SLIDE 1 About the Optimal Optical Transfer Function
Jörg Enderlein Georg August University Göttingen Germany Quantitative BioImaging 2019, January 9 ‒ 11 Rennes, France
SLIDE 2 The Optical Microscope And Its Resolution
min
2 sin 2 N.A. y n
SLIDE 3 The Optical Transfer Function
sin ' sin M n Abbe‘s sine condition: detection and imaging as a superposition
SLIDE 4
The Optical Transfer Function
imaging as a superposition of plane waves Fourier transform of electric field
SLIDE 5
The Optical Transfer Function
intensity = absolute square of electric field in Fourier space: convolution Fourier transform of electric field
SLIDE 6
The Optical Transfer Function
Optical Transfer Function Fourier transform of electric field
SLIDE 7
The Optical Transfer Function
PSF = Fourier back- transform of OTF Optical Transfer Function
SLIDE 8
The Point Spread Function
electric field intensity
SLIDE 9
The Optical Transfer Function
electric field Fourier transform of electric field
SLIDE 10
The Optical Transfer Function
convolution Fourier transform of electric field
SLIDE 11
The Optical Transfer Function
convolution OTF
SLIDE 12 The Optical Transfer Function
electric field of collected light
electric field of focused excitation OTF WFM
OTF CLSM (no pinhole)
SLIDE 13 The Optical Transfer Function
2 max sin n k
4 max sin n k
min
2 2 sin 2 N.A. max y n k
SLIDE 14
But what would be the optimal Optical Transfer Function for a given finite frequency support of a microscope? Answer: The OTF which yields the sharpest image.
SLIDE 15 One-dimensional case
max max max
lim exp 2
q q q
dq iqx x
But we have also to require strict non-negativeness
OTF PSF Maybe, a uniform amplitude across all available frequencies is optimal.
SLIDE 16 One-dimensional case
max max
2
exp 2
q q
dq U x iqx
strictly non-negative OTF PSF
SLIDE 17
How about non-uniform amplitude distribution?
1 a q q OTF E-Field PSF
SLIDE 18 A heuristic argument for the Optimal Optical Transfer Function
2
dxU x x dxU x
does generally not converge What is a good measure of „sharpness“? So what about the following idea?
2 2 2
dxU x x dxU x
minimize
SLIDE 19 A heuristic argument for the Optimal Optical Transfer Function
2 2 2
dxU x x dxU x
1 a q q
SLIDE 20
Recipe For Finding Optimal OTF: Minkowski Sum Decomposition
Given the frequency support of OTF (B), search Minkowski decomposition (A) so that its auto-convolution recovers the OTF support, then fill Minkowksi decomposition with uniform frequency amplitude and calculate via auto- convolution optimal OTF. A A B
SLIDE 21 OTFs of Ideal Wide-Field Microscope or Pinhole-less Laser-Scanning Microscope Are Optimal
electric field of collected light
electric field of focused excitation OTF WFM
OTF CLSM (no pinhole)
SLIDE 22
Minkowski Sum = Geometric Convolution
A B
SLIDE 23
Minkowski Sum = Geometric Convolution
A B
SLIDE 24
Minkowski Sum = Geometric Convolution
A B C
SLIDE 25
Minkowski Sum Decomposition
generally unsolved problem easy for convex shapes
SLIDE 26
Example: Ideal Confocal Microscope Or Image Scanning Microscope
OTF of excitation OTF of detection through infinitely small pinhole OTF of LSCM with infinitely small pinhole Stokes shift neglected
SLIDE 27
Example: Ideal Confocal Microscope
SLIDE 28
Example: Ideal Confocal Microscope
SLIDE 29 Conclusion
- Optimal OTF can be generated via an auto-
convolution of a frequency distribution with uniform constant amplitude
- General problem of how to find Minkowski
decomposition for non-convex shapes - may be complicated
- Knowing the optimal OTF is important for
deconvolution but also for physical PSF engineering
SLIDE 30
Acknowledgements
Ingo Gregor Alexey I. Chizhik Anna M. Chizhik Narain Karedla Roman Tsukanov Yunking Tang Simon Stein Jan Thiart Daja Ruhlandt Sebastian Isbaner Arindam Ghosh Akshita Sharma Aditya Katta Soheil Mojiri Shun Qin Hongje Jang Nazar Oleksiievits Collaborations Fred Wouters Gertrude Bunt Jörg Großhans Robert Ros Andreas Janshoff Florian Rehfeldt Ralph Kehlenbach
www.joerg-enderlein.de