Physical Criteria Committee Meeting 1 September 14, 2016 PLANNERS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
physical criteria
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Physical Criteria Committee Meeting 1 September 14, 2016 PLANNERS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 02, 2022 250 likes •973 views

Wold Architects and Engineers 332 Minnesota Street Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651 227 7773 Physical Criteria Committee Meeting 1 September 14, 2016 PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS Agenda Introductions Overview of Goals /

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Wold Architects and Engineers

332 Minnesota Street Suite W2000 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651 227 7773

PLANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS

Physical Criteria

Committee Meeting 1

September 14, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

» Introductions » Overview of Goals / Outcomes » Types of Data » Information in Detail » Criteria Development & Discussion » Other?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introductions

Wold Architects and Engineers

Co-Chairs Who Are You? » Name » Connection

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Goals / Outcomes

Quantify / Define Need

  • Where Should The Focus Be?
  • What Should The Priorities Be?
  • What Are Minimum Expectations?
  • What Are Operational Goals?

Roles & Responsibilities

  • 1. Show Up
  • 2. Talk To Others
  • 3. Review the Information
  • 4. Participate in the Discussion
  • 5. Be Respectful

How Do Physical Conditions Limit Learning?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Types of Data

Facilities Inventory:

  • Life Cycle Assumptions
  • Baseline Assessment
  • Requires prioritization to

customize

District Funding:

  • Buildings & Grounds Budget
  • Previous Maintenance Funding
  • Utility Data
  • Current Roof & Paving Plans
  • Technology Plan

Future Data (as needed):

  • Systems comparison
  • Cost models
  • Code / Regulatory Standards

For Consideration:

  • Similar approaches in other

Districts?

  • Minimum Standards &

Approaches

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why Were the Facilities Inventoried?

  • Current Observation of Existing District Facilities
  • Updated Catalogue of Existing Materials and Equipment
  • Development of Comprehensive Maintenance Strategy
  • Create Two

Year Alternative Facilities Recommendation

  • Forecast Ten

Year Maintenance Recommendation

Inventory

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Inventory Facility Inventory Process

  • Define District Categories and Sub-Categories
  • Tour Existing Facilities (Incl. meeting with On-Site Staff)
  • Define Analysis Criteria
  • Apply Analysis Criteria to the Inventory
  • Evaluate Inventory Program Recommendations
  • Develop

Two and Ten Year Maintenance Plans

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Inventory

District Primary Categories / Sub Categories

[Architectural]

  • Site
  • Parking
  • Exterior
  • Envelope
  • Doors
  • Roofing
  • Fenestration
  • Interior
  • Floors
  • Walls
  • Ceilings
  • Doors
  • Equipment
  • Casework
  • Other
  • Mechanical
  • HVAC
  • Plumbing
  • Controls
  • Electrical
  • Power & Distribution
  • Lighting
  • Systems
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Inventory Life Cycle Base Timelines

  • Boilers
  • Casework
  • Ceiling Systems
  • Chillers
  • Exterior Doors
  • Interior Doors
  • Corridor Lockers
  • Exterior Aluminum

Windows

  • Exterior Face Brick
  • Exterior Sealant
  • Metal

Toilet Partition

  • Room Carpet
  • Corridor Carpet
  • Ceramic Floor

Tile

  • Quarry

Tile Flooring

  • VCT Flooring
  • Plumbing Fixtures
  • Built-Up Roof Assembly
  • Ballasted EPDM Roofing
  • 90 mil Adhered EPDM Roof
  • Ceramic

Tile Wall Finish

  • Paint Wall Finish
  • Vinyl

Wall Covering

  • 25-40

Years

  • 25-45

Years

  • 20-40

Years

  • 15-30

Years

  • 20-30

Years

  • 30+

Years

  • 30-40

Years

  • 30+

Years

  • 100+

Years (Tuckpointing: 35 Years)

