meeting 22
play

Meeting 22: 9 August 2016 1 Karakia 2 Agenda 10:00am Welcome, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Greater Heretaunga and Ahuriri Land and Water Management Collaborative Stakeholder (TANK) Group Meeting 22: 9 August 2016 1 Karakia 2 Agenda 10:00am Welcome, karakia, notices, meeting record 10:15am Tutaekuri locality of values


  1. Greater Heretaunga and Ahuriri Land and Water Management Collaborative Stakeholder (TANK) Group Meeting 22: 9 August 2016 1

  2. Karakia 2

  3. Agenda 10:00am Welcome, karakia, notices, meeting record 10:15am Tutaekuri – locality of values 10:30am Ngaruroro and Tutaekuri attributes states 12:30pm LUNCH 1:15pm ….Continued…. 2:30pm Waitangi Estuary – freshwater influences 3:00pm COFFEE BREAK 3:15pm Updates on: Working Groups, Water Conservation Order, Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) work and RPC meeting 3:45pm TANK Information Portal 3:50pm Agenda setting for next meeting ~4:00pm FINISH 3

  4. Meeting objectives 1. Continue to make choices for attribute states in: • the Ngaruroro River • Ngaruroro River tributaries 2. Confirm values for the Tutaekuri catchment 3. Understand current state and make choices for attribute states for the Tutaekuri River 4. Understand estuary state in relation to freshwater inputs 4

  5. Action points ID Action item Person Status responsible 21.1 Provide a link on the portal to the Next Steps for Freshwater summary of submissions. Desiree Completed http://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Fresh%20water/summary-of- submissions-next-steps-for-freshwater-final-3.pdf 21.2 Provide feedback on the “TANK Plan Change – Engagement Plan” to Drew as the convenor TANK members of the Engagement Working Group. 21.3 Bring back a firmer set of guidelines for working group membership including matters such HBRC Completed project See Briefs on as who gets to decide who joins the working groups and the roles of TANK plenary team portal members, observers and other supporting experts. 21.4 Discuss the process around a spokesperson(s) further and report back with further Drew/ To be Engagement considered by clarification, including working with the mana whenua group. WG WG 21.5 Provide the plenary group with a gap analysis that compares all the previous work that has Rina/ In progress Stormwater been carried out for stormwater in the TANK catchment and identification of what work WG needs to be done 21.6 Compose and provide to the plenary group a reading list to read to come up to speed on Rina In progress information available. 21.7 HBRC to clarify the locations of the Poporangi and Ohara Streams. Mary-Anne Completed. See GIS map 21.8 HBRC to check whether swimability is a compulsory value in the RPS everywhere all of the Mary-Anne Refer Meeting time. record 5

  6. T ūtaekuri Values 6

  7. Tutaekuri Catchment Values Location Values Comments All water - surface and groundwater Mauri Household water supply may need Life-supporting capacity treatment because of natural water Habitat and biodiversity - native fish, eels, quality. This especially includes surface plants and birds water, as there are animals and birds in Trout fishery the catchment. Household water supply Stock drinking water All surface water Swimming/immersion Provision of access not part of this water Mahinga kai, quality management consideration Nohoanga Swimming not at flood flows or for urban Taonga raranga, taonga rongoa. streams Natural character and Amenity – (including wild and scenic value) as there High natural character values above is a high level of natural character Mangatutu R confluence. Fishing - whitebait, eels, trout Surface - main stem and tributaries - and Food and fibre production/ processing groundwater (and employment) Industrial and commercial use (and employment) Main stem Tourism, Kayaking Rafting Main stem ( specific lower reaches) Gravel extraction Main stem and Mangaone R Trout fishing Shallow lakes and wetlands Commercial eeling ? Surface waters - tributaries Small scale hydro-electric power generation Surface and groundwater Direct discharges (including stormwater) More details (consent data) about direct and non-point source discharges discharges are required before making a decision about the use of surface waters for discharge of contaminants Groundwater Contribution to surface flows and water 7 body values

  8. • Amendments - include “amenity value” • Other suggestion; land cover as value 8

  9. Meeting 22 Ngaruroro and Tutaekuri catchments Water Quality 9

  10. Meeting 22 Ngaruroro and Tutaekuri catchments Water Quality  General considerations and recap from last meeting Tutaekuri catchment:  NOF attributes for toxicity (ecosystem health) and E.coli (contact recreation) Ngaruroro and Tutaekuri catchments:  Algae and nutrients  Macroinvertebrates  Water clarity, sediment 10

