M EET THE N EIGHBORS : SEGUE R ESULTS F OR T HE D ISK Jennifer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

m eet the n eighbors
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

M EET THE N EIGHBORS : SEGUE R ESULTS F OR T HE D ISK Jennifer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M EET THE N EIGHBORS : SEGUE R ESULTS F OR T HE D ISK Jennifer Johnson Ohio State University B EAUTIFUL S PIRAL G ALAXIES T HE P RIME OF T HE M ILKY W AY The Milky Way has a record of this, if we can disentangle it! Hopkins & Beacom 2006;


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MEET THE NEIGHBORS:

SEGUE RESULTS FOR THE DISK

Jennifer Johnson Ohio State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BEAUTIFUL SPIRAL GALAXIES

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE PRIME OF THE MILKY WAY

The Milky Way has a record of this, if we can disentangle it!

Hopkins & Beacom 2006; Fakhouri et al. 2010

slide-4
SLIDE 4

THE PRIME OF THE MILKY WAY

The Milky Way has a record of this, if we can disentangle it!

Hopkins & Beacom 2006; Fakhouri et al. 2010

slide-5
SLIDE 5

FOCUS ON THE THICK DISK

 Thick disks common in spiral galaxies (Morrison

et al. 1993, Yoachim & Dalcanton 2005)

 Stars are not left to circle the Galaxy

undisturbed!

 What has the history of the Galaxy done to the

disk?

 Radial mixing (e.g ., Roskar et al. 2008, Schoenrich &

Binney 2009)

 Other secular evolution (e.g. effects of bar)  Satellite pass bys (e.g. Quinn et al. 1993)  Satellite merging (e.g Abadi et al. 2003)  Gas infall

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PRESENTATION OF DISK WORK IN PROGRESS

 Kinematics for Chemically Distinct Stars

  • Y. S. Lee, T. Beers +

 Radial Metallicity Gradient in the Milky Way

Disk

  • J. Cheung, C. Rockosi, H. Morrison, R. Schoenrich, +

 The Milky Way Metallicity Distribution as a

Function of Position and Kinematics

  • K. Schlesinger, JAJ, H. Morrison, Kelly Holley-

Bockelmann, L. Palladino, R. Schoenrich

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A SINGLE PLOT TO REPRESENT YEARS OF RESEARCH

Bensby et al. 2004

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ADVANTAGES OF SEGUE

 Kinematically unbiased  Photometrically biased  Defined color cut criteria  ugriz photometry  Target information in the CAS  400,000 spectra = lots!  Spectra: radial velocities, [Fe/H], [α/Fe], large

number of spectra indices (Lee et al. 2008, Yanny et al. 2009, Smolinski et al. 2010)

 Proper motions for nearby stars

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LEE ET AL

KINEMATICS FOR CHEMICALLY DISTINCT STARS

  • SEGUE F/G type stars in the color range of 0.2 < g-r < 0.55
  • Among 70,000, about 48,000 selected with well determined

stellar parameters, including [α/Fe], from the SSPP, radial velocities, distances, and proper motions

  • Computed U, V, W, Vφ, Rapo, Rperi, Zmax, and eccentricity
  • Selected ~ 20,000 stars with log g > 4.2, S/N > 30, |Z| < 2 kpc,

7 < R/kpc < 11, [Fe/H] > -1.4, and Vφ > 50 km/s

  • Define thin disk stars = [α/Fe] < 0.2, thick disk stars =

[α/Fe] > 0.3

  • [α/Fe] derived from SEGUE spectra (Lee et al. 2010, AJ, in

press)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

DISTRIBUTION OF [FE/H] AND VΦ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TREND OF ROTATIONAL VELOCITY

See also, e.g. Navarro et al. 2010

slide-12
SLIDE 12

DISTRIBUTION OF ECCENTRICITY

Sales et al. (2009) SEGUE sample

See also Dierickx, et al. 2010, Wilson et al. 2010

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CHEUNG, ET AL RADIAL METALLICITY GRADIENTS IN THE DISK

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SAMPLE

 Low-latitude target scheme – focused on turnoff

stars

 7712 stars with 5000 < T < 7000 K  Distance for turnoff stars are tricky  Observed Distribution weighted  Area Sampling  Color-Magnitude Sampling  Luminosity Sampling  Ongoing tests include comparing “observed”

Schoenrich model with underlying parameters

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PRELIMINARY RADIAL GRADIENTS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

COMPARISON OF SLOPES WITH LITERATURE

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SCHLESINGER, ET AL METALLICITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS

 Based on “G” and “K” sample, broad color cuts

  • nly – not true for all categories – DR7

 S/N > 10, log g > 4.1, SSPP-measured [Fe/H]  For most metallicities, color cuts redder than

turnoff – distance estimation easier

 Isochrone-based distances and masses  “Volume”-limited samples  G+K sample : 0.75 kpc – 1.8 kpc  G sample 0.75 kpc – 5 kpc  ~35,700 G and 20,900 K dwarfs with parameters  Volume-limited: 19,482 G+K dwarfs; 26,269 G

dwarfs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

MDF CORRECTIONS

 Weighting to account for

uneven sampling of spectra in the g-r,r plane

 Correction for targeting in

multiple categories (i.e. G dwarf and metal-poor)

 LF function correction  Effect on distances of

including subgiants and binaries (Schlesinger et al. 2010, ApJ, in press)

 [Fe/H] measurements from

SSPP (above solar) = DR8

 Effect of isochrone choice

slide-19
SLIDE 19

METALLICITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION

Preliminary result Volume-limited sample of G and K dwarfs Compare with other results, e.g., Geneva- Copenhagen Compare with models: Besancon and TRILEGAL, for example

slide-20
SLIDE 20

MDF AS A FUNCTION OF Z FOR GD

See e.g, Gilmore & Wyse 1995, Allende Prieto et al. 2006

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MDFS AND KINEMATICS

Preliminary result Volume-limited sample

  • f G and K dwarfs

MDF of all Galactic components (within 1.8 kpc) Interesting connection to work within SEGUE to characterize the metal-rich halo component.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PROGRESS!