  • 10+

Years

  • 25

Years

  • 15-25

Years

  • 15-20

Years

  • 40+

Years

  • 40+

Years

  • 25+

Years

  • 20-50

Years

  • 30

Years

  • 15-20

Years

  • 30

Years

  • 40-60

Years

  • 5-10

Years

  • 15-20

Years

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Inventory District Priorities (TBD)

  • Priority 1: Items concerning mitigating deterioration of the

building and energy efficiency

  • Priority 2: Items that concern exterior site areas
  • Priority 3: Items concerning indoor systems that are

deteriorated

  • Priority 4: Items that concern high use student areas
  • Priority 5: Remaining deferred maintenance items
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Findings / Analysis ISD 623 Facilities Snapshot

  • There are nearly 10 acres of Carpet throughout the District.
  • There is over 69,000 SF of Ceramic

Tile Floors throughout the District.

  • There are over 25 acres of Roofs throughout the District.
  • There are over 1.3 Million SF of Painted Walls throughout the

District.

  • There are 21 Roof

T

  • p Air Handling Units throughout the

District.

  • There are 161 Interior Air Handling Units throughout the

District.

  • There are over 1,875 Sinks throughout the District.
  • There are over 20,000 Light Fixtures throughout the District.
  • There are over 30 acres of Parking Lots throughout the District.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Findings / Analysis Draft Report: Context

  • Everything is currently included based on Life Cycle.
  • Annual Funding set to $200 Million to show backlog.
  • Inflation set to fixed 4%.
  • No prioritization or sorting has been implemented.
  • No upgrades are included – “like for like” replacement.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Exterior 4% Interior 12% Electrical 6% Mechanical 69% Site 6%

Findings / Analysis T en Year Overview (with Backlog)

  • $186,265,845 in Total Recommended Maintenance
  • Exterior: $ 31,540,674
  • Mechanical: $ 76,509,089
  • Electrical: $ 12,459,630
  • Interior: $ 56,713,503
  • Site: $ 8,829,159
  • Recommended

Work at all District Facilities

  • Backlog in

Year One: $ 147,594,145

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Findings / Analysis Context

Roseville is an Older Infrastructure District:

  • Last major renovation was 20+ years ago
  • (Almost) All buildings built between 1952-68, and are

now 50-60 years old

  • Harambee is the newest building (1996)
  • Different issues than a suburban growth district
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Strategic Planning

Annual Funding Strategy Assumptions

  • Immediately Addressing Entire Backlog is Not Practical or Feasible
  • Continued Investment at Current Rate Will Require Significant Future

Investment

  • Any Plan Must Address Critical Asset Deterioration Immediately
  • Equity Between Buildings and Work Categories is Expected
  • Life Expectancy Issues Will Drive Major Funding Allocations
  • A roof life expectancy of 25 years requires 40% replacement over ten years
  • An asphalt systems life expectancy of 20 years requires 50% replacement
  • ver ten years
  • Energy Efficiency Projects with High Return Costs Should Be Explored

Planning Will Likely Be a Combination of Annual Investment, Future Reinvestment Strategy, and Efficiency Based Project Alternatives

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Strategic Planning The Facts:

  • For every District in Minnesota, annual funding allocations by the state fall

considerably short of what is required to maintain district assets.

  • Capital funding for School Districts is tied to age of buildings and District owned

square footage as well as pupil counts. Capital funding can only be used for capital expenditures such as buildings, textbooks, technology, etc. Each District makes difficult choices as to allocations for the different types of capital investments

  • Minnesota State funding for capital expenditures falls short 80% annually; over a 15

year period, this leads to an approximate $75 million backlog in deferred maintenance for a School District the size of Roseville Area Schools.

  • Even when a District approaches it’s taxpayers with a significant facility reinvestment

plan, it is unlikely that a School District will ever be able to fully catch up. Prioritization becomes important when discussing facilities needs with the public.

  • The combination of inadequate annual funding and maintenance needs of roughly

1,500,000 square feet of facilities leads to a cycle of maintenance reinvestment request every 7-10 years to stay on top of facility issues.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Strategic Planning

Efficiency / Return On Investment Projects

0 to 5 year Payback:

  • Ventilation air management/CO2 control.
  • 2-speed control of gymnasium AHU’s.
  • 2-speed control of auditorium AHU’s.
  • AHU discharge temperature reset.
  • Weather tighten exterior envelope.
  • Repair steam traps.

5 to 10 year Payback:

  • High efficiency boilers.
  • High efficiency water heaters.
  • Convert to direct digital controls.
  • Free cooling space temperature setpoints.
  • District wide control access.
  • Variable speed/high efficiency motors.
  • Variable speed kitchen exhaust.
  • De-stratification fans in gyms.
  • Lighting controls (occupancy sensors, photo

cells, daylight controls)

Significant Investment Strategies [Up to 30% Reduction in Operating Costs]

  • Convert from steam to hot water operation.
  • Heat recovery of exhaust air.
  • Replace air handling / unit ventilator systems near the end of their

useful life with new modern system approaches.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Inventory Summary

  • District has kept up-to-date on Roofs &

Paving

  • Mechanical Overwhelming Issue:
  • Every building had issues with temperature control
  • Pneumatic controls out of date
  • Tunnel based ventilation doesn’t meet ventilation

standards; may contain asbestos

  • Tremendous potential for efficiency
  • Dehumidification?
  • Finishes are Showing Life Cycle
  • Fairview Needs Reinvestment Decision
slide-19
SLIDE 19

District Facilities

Building Built Additions (Remodels) Brimhall ES 1957 1958, 1959, 1972, 1994 Central Park ES 1966 1968, 1996 Edgerton ES 1952 1955, 1961, 1967, 1969, 1996, 2004 Falcon Heights ES 1951 1961, 1969, 1995, 1998, 2014 Harambee ES 1996 Little Canada ES 1968 1989, 1995 ED Williams ES 1963 1966, 1969, 1997, (2016) Parkview Center School 1967 1969, 1975, (1997) RAMS 1963 1966, 1970, 1972, 1974 (Portables), 1975, 1990, 2004 RAHS 1952 1962, 1969, 1970, 1975, 1993-96, 2003, 2005 Fairview CC 1956 1957, 1969, 1973 District Center 1967 Various Minimal Renovations

slide-20
SLIDE 20

District Facilities

  • 1957, 1958, 1959, 1972, 1994
  • 16.80 Acres

Brimhall Elementary School

slide-21
SLIDE 21

District Facilities

  • 1957, 1958, 1959, 1972, 1994
  • 16.80 Acres

Brimhall Elementary School

  • Boiler Plant: Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Air routed through tunnels (minimal)
  • Dehumidification: Office, 1994 classroom addition
  • Controls: 1994 – DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

District Facilities

  • 1957, 1958, 1959, 1972, 1994
  • 16.80 Acres

Brimhall Elementary School

slide-23
SLIDE 23

District Facilities

  • 1966, 1968, 1996
  • 9.40 Acres

Central Park Elementary School

slide-24
SLIDE 24

District Facilities

  • 1966, 1968, 1996
  • 9.40 Acres

Central Park Elementary School

  • Boiler Plant: Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Air routed through tunnels (minimal)
  • Dehumidification: Office, 1995 classroom addition
  • Controls: 1995 – DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

District Facilities

  • 1966, 1968, 1996
  • 9.40 Acres

Central Park Elementary School

slide-26
SLIDE 26

District Facilities

  • 1952, 1955, 1961, 1967, 1969, 1996, 2004
  • 13.00 Acres

Edgerton Elementary School

slide-27
SLIDE 27

District Facilities

  • 1952, 1955, 1961, 1967, 1969, 1996, 2004
  • 13.00 Acres

Edgerton Elementary School

  • Boiler Plant: (1) Steam, (1) Hydronic
  • Ventilation: Air routed through tunnels

(minimal), 1995 AHU w/ VAV

  • Dehumidification: Office, some support
  • Controls: 1995 – DDC, Original -

Pneumatic

  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

District Facilities

  • 1952, 1955, 1961, 1967, 1969, 1996, 2004
  • 13.00 Acres

Edgerton Elementary School

slide-29
SLIDE 29

District Facilities

  • 1951, 1961, 1969, 1995, 1998, 2014
  • 8.80 Acres

Falcon Heights Elementary School

slide-30
SLIDE 30

District Facilities

  • 1951, 1961, 1969, 1995, 1998, 2014
  • 8.80 Acres

Falcon Heights Elementary School

  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam
  • Ventilation: Air routed through tunnels (minimal)

Dehumidification: Office, Computer Lab, 2014 Addition

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-31
SLIDE 31

District Facilities

  • 1951, 1961, 1969, 1995, 1998, 2014
  • 8.80 Acres

Falcon Heights Elementary School

slide-32
SLIDE 32

District Facilities

  • 1996
  • 27.30 Acres

Harambee Elementary School

slide-33
SLIDE 33

District Facilities

  • 1996
  • 27.30 Acres

Harambee Elementary School

  • Boiler Plant: Hydronic
  • Ventilation: Internal AHU’s w/ VAV
  • Dehumidification: DX All areas except gym
  • Controls: Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification: NOTE – All Areas have dehumidification except gym Toilet Renovation NO Dehumid- ification

slide-34
SLIDE 34

District Facilities

  • 1996
  • 27.30 Acres

Harambee Elementary School

slide-35
SLIDE 35

District Facilities

  • 1968, 1989, 1995
  • 16.00 Acres

Little Canada Elementary School

slide-36
SLIDE 36

District Facilities

  • 1968, 1989, 1995
  • 16.00 Acres

Little Canada Elementary School

  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam
  • Ventilation: Air routed through tunnels (minimal), 1989

Unit Ventilators

  • Dehumidification: Office, Computer Lab, Media Lab
  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up, Metal

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-37
SLIDE 37

District Facilities

  • 1968, 1989, 1995
  • 16.00 Acres

Little Canada Elementary School

slide-38
SLIDE 38

District Facilities

  • 1963, 1966, 1969, 1997
  • 13.60 Acres

E.D. Williams Elementary School

slide-39
SLIDE 39

District Facilities

  • 1963, 1966, 1969, 1997
  • 13.60 Acres

E.D. Williams Elementary School

  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchanger
  • Ventilation: Air routed through tunnels (minimal), 1997

additions RTU’s

  • Dehumidification: Office
  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up, Metal

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-40
SLIDE 40

District Facilities

  • 1963, 1966, 1969, 1997
  • 13.60 Acres

E.D. Williams Elementary School

slide-41
SLIDE 41

District Facilities

  • 1967, 1969, 1975, (1997)
  • 164,699 sf, 26.30 Acres

Parkview Center School

slide-42
SLIDE 42

District Facilities

  • 1967, 1969, 1975, (1997)
  • 164,699 sf, 26.30 Acres

Parkview Center School

  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Unit Ventilators, AHU - Lower Level
  • Dehumidification: Office, ECFE, Some Classrooms w/

Unit Ventilators

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Unit Ventilators, AHU - Lower Level
  • Dehumidification: Office, ECFE, Some Classrooms w/

Unit Ventilators

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

District Facilities

Parkview Center School

  • 1967, 1969, 1975, (1997)
  • 164,699 sf, 26.30 Acres
slide-44
SLIDE 44

District Facilities

Parkview Center School

  • 1967, 1969, 1975, (1997)
  • 164,699 sf, 26.30 Acres
  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Unit Ventilators, AHU - Lower Level
  • Dehumidification: Office, ECFE, Some Classrooms w/