  11. Take home points from last meeting • Progress too slow • ‘Happy/ unhappy’ rating for current state not suitable • Unknown uncertainty behind data • Sometimes confusing Changes to this presentation :  Discussing attributes for Tutaekuri and Ngaruroro together  Replacement of rating happy/ unhappy with current state by prioritising responses instead  Tables now sorted separately for main stem and tributaries (management zones?)  Background information on the data  Ngaruroro macrophyte dominated lowland sites taken out of algae section 11

  12. RESPONSE RATING NARRATIVE (PRIORITY) Water quality and/or quantity needs of the values are not being met or High There is a high risk that values will be significantly adversely affected without management intervention Water quality and quantity needs of the values are not being fully met or Medium There is a risk that values will be adversely affected without management intervention Water quality and quantity needs of the values are being mostly met or There is a low risk that values will be adversely affected Low or Management response required for other priority areas may manage this aspect at higher level of protection Water quality and quantity needs of the values are being fully met No and There is a very low risk that values will be adversely affected 12

  13. Site name E.coli NO 3 Amm-N Chla PeriWCC MPh DIN TN DRP TP Bdisk Turbidity MCI Ngaruroro catchment Ngaruroro Rv at Kuripapango A A A A A A A B B E *Taruarau Rv A A A A A A A A A B A E Ngaruroro Rv at Whanawhana A A A B B A A A A C B G *Poporangi Strm A A A B B D D F C C C G Ngaruroro Rv U/S HB Dairies A A A C A A A A A C B G Ngaruroro Rv D/S HB Dairies A A A B A A A A B D C G *Maraekakaho Strm A B A P C D F C C B G Ngaruroro Rv at Ohiti A A B B B A A B D D G Waitio Strm B A B B B C C F C C A G-F *Ohiwia Strm C A A D D F F C B F Ngaruroro Rv at Fernhill A A A B B B B A B D C F Ngaruroro Rv at Motorway A A A B B B B A B D C G-F Tutaekuri-Waimate Strm B A A C C F F E C F Ngaruroro Rv at Chesterhope NIWA A A A B B C D C G Tutaekuri catchment Tutaekuri Rv at Lawrence Hut A A A A A A A A A A A E *Mangatutu Strm A A A D C C F B D B G Tutaekuri Rv U/S Mangaone Rv A A B B A B B D B D B G Mangaone Rv at Rissington A A A B A C C F C C A G *Mangaone Rv at Dartmoor A A A B B F D C A G *Tutaekuri Rv at Puketapu A A A C A B B E B C A F Tutaekuri Rv at Brookfields Br A A A D A B B E B C B F Karamu and Ahuriri catchments Ruahapia Strm C A B D D F F E C P Karewarewa Strm C C C E F F F D C P Awanui Strm B B B E F F F D B P Poukawa Strm A A A C F F F D A P Herehere Strm D B A C D F F C C P Mangarau Strm at Keirunga Rd B A A D B C F F E C F Mangarau Strm at Te Aute Rd B B A C F F F F E B P Clive Rv B B A D D F F D B P Taipo Strm C A C D E F F F D P 13

  14. Attribute groups of similar response to management TANGATA WHENUA ECOSYSTEM HEALTH RECREATION, SOCIAL SOCIAL, CULTURAL Water quality Ecosystem Toxicants Trophic state Pathogens health (Other factors) ECONOMIC, TOURISM Nitrate Algae Water clarity MCI E. coli Ammonia (Biomass) ANZECC, RRMP NOF NOF Stark 2007 (MfE) NOF Hay & Hayes Algae Nitrate and (Cover) Sediment, DRP and E. coli : ammonia Biggs 2000 (MfE) NIWA 2016 are Similar pathways into streams. Nutrients components ( DIN, DRP ) of DIN. Biggs 2000 (MfE) NIWA 2016 14

  15. NOF attributes: aims in NOF bands Compulsory attributes for ecosystem health and human health (recreation)- Tutaekuri catchment TANGATA WHENUA RECREATION, ECOSYSTEM HEALTH HUMAN HEALTH 3 1 2 Toxicants Trophic state Pathogens Nitrate Algae E. coli Ammonia (Biomass) NOF NOF NOF 15

  16. Nitrate toxicity on aquatic organisms, Tutaekuri catchment Guideline source: NOF band Attribute/Indicator: Nitrate NO3-N (mg /L) Ecosystem Ecosystem Value: Health Health Toxicity Toxicity Statistic: Annual median Annual 95th %ile NOF narrative state Tutaekuri Rv at Lawrence Hut A A *Mangatutu Strm (A) (A) High conservation value Tutaekuri Rv U/S Mangaone Rv A A system. Mangaone Rv at Rissington A A Unlikely to be effects even on *Mangaone Rv at Dartmoor (A) (A) sensitive species. *Tutaekuri Rv at Puketapu (A) (A) Tutaekuri Rv at Brookfields Br A A 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend