microscope status mission definition and recent
play

MICROSCOPE status, mission definition and recent instrument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MICROSCOPE status, mission definition and recent instrument development P. Touboul pierre.touboul@onera.fr The ratio of the masses of two bodies is defined in two ways which differ from each other fundamentally,, as the reciprocal ratio


  1. MICROSCOPE status, mission definition and recent instrument development P. Touboul pierre.touboul@onera.fr “The ratio of the masses of two bodies is defined in two ways which differ from each other fundamentally,…, as the reciprocal ratio of the accelerations which the same motive force imparts to them (inert mass),…, as the ratio of the forces which act upon them in the same gravitational field (gravitational mass). The equality of these two masses, so differently defined, is a fact which is confirmed by experiments… The possibility of explaining the numerical equality of inertia and gravitation by the unity of their nature, gives to the general theory of relativity, according to my conviction, such a superiority over the conception of classical mechanics…” A. EINSTEIN The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton,

  2. THE MICROSCOPE MISSION µsat spin Z Y SELECTED IN CNES NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM with ESA COOPERATION CNES SMALL SATELLITE MISSION X ESA THRUSTERS MISSION PROPOSED BY ONERA (Pi) & OCA (Co-Pi) with ZARM (Co-I) Courtesy CNES Jan – April 2006 : Preliminary Design Review of the Instrument, the Satellite, the Mission (End of Phase B) Launch expected in 09-10 depending on Feeps. Thanks to Gilles Métris and his team (OCA), PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 2 to Hans Dittus and his team (ZARM), to Jean Bernard Dubois and his team (CNES), to Davide Nicolini and his team (ESA) to GREX for scientific supports, exchanges and emulations Activities supports and Funding from CNES and Institutes “The ratio of the masses of two bodies is defined in two ways which differ from each other fundamentally,…, as the reciprocal ratio of the accelerations which the same motive force imparts to them (inert mass),…, as the ratio of the forces which act upon them in the same gravitational field (gravitational mass). The equality of these two masses, so differently defined, is a fact which is confirmed by experiments…

  3. Equivalence Principle STEP objective 10 -18 GG objective 10 -17 • Quantum Theory, Standard Model Electromagnetism, Strong & Weak Nuclear Force MICROSCOPE • Geometric Theory of Gravitation, GR � Super Symmetry requires new particles... 10 -15 � Super String Theory, Branes… requires new field… 10 -13 ⇒ Galaxy rotation � Dark matter ? 25% ⇒ Universe Expansion acceleration � Dark Energy ? 70% 10 -11 10 -9 Domain of validity for current theories to be always confirmed more accurately 10 -7 Many proposed space experiments: 10 -5 Lorentz Invariance test :PHARAO, LATOR,… • PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 3 • Post-Newtonian Parameters accurate 10 -3 determination : GPB, PHARAO,... • Determination and observation of relativistic effects : GPB, LISA, ASTROD, … 1700 1800 1900 2000 • Stability of ‘Constants’ m m g g = − 2 1 δ Equivalence Principle Tests (by UFF test) directly verify a fundamental basis of m m I I 2 1 our present Gravity knowledge & may confirm dilaton existence The possibility of explaining the numerical equality of inertia and gravitation by the unity of their nature, gives to the general theory of relativity, according to my conviction, such a superiority over the conception of classical mechanics…” A. EINSTEIN The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton,

  4. A Mission concept relying on best current technologies and models GRACE EM & GOCE FM accelero. Jason altimetry during qualification tests 06 DEMETER launched in 2004 CNES micro satellite ONERA Accelerometer OCA Space Geodesy & PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 4 Astrometry MICROSCOPE FEEP Control Drag Free Control Pos Det + ADC ESA FEEP Laws + DAC - 1 PM DVA Science Data Output ADC

  5. GOCE FM tests in lab. (Jul 06) PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 5 Noise FM03 Axis Z 1,E-05 Gradio DM1 GOCE ESA mission : 1,E-06 ASH FM03 m.s-2.Hz-1/2 • 6 Electrostatic accelerometers for the full tensor gravity gradiometer 1,E-07 Tests on horizontally controlled table 1,E-08 1,E-02 1,E-01 1,E+00 Frequency (Hz)

  6. A Mission concept relying on best current technologies and models Jason altimetry DEMETER launched in 2004 ONERA Accelerometer CNES micro satellite OCA Space ZARM drop tower Geodesy & PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 6 Astrometry MICROSCOPE FEEP Control Drag Free Control Pos Det + ADC ESA FEEP Laws + DAC - 1 PM DVA Science Data Output ADC

  7. Free fall tests in ZARM 2.10 -12 ms -2 /Hz 1/2 from 5 to 100 mHz PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 7 ZARM drop tower Comparison between GRACE and GOCE inst. along vertical

