Pradesh Maharashtra Up (+1) Up (-2)

  • Up (+ 6)

Up (+1 ) Up (+1)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Pillar 2: Labour

20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 Pe Per cap apita GS GSDP DP Pop Population wit ith seco condary leve evel ed educ ucation or high igher 20 40 60 80 100 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Pe Perception on ea easy sy lab abour laws Nu Number of man man-days los

  • st

t due ue to

  • str

trikes s (a a high igher valu lue implie ies less sser num number of f man man-days los

  • st due

ue to

  • stri

trikes)

Educated Workforce and per capita GSDP

Number of Man-days Lost due to Strikes and Labour Laws

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Rankings: Pillar 2 (labour)

2018 Trend Top 6 states Tamil Nadu Andhra Pradesh Karnataka Uttar Pradesh Kerala Maharashtra

  • Up (+ 2)

Up (+3 ) Up (+1) Down (-2)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Pillar 3: Infrastructure

  • 20

20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 Ind ndustria ial l GS GSVA as as % % of

  • f To

Tota tal l GS GSVA Ro Road Den ensity 20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 Pe Perception of f ad adequate pow

  • wer sup

upply ly Pow Power sho hortage (hig higher valu alue impli lies less esser sho hortage) Power Shortage and Availability of Power Supply Road Density and Industrial GSVA

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Rankings: Pillar 3 (infrastructure)

2017 Trend Top 6 States Delhi Punjab Maharashtra Haryana Kerala Tamil Nadu

  • Up (+2)

Down (-1) Up (+2)

  • Up (+2)
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Pillar 4: Economic climate

20 40 60 80 100 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Pe Perception on the he econ economic ic clim limate Ind ndustria ial l GS GSVA

Ind Industrial GSVA an and d per perception of

  • f

eco economic clim limate

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 40 60 80 100 Perc rception on tax x poli

  • licy

transitio ion to

  • GS

GST T GS GST T as as a a perce centage of f non non-agric icultre GS GSVA GST and Perception on Ease of Transition to GST

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Rankings: Pillar 4 (economic climate)

2017 Trend Top 6 states Delhi Telangana Gujarat Maharashtra Karnataka Andhra Pradesh Up (+1) Up (+4) Down (-2) Up (+1) Up (+2) Up (+5)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Pillar 5: Governance and political stability

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 40 60 80 100 Pe Per cap apita GS GSDP DP Gov Governance ce index 20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 Perc rception on Acq cquirin ing g ap approvals ls Environment t rela elated sta talle lled proj

  • jects

(Hig igher valu alue impli lies less sser sta tall lled proj

  • ject

cts) Stalled Projects and Perceptions on Acquiring Approvals for Business Governance and per capita GSDP

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Rankings: Pillar 5 (governance & political stability)

2018 Trend Top 6 states Tamil Nadu Haryana Punjab Gujarat Madhya Pradesh Karnataka Up (+4) Down (-1) Up (+1) Down (-2) Up(+3) Up (+1)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Unique component of N-SIPI

Constructed using extensive and scientifically based industry surveys across 21 states The Perceptions Pillar forms the sixth pillar of N-SIPI

54% 32% 14%

No Problem Moderate Severe

Percent respondents finding getting approvals for land a problem

Pillar 6: Perceptions

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Pillar 6: Perceptions

21.2 28.3 28.7 28.8 29.1 30.1 30.9 31.3 34.4 34.6 35.9 37.4 43.6 44.4 44.5 45.7 45.9 55.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 Availability of power Availability of raw material Road / Rail quality/ connectivity Availability of unskilled labour Industry related policies Availability of water Availability of skilled labour Availability of net connectivity Labour relations Access to finance Sewage facility Labour laws Getting all approvals before starting business Quality of skilled labour Tax policy transition to GST Difficulty in getting approvals for land Corruption in the state Law and order situation in the state

Constraints Faced by Business (% Respondents)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pillar 6: GST perceptions

56.4 29.0 14.5 No problem Moderate Severe 39.6 42.6 17.3 Better Same Worse Respondents Perceiving the Impact of GST on Their Businesses (%) Respondents Reporting Problems Related to Tax Policy Transition to GST (%)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Rankings: Pillar 6 (perceptions)

2018 Trend Top 6 states Gujarat Haryana West Bengal Kerala Delhi Uttarakhand

  • Up (+2)

