Motorcycle Rider Training and Collision Avoidance Jim Ouellet Head - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

motorcycle rider training and collision avoidance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Motorcycle Rider Training and Collision Avoidance Jim Ouellet Head - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Motorcycle Rider Training and Collision Avoidance Jim Ouellet Head Protection Research Laboratory Paramount, CA 90723 Vira Kasantikul Silpakorn University Nakhon-Pathom, Thailand Does rider training improve collision avoidance performance?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Motorcycle Rider Training and Collision Avoidance

Jim Ouellet

Head Protection Research Laboratory Paramount, CA 90723

Vira Kasantikul

Silpakorn University Nakhon-Pathom, Thailand

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Does rider training improve collision avoidance performance?

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • “Formally trained” riders in the Hurt

study were mostly LAPD or CHP motor

  • fficers, who had far more rigorous

training than most rider training courses and more riding experience.

  • In Thailand, only one rider had any

formal training.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Rider collision avoidance braking by rider training, Hurt Study

31 31 30 31 24 33 34 28 26

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

None Front (any combination) Rear only or rear brake & swerve

Percent

Self-taught (n = 393) Family, friends (n = 340) Formal training (n = 61)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Rider evasive action choice & execution by rider training, Hurt study

30.5 31.5 36.1 19.5 15.2

30.5 35.6 29.5

14 9.9 11.5 18

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100 % Self-taught (n = 400) Family, friends (n = 343) Formal training (n = 61) No Action Right choice, poor execution Wrong choice, good execution Wrong choice, poor execution Proper choice and execution

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Loss of control mode by rider training for riders who took evasive action, Hurt study

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

No loss Capsize Wobble Lost wheelie Slide-out High-side Ran off road

Loss of control mode Percent

Self-taught (n = 272) Family, friends (n = 235) Formal training (n = 40)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Loss of control mode by rider training for Thailand riders who took evasive action

Capsize High-side Ran off road Slide out No loss of control 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Percent

Family, friends (n = 65) Self-taught (n = 471)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Loss of control mode among riders who took evasive action

Ran off road High side Slide-out Capsize No Loss

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Percent Thailand (N = 550) Hurt study (N = 603)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thailand, cumulative percent distribution, front and rear skid mark length

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 35

Skid length, meters Cumulative percent

Front (n=33) Rear (n=105)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Time from Precipitating Event to impact, Thailand & Hurt studies

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 7

Time, seconds

Cumulative %

Hurt Study Thailand

slide-12
SLIDE 12

But lower crash speeds mean less severe injuries, right? Right?

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Brake type and frequency

  • f braking slide-out
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thailand, rider training and collision avoidance action

10 20 30 40 50 60 No action Braking

  • nly

Swerve

  • nly

Brake & swerve Other

Self-taught Family, friends