Monthly Webinar Series January, 2019 Todays Agenda - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

monthly webinar series
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Monthly Webinar Series January, 2019 Todays Agenda - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Monthly Webinar Series January, 2019 Todays Agenda Announcements/Trial Updates Christina Grabarits This Months Top Enroller & Prize Winner! Christina Grabarits Breakthrough Diseases & Re-Randomizations Ellen Mowry & Scott


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Monthly Webinar Series

January, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Today’s Agenda

Announcements/Trial Updates

Christina Grabarits

This Month’s Top Enroller & Prize Winner!

Christina Grabarits

Breakthrough Diseases & Re-Randomizations

Ellen Mowry & Scott Newsome

Commitment Pledge Responses

Ellen Mowry & Scott Newsome

  • Mt. Everest & Rowing Competition

Christina Grabarits

Q & A

Team

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Announcements/Trial Updates

CHRISTINA GRABARITS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TREAT-MS Trial Study Updates

We now have 29 sites activated and 64 patients enrolled!!! We need each activated site to screen at least 6 patients each month and enroll 3-4 each month so we can reach our goal of 900 enrolled by June 30, 2019! Thank you for your dedication to the trial and please reach out with questions! The Johns Hopkins Coordinating Center is here to support you!!!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Save the Date!!!

Next in-person Study Advisory Committee (SAC) meeting will be held in Dallas, TX on February 27, 2019 from 1:30 – 5 pm, preceding the ACTRIMS meeting.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Activated Sites

*AS OF FRIDAY, 12/28/18

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recent Enrollments

*AS OF FRIDAY, 12/28/18

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Monthly Randomization Race

December Enrollments:

Site Randomizations

University of Washington 1 Norton Neurology Specialists 2 Christiana Care 1 University of Kansas Medical Center 2 University of Alabama at Birmingham 3 Johns Hopkins 3

Total this month 12

slide-18
SLIDE 18

December’s Top Enroller:

University of Alabama at Birmingham

$50

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Breakthrough Disease and Re-randomization

ELLEN M. MOWRY, M.D., M.C.R. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF NEUROLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCOTT D. NEWSOME, D.O. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF NEUROLOGY JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

slide-20
SLIDE 20

TREAT-MS: Objectives

  • 1. To evaluate whether an “early aggressive” therapy approach, versus starting with a traditional

th ther erapy, in influ fluen ences th the e in inter ermediate-term risk risk of

  • f dis

isabil ilit ity progression. => => Will ill in inves estigate overall ll and with ithin str trata of

  • f peo

eople at t high igher ver ersus lo lower risk risk of

  • f lon

longer-term dis isabili lity

2.

  • 2. To evaluate if

if, , among patients deemed at t lo lower ris risk for dis isability ac accumulatio ion who start on tr traditional, , fir first-line MS th therapies but experience breakthrough dis isease, , th those who switch to a a hig igher-efficacy th therapy ver ersus a new fir first-line th therapy have different in intermediate-term ris risk of f dis isability accumulation.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Risk Strata Determinants

Enrollment within 6 months of 1st attack: high risk if both Clinical or radiographic involvement of the spinal cord OR brainstem/cerebellum AND MRI with >10 T2 lesions OR ≥4 Gadolinium-positive (Gad+) lesions, OR another attack in the first 6 months since the 1st attack, OR new lesions on MRI if a subsequent MRI is available already Enrollment > 6 months since 1st attack: high risk if any 2 of the 4 are true Clinical or radiographic involvement of the spinal cord OR brainstem/cerebellum MRI with >10 T2 lesions OR ≥4 Gad+ lesions Residual damage (incomplete recovery based on exam [Functional System Score ≥2 , with the deficit(s) on exam corresponding to the region of prior relapse]) Ongoing activity in the past year: 2 or more relapses OR ≥3 new MRI lesions in past year OR ≥2 Gad+ lesions

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Original Randomization

1:1 randomization 1:1 randomization

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Switch in Therapy for Breakthrough?

High risk disability indicators Low risk disability indicators

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Defining Breakthrough Disease

  • ANY breakthrough disease after 6 months on therapy will make

allowable a discussion about change in therapy

  • Treating clinicians required to document discussion of switching

therapy if excessive breakthrough has occurred

  • Modified Rio score will be used to define excessive breakthrough:

Original: >4 new T2 lesions (MRI)=1 point; 1 relapse=1 point; 2 relapses=2 points

  • Scores of 2 to 3= treatment non-response with respect to progression risk at 4 years.

Later re-classified for those who scored 1 point (based on activity from months 12-18) into:

  • Medium-low risk (no relapses, <2 new MRI lesions) same as score of zero
  • Medium-high risk (≥1 relapse or ≥2 new MRI lesions) same as score 2 or 3
slide-25
SLIDE 25

TREAT-MS Maximum-Tolerated Modified Rio Score

End of Year 1: a Modified Rio Score of 2-3, or in “medium-high” risk subgroup End of Year 2: a) if prior Modified Rio Score was medium-low risk (at year 1); anything more than 1 additional T2 hyperintensity at year 2 MRI (or earlier in year 2 if a relapse occurs prior to the year-end visit) b) if Year 1 Modified Rio Score was 0, a Modified Rio Score of “medium-high” risk or greater Subsequent years will be treated in the same fashion. For example, at the end of year 3: a) if prior Modified Rio Score was medium-low (at year 2): anything more than 1 additional T2 hyperintensity by end of year 3 (or earlier in year 3 if a relapse occurs prior to the year-end visit) b) if Year 2 Modified Rio Score (at year 2) was 0, a Modified Rio Score of “medium-high” risk or greater

slide-26
SLIDE 26

MRI logistics: timing of month 6 MRI

Perhaps the most critical MRI in terms of having it, and its timing. Why?

  • Able to switch therapy for ANY NEWbreakthrough disease occurring AFTER 6 months on therapy
  • Doing the month 6 MRI at the wrong time can reduce the ability to use it to support claim for breakthrough disease:

If “month 6” MRI is completed (relative to start date of first therapy): ≤ 6 months: for the subsequent MRI scan, we will only be able to confirm a new lesion occurred “after 6 months on therapy” if the new lesion is enhancing >6 months-8 months: can serve as true reference MRI scan against which subsequent new lesions can be confirmed as

  • ccurring “after 6 months on therapy”

>8 months: if a new lesion is present AND enhancing, we can assume it developed “after 6 months on therapy;” if not enhancing, the MRI will simply be a reference MRI scan against which subsequent new lesions can be confirmed

Advice: unless you are controlling the scheduling of the “month 6 MRI,” don’t order it until AFTER they have been on the therapy for 6 months.

  • If you prefer to have MRI in hand at the visit, since clinic visit windows are wide, perhaps schedule MRI plus clinic visit

for a bit >6 months AFTER start date of DMT

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Who Gets Re-randomized for Breakthrough?

High risk disability indicators Low risk disability indicators

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Switch in Therapy for Breakthrough?

High risk disability indicators Low risk disability indicators

  • The other patients do not have a re-randomization for first

breakthrough if they are changing therapy

  • If patients in the re-randomized group have a second breakthrough

after 6 months on THAT therapy, there is no more randomization

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Medications by Treatment Class

Traditional (First-line) Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone, Glatopa, other generics) Intramuscular interferon (Avonex) Subcutaneous interferon (Betaseron, Extavia, Rebif) Pegylated interferon (Plegridy) Teriflunomide (Aubagio) Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera) Fingolimod (Gilenya) Early Aggressive Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) Ocrelizumab (Ocrevus) Rituximab (Rituxan) Natalizumab (Tysabri)

(Cladribine, if it becomes FDA-approved) *Should not utilize dosages that exceed the maximally approved dosage for MS (or, in the case of rituximab, than the maximally approved dosage for RA) *New FDA-approved therapies will be added to medication lists after consensus-based approach by Study Advisory Committee

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Re-randomization Demo in Vision

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Documenting Treatment Switches

  • Treatment discontinuation for reasons other than breakthrough: Participants who

discontinue therapies for reasons other than breakthrough disease (e.g. intolerance, adverse effect, desire to conceive) will be encouraged (except in the instance of trying to conceive or pregnancy itself, or when such treatment is otherwise contraindicated) to choose another therapy within the efficacy class to which the discontinued therapy belongs.

  • Regardless of reason for switch, the factors that supported each individual treatment

choice will be documented at baseline and at any point a switch is made.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Commitment Pledge

ELLEN M. MOWRY, M.D., M.C.R. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF NEUROLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

SCOTT D. NEWSOME, D.O. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF NEUROLOGY JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Your Commitment is KEY!

Activated sites as of 12/11/18 have received this commitment letter from the trial PIs at Johns Hopkins along with this commitment pledge Sign and send back your commitment pledge ASAP

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Sites Returned Commitment Pledge

Site Date Letter Sent to Site Date Signed Letter Received from Site Advanced Neurology Specialists 12-Dec-18 13-Dec-18 University of Maryland 12-Dec-18 13-Dec-18 New York University School of Medicine 12-Dec-18 14-Dec-18 University of Kansas Medical Center 12-Dec-18 17-Dec-18 University of South Florida Health 12-Dec-18 20-Dec-18 Columbia Presbyterian 11-Dec-18 21-Dec-18 University of Miami 12-Dec-18 21-Dec-18 Central Texas Neurology 12-Dec-18 14-Dec-18 University of Washington 11-Dec-18 14-Dec-18

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Sites Pending Return of Commitment Pledge

Site Date Letter Sent to Site Date Signed Letter Received from Site

Baylor Scott & White Health 11-Dec-18 Mayo Clinic 11-Dec-18 Stony Brook University 11-Dec-18 University of California at San Francisco 11-Dec-18 University of Cincinnati 11-Dec-18 University of Louisville 11-Dec-18 University of Rochester 11-Dec-18 University of Vermont 11-Dec-18 Vanderbilt University Medical Center 11-Dec-18 Christiana Care 12-Dec-18 Neurology Specialists of Tidewater 12-Dec-18 Norton Neurology Services 12-Dec-18 Ohio Health 12-Dec-18 Swedish Medical Center 12-Dec-18 University of Alabama at Birmingham 12-Dec-18 University of Florida Gainesville 12-Dec-18 University of Utah 12-Dec-18

Please sign the commitment pledge, emailed to your site during the second week of December, to secure your dedication to this very important trial!

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The Mount Everest Climb

CHRISTINA GRABARITS

slide-37
SLIDE 37

ELEVATION

Mount Everest Contenders

*Not fit to scale

89.3 88.9 65.6

  • 2. Cedars Sinai

46.0 40.5 92.9 47.2

  • 4. RWJ Barnabas Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center
  • 5. Billings Clinic

35.4 53.8

  • 10. University of Massachusetts
  • 8. Georgetown University
  • 6. Providence Health
  • 8. Providence Health

32.5

  • 1. Allegheny Health Network

Activated Sites

  • 3. Massachusetts General Hospital
  • 9. Rush University Medical Center
  • 11. University of California at San Francisco
  • 13. Columbia Presbyterian
  • 3. Advanced Neurology Specialists
  • 8. Norton Neurology Specialists
  • 2. Christiana Care
  • 5. NYU School of Medicine
  • 10. University of Rochester
  • 7. Swedish Medical Center
  • 4. University of Vermont
  • 9. University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • 6. University of Florida Gainesville
  • 12. University of Kansas Medical Center
  • 1. Johns Hopkins University
  • 14. Mayo Clinic
  • 15. University of South Florida Health
  • 16. Stony Brook University
  • 17. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • 18. University of Louisville
  • 19. Baylor Scott & White Health
  • 20. University of Cincinnati
  • 21. University of Washington
  • 22. Central Texas Neurology Consultants
  • 23. University of Miami
  • 24. Ohio Health
  • 25. University of Maryland
  • 26. University of Utah
  • 27. Neurology Specialists of Tidewater
  • 28. Dignity Health Sacramento
  • 29. Providence Health
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Rank Activated Sites Final Points

1 Christiana Care 134.5 2 Norton Neurology Specialists 130.9 3 Baylor Scott & White Health 120.3 4 Columbia Presbyterian 112.6 5 Central Texas Neurology Consultants 104.1 6 University of Cincinnati 102.5 7 Dignity Health Sacramento 93.0 8 Advanced Neurology Specialists 85.3 9 New York University School of Medicine 85.2 10 University of Maryland 82.7

Mount Everest Standings

slide-39
SLIDE 39

The Rowing Competition

CHRISTINA GRABARITS

slide-40
SLIDE 40

West Midwest South Northeast Team A Team B Team C Team D Team E Team F Team G Team H

Advanced Neurology Specialists University of California at San Francisco Mayo Clinic Baylor Scott & White Health University of Louisville Christiana Care New York University School of Medicine University of Vermont Swedish Medical Center University of Washington University of Cincinnati University of Kansas Medical Center Norton Neurology Services Vanderbilt University Medical Center Stony Brook University Columbia Presbyterian University of Utah Dignity Health Sacramento Ohio Health University of Michigan University of Florida, Gainesville University of Alabama at Birmingham University of Rochester Geisinger Clinic Billings Clinic Barrow Neurological Institute Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation Wayne State University University of South Florida Health University of Maryland Icahn School of Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Providence Health University of California Los Angeles Rush University Medical Center University of Miami Neurology Specialists of Tidewater Barnabas Multiple Sclerosis Comp. Care Center University of Massachusetts Worcester Cedars Sinai University of California San Diego Central Texas Neurology Consultants Georgetown University Hackensack University Medical Center Allegheny Health Network

Assigned teams

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Northeast Team H U Vermont Columbia Presbyterian Northeast Team G U of Rochester Stony Brook NYU West Team B UCSF U of Washington

Rowing Competition Standings

  • Indv. Sites

Points

  • 1. Advanced Neuro

Specialists 67

  • 2. UFL Gainesville

52

  • 3. Norton

51

  • 4. Christiana Care

44

  • 5. Swedish

41

  • 6. UAB

38

  • 7. U Kansas Med Ctr

32

  • 8. NYU

28

  • 9. U South FL Health

21

  • 10. U of Washington

14

JHU Midwest Team D Baylor Scott & White Health KUMC U of Louisville Norton UFL Gainesville South Team E CentralTx Neuro U of Miami U of South Florida Health Midwest Team C U Cinn Mayo Clinic Ohio Health West Team A Swedish Advanced Neuro Spc U of Utah South Team F UAB U of Maryland Christiana Care Vanderbilt Neuro Spc of Tidewater

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Rowing Competition

https://treat.preludedynamics.com

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Op Open en fo for Q r Que uest stio ions ns

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Thank You for attending today’s webinar!

Join us tomorrow for the encore performance! January 3rd @ 8 AM EST

February’s Monthly Webinar will be held on the 6th at 3pm and 7th at 9am Eastern