Motorcycle Rider Training and Collision Avoidance Jim Ouellet Head - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Motorcycle Rider Training and Collision Avoidance Jim Ouellet Head - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Motorcycle Rider Training and Collision Avoidance Jim Ouellet Head Protection Research Laboratory Paramount, CA 90723 Vira Kasantikul Silpakorn University Nakhon-Pathom, Thailand Does rider training improve collision avoidance performance?
Does rider training improve collision avoidance performance?
- “Formally trained” riders in the Hurt
study were mostly LAPD or CHP motor
- fficers, who had far more rigorous
training than most rider training courses and more riding experience.
- In Thailand, only one rider had any
formal training.
Rider collision avoidance braking by rider training, Hurt Study
31 31 30 31 24 33 34 28 26
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
None Front (any combination) Rear only or rear brake & swerve
Percent
Self-taught (n = 393) Family, friends (n = 340) Formal training (n = 61)
Rider evasive action choice & execution by rider training, Hurt study
30.5 31.5 36.1 19.5 15.2
30.5 35.6 29.5
14 9.9 11.5 18
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100 % Self-taught (n = 400) Family, friends (n = 343) Formal training (n = 61) No Action Right choice, poor execution Wrong choice, good execution Wrong choice, poor execution Proper choice and execution
Loss of control mode by rider training for riders who took evasive action, Hurt study
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
No loss Capsize Wobble Lost wheelie Slide-out High-side Ran off road
Loss of control mode Percent
Self-taught (n = 272) Family, friends (n = 235) Formal training (n = 40)
Loss of control mode by rider training for Thailand riders who took evasive action
Capsize High-side Ran off road Slide out No loss of control 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Percent
Family, friends (n = 65) Self-taught (n = 471)
Loss of control mode among riders who took evasive action
Ran off road High side Slide-out Capsize No Loss
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Percent Thailand (N = 550) Hurt study (N = 603)
Thailand, cumulative percent distribution, front and rear skid mark length
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 35
Skid length, meters Cumulative percent
Front (n=33) Rear (n=105)
Time from Precipitating Event to impact, Thailand & Hurt studies
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 7
Time, seconds
Cumulative %
Hurt Study Thailand
But lower crash speeds mean less severe injuries, right? Right?
Brake type and frequency
- f braking slide-out
Thailand, rider training and collision avoidance action
10 20 30 40 50 60 No action Braking
- nly
Swerve
- nly
Brake & swerve Other
Self-taught Family, friends