Lecture 3. Intelligent Systems: Properties and Principles Fabio - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lecture 3 intelligent systems properties and principles
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lecture 3. Intelligent Systems: Properties and Principles Fabio - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lecture 3. Intelligent Systems: Properties and Principles Fabio Bonsignorio The BioRobotics Institute, SSSA, Pisa, Italy and Heron Robots Old attempts Jaquet-Droz Brothers (1720-1780) Old attempts Karakuri Dolls Chahakobi Ningyo (Tea


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lecture 3. Intelligent Systems: Properties and Principles

Fabio Bonsignorio The BioRobotics Institute, SSSA, Pisa, Italy and Heron Robots

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Old attempts

Jaquet-Droz Brothers (1720-1780)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Old attempts

Karakuri Dolls

Chahakobi Ningyo (Tea Serving Doll) by SHOBEI Tamaya IX, and plan from 'Karakuri Zuii' ('Karakuri - An Illustrated Anthology') published in 1796.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Older and newer attempts

Juanelo Torriano alias Gianello della Torre, (XVI century) a craftsman from Cremona, built for Emperor Charles V a mechanical young lady who was able to walk and play music by picking the strings

  • f a real lute.

Hiroshi Ishiguro, early XXI century Director of the Intelligent Robotics Laboratory, part of the Department of Adaptive Machine Systems at Osaka University, Japan

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Data are very important, but they are not all in a digital economy. ACTIONS, MOBILITY and STRENGTH are also needed! Robotics: a great opportunity to innovate, connect and transform. Robotics is technology and business, but it is also creativity and fun!

5 “[...] The size of the robotics market is projected to grow substantially to 2020s. This is a global market and Europe’s traditional competitors are fully engaged in exploiting it. Europe has a 32% share of the industrial market. Growth in this market alone is estimated at 8%-9% per annum. Predictions of up to 25% annual growth are made for the service sector where Europe holds a 63% share of the non-military

  • market. […]”

“[…] From today’s €22bn worldwide revenues, robotics industries are set to achieve annual sales of between €50bn and €62bn by 2020. […]” http://sparc-robotics.eu/about/ SPARC Strategic Research Agenda

Robotics is one of the 12 disruptive technologies identified by McKinsey

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Waves of Robotics Innovation

1990

Industrial robotics

Advanced, Future and Emerging Robotics & Cognitive Systems

Industrial leadership and societal impact

IoT

AI

ML

Sustainable industrial leadership and ubiquitous societal impact

Bionics & Bioins piratio n

MC, Simpl., Self-org. Cognitiv e Science

First wave Second wave Third wave

2st c r e s t 1st crest 2st crest 1st crest 2st crest

Multif. Nanomat.

Society

2000

Robotics body of knowledge

Future

  • f

Robotics

Mech Eng Comp Sci Ctrl Eng

1st crest

2015 2020 2030

Methodologies and Technologies for Robotics and Mechatronics New wave of use-centered science- based radical innovations

2025

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The need for an embodied perspective

7

  • “failures” of classical AI
  • fundamental problems of classical approach
  • Wolpert’s quote: Why do plants not have a

brain? (but check Barbara Mazzolai’s lecture at the ShanghAI Lectures 2014)

  • Interaction with environment: always

mediated by body

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Two views of intelligence

classical: 
 cognition as computation embodiment: 
 cognition emergent from sensory- motor and interaction processes

slide-9
SLIDE 9

“Frame-of-reference” Simon’s ant on the beach

  • simple behavioral rules
  • complexity in interaction, 


not — necessarily — in brain

  • thought experiment:


increase body by factor of 1000


9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The “symbol grounding” problem

real world:
 doesn’t come
 with labels … How to put the labels??

