Middle State s Se lf- Study Br ie fing Se ssion F all 2017 Dr. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Middle State s Se lf- Study Br ie fing Se ssion – F all 2017 Dr. E ric Be nja min Dr. Me lissa F . Gre g o ry Pro f. T a mmy Stua rt Pe e ry

We lc ome / se ssion ove rvie w  Ove r vie w of Se lf- Study pr oc e ss 5 minute s  Complianc e Re por t 5 minute s  E xe c utive Ove r vie w – Se ve n Standar ds 70 minute s  Standar ds I & 2, Q&A  Standar ds 3 & 4, Q&A  Standar ds 5, 6, 7, Q&A  Ne xt ste ps/ Pr e par ing for MSCHE Visit 10 minute s

Why is Ac c re dita tion importa nt?  e stablishe s a be nc hmar k for quality and c onsiste nc y  fac ilitate s the tr ansfe r of c r e dits be twe e n institutions  qualifie s an institution to offe r fe de r al financ ial aid for stude nts  He lps pr ospe c tive stude nts to c onfir m that a sc hool has me t e stablishe d standar ds of e duc ation  E nsur e s a pr oc e ss of c ontinuous se lf-impr ove me nt  Involve s fac ulty, staff, and stude nts in the pr oc e ss of planning and pr ior itizing  Pr ovide s a me c hanism for tr anspar e nc y and ac c ountability

Se lf- Study Proc e ss Ove rvie w F ina l • BOT • T ra ining Dra fting • a c tio n Co mmitte e T e a m Cha ir De c e mb e r • • Spring MSCHE 2017 - • Visit fo rma tio n F a ll 2017 2015-F a ll Spring visit 2017 Re se a rc h Appro va ls 2018 • • MSCHE • Dra fting Co mplia nc e • • a c tio n Re po rt

Complianc e Re por t

Complia nc e Re port  Dra ft re po rt c o mple te d a nd c irc ula te d thro ug h g o ve rna nc e  T e a m pa rtic ipa te d in MSCHE c o mplia nc e we b ina rs  Dra ft pre -re vie we d b y E ric a Swa in fro m MSCHE  K e y hig hlig ht: impro ve me nts ma de to stude nt c o mpla int pro c e ss: Ce ntra l we b pa g e fo r stude nt c o mpla ints  Will b e pre se nte d to the BOT fo r a c tio n Oc to b e r 16  Will b e se nt to MSCHE in No ve mb e r

E xe c utive Ove r vie w Se ve n Sta nda rds

Sta nda rd I – Mission & Vision Ana lysis  T ho ug htful a nd inc lusive missio n a nd visio n de ve lo pme nt pro c e ss (Crite rio n 1)  I nno va tive Ac a de mic a nd Stude nt Affa irs pro g ra mming (Crite ria 1, 2, 3)  Ce ntra l fo c us o n stude nt suc c e ss (Crite ria 1, 2, 3)  Na tio na l mo de l o f e duc a tio na l e xc e lle nc e , o ppo rtunity, & stude nt suc c e ss (Crite ria 1, 2, 3)  Ac c o unta b le fo r o ur re sults (Crite ria 1 & 4)

Sta nda rd I – Mission & Vision Sug g e stion  Cre a te a nd Ma inta in a c o mpre he nsive list o f stude nt, sta ff, fa c ulty, a nd a dministra to r a c c o mplishme nts tha t c a n b e a c c e sse d a nd vie we d b y inte rna l a nd e xte rna l c o nstitue nts. T he institutio n will ne e d to de c ide who ta ke s re spo nsib ility fo r this ta sk.

Sta nda rd II – E thic s & Inte g rity Ana lysis a nd Stre ng ths  Co mmitme nt to Ac a de mic F  E mplo ye e e va lua tio n (Crite rio n 5) re e do m a nd I nte lle c tua l Pro pe rty rig hts  Disc ipline , se pa ra tio n, a nd e mplo ye e (Crite rio n 1) g rie va nc e pro c e dure s (Crite ria 3 & 5)  E q uity a nd inc lusio n (Crite rio n 2)  Co mmunic a tio n (Crite rio n 6)  Offic e o f Co mplia nc e , Risk, a nd  Ac c e ssib ility (Crite rio n 7) E thic s (Crite ria 8 & 9)  Affo rda b ility (Crite rio n 7)  Offic e o f the Omb uds (Crite ria 2, 3, 8)  Re c ruitme nt, hiring , a nd pro mo tio n (Crite rio n 5)

Sta nda rd II – E thic s & Inte g rity Sug g e stions   Co ntinue the pro c e ss o f re vie wing the e mplo yme nt Co ntinue to de ve lo p a nd imple me nt a n E q uity a nd pra c tic e s c o nc e rning de pa rtme nt c ha irs a nd ta ke I nc lusio n Ma ste r Pla n. a ppro pria te ste ps to e nsure c o nsiste nt a nd e q uita b le imple me nta tio n pro c e dure s.  I nc o rpo ra te the pe rio dic a sse ssme nt o f e thic s a nd inte g rity with the pe rio dic a sse ssme nt o f c o mplia nc e .  Re vie w the c urre nt pro c e ss whe re b y q ua lifie d e mplo ye e s a re a ffo rde d o pe n a nd a c c e ssib le  Co ntinue to e xa mine the c urre nt pro c e ss o f c o lle g e wide o ppo rtunitie s to e xpre ss inte re st a nd b e e mplo ying pa rt-time fa c ulty a nd imple me nt the c o nside re d to se rve in a c ting a nd inte rim c ha ng e s ne e de d to a ssure the re is a me a ning ful a dministra to r ro le s. o ppo rtunity fo r inte rna l a nd e xte rna l po te ntia l c a ndida te s to b e a wa re o f a nd e xpre ss inte re st in  Co nside r de ve lo ping a tra ining mo dule o n re vise d suc h o ppo rtunitie s. Co lle g e c o mmunic a tio n g uide line s fo r fa c ulty, sta ff, a nd a dministra to rs. .