Unit Ventilators

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-45
SLIDE 45

District Facilities

Parkview Center School

  • 1967, 1969, 1975, (1997)
  • 164,699 sf, 26.30 Acres
slide-46
SLIDE 46

District Facilities

Roseville Area Middle School [RAMS]

  • 1963, 1966, 1970, 1972, 1975, 1990, 2004
  • 240,747 sf, 41.00 Acres
slide-47
SLIDE 47

District Facilities

Roseville Area Middle School [RAMS]

  • 1963, 1966, 1970, 1972, 1975, 1990, 2004
  • 240,747 sf, 41.00 Acres
  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Unit Ventilators, RTU’s w/ Heat

Recovery & VAV’s at Auditorium, Media Center

  • Dehumidification: DX for Office, Auditorium, FACS and

Science

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Unit Ventilators, RTU’s w/ Heat

Recovery & VAV’s at Auditorium, Media Center

  • Dehumidification: DX for Office, Auditorium, FACS and

Science

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

District Facilities

  • 1963, 1966, 1970, 1972, 1975, 1990, 2004
  • 240,747 sf, 41.00 Acres

Roseville Area Middle School [RAMS]

slide-49
SLIDE 49

District Facilities

Roseville Area Middle School [RAMS]

  • 1963, 1966, 1970, 1972, 1975, 1990, 2004
  • 240,747 sf, 41.00 Acres
slide-50
SLIDE 50

District Facilities

1963, 1966, 1970, 1972, 1975, 1990, 2004

  • 41.00 Acres

Roseville Area Middle School [RAMS]

slide-51
SLIDE 51

District Facilities

  • 1962, 1969, 1970, 1975, 1993-96, 2003, 2005
  • 402,293 sf, 40.00 Acres

Roseville Area High School [RAHS]

slide-52
SLIDE 52

District Facilities

  • 1962, 1969, 1970, 1975, 1993-96, 2003, 2005
  • 402,293 sf, 40.00 Acres

Roseville Area High School [RAHS]

  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Constant Volume AHU’s, 1994

Additions AHU’s w/ VAV’s

  • Dehumidification: DX for noted areas (Exterior

classrooms not dehumidified)

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Constant Volume AHU’s, 1994

Additions AHU’s w/ VAV’s

  • Dehumidification: DX for noted areas (Exterior

classrooms not dehumidified)

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

District Facilities

  • 1962, 1969, 1970, 1975, 1993-96, 2003, 2005
  • 402,293 sf, 40.00 Acres

Roseville Area High School [RAHS]

slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original Constant Volume AHU’s, 1994

Additions AHU’s w/ VAV’s

  • Dehumidification: DX for noted areas (Exterior

classrooms not dehumidified)

  • Controls: DDC, Original - Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

District Facilities

  • 1962, 1969, 1970, 1975, 1993-96, 2003, 2005
  • 402,293 sf, 40.00 Acres

Roseville Area High School [RAHS]

slide-55
SLIDE 55

District Facilities

Roseville Area High School [RAHS]

  • 1962, 1969, 1970, 1975, 1993-96, 2003, 2005
  • 402,293 sf, 40.00 Acres
slide-56
SLIDE 56

District Facilities

  • 1956, 1957, 1969, 1973
  • 171,170 sf, 21.70 Acres

Fairview Community Center

slide-57
SLIDE 57

District Facilities

  • 1956, 1957, 1969, 1973
  • 171,170 sf, 21.70 Acres

Fairview Community Center

  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat

Exchangers

  • Ventilation: Air routed through

tunnels (minimal), Unit Ventilators

  • Dehumidification: DX for noted areas

as part of 1994 renovations

  • Controls: Original – Pneumatic
  • Note: No Fire Protection
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-58
SLIDE 58
  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat

Exchangers

  • Ventilation: Air routed through

tunnels (minimal), Unit Ventilators

  • Dehumidification: DX for noted areas

as part of 1994 renovations

  • Controls: Original – Pneumatic
  • Note: No Fire Protection
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

District Facilities

  • 1956, 1957, 1969, 1973
  • 171,170 sf, 21.70 Acres

Fairview Community Center

slide-59
SLIDE 59

District Facilities

  • 1956, 1957, 1969, 1973
  • 171,170 sf, 21.70 Acres

Fairview Community Center

slide-60
SLIDE 60

District Facilities

  • 1967
  • 5.00 Acres

District Center

slide-61
SLIDE 61

District Facilities

  • 1967
  • 5.00 Acres

District Center

  • Boiler Plant: Original Steam w/ Heat Exchangers
  • Ventilation: Original AHU and Unit Ventilators
  • Dehumidification: DX for entire building (except

garage)

  • Controls: Original – Pneumatic
  • Roof: Built Up

Dehumidification Toilet Renovation

slide-62
SLIDE 62

District Facilities

  • 1967
  • 5.00 Acres

District Center

slide-63
SLIDE 63

$- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $705,766 $955,000 $2,517,200 $3,249,099 $1,341,728 $921,940 $321,500 $389,000 $1,030,273 $1,402,040 $471,585 $993,000 $835,000 $1,445,505

Previous Maintenance Investment

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Annual B&G Budget

$3,963,905 $166,111 $545,174 $1,518,354 Salaries & Benefits 64% Professional Services/Repairs 3% Repair Supplies 9% Utiltities 25%

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Utility Data

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Security

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Security

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Security

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Criteria Development & Discussion

  • 1. What do you think are the highest

priority Facility Issues to address?

  • 2. What are some of your Questions?
  • 3. What Information do you want to

make sure you see?

  • 4. What are the Pre-Conceptions?
slide-70
SLIDE 70

Example Criteria Statements

(From ISD 477 Long Range Planning) FACILITIES CRITERIA:

  • Portable classrooms are NOT calculated in any of the repair costs, nor is

investing in them supported by the committee. Replacement is assumed.

  • A centralized variable air volume [VAV] system with internally located air

handling units [AHU] is the baseline system for HVAC infrastructure. This will necessitate new construction for these units within the repair costs.

  • Baseline standards for additional systems include:
  • Exterior Envelope: Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) back-up with brick or Exterior

Insulation Finish Systems (EIFS) walls, concrete wall panels for gymnasium(s), built up bitumen roofs.

  • Interiors: Steel stud with Gypsum Board and tile at classrooms, toilet rooms, etc.,

burnished CMU at corridors, Vinyl Composition Tile (VCT) or carpet at classrooms, stained/sealed concrete floors at corridors & cafeterias

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Additional Information:

  • “Do Better School Facilities Improve Learning” American Schools &

Universities, 2008

  • “Where Children Learn: The Effect of Facilities on Student Achievement” Council
  • f Educational Facility Planners International (CEFPI), 1998
  • “Do K-12 Facilities Affect Student Outcomes?” T

ennessee Advisory Commission

  • n Intergovernmental Relations, 2003
  • “Impact of Inadequate School Facilities on Student Learning” OESE Archived

Information, 2003

  • “School Facility Conditions and Student Academic Achievement”, Glen Earthman:

Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 2002

  • “Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes?”, Mark Schneider: National

Clearing House for Educational Facilities, 2002

  • “Can A Building Make

You Smarter?”, Lindsey Baker: School Planning & Management, 2007

  • “Healthier Schools”, Laura Spriggs: School Planning & Management, 2007

Strategic Planning

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Thank you!

Other?

Next Meeting:

  • Thursday 9/29 @ 6:00

Please Make Sure You Signed In!

On-Line:

  • Preliminary Inventory Report(s)
  • Utility Data for 2015-16
  • Security Audit
  • Presentation & Meeting Minutes