10

Gary Larson

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Goals

  • What is intelligence? Natural and artificial?
  • conceptual and technical know-how in the

field

  • informed opinion on media reports
  • things can always be seen differently
  • new ways of thinking about ourselves and

the world around us

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

‘Caveat’

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Old ideas

13

“If every tool, when ordered, or even of its own accord, could do the work that befits it, just as the creations of Daedalus moved of themselves . . . If the weavers' shuttles were to weave of themselves, then there would be no need either of apprentices for the master workers or of slaves for the lords.” Aristotle (from Politics, Book 1, 1253b, 322 BC)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Old ideas

14

The part of the quote "or even of its own accord” is elsewhere

translated as "or by seeing what to do in advance" etc. (you may find many translations). I think this is an important part of the quote, so it's good to go back to the original text: Aristotle uses the word "προαισθανόµενον" – proaisthanomenon this means literaly: pro = before, aisthanomenon = perceiving, apprehending, understanding, learning (any of these meanings in this order of frequency) in my view it is clearly a word that is attributed to intelligent, living agents....i.e. ones with cognitive abilities (!)

personal communication, Dr. Katerina Pastra Research Fellow Language Technology Group Institute for Language and Speech Processing Athens, Greece

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Two views of intelligence

classical: 
 cognition as computation embodiment: 
 cognition emergent from sensory- motor and interaction processes

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The need for an embodied perspective

16

  • “failures” of classical AI
  • fundamental problems of classical

approach

  • Wolpert’s quote: Why do plants not …?
  • Interaction with environment: always

mediated by body

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Complete agents

17

Masano Toda’s Fungus Eaters

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Properties of embodied agents

  • subject to the laws of physics
  • generation of sensory stimulation

through interaction with real world

  • affect environment through behavior
  • complex dynamical systems
  • perform morphological computation

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Complex dynamical systems

19

non-linear system - in contrast to a linear one
 —> Any idea?


slide-20
SLIDE 20

Complex dynamical systems

concepts: focus box 4.1, p. 93, “How the body …”

  • dynamical systems, complex systems, non-

linear dynamics, chaos theory

  • phase space
  • non-linear system — limited predictability,

sensitivity to initial conditions

  • trajectory

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Today’s topics

  • short recap
  • characteristics of complete agents
  • illustration of design principles
  • parallel, loosely coupled processes: the

“subsumption architecture”

  • case studies: “Puppy”, biped walking
  • “cheap design” and redundancy

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Design principles for intelligent systems

Principle 1: Three-constituents principle Principle 2: Complete-agent principle Principle 3: Parallel, loosely coupled processes Principle 4: Sensory-motor coordination/ information self-structuring Principle 5: Cheap design Principle 6: Redundancy Principle 7: Ecological balance Principle 8: Value

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Three-constituents principle

define and design

  • “ecological niche”
  • desired behaviors and tasks
  • design of agent itself

design stances scaffolding

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Complete-agent principle

  • always think about complete agent behaving

in real world

  • isolated solutions: often artifacts — e.g.,

computer vision (contrast with active vision)

  • biology/bio-inspired systems: every action

has potentially effect on entire system

24

can be exploited!

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Recognizing an object in a cluttered environment

25

manipulation of 
 environment can
 facilitate perception

Experiments: Giorgio Metta and Paul Fitzpatrick Illustrations by Shun Iwasawa

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Today’s topics

  • short recap
  • characteristics of complete agents
  • illustration of design principles
  • parallel, loosely coupled processes: the

“subsumption architecture”

  • case studies: “Puppy”, biped walking
  • “cheap design” and redundancy

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Parallel, loosely coupled processes

  • emergent from system-environment

interaction

  • based on large number of parallel,

loosely coupled processes

  • asynchronous
  • coupled through agent’s sensory-motor

system and environment

27

intelligent behavior:

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The subsumption architecture

28

s e n s

  • r

s actuators

perception - modeling - planning - acting sense-model-plan-act sense-think-act

s e n s

  • r

s actuators explore collect object avoid obstacle move foreward classical, cognitivistic “behavior-based”, subsumption

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Mimicking insect walking

  • subsumption architecture


well-suited

29

six-legged robot “Ghenghis”

