matthew t menard m d
play

Matthew T. Menard, M.D. Stenting In-stent restenosis Brigham and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

4/15/2016 Matthew T. Menard, M.D. Stenting In-stent restenosis Brigham and Womens Hospital University of California San Francisco Vascular Symposium April 15, 2016 Bittl. NEJM 1996 Delivery of ionizing radiation through a directed


  1. 4/15/2016 Matthew T. Menard, M.D. Stenting In-stent restenosis Brigham and Women’s Hospital University of California San Francisco Vascular Symposium April 15, 2016 Bittl. NEJM 1996 � Delivery of ionizing radiation through a directed approach Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting (PTAS) aimed at affecting local tissue. Barotrauma and stent placement: Procedure-related � Animal models showed that radiation inhibits the effects of - Endothelial denudation - Subintimal hemorrhage risk factors vascular smooth muscle proliferation in blood vessels - Local dissection - Elastic recoil undergoing angioplasty INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE � Also thought to prevent late remodeling by inhibiting Vascular smooth muscle Extracellular matrix adventitial fibrosis cell activation formation Patient-specific risk factors � Initial benefit for ISR of coronary stents was shown in several (clinical and genetic) trials (Gamma 1, Wrist, Long Wrist, Inhibit) Neointimal hyperplasia Lesion-specific risk factors � Further application was studied in denovo lesions in the IN-STENT RESTENOSIS peripheral circulation (Vienna and Paris studies) Jukema et al. Nat Review 2012 1

  2. 4/15/2016 � Clinical use of radioactive sources to deliver � Radioactive isotopes are made with neutron highly therapeutic and palliative radiation bombardment of stable elements in a reactor therapy to a range of targets or accelerator ▪ gynecological, urological, pulmonary, head and neck, � Large unstable nucleus yearning for peace gastrointestinal, sarcoma, vascular, dermatological, � As nucleus decays emanations occur – endocrine disease � Photons: conservation of mass, energy � Extrinsic electron displaces inner shell electron � Alpha, beta, gamma, neutrinos, bosons, … � Outer shell electron replaces displaced electron � Energy difference between shells is ejected as chargeless wave/particle (conservation of energy) 6 7 102 patients with either new or � EVBT: intraluminal delivery of radiation � restenotic femoropopliteal lesions. Randomized to angioplasty and Gamma � brachytherapy, or angioplasty alone. Tissue No stenting in this trial Stent � growth 6 month restenosis rate: � � 30% angioplasty and brachytherapy vs γ -emitter ( 192 Iridium) � 57% for the angioplasty alone group. Brachytherapy delayed restenosis � recurrence: In-stent restenosis � 17.5 months brachytherapy group vs. � attenuation of collagen synthesis � suppression of monocyte/macrophage activity � 7.4 months in the angioplasty alone � decrement or delay of smooth muscle cell group proliferation � approved by FDA for treatment of ISR in 2000 Radiology 2006 240(3) 878-844 2

  3. 4/15/2016 EDGE RESTENOSIS � Restenosis adjacent to the proximal and distal edges of the implanted stent (“edge effect” or “candy wrapper” phenomenon) � Causes: 1. Radioactive dose fall-off at the stent edges 2. Failure of stent to treat the barotraumatized margins Distal Proximal barotrauma barotrauma 11 Source length Primary patency Treatment type Reference 6 months 1 year Repeat balloon angioplasty 27% -- Dick et al. Radiology 2008 Target localization (ISR lesion, angioplasty) Cutting balloon angioplasty 35% -- Dick et al. Radiology 2008 50% 0% Karthik et al. EJVES 2007 Cryoplasty -- 28% Schmieder et al. JVS 2010 Directional atherectomy -- 54% Zeller et al. JACC 2010 distal proximal Excimer laser and “safety margin” “safety margin” -- 48% Laird et al. Card Cath Int 2012 stent-graft Key features: PTA, laser, or excisional 55% 47.6% Yeo et al. Card Cath Int 2011 1. Higher radiation dose (20 gray) atherectomy 2. 2 cm“safety margins” of radiation coverage proximal and distal to (70%) -- Vienna 4 (2001) angioplastied/stented area PTA+EVBT (67%) (57%) Vienna 5 (2005) 95.2% 79.8% Leipzig 2012 Customized treatment depth: 0.5mm + radius of largest PTA balloon 3. 3

  4. 4/15/2016 Retrospective, single-center review of 43 cases of EVBT for lower extremity ISR � at Brigham and Women’s Hospital between 2004-2012 Mean age (years) (± standard deviation) 67.0±11.4 Indication for original stents All patients were evaluated by radiation oncologist and consented for EVBT � Female gender, N (%) 16 (38.1%) Claudication 34 (81%) ahead of time Smoking Critical limb ischemia 8 (19%) Former 19 (50.0%) Stent location Aspirin and clopidogrel indefinitely Current 6 (15.8%) Common iliac artery 3 (7%) � Diabetes 20 (47.6%) External iliac artery 6 (14%) Hypertension 36 (85.7%) Superficial femoral artery 26 (62%) Stents undergo duplex ultrasound surveillance for recurrent ISR at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, � Hypercholesterolemia 31 (73.8%) Popliteal artery 2 (45%) and 18 months and then yearly Combined SFA and 5 (12%) Chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine ≥ 7 (16.8%) popliteal segments 2mg/dL) Primary endpoint: stent patency (primary, primary-assisted, and secondary) at 1 � End stage renal disease 2 (4.8%) and 2 years � Stent patency: freedom from ≥ 50% recurrent stenosis by duplex ultrasound Calibrated SFA in-stent dummy restenosis strand for before PTA EVBT planning SFA in-stent restenosis after PTA 4