Sta nda rd II – E thic s a nd Inte g rity Re c omme nda tion  De ve lo p a n a c tio n pla n, to inc lude o b je c tive s, stra te g ie s, time line s, re so urc e s, a nd suc c e ss indic a to rs, fo r e xpa nding Omb uds se rvic e s to stude nts

Q & A: Standar ds I & II

Sta nda rd III – De sig n & De live ry of the Stude nt L e a rning E xpe rie nc e Ana lysis  Stude nt e q uity/ stude nt suc c e ss (Crite ria 1, 3, 4, 5, 8)  I nno va tio n (Crite ria 1, 2, 5, 8)  Co mmunic a ting with Stude nts (Crite rio n 3)  Pro fe ssio na l De ve lo pme nt (Crite rio n 2)  E va lua tio n (Crite rio n 2)

Sta nda rd III – De sig n & De live ry of the Stude nt L e a rning E xpe rie nc e Sug g e stions  I nve stig a te wa ys o f de mo nstra ting e ithe r a t the  E va lua te the pro c e sse s a nd pra c tic e s re la te d to de pa rtme nt o r disc ipline le ve l, ho w pro fe ssio na l c urric ulum a ppro va l, c o urse a nd pro g ra m de ve lo pme nt pa rtic ipa tio n tra nsla te s into a sse ssme nt, a nd c o lle g e a re a re vie w to me a sura b le c ha ng e a nd stude nt suc c e ss in stre a mline the ir re la tio nships a nd to e nsure tha t the c la ssro o m a nd is linke d e xplic itly to Co lle g e the y a re a lig ne d with the Co lle g e ’ s prio ritie s. prio ritie s.  Co ntinue the inve stig a tio n a nd imple me nta tio n  I nve stig a te wa ys o f c re a ting pro te c te d time s, o f a n inte ra c tive stude nt syste m tha t will a llo w e ithe r a t the disc ipline a nd de pa rtme nt le ve l stude nts to e xplo re a nd mo nito r the ir pro g re ss a nd/ o r institutio na lly, so tha t mo re full- a nd to wa rd a c re de ntia l. pa rt-time fa c ulty c a n pa rtic ipa te in pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt mo re re g ula rly  As indic a te d in the AMP, de ve lo p mo re fo c use d pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt pa thwa ys fo r fa c ulty  I mple me nt pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt o ffe ring s a nd instruc tio na l sta ff a lig ne d to disc ipline fo c use d o n c la ssro o m o b se rva tio ns to impro ve ne e ds, a dva nc e me nt o f the Co lle g e ’ s prio ritie s o f inno va tio n, e q uity fo r stude nts, a nd te a c hing the e ffe c tive ne ss a nd q ua lity o f c la ssro o m e xc e lle nc e . e va lua tio ns a nd to he lp a lig n o b se rva tio ns with Co lle g e prio ritie s.

Sta nda rd III – De sig n & De live ry of the Stude nt L e a rning E xpe rie nc e Re c omme nda tions  I de ntify c o nsiste nt, dire c t stra te g ie s fo r e xplic itly c o mmunic a ting pre re q uisite s, b o th c re dit- le ve l a nd pre c re dit-le ve l, tha t a re re q uire d prio r to b e g inning a pro g ra m se q ue nc e to e nsure tha t stude nts ha ve a c c ura te info rma tio n a b o ut re q uire me nts a nd po te ntia l time to c o mple tio n o f the ir c ho se n de g re e .  Alig ning with the AMP’ s sta te d g o a l o f “re vising the e va lua tio n syste m to re fle c t institutio na l g o a ls, the ne w o rg a niza tio na l struc ture , a nd the dyna mic ro le o f the 21 st c e ntury fa c ulty,” c o nduc t a c o mpre he nsive re visio n o f the ma te ria ls a nd pra c tic e s re la te d to e va lua tio n o f full- a nd pa rt-time fa c ulty a nd ide ntify a c yc lic a l pro c e ss to re vie w the e va lua tio n ma te ria ls to e nsure the y a re re g ula rly upda te d, a pplie d, re le va nt, a nd pra c tic a l.

Sta nda rd IV – Support of the Stude nt L e a rning E xpe rie nc e Ana lysis  I nno va tive a nd inte ntio na l re spo nse to suppo rt stude nt suc c e ss (Crite ria 1 & 6)  I nte ntio na l a ppro a c h to pro viding e q uity in e duc a tio na l o ppo rtunity (Crite ria 1, 2, 4, 6)  Co mpre he nsive suppo rt fo r pa thwa ys to c o mple tio n (Crite ria 1 & 2)  E ng a g e me nt b e yo nd the c la ssro o m ( Crite rio n 4)