Linking Health with Nature Experience: Restoration and Other - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

linking health with nature
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Linking Health with Nature Experience: Restoration and Other - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Linking Health with Nature Experience: Restoration and Other Pathways Terry Hartig Institute for Housing and Urban Research and Department of Psychology Uppsala University Relation between amount of green space (in a 3 km radius) and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Linking Health with Nature

Experience: Restoration and Other Pathways

Terry Hartig Institute for Housing and Urban Research

and

Department of Psychology Uppsala University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Relation between amount of green space (in a 3 km radius) and self-perceived health (percentage stating their health is less than good), with controls for urbanity, sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics (from Maas et al., 2006).

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Incidence rate ratios for deaths from circulatory disease in income-deprivation quartiles 2–4, relative to income deprivation quartile 1 (least deprived), stratified by exposure to green space (from Mitchell & Popham, 2008).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Three intertwined pathways

Physical activity Social interaction Restoration

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Restoration

Discrete restorative experiences

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Proofreading performance (% of errors detected) as a function of the environment available for restoration after attentionally demanding tasks (from Hartig et al., 1991).

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Environment % Errors Detected Natural Urban Passive

slide-7
SLIDE 7

From Bowler et al. (2010).

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Systolic blood pressure change in different environments available after stressor exposure (from Hartig et al., 2003).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Restoration

Cumulative effects

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Variables OR (95% CI) Age in 1997 1.179 (1.157 to 1.202) 10-12 years education (ref: 6-9 years) 0.718 (0.513 to 0.865) 13+ years education 0.666 (0.586 to 0.878) Income from work 1997 0.862 (0.849 to 0.875) Family disp. Income 1.018 (1.005 to 1.031) Couple without children (ref: single) 0.752 (0.578 to 0.979) Couple with children 0.506 (0.361 to 0.711) Detached housing (ref: multifamily) 1.212 (0.991 to 1.483) No access to leisure home (ref: access) 1.419 (1.039 to 1.936)

Logistic regression analysis of early retirement for health reasons among 19,221 men in Sweden during 1998-99, after 9 years of follow-up (from Hartig & Fransson, 2009).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Restoration

Social ecological determinants

slide-12
SLIDE 12

June July August Test month temperature (men)

  • .0524 (.0465)
  • .0747* (.0325)

.0475 (.0433) Test month temperature (women)

  • .1317 (.1116)
  • .2159** (.0717)

.1212 (.1174)

Estimated parameters for monthly dispensed defined daily doses of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors per 1000 persons to men and women in Sweden, 1/1991 – 12/1998 (from Hartig, Catalano, & Ong , 2007).

  • Note. Standard errors in parentheses. *p < .05, one-tailed. **p < .01, one-tailed.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Relevance to biodiversity protection

Restoration as a motive for nature protection

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Norwegian adults (N = 1293) endorsement of three statements about use of nature for psychological restoration (i.e., either agree or do not agree) (from Hartig, Kaiser, & Strumse, 2007).

I need time in nature to be happy. Sometimes when I am unhappy I find comfort in nature. Being out in nature is a great stress reducer for me.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The association between the use of nature for psychological restoration and general ecological behavior (from Hartig, Kaiser, & Strumse, 2007).

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Relevance to biodiversity protection

Constrained restoration and the ”pasteurization” of nature

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Concluding remarks

Progress is being made in building the body of evidence on the processes through with nature experience becomes linked with health. Psychological restoration is a key process. Restorative experiences in nature can help to support efforts to preserve biodiversity. Yet, the desire for restoration in nature may also hinder efforts to preserve biodiversity.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

References

Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, Pullin AS (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10, 456. Hartig T, Catalano R, Ong M (2007). Cold summer weather, constrained restoration, and the use of anti-depressants in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27, 107-116. Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 109-123. Hartig T, Fransson U (2009). Leisure home ownership, access to nature, and health: A longitudinal study of urban residents in Sweden. Environment and Planning A 41: 82-96 . Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Strumse E (2007). Psychological restoration in nature as a source

  • f motivation for ecological behavior. Environmental Conservation 34, 291-299.

Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment

  • experiences. Environment and Behavior 23, 3-26.

Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 60, 587-592. Mitchell R, Popham F (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372, 1655-1660 Photo credit: Aedes stictitus, floodwater mosquito; Johan Nilsson. Other photos by Terry Hartig.