Up (+18) Up (+3) Up (+1) Up (+10)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Overall Rankings under N-SIPI 2018 and Trends

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Overall rankings under N-SIPI 2018: All Six Pillars

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Dynamic shifts: Change in rankings in 2018 as compared to 2017

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Dynamic shifts: Change in rankings in 2018 as compared to 2017

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Dynamic shifts: Change in rankings in 2018 as compared to 2017

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Dynamic shifts: Change in rankings in 2018 as compared to 2017

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Perceptions Pillar-Survey Based

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The N-SIPI Perception Survey is aimed to have -

  • A better understanding of the constraints to business

in the selected states at ground level

  • The survey depicts perceptions emerging from their

experience and involvement on the various aspects of reforms as captured through specific indicators at the firm level through the responses to the structured questionnaire both from the manufacturing and services sector units

Survey objectives

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Survey pillars & sub-pillars

Land

Availability Procedural constraints

Labour

Skilled Quality Unskilled Relation Laws

Infrastructure

Power Water Net Connectivity Sewage Road/Rail connectivity

Economy & Governance

Industry policy Finance accessibility Raw materials Clearance Corruption Law & Order Tax policy transition

Business Environment

Prospective business condition Own financial position Present investment climate GST Current level of

  • peration
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Survey features

Spatial Spread 20 major States and Delhi Sample Size 1049 units, 44 districts Survey Period May-June 2018 Survey Method Questionnaire-based interviews Responding units MSMEs, large sized manufacturing and services firms

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • For the first time, the CAPI method followed to collate

the real-time data from the responding units

  • Mostly a panel response carried forward from N-SIPI

2017

  • Higher share of small and medium-sized firms across

major states

  • Higher response ratio enables having improved

perceptions through weighted responses

Basic observations

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Survey coverage

Ownership type

Industry sector

53% 39% 7% 1% Private Limited Public Limited Partnershi p/Individu al Ownership MNC 19% 21% 18% 8% 30% 4% Consumer Durable Consumer Non_Dura ble Intermedi ate Capital

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Firm size distribution

Manufacturing firms Service firms

54% 35% 11% 10 to 100 crore 100 to 500 crore 500 crore and above

33% 36% 31% 5 to 10 crore 10 to 50 crore 50 crore and above

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Perceptions on land

Problem acquiring land Difficulties in getting approval

14% 86% Yes No 54% 32% 14% No Problem Moderate Severe

Overall Problem in acquiring land Problem in getting permissions/ approval Least Problem Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Himachal Pradesh Biggest Problem Uttarakhand Jharkhand Karnataka

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Land constraints more for smaller firms compared with the larger ones 14.5 11.6 2.6 14.8 12.9 6.5

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

10-100 100-500 Over 500 Acquiring land High to severe difficulty in getting approval

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Business environment is

  • ptimistic

Business environment Firms’ financial position 59% 36% 5% Better Same Worse 58% 37% 5% Better Same Worse

Overall ll Business conditions Fi Financial al pos position Leas Least Problem Telangana Telangana Karnataka Biggest Problem Bihar Maharashtra Punjab

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Key constraints faced by small, medium and large businesses (% respondents)

25.4 35.4 45.7 30.0 43.5 32.9 23.9 49.0 50.4 34.7 42.7 30.1 24.7 48.7 40.3 32.9 47.4 20.8

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

Corruption as a potential problem Acute transitional problem to GST Problem in getting approvals for starting business Difficulty in labour relations Law and order as a problem Difficulty in connectivity of surface transport

10 -100 100 -500 Over 500

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • There are five pillars for the N-SIPI perception survey

and each pillar contains different sub-pillars

  • The responding units answer to each of the question in

the sub-pillar has been quantified

  • The quantified response of each of the sub-pillar is

totalled for each of the pillar and compared with the responses received from each of the states

  • The overall position in the ranking is arrived by

comparing the weighted average response of all the pillars across states

How states are compared and ranked

slide-42
SLIDE 42

State positions in ranking of investment perception

Achievers Front runners Potential to improve Gujarat Rajasthan Andhra Pradesh Haryana Madhya Pradesh Bihar West Bengal Uttar Pradesh Karnataka Kerala Chhattisgarh Telangana Delhi Jharkhand Maharashtra Uttarakhand Assam Punjab Odisha Himachal Pradesh Tamil Nadu

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

THANK YOU