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Insect walking

  • no central control for leg

coordination

  • nly communication between

neighboring legs

30

Holk Cruse, German biologist

neural connections

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Insect walking

  • no central control for leg

coordination

  • nly communication between

neighboring legs

  • global communication: through

interaction with environment

31

Holk Cruse, German biologist

neural connections

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Communication through interaction with

  • exploitation of interaction with environment

simpler neural circuits

32

angle sensors in joints

“parallel, loosely coupled processes”

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Kismet: The social interaction robot

33

Cynthia Breazeal, MIT Media Lab
 (prev. MIT AI Lab)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Kismet: The social interaction robot

34

Cynthia Breazeal, MIT Media Lab
 (prev. MIT AI Lab)

Video “Kismet”

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Kismet: The social interaction robot

35

Cynthia Breazeal, MIT Media
 lab (prev. MIT AI Lab)

Reflexes:

  • turn towards loud noise
  • turn towards moving objects
  • follow slowly moving objects
  • habituation

principle of “parallel, loosely coupled processes”

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Kismet: The social interaction robot

36

Cynthia Breazeal, MIT Media
 lab (prev. MIT AI Lab)

Reflexes:

  • turn towards loud noise
  • turn towards moving objects
  • follow slowly moving objects
  • habituation

social competence: a collection of reflexes ?!?!???

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Scaling issue: the “Brooks-Kirsh” debate

insect level —> human level? David Kirsh (1991): “Today the earwig, tomorrow man?” Rodney Brooks (1997): “From earwigs to humans.”

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Scaling issue: the “Brooks-Kirsh” debate

insect level —> human level? David Kirsh (1991): “Today the earwig, tomorrow man?” Rodney Brooks (1997): “From earwigs to humans.”

38

volunteer for brief presentation on the “Brooks-Kirsh” debate - or generally, scalability of subsumption (on a later date)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Probabilistic Model Of Control

39

  • Although it may seem strange only in recent times

the classical results from Shannon theory, have been applied to the modeling of control systems.

  • As the complexity of control tasks namely in robotics

applications lead to an increase in the complexity of control programs, it becomes interesting to verify if, from a theoretical standpoint, there are limits to the information that a control program must manage in

  • rder to be able to control a given system.
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Information self- structuring

Experiments: Lungarella and Sporns, 2006
 Mapping information flow
 in sensorimotor networks
 PLoS Computational Biology

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Probabilistic Model Of Control

41

Directed acyclic graphs representing a control process. (Upper left) Full control system with a sensor and an

  • actuator. (Lower left) Shrinked Closed Loop diagram merging sensor and actuator, (Upper right) Reduced open loop
  • diagram. (Lower right) Single actuation channel enacted by the controller's state C=c.

Touchette, Lloyd (2004)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Models of ‘Morphological Computation’

42

Relations (II) links the mutual information between the controlled variable and the controller to the information stored in the elements, the mutual information between them and the information stored in the network and accounts for the redundancies through the multi information term ΔI.

(II)

ΔHN + ΔHi

i n

− ΔI ≤ I X;C

( )

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Snakebot

43 see: Tanev et. al, IEEE TRO, 2005

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Maybe not GOF Euclidean space? :-)

44 see: Bonsignorio, Artificial Life, 2013

slide-45
SLIDE 45

'Look Ma, No Hands' syndrome?

slide-46
SLIDE 46

When two systems are ‘equivalently’ ‘intelligent’ for a given set of tasks (e.g. DLA?) When a system ouperform another? There is a ‘sufficient statistics’ for a given set of tasks We need a confidence estimation that… our self-driving car won’t provoke an accident.

Comparison and ranking

PARADIGM CLASHES

slide-47
SLIDE 47

When two systems are ‘equivalently’ ‘intelligent’ for a given set of tasks (e.g. DLA?) When a system ouperform another? There is a ‘sufficient statistics’ for a given set of tasks We need a confidence estimation that… our self-driving car won’t provoke an accident.

Comparison and ranking

PARADIGM CLASHES PARADIGM CLASHES

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Statistical significance

Picture source: wikipedia

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Thank you!

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Thank you!

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Thank you for your attention!

51

www.shanghailectures.org