  5. 4/15/2016 Femoropopliteal ISR lesions, N (%) 33 (76.7%) � Technical success: 42/43 (97.6%) Additional stenting at time of EVBT 10 (31.3%) Location of ISR: 26 (60.5%) Mean EVBT treated length, cm (± SD) 23.6±13.1 Superficial femoral artery (SFA) � Follow-up time: 706.3±543.7 days Popliteal artery 2 (4.7%) Maximum PTA balloon diameter (in mm) Combined SFA and popliteal arteries 5 (11.9%) � Symptom status: 2 (6.3%) 4 4.5 1 (3.1%) Indication for EVBT: 5 17 (53.1%) Claudication 16 (50.0%) � Claudicants: 6 Critical stenosis on duplex 12 (37.5%) 13 (40.6%) Critical limb ischemia ▪ resolved in 18/20 (85%) 3 (9.4%) Mean total radiation time, minutes (± SD) 16.6 ±9.8 Tibial runoff at time of EVBT (number of At least 1 re-intervention for ISR prior to EVBT 11 (34.4%) ▪ Improved and then recurred in 2/20 vessels): 5 (19.2%) Mean ABI (± SD): 1 6 (23.1%) Pre-EVBT 0.76±0.22 � Mean ABI change: +0.14±0.23 (range -0.21- 2 Post-EVBT 15 (57.7%) 0.91±0.18 3 0.84) � Recurrent ISR 50-99% stenosis after EVBT: 8/42 (19.1%) � Mean time to recurrent ISR: 505±348 days 6 months � In-stent recurrence: 4/8 Time after 1 year 2 years (180 EVBT (365 days) (730 days) � In-segment recurrence: 4/8 days) Primary 87.5% 75.2% 63.7% patency (NAR=32) (NAR=23) (NAR=11) � Early thrombotic occlusion: 2/42(4.7%) Primary 92.1% 89.1% 80.6% � Time to occlusion: 1 day, 26 days assisted (NAR=32) (NAR=29) (NAR=15) patency � Late thrombotic occlusion: 5/42 (11.9%) Secondary 92.1% 89.1% 85.6% � Mean time to recurrent ISR: 708 ± 368 days patency (NAR=33) (NAR=29) (NAR=16) � Death: 1 (possible acute coronary syndrome) 5

  6. 4/15/2016 Primary patency Treatment type References 6 months 1 year 2 years Balloon angioplasty 27% -- -- Dick et al. Radiology 2008 Time after 6 months 1 year 2 years Cutting balloon 35% -- -- Dick et al. Radiology 2008 EVBT (180 days) (365 days) (730 days) angioplasty Primary 86.6% 78.5% 66.8% 50% 0% -- Karthik et al. EJVES 2007 Cryoplasty patency (NAR=22) (NAR=17) (NAR=7) -- 28% -- Schmieder et al. JVS 2010 Primary Directional atherectomy -- 54% Zeller et al. JACC 2010 89.7% 85.4% 76.9% assisted Excimer laser and (NAR=23) (NAR=19) (NAR=8) -- 48% -- Laird et al. Card Cath Int 2012 patency stent-graft Secondary 66.8% 85.4% 85.4% PTA, laser, or excisional 55% 47.6% Yeo et al. Card Cath Int 2011 patency (NAR=7) (NAR=19) (NAR=9) atherectomy (70%) -- -- Vienna 4 (2001) PTA+EVBT (67%) (57%) -- Vienna 5 (2005) 95.2% 79.8% -- Leipzig 2012 PTA+EVBT 86.6% 78.5% 66.8% Current study � Retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent brachytherapy for angiographically proven instent � All patients were pretreated with Aspirin 325 mg, and Plavix restenosis, thrombosis, or occlusion load of 300-600mg pre or immediately post procedure. � Data collected between December 2003 to February 2010 at Brigham and Women’s Hospital cardiac catheterization � Intra-arterial heparin with a goal ACT (activated clotting laboratory. time) of >250 � Thirty two patients were identified including 42 lower extremities � Performed by 3 operators � Decisions regarding provisional brachytherapy were made � Lesions included 31 SFA stents, 10 iliac stents, and 1 popliteal prior to cath, and were based on a combination of stent. symptoms, ABIs, and ultrasound findings. � Patient follow-up duration has been 5 years (and ongoing) 6

  7. 4/15/2016 Characteristic N Age (years, range) 66 (52-84) Gender (Male) 18/32(56%) CAD 24/32(75%) HTN 31/32(97%) CRI 4/32(12.5%) Smoker 26/32(81%) DM 14/32 (44%) Statin 29/32 (91%) ACEi 22/32 (69%) Index procedural Indication N Brachytherapy Indication N Claudication 39/42 (93%) Claudication 40/42 (95%) Critical limb ischemia 3/42 (7%) Critical limb ischemia 1/42 (2.5%) Index intervention N Ultrasound (high grade stenosis, no 1/42 (2.5%) symptoms) Iliac 10/42 (24%) SFA 32/42 (76%) Mode of index stent failure N Popliteal 1/42 (2%) Restenosis 31/42 (74%) Occlusion 9/42 (21%) Index Lesion N Thrombosis 1/42 (2.5%) Lesion length (mean, range) 266, 40-480 mm Chronic total occlusion 24/42 (57%) Unknown 1/42 (2.5%) Stenosis 18/42 (43%) 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend