Low-Crossing Spanning Trees An Alternative Proof and Experiments - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

low crossing spanning trees
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Low-Crossing Spanning Trees An Alternative Proof and Experiments - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary Low-Crossing Spanning Trees An Alternative Proof and Experiments Panos Giannopoulos Maximilian Konzack Wolfgang Mulzer March 35, 2014 EuroCG 2014, Ein-Gedi, Israel


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Low-Crossing Spanning Trees

An Alternative Proof and Experiments Panos Giannopoulos Maximilian Konzack Wolfgang Mulzer March 3–5, 2014 EuroCG 2014, Ein-Gedi, Israel

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Spanning Trees with Low Crossing Number

Our Results

1 Simple proof on low-crossing

spanning trees

2 A new heuristic to compute

those trees

3 Experimental results on

  • artificial data
  • real TSP instances from

TSPLIB

What is a crossing?

a b c d e f

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

What is a Low-crossing Spanning Tree?

a b c d e f l1 l2 l3 l4 A spanning tree F with crossing number 2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Is there only one optimum?

a b c d e f l1 l2 l3 l4 Another spanning tree F with crossing number 2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Is this an optimum?

a b c d e f l1 l2 l3 l4 Non optimal spanning tree F with crossing number 3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Preliminaries

Definition (Crossing Number)

  • P : a planar point set in general position
  • T : a spanning tree for P
  • crossing number of T : maximum number of edges in T that

can be intersected

Fact

  • P always has a spanning tree with crossing number

O(√n) [Chazelle, 1989] using iterative reweighting

  • NP-hardness of computing the optimal tree [Fekete, 2008]

Previous Work

  • Heuristic on iterative LP-rounding [Fekete, 2008]
  • Iterative randomized rounding while solving a certain

LP [Har-Peled, 2009]

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Existence of Low Crossing Trees

Iterative Rounding [Har-Peled, 2009]

1 Selecting edges from LP formulation 2 Forming a spanning tree

Input: P, L Intermediate Step

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

LPs for the Proof

Summary

  • Primal models a graph with O(√n) crossing number
  • Each point p ∈ P has an incident edge

Primal

  • pq∈Eℓ

xpq ≤ √n ∀ℓ ∈ LP

  • pq∈EP

xpq ≥ 1 ∀p ∈ P xpq ≥ 0 ∀pq ∈ EP

Notation

1 EP : set of line segments pq

with p = q ∈ P

2 LP : set of representative

lines

3 For ℓ ∈ L : Eℓ ⊆ EP set of

all edges intersecting ℓ

4 For pq ∈ EP : Lpq ⊆ LP set

  • f lines intersecting pq
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Notion of the Proof

Our Results

  • A shorter proof
  • Simplified Primal-Dual LP formulation from [Har-Peled, 2009]
  • Using Farkas’ Lemma

Lemma (Farkas’ Lemma)

Let A be a rational m × n matrix and b ∈ Qm. Either

1 there is a vector x ∈ Qn satisfying Ax ≤ b, x ≥ 0, or 2 there is a vector y ∈ Qm satisfying ATy ≥ 0, bTy < 0, y ≥ 0.

Idea

  • Show infeasibility of Dual LP by contradiction
  • Due to Farkas’ Lemma, Primal must be feasible
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Overview of Algorithms

Approximation Algorithms

IterReweighting Popular framework [Welzl, 1992]

  • Weighting of lines and edges
  • Choosing iteratively lightest edge

Har-Peled LP Adjusted LP from proof [Har-Peld, 2009] IterLP-rounding LP from [Fekete, 2008]

  • selecting in each iteration one suitable edge
  • using exponential number of constraints

A new heuristic: Connected Components Approach

  • adapted from IterLP-rounding
  • with polynomial many constraints
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Connected Components Heuristics

Notation

  • LP models only edges among the connected components C
  • E(C) are these edges

LP

minimize t

  • s. t.
  • pq∈E(C)

xpq = |C| − 1

  • pq∈E(C): p∈C,q∈C

xpq ≥ 1 ∀C ∈ C

  • pq∈E(C): pq∩ℓ=∅

xpq ≤ t ∀ℓ ∈ L xpq ≥ 0 ∀pq ∈ E(C)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Data Setting

P uniformly at random from integer [n] × [n] grid perturbed by an ε

All lines

L = LP, |L| = Θ(n2)

IterReweighting on |P| = 20 with all lines

Random lines

L of size Θ(√n)

IterReweighting on |P| = 20 with random lines

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Experimental Results on Artificial Data

All lines Random lines

  • All algorithms produce a crossing number O(√n)
  • IterReweighting yields a crossing number lower than O(√n)

for random lines

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Average Crossing Number on Artificial Data

Average crossing number on random points with random lines

  • The number of all crossings
  • ver the number of lines
  • Best results by

IterReweighting and Connected Components

  • Yielding an average crossing

number of O(log(n))

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Summary

1 Alternative proof on existence of low-crossing spanning trees

with crossing number O(√n)

2 A new heuristic competing with existing approaches 3 Experimental results on

  • artificial data
  • real TSP instances from TSPLIB

Thank you.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Oscillation of IterLP-rounding

  • Skipping of heavy weight edges might influence crossings
  • Only effects IterLP-rounding
  • Input data: Random points with random lines
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Fekete et. al. IP

IP: minimize t (1) such that

  • ij∈EP

xij = n − 1 (2)

  • ij∈δ(S)

xij ≥ 1 ∀∅ = S ⊂ P (3)

  • ij∈EP:ij∩ℓ=∅

xij ≤ t ∀ℓ ∈ L (4) xij ∈ {0, 1} ∀ij ∈ EP (5)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Iterative Reweighting

Algorithm

IterReweighting(G, L) 1 i ← 1 2 F ← ∅ 3 C ← {{1} , {2} , . . . {n}} 4 while |C| > 1 5 do ni−1(l) ← |{e ∈ F | e ∩ ℓ = ∅}| ∀ℓ ∈ L 6 wi−1(l) ← 2ni−1(l) ∀ℓ ∈ L 7 wi−1(e) ←

  • l∈L:e∩ℓ=∅

wi−1(l) ∀e ∈ E(C) 8 ij ← arg min

pq∈E(C)

{wi−1(pq)} 9 F ← F ∪ {ij} 10 C ← Merge(C(i), C(j)) 11 i ← i + 1 12 return F

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

Har-Peled’s generic LP

LP for set systems with bounded VC dimension: max

  • pq∈EP

ypq (6) such that

  • pq∈EP:|pq∩S|=1

ypq ≤ t ∀S ∈ F (7)

  • q∈P:q=p

ypq ≥ 1 ∀p ∈ P (8) ypq ≥ 0 ∀pq ∈ EP (9)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Low Crossing Spanning Trees Experiments Summary

What is the average crossing number?

Definition

The average crossing number for a spanning tree F is defined by: ∅ cross(F) := 1 |L|

  • ℓ∈L

|{pq ∈ F | pq ∩ ℓ = ∅}|