  8. A family of space accelerometers • Γ n :10 -10 ms -2 /Hz 1/2 • Γ n :3·10 -9 ms -2 /Hz 1/2 • Γ max : 5·10 -5 ms -2 • Γ max :10 -4 ms -2 • [10 -4 ; 10 -1 ]Hz • [2·10 -4 ; 10 -1 ]Hz •Two in orbit from Mar 02 •One in orbit from Jul 00 ASTRE Microgravity sensor 1 mg down to 3 nanog 3 schuttle flights in 95-96 PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 8 : 2·10 -12 ms -2 /Hz 1/2 • Γ n MICROSCOPE • Γ max : 6·10 -6 ms -2 • [5·10 -3 ; 10 -1 ]Hz • to be launched in 07 : < 3.10 -15 ms -2 @ f EP • Γ n • Γ max : 3.10 -8 ms -2 • [10 -4 ; 4.10 -3 ]Hz

  9. A Mission concept relying on best current technologies and models Jason altimetry DEMETER launched in 2004 ONERA Accelerometer CNES micro satellite OCA Space ZARM drop tower Geodesy & PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 9 Astrometry MICROSCOPE FEEP ESA FEEP

  10. A Mission concept relying on best current technologies and models Jason altimetry DEMETER launched in 2004 ONERA Accelerometer CNES micro satellite OCA Space ZARM drop tower Geodesy & PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 10 Astrometry MICROSCOPE FEEP ESA FEEP

  11. Test accuracy : δ = 10 -15 MICROSCOPE Test Principle Specified per session of 1 day to 1 week Mission duration : 1 year • Earth : Gravity Source • Two pairs of masses B/ μ Z/ μ (N-Z)/ μ made of different composition in free fall Pt 1.008009 0.40296 0.20208 Measurement • Test: Pt/Ti Axis Ti 1.008911 0.46309 0.08273 • Reference : Pt/Pt • Maintained on the same orbit (<10 -11 m) Optional Spin by electrostatic forces � Test measurement • Low noise: • Long duration integration (>20 orbits) & numerous measures PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 11 • Drag compensated satellite • Very clean thermal environment Material 1 (Pt) • EP violation signal well defined Material 2 (Ti) • Phase: attitude wrt position in orbit • Frequency: f orb + f spin = + f f f ep o s

  12. HELIOSYNCHRONOUS The Orbit • Thermal stability • Maxi power with less solar panels (stiff S/C : high frequency modes) No eclipse during measurement phase • QUASI-CIRCULAR & POLAR Eccentricity < 5.10 -3 • To limit Earth gravity gradient (Egg) @ f EP Known better than 5. 10 -5 • To correct measurements from Egg effects Satellite altitude PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 12 • 730 or 790 km : Larger signal Pointing Less radiation (electronics) • Inertial or rotating satellite : Higher f orb 2 spin freq. : ( π +1/2) f orb & ( π +3/2) f orb (to 1400 km : No eclipse, • Finely controlled requiring Less thermal disturbance) Attitude Estimator from SST & Instrument data, up to a few 0.1 µrad : • Position to be known from 7 m, 14 m to 100m (for Earth gravity gradient corrections) sensitive to S/C thermal behavior

  13. A satellite coming from MYRIADE line Desorbitation system SAS SU REF & SU EP SST Electronics µDPU +X BCU +Z OBC PCDU +Y FEEU Pyro I CUME PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 13 RX/ TX2 RX/ TX1 Magnetotorquer Battery 1 EPSA inertial SST No gyros wheel With Cnes Courtesy

  14. Electric Propulsion System : Baseline Configuration Electric Propulsion System : Baseline Configuration for the drag- -free control free control for the drag 4 Electric Propulsion Subsystem Assembly, Cluster of 3 FEEP thrusters Cesium FEEP => Specific constraints & Electrostatic Discharge risk • EPS total mass = 41 kg • Average power ~100 W (@ 30 µN) • Maximum power = 4 x 53 W = 212 W PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 14 EPS: ESA EPSA: ALTA (prime) PPCU: Galileo Avionica NA: AAS Proel PMD: Astrium SAS LOM: Contraves Space Drag free system specs : 3.10 -10 ms -2 Hz -1/2 along 3 axes 10 -12 ms -2 @ f EP

  15. Alternate Solutions Indium FEEP : Proportional cold gas thruster : Interest : Interest: • relatively simple ⇒ reliability • low interaction with water vapor • tested • reduced power consumption 50 W Drawbacks: (reduced solar panel area : x 0.6) limited thrust (50 µN) ⇒ clusters Drawbacks: small Isp ⇒ mass increase : + 20kg ⇒ weight and power very high for microsatellite PIERRE TOUBOUL - GREX ,Florence – sept 06 – 15 AAS (Laben) back-up with double solar panels Marotta UK Possible back-up

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend