measuring sin 2 2 13 with reactor antineutrinos
play

Measuring sin 2 2 13 with Reactor Antineutrinos - Proposals with US - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measuring sin 2 2 13 with Reactor Antineutrinos - Proposals with US Involvement - Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005 Understanding Neutrino Mixing Atmospheric Solar


  1. Measuring sin 2 2 θ 13 with Reactor Antineutrinos - Proposals with US Involvement - Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  2. Understanding Neutrino Mixing Atmospheric Solar Reactor (Super-K) (SNO) (KamLAND) CHOOZ � U e 1 U e 2 U e 3 � U MNSP Matrix � � U = U µ 1 U µ 2 U µ 3 � � hep-ph/0405172 � � U � 1 U � 2 U � 3 � � e � i � CP sin � 13 � � � 1 0 0 � cos � 13 0 � cos � 12 sin � 12 0 � � 1 0 0 � � � � � � � � � e i � / 2 0 cos � 23 sin � 23 0 1 0 � sin � 12 cos � 12 0 0 0 = � ? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � e i � CP sin � 13 e i � / 2 + i � 0 � sin � 23 cos � 23 0 cos � 13 0 0 1 0 0 � � � � � � � � atmospheric, K2K reactor and accelerator SNO, solar SK, KamLAND 0 νββ θ 13 = ? θ 23 = ~ 45° θ 12 ~ 32° Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  3. θ 13 from Reactor and Accelerator Experiments reactor � � � � 2 L 2 L ee � 1 � sin 2 2 � 13 sin 2 � m 31 � � cos 4 � 13 sin 2 2 � 12 sin 2 � m 21 P � � � 4 E � 4 E � � � � � - Clean measurement of θ 13 - No matter effects mass hierarchy CP violation accelerator matter - sin 2 2 θ 13 is missing key parameter for any measurement of δ CP Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  4. A Precision Measurement of θ 13 Next-generation experiments will not measure CP violation but some values of δ CP could be excluded. hep-ex/0409028 Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  5. Measuring θ 13 with Reactor Antineutrinos Precision Oscillation Measurement as a Function of Distance from Source � 2 L � � 2 L � ee � 1 � sin 2 2 � 13 sin 2 � m 31 � � cos 4 � 13 sin 2 2 � 12 sin 2 � m 21 P � � � 4 E � 4 E � � � � � θ 13 Relative ν e flux measurement at different distances. Diablo Canyon ν e ν e ν e 0.5-2 km nuclear reactor Event rate: ~1 event/GW/ton/day at 1km underground scintillator ν detectors, ~40-200t Projected sensitivity: sin 2 2 θ 13 ≈ 0.01 Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  6. Signatures of θ 13 in a Reactor Experiment Disappearance of ν e : Reduction of interaction rate near  far comparison Rate and shape effects optimize at different baselines ratio mid/far 1 km Spectral Distortion P ee mid  far comparison 2.5 km → 3 baselines provide consistency checks and eliminate single point failure of experiment, in particular if the backgrounds are too high in near detector or unaccounted systematics in one Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005 of detectors

  7. Proposals to Measure θ 13 with Reactor Neutrinos Krasnoyarsk, Russia Diablo Canyon, CA Braidwood, Il Kashiwazaki, Japan Daya Bay, China Chooz, France horizontal tunnels vertical shafts Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  8. Proposals to Measure θ 13 with Reactor Neutrinos Krasnoyarsk, Russia Diablo Canyon, CA Braidwood, Il Braidwood Double Chooz Daya Bay Kashiwazaki, Japan Daya Bay, China Chooz, France horizontal tunnels vertical shafts Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  9. DoubleChooz …Improving on Chooz ‘ Double-Chooz ’ Project 10 tons detectors 8.4 GW th reactor power 300 mwe overburden at far site ~50 mwe overburden at near site 0.1-0.2 km 1.05 km Sensitivity sin 2 (2 θ 13 ) < 0.03 at 90% CL 2 = 2 x 10 -3 eV 2 after 3 yrs, Δ m atm → Improve the detector concept → and backgrounds rejection on Chooz Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  10. Prototype Development 1/5 scale acrylic vessel buffer to reduce backgrounds Liquid scintillator + Gd Liquid scintillator (gamma catcher) 3-zone detector Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  11. Double Chooz Sensitivity (2007-2012) Far & Near detectors Far detector Far detector starts in 2007 together only σ sys =0.6% σ sys =2.5% σ sys =2.5% Near detector 16 months later Δ m 2 atm = 2.8 10 -3 eV 2 Will be known to 20% by MINOS Far detector starts Near detector starts 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2007 2003 Site Proposal & design Construction ? Data taking Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  12. Braidwood Neutrino Experiment Braidwood Setup • Two 3.6 GW reactors • near: 2x65 ton (fid vol), 270 m • far : 2x65 ton (fid vol), 1510 m • 180m shafts and detector halls (450 mwe) depth • optimized distances Braidwood Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  13. Braidwood Detector Concept • Transport for moving detectors from construction/filling area to underground halls. • Moving required for cross checks. • Outer steel buffer oil containment (7m diameter) • Inner acrylic Gd-Scint containment (5.2m diameter) • 2-zone detector • 1000 low activity glass 8” PMTs (25% coverage) Goal: < 1 neutron background event/day/detector Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  14. Braidwood Sensitivity and Discovery Potential 3 years, Δ m 2 > 2.5 x 10 -3 eV 2 90% CL limit at sin 2 2 θ 13 < 0.005 3 σ discovery for sin 2 2 θ 13 > 0.013 Uncertainties for 3 yr Data Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  15. Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant Powerful ν e Source: Multiple reactor cores. (4 units 11.6 GW E th, eventually 6 units 17.4 GW E th ) Shielding from Cosmic Rays: Up to 1200 mwe overburden nearby. Infrastructure: Construction roads. Controlled access. Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  16. Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant Laboratory with Horizontal Tunnels - Simplifying logistics: Build detectors outside before moving into tunnel. - Swapping detectors: Eliminates most systematic errors. Helps understand backgrounds. - Modular detectors: Phased approach, 30-40t allowing rapid deployment, different target mass configurations, and cross-calibration. -Optimizing distance to reactors Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  17. Tunnel Layout at Daya Bay ~0% slope 2x 2.9 GW th Ling Ao ll ~0% slope (under construction) 2x 2.9 GW th ~0% slope Ling Ao 670 m, ~12% slope only for extraction of waste rock access portal 8% slope • Maximize overburden 2x 2.9 GW th • Optimize distances to reactors: Daya Bay - maximize sensitivity - cancel reactor systematics Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005 • Flexible configuration

  18. Tunnel Layout at Daya Bay FAR SITE overburden ~1050 mwe distance to Daya Bay ~1900 m distance to Ling Ao ~1600 m Ling Ao NEAR SITE overburden ~300 mwe distance to Ling Ao ~500 m distance to Daya Bay ~1300 m Ling Ao ll (under construction) MID SITE overburden ~620 mwe distance to Daya Bay ~1100 m distance to Ling Ao ~750 m Ling Ao access portal Daya Bay NEAR SITE Site Reactor ν e Signal (/day ) overburden ~300 mwe near 1160 distance to Daya Bay ~360 m distance to Ling Ao ~900 m mid 464 Daya Bay far 116 Not a rare event experiment, Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005 precision oscillation physics.

  19. Development of Multi-Layer Detector Modules Option A: horizontal, cylindrical modules ~600 externally mounted PMTs ~40cm of mineral 12% PMT coverage oil buffer to � E 7% E ~ reduce E ( MeV ) backgrounds Liquid scintillator + Gd Liquid scintillator (gamma catcher) ν e +p → e + +n → evaluating need for 2 or 3 zones Electronics ~40 ton fiducial volume integrated calibration systems • movable over a distance of ~2km Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  20. Detector Design Studies Option B: vertical, upright modules - multiple modules, easier to fabricate - modular muon shielding with water tanks Roof shown slide back to reveal detector modules. Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  21. Technical Challenges: Multi-Layer Acrylic Detectors A commercial double-walled acrylic tank Evaluating need for 2 or 3 zones: • third layer increases cost, difficulty of construction, complexity stress analysis threshold on positron spectrum? gamma cascade tail? 2-zone: cascade cut at ~4MeV gives an uncertainty of <0.2% for threshold uncertainties <1% Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  22. Movable Detector Modules in Underground Halls Swapping: Cancellation of systematics Side-by-Side Calibration : Initial side-by-side calibration at near site Cross-Check of Modules Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  23. Mountainous Site With Horizontal Access Tunnel 707 m • reduce systematics by swapping • access to large overburden • Daya Bay offers up to 1100 mwe overburden Muon flux underground Antineutrino candidate signal: Correlated Backgrounds ν e +p → e + +n - Muon spallation - 9 Li - Fast neutrons Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

  24. Correlated Backgrounds Measuring 9 Li Muon flux low enough at mid and far sites so that we can measure 9 Li production and subtract it. mid: depth 560 mwe 0.176/m 2 /sec µ 9 Li 0.32 ± 0.10% far: depth ~1100 mwe 0.016/m 2 /sec µ 9 Li 0.17 ± 0.14% → 9 Li at KamLAND, D. Dwyer, JG10 near: muon flux high, we cannot make sufficiently precise measurement of 9 Li background, need calculation based on measurements at mid and far site Ref: Daya Bay US LOI Karsten Heeger US-Japan Seminar, September 17, 2005

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend