T RA N SI T I M PRO V EM EN T & PED EST RI A N REA LM PRO JECT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
T RA N SI T I M PRO V EM EN T & PED EST RI A N REA LM PRO JECT ST REET SCA PE CO M M U N I T Y M EET I N G ST REET SCA PE CO M M U N I T Y M U N I EET I N G I July 6, 2016 Meeting Etiquette Streetscape Community Meeting Please
July 6, 2016
T RA N SI T I M PRO V EM EN T & PED EST RI A N REA LM PRO JECT
ST REET SCA PE CO M M U N I T Y M EET I N G ST REET SCA PE CO M U N I M U N I T Y M I EET I N G
Streetscape Community Meeting
Streetscape Community Meeting Welcome and Introductions - (15 Min.) Streetscape Conceptual Plan - (30 Min.) Feedback/ Discussion - (15 Min.) Break Out Session - (20 Min.) Stakeholders: HAMA, HAIA, HANC, CVIA 1 2 3 4
First Public Meeting Cole Valley Fair Upper Haight Farmers’ Market Public Realm Plan- Public Workshop Public Realm Plan- Open House Haight St. Merchant’s Working Group # 1 SFMTA Board Approves Rapid Project Haight St. Merchant’s Working Group # 2 Public Realm Plan- Open House Public Realm Plan- Final Report Completed Focus Group Meeting w/ Stakeholder Groups # 1 Focus Group Meeting w/ Stakeholder Groups # 2 10.24.12 09.29.13 10.23.13 02.27.14 06.11.14 10.14.14 10.20.14 10.28.14 02.25.15 02.01.15 02.19.16 03.22.16 07.06.16 Streetscape Community Meeting
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 5
“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 6
“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 7
“Revolutionize Haight” By: Reed Martin/Grand San Francisco
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 8
Connected to the Past Moving T
The Haight Street of today is markedly different than the Haight Street of past generations but many aspects
built long before the street became the crowded destination that it is today. Furthermore, navigating the residential side streets to arrive at the commercial corridor can be difficult for outside visitors. This neighborhood, perhaps more than any other in our city, will always be associated with elements of the past -- and it is for this reason that the future design of Haight Street must enable the greatest possible degree of flexibility by creating urban spaces that are able to evolve with the changing demands of the neighborhood.
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 9
Global Reach Regional Appeal Local Character The Upper Haight Streetscape Improvement Project encompasses half a mile long urban space which spans one
layered with a history of connection, activism, entertainment, tolerance, community, and counter-culture. The place tells its own story through its distinct neighborhood character, thriving commercial corridor, and the global appeal that brings international visitors to Haight Street every day. Moving forward, we seek to enrich an already compelling story and bring this urban space up to date through new lighting, embedded way-finding, neighborhood greening, and expanded pedestrian spaces. These few simple features allow the narrative of Haight Street to remain connected to the past while also providing the necessary opportunities to shape new stories well into the future.
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 10
G L O B A L R E A C H
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 11
The historical elements and iconic symbolism are features which foster Haight Street’s role as an international destination for visitors.
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 12
R E G I O N A L A P P E A L
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 13
The thriving commercial corridor which runs through Upper Haight Street is an essential element in the neighborhood’s resilience. Unique retail shops, curiosities, and iconic local establishments will help bring Haight Street into the future.
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 14
L O C A L C H A R A C T E R
H A I G H T S T
G O L D E N G A T E P A R K M A S O N I C A V E C E N T R A L A V E A S H B U R Y S T C L A Y T O N S T B E L V E D E R E S T C O L E S T S H R A D E R S T S T A N Y A N S T
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 15
The new design should build upon the unique local character already present in the Upper Haight Street neighborhood in order to create a thriving streetscape that all can enjoy.
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 16
BEYOND THE SUMMER OF LOVE Global Reach Regional Appeal Local Character Contemporary Haight Street The future Haight Street presents an opportunity to draw upon the international, regional, and local elements to carry Haight St. into the future while maintaining significant connections to our historical past.
C O N C E P T
Haight Streetscape Improvements
SH SH S RA RA RA R DE DE D R R T ST T CO CO CO COLE LE LE ST (EA EA E ST ST T) CL C AY AY AYTO TO ON ST ST S
matchline matchline
CL CL C AY AY AY YTO TO T N ST ST T ST AS AS ASHB B HB R UR URY Y Y ST ST T MA MA MA ASO SO SO ONI NIC AV AV VE CE CE CE C NT NT NTRA RA R L L L AV AV AV VE ST ST STAN AN ANYA YA Y N ST ST ST ST HAIGHT ST CO CO CO C LE LE LE LE ST T (W (W (W (WES ES ES EST) BE B LV V LVED ED ED DER ERE E ST ST
50’
Be Ben Ben Be e & Je Je Jer Je ry’s Ice Cream e McD McD McD Dona
ld’ d’ d’ d s Cha Cha Cha Cha Cha Cha Cha
HAIGHT ST
Plo Ploy II Tha Tha h i Cui C sin s e Sp Spa S rro
Str Street eet t T ac T ac T ac T ac T aco Hob Ho Hob H son son’s ’s s s Cho Ch Ch Ch Choice ce Mar Ma tin tin tin n Ma Ma Mack’s s Por Por Por Por rk Sto Sto Sto Store re re Caf Caf Caf Caf Cafe Pe Pe People ple’s ’s Caf Caf C e Blue Front nt n Deli Hai Hai Hai H ght ght ght gh g Pat Pat Pat tio io io Caf Caf Caf Caf afe Mag Magnol nol nol nolia ia Gas Gastro ro ro ro
pub p Cof Coffee fee fe fe T
The e Pe Pe Pe P opl
Sia Siam L m otu
Tha Tha ai Ale Ale Alembi mbi m c Zona a Ros Ros R a Cit C rus us us us Clu Clu Clu Clu C b Who Whole le Foo Foods ds Amo Am Amo Amoeba eba eb eba Mus Mus Mus Mus sic ic Goo Goo Go
dwill Was Wa Was W tel e and and Th The The Th Re Re Re Red Vic Vic Vi Victor torian ian Hai Haight ght g St Stree ree r t t Mar Market ket Buf Buffal falo Exc Exc Exc chan han han hange ge ge ge Lov L ed d T
D th th th h th
GOLD DEN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN N GA GA A G TE TE T PA ARK K
Dec De De De e ade es
Fas as a hion The The T Boo Boo
ksm mith t Zam Z Zam Rob Rob R ert er s s Har ar Ha dwa d re r Bur Bur Bu ger er er Urg Urge Cro Cro
ds RV RV RVC RV RV R A Pie Pie P dmo dmo dmo mont nt nt nt nt Bou Bou
B tiq tiq tiq tiq i ue e ue ue ue Jam Jammin m
M
On On On n Hai Haight ght ght Chi hi Chi Chi C nes nes nes nes s es I e I e I e Imme mme m mme mm rsi rsi rsi ion
Sch ch Sch c ool
a Cen Cen Cen Centra tra tra tral Hai H i H i Ha ght ght gh ght Market e Bra aind ndrop r s Hai Hai Ha ght ght ght ht ht As Ash As As s bur ur ur ry T
S T
T
hi hir hir h ts ts ts ts Avi Aviato ato ato ato
r Nat Nat at Nation ion ion ion
LEGEND
New Sidewalk Paving New Transit & Pedestrian Bulbs Decorative Intersection Treatment Continental Crosswalk New Street Lighting Fixture New Pedestrian Lighting at Haight/ Ashbury (E) Street Tree Corridor Nodes Transit Stops (E) Parklet to Remain
Stanyan Transit Node Haight/ Ashbury Node T- Intersections Node
P L A N D I A G R A M P L A N D I A G R A M
Note: Colors and patterns shown in plan are for diagramatic purposes only. (E) (E) (E) ) Pa Pa Pa P rkl rklet et e to to Rem Rem Rem e ain ain n
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 18
AS AS AS ASHB HB HB B HBUR UR UR URY Y ST ST ST A MA MA A MASO SO SO O SONI NI NI NI N C AV AV AV AV V AVE HA HA HA HA HAIG G I HT H ST Potential Future String Lighting (by Community) New Pedestrian Lighting New Street Lighting Fixtures New Decorative Pedestrian Bulb Treatment at Haight/ Ashbury Intersection Continental Crosswalks New Curb Ramps New Sidewalk Paving Throughout
Typical Section
20’
LEGEND
New Sidewalk Paving New Transit & Pedestrian Bulbs Decorative Intersection Treatment Continental Crosswalk New Street Lighting Fixture New Pedestrian Lighting at Haight/ Ashbury (E) Street Tree Potential Future String Lighting (by Community)
T Y P I C A L B L O C K
Note: Colors and patterns shown in plan are for diagramatic purposes only.
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 19
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 20
E X I S T I N G P R O P O S E D
44’-9” ROADWAY 31’-9” ROADWAY 12’-0” WALK 18’-0” WALK 12’-0” WALK 19’-0” WALK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE Expanded Bulbout Walkway Selective Tree Replacement New Pedestrian Lighting
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 21
SIDEWALK PATH OF TRAVEL ZONE LIGHT + FIBER CONDUIT TREE + PED LIGHT ZONE
SIDEWALK ZONE: 8’-0” OVERALL WIDTH: 12’-0” TREE + PED LIGHT ZONE: 4’-0”
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
CORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
W O R K S H O P # 3 J u n e 1 1 , 2 1 4
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING SIGNAGE IDENTITY GREENING SEATING (INFORMAL) Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards. Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative
by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens. There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details. Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE TIE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE MODERN CROSSWALKS STREET TREES POINTS OF INTEREST PLANTER EDGES TRADITIONAL SIDEWALK PLAQUES PLANTERS TRANSIT LEANING POSTS STOREFRONT ARTISTIC ELEMENTS STORMWATER PARKING BOLLARDS DECORATIVE BANNERS TREE GUARDSGREENING IDENTITY SIGNAGE LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight
was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole. Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens. Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk
intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT ‘GREEN’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE ‘ACTIVE’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION PUBLIC ART ‘AMENITY’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION INTERSECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTION TREATMENTLIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES INTERSECTIONS
GREEN AMENITY ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side) Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side) Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side) Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side) Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side) Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLE
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART INTERSECTION MARKER INTERSECTION TREATMENT FLEXIBLE SPACEHIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 22
Haight Streetscape Improvements
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight
was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole. Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens. Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk
intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT ‘GREEN’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE ‘ACTIVE’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION PUBLIC ART ‘AMENITY’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION INTERSECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTION TREATMENTLIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES INTERSECTIONS
LES AND CHAIRS MOVEABLE TABL TINGS PLANT RS LANTE TREES/PL TER ER PLANT STORMWATE ISPLAY ART DI NG PARKIN BICYCLEGREEN AMENITY ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side) Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side) Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side) Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side) Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side) Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLE
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART INTERSECTION MARKER INTERSECTION TREATMENT FLEXIBLE SPACEHIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative
by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens.
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 23
SPACING: 40’ to 50’
HEIGHT: 17’-4” COLOR: Powdercoated Black
P E D E S T R I A N L I G H T I N G
O P T I O N A Holophane “GranVille” O P T I O N B Holophane “Syracuse” y
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 24
FLAG SIZE: 3’-0” x 3’-0” INTEGRAL COLOR: Dark Grey/ Charcoal
S I D E W A L K P A V I N G
O P T I O N A O P T I O N B Concrete w/ dark grey integral color (without sparkle grain finish) Concrete w/ dark grey integral color & sparkle grain finish
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 25
Thoughtfully located street trees along Haight Street can greatly enhance the strong architectural character of the
forest at each cross street would establish community greening
also creating a sense of arrival for visitors as they approach Haight Street.
Damaged Limbs Dense Canopy Leaning Trunk Choked Roots Leaning Trunk Unhealthy Environment Dense Canopy
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 26
Meet on Haight Street (near Stanyan St.) near the Whole Foods parking lot. *Please wear walking shoes as we’ll walk each side of Haight Street between Stanyan St. and Central Ave.
MEET HERE Whole Foods Golden Gate Park S t a n y a n S t . Haight St.
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
CORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
WORKSHOP # 3 June 11, 2014
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING SIGNAGE IDENTITY GREENING SEATING (INFORMAL) Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards. Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative
by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens. There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details. Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE T I E LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE MODERN CROSSWALKS STREET TREES POINTS OF INTEREST PLANTER EDGES TRADITIONAL SIDEWALK PLAQUES PLANTERS TRANSIT LEANING POSTS STOREFRONT ARTISTIC ELEMENTS STORMWATER PARKING BOLLARDS DECORATIVE BANNERS TREE GUARDSGREENING IDENTITY SIGNAGE LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight
was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole. Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens. Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk
intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT ‘GREEN’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE ‘ACTIVE’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION PUBLIC ART ‘AMENITY’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION INTERSECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTION TREATMENTLIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES INTERSECTIONS
LES AND CHAIRS MOVEABLE TABL TINGS PLANT RS LANTE TREES/PL TER ER PLANT STORMWATE ISPLAY ART DI NG PARKIN BICYCLEGREEN AMENITY ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side) Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side) Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side) Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side) Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side) Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLE
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART INTERSECTION MARKER INTERSECTION TREATMENT FLEXIBLE SPACEHIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND STANYAN
Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk
intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT ‘GREEN’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE ‘ACTIVE’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION PUBLIC ART ‘AMENITY’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION INTERSECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTION TREATMENTINTERSECTIONS
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLE
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART INTERSECTION MARKER INTERSECTION TREATMENT FLEXIBLE SPACEHIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
CORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
WORKSHOP # 3 June 11, 2014
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING SIGNAGE IDENTITY GREENING SEATING (INFORMAL) Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards. Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative
by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens. There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details. Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVO VO ORITE ORITE O FAVO OR ORITE O FAVO VO ORITE FAVO FAVO ORITE O FAVO ORITE T I E LEAST FAVO ORITE LEAST AST FAVOR RITE RITE LEAST A FAVO VORITE RITE LEA T AST FAVO AVORITE LEAST AST FAVORITE MODERN CROSSWALKS STREET TREES POINTS OF INTEREST PLANTER EDGES TRADITIONAL SIDEWALK PLAQUES PLANTERS TRANSIT LEANING POSTS STOREFRONT ARTISTIC ELEMENTS STORMWATER PARKING BOLLARDS DECORATIVE BANNERS TREE GUARDSGREENING IDENTITY SIGNAGE LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 27
Mid Block Improvements
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight
was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole.
New Pedestrian Lighting Centered on Paving Band In Ground Planting Areas within Expanded Bulbs Iconic Paving at Expanded Pedestrian Areas Existing Street Trees
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 28
Belvedere St Cole (W) St Cole (E) St
C O N C E P T A T T - B U L B S
E N L A R G E M E N T A R E A
N 30 60
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 29 80’-0” to 115’-0” 1 2 ’
6 ’
Features: Opportunity for Quotes in Concrete Paving
E N L A R G E M E N T A R E A
C O N C E P T A T T - B U L B S
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
CORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
W O R K S H O P # 3 J u n e 1 1 , 2 1 4
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING SIGNAGE IDENTITY GREENING SEATING (INFORMAL) Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards. Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative
by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens. There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details. Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE TIE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE LEAST FAVORITE MODERN CROSSWALKS STREET TREES POINTS OF INTEREST PLANTER EDGES TRADITIONAL SIDEWALK PLAQUES PLANTERS TRANSIT LEANING POSTS STOREFRONT ARTISTIC ELEMENTS STORMWATER PARKING BOLLARDS DECORATIVE BANNERS TREE GUARDSGREENING IDENTITY SIGNAGE LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
HAIGHT AND STANYAN WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight
was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole. Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens. Top priorities for the Haight/Stanyan intersection were continuing the bike rental use and providing an element to mark the intersection as the gateway between Haight Street and Golden Gate Park. Preferences for the Haight/Cole intersection were for ‘Green’ and ‘Active’ sidewalk
intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
GATEWAY ELEMENT ‘GREEN’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION CONTINUE BIKE RENTAL USE ‘ACTIVE’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION PUBLIC ART ‘AMENITY’ SIDE- WALK EXTENSION INTERSECTION TREATMENT INTERSECTION TREATMENTLIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES INTERSECTIONS
GREEN AMENITY ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side) Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side) Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side) Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side) Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side) Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND COLE
HIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT AND ASHBURY
PUBLIC ART INTERSECTION MARKER INTERSECTION TREATMENT FLEXIBLE SPACEHIGHEST PRIORITY LOWEST PRIORITY
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
WAYS TO USE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6
Past outreach indicated that there was a desire for additional mid-block sidewalk space along Haight
was the block between Clayton and Ashbury, followed by the block between Shrader and Cole. Consistent with preferences for the entire corridor, the highest priority for mid-block spaces was additional greening and sidewalk gardens.
LIKE DISLIKE
MID BLOCK SPACES
LES AND CHAIRS MOVEABLE TABL TINGS PLANT RS LANTE TREES/PL TER ER PLANT STORMWATE ISPLAY ART DI NG PARKIN BICYCLEGREEN AMENITY ACTIVITY
MOST PREFERRED LEAST PREFERRED
Location C: Between Clayton and Ashbury (north side) Location A: Between Shrader and Cole (north side) Location D: Between Clayton and Ashbury (south side) Location B: Between Shrader and Cole (south side) Location E: Between Ashbury and Masonic (south side) Location F: Between Masonic and Central (north side)
HAIGHT STREET SURVEY RESULTS
CORRIDOR-WIDE TREATMENTS
CORRIDOR TREATMENT PRIORITIES
TREATMENT ELEMENTS
W O R K S H O P # 3 J u n e 1 1 , 2 1 4
HIGHEST PRIORITY
LIGHTING SIGNAGE IDENTITY GREENING SEATING (INFORMAL) Over 150 people responded to our Haight Street survey, either at a public meeting or online. Many thanks to those who took the time to respond! Please visit http://haightashbury.sfplanning.org to view the survey and the accompanying presentation boards. Participants were asked to rank treatments that could be implemented along Haight Street. Pedestrian-scale lighting and additional greening were both high priorities. Of the various lighting opportunities, the strongest support was for traditional pedestrian lighting and decorative
by sidewalk planters and stormwater gardens. There was general support for some identity features, but not at the expense of lighting or greening. Within this category, the strongest support was for creative functional elements, such as artistic bike racks or special paving details. Wayfinding signage was a lower priority, through there was support for signage highlighting points of interest or transit access. Informal seating was the lowest priority for the corridor.
SEATING
FAVO VO ORITE ORITE O FAVO OR ORITE O FAVO VO ORITE FAVO FAVO ORITE O FAVO ORITE TIE LEAST FAVO ORITE LEAST AST FAVOR RITE RITE LEAST A FAVO VORITE RITE LEA T AST FAVO AVORITE LEAST AST FAVORITE MODERN CROSSWALKS STREET TREES POINTS OF INTEREST PLANTER EDGES TRADITIONAL SIDEWALK PLAQUES PLANTERS TRANSIT LEANING POSTS STOREFRONT ARTISTIC ELEMENTS STORMWATER PARKING BOLLARDS DECORATIVE BANNERS TREE GUARDSGREENING IDENTITY SIGNAGE LIGHTING
LOWEST PRIORITY
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 30
Haight and Ashbury Improvements
Top priorities for the Haight/Ashbury intersection were special paving, and highlighting the intersection with either public art or a more traditional intersection marker.
S O C I A L A C T I V I T Y
H A I G H T / A S H B U R Y
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 31
Then Now
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 32
Haight Ashbury Intersection
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 33
Ashbury St y Haight St To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF
Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream Haight Ashbury T
Aviator Nation RVCA N 20 40
*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials. Mosaic Tiles- Grey T
H A I G H T / A S H B U R Y
O P T I O N A
Victorian Column Gateway
h s
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 34
Ashbury St y Haight St To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF
Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream Haight Ashbury T
Aviator Nation RVCA N 20 40
*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials. Mosaic Tiles- Blue Jewel T
H A I G H T / A S H B U R Y
O P T I O N B
el T
Victorian Column Gateway
h s
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 35
Ashbury St y Haight St To Golden Gate Park To Downtown SF
Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream Haight Ashbury T
Aviator Nation RVCA N 20 40
*Note: Street Trees not shown for graphic clarity of paving materials. Mosaic Tiles- Purple Jewel T
H A I G H T / A S H B U R Y
O P T I O N C
Jewel T
h s
Upper Haight T ransit Improvement & P edestrian R ealm Project
Streetscape Community Meeting | 07.06.16 36
www.sfmta.com/7rapid http://sf-planning.org/haight-ashbury-public-realm-plan Amy Lam, Project Manager (Amy.Lam@sfdpw.org)