Web Course Web Course Physical Properties of Glass Physical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

web course web course physical properties of glass
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Web Course Web Course Physical Properties of Glass Physical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Web Course Web Course Physical Properties of Glass Physical Properties of Glass 1. Properties of Glass Melts 1. Properties of Glass Melts 2. Thermal Properties of Glasses 2. Thermal Properties of Glasses Richard K. Brow Missouri University


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-1

Web Course Web Course Physical Properties of Glass Physical Properties of Glass

  • 1. Properties of Glass Melts
  • 1. Properties of Glass Melts
  • 2. Thermal Properties of Glasses
  • 2. Thermal Properties of Glasses

Richard K. Brow Missouri University of Science & Technology Department of Materials Science & Engineering

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-2

Melt and Glass Properties

  • Viscosity
  • Surface Tension
  • Thermal Expansion
  • Heat Capacity
  • Thermal Conductivity
slide-3
SLIDE 3

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-3

Surface Tension Surface Tension

slide-4
SLIDE 4

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-4

Thermodynamic definitions

  • To create a stable interface between two phases, the free

energy of formation of the interface must be positive (to avoid miscibility.) l dx F Work (W) done to create new area (dA=l·dx): W = F·dx Surface tension (γ) resists the creation of new area:

γ = F/l , and so W = γ·dA

Units for γ : ergs/cm2 (or dyn/cm), J/m2 (or N/m)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-5

Young-LaPlace Equation

  • Surface tension resists bubble expansion,

so work is required to expand bubble radius

  • This pressure differential explains:

– Capillary rise – Increased vapor pressure/solubility of curved surfaces – Wetting behavior (Young-Dupree equation)

r dr ΔP·ΔV = γ·dA ΔP·(4πr2·dr) = γ·(8πr·dr) ΔP = 2γ/r

Glass melt wall

γw γg γgw β

Air

γw = γgw+ γg·cos(π−β)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-6

What is the source for ‘surface energy’?

  • Consider a hypothetical lattice

‘Surface atoms’ have lower average coordination numbers (CN) than ‘bulk atoms’; this affects lattice energy (V) which depends on bond energy (ε) and number of bonds (CN).

8 . 6 . : . 2 , 2

min min

− ≈ > − ≡ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ =

bulk surface bulk surface surf surface bulk bulk

CN CN Note V V Energy Surface CN V CN V ε ε

Surface energy arises from the incomplete coordination (or charge compensation) of surface atoms compared to bulk atoms.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-7

Si O O O O O O O Si

  • O

O O O Si Si+ O O O

Does fracture create dangling bonds? Reconstruction is more likely:

Si+ O O O

  • O

O O Si Si O O O O O Si O Edge-shared tetrahedra are commonly sound on silica surfaces No ESR evidence: Hochstrasser and Antonini (1972)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-8

MD Simulation of silica glass fracture surface EA Leed et al., Phys Rev B 72[15] 155427 (2005)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-9

‘Modified’ surfaces extend several monolayers

Pair-distribution functions from a silica fracture surface from a molecular dynamics simulation- compared to the ‘bulk’ PDF (bottom) Levine et al., J. Chem. Phys. 86 2997 (1987).

slide-10
SLIDE 10

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-10

Surface Tension Surface Tension-

  • melts

melts

  • Smoothing sharp corners (fire polishing)
  • Contraction of fibers during fiber-drawing
  • Equilibrium thickness of ‘float glass’ melts
  • Adhesion and wetting (contact angles) with forming materials
  • Penetration of glass melts into refractory pores
  • Nucleation and growth of gas bubbles in the melt
  • Eddy currents at melt surfaces due to local differences in γ
  • Compositional gradients near refractory walls create γ-

gradients which drive melt currents- undercutting refractories at ‘melt line’

slide-11
SLIDE 11

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-11

Eddy currents at melt surfaces due to local differences in γ

  • Compositional gradients near refractory walls create γ-

gradients which drive melt currents- undercutting refractories at ‘melt line’

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-12

Measuring Surface Tension Measuring Surface Tension

Droplet method: Measure weight (m·g) of melt drop that detaches from end of Pt-rod or tube: γ = m·g/(2π·r) Bubble-pressure method: Measure pressure (Δp) required to blow a bubble from a melt (density ρ) with a Pt-capillary (radius r) inserted to a depth (l): γ= r·(Δp-g·l·ρ)/2 Ring method Pt-wire ring (radius ‘R’) immersed in a melt, then pulled

  • ut with application of constant force (W); ‘a’ is correction

factor.. γ=aW/4π·R Elongation of glass fiber

Pt-rod (radius ‘r’)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-13

Surface Tension Surface Tension

Glass type γ (mN/m) S-L-S (flint/float) Brown bottle E-glass TV-glass 310 296 315 248 water mercury 72 550

From Beerkens, 1997

Slight temperature dependence: γ decreases 4-10 mN/m per 100°C increase for most common glasses SO3, Cr2O3, V2O5 all significantly decrease γ, as does water MgO, Al2O3 increase γ

  • Low surface tension

melts may foam

Na2SO4 (liq) has lower surface tension (266 mN/m) than an SLS melt- Na2SO4 (liq) spreads on top of melt (continuous glassmelting tank operation) where it wets and dissolves unmelted sand….

slide-14
SLIDE 14

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-14

Compositional Effects on Surface Tension Compositional Effects on Surface Tension

Polarizable ions (K+

  • vs. Na+) reduce γ
slide-15
SLIDE 15

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-15

Compositional Effects on Surface Tension Compositional Effects on Surface Tension

Polarizable ions (Pb2+) reduce γ

Note: γ for B2O3 liquids is 80 mN/m at ~900°C (Varshneya, p. 243)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-16

Compositional Effects on Surface Tension Compositional Effects on Surface Tension

Polarizable ions reduce γ and γ decreases with temperature

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-17

Thermal Expansion Thermal Expansion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-18

Definitions

( )

1 2 1 1 2

T T V V V

m

− − = β

P

T V V ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ∂ ∂ = 1 β

Average volume expansion coefficient when temperature increases from T1 to T2 The instantaneous volume expansion coefficient is given by The corresponding linear expansion coefficients (α) are obtained by replacing volume with length, e.g.

T l l Δ Δ = α

Units: 10-7/ºC, reported over designated temperature range

slide-19
SLIDE 19

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-20

Dilatometric softening pt, Td:η~109-1010 Pa·s well annealed rapid cool

slide-21
SLIDE 21

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-21

Shelby, 1997

slide-22
SLIDE 22

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-22

Shelby

internuclear repulsion

Coulombic attraction

Note too: Networks can expand/contract by bond- bending as well as ‘bond- separation’

slide-23
SLIDE 23

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-23

Δl l4.2K

  • Temp. (K)

SiO2 Zn(PO3)2 GeO2 BeF2 B2O3 Note: Tetrahedral framework glasses exhibit ‘anomalous’ CTE behavior at low temperatures- Tetrahedral rotations and bond angle changes

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-24

xNa2O·(100-x)SiO2 glasses

51.15% SiO2 67.11% SiO2 77.30% SiO2 88.17% SiO2

What accounts for this unusual CTE behavior?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-25

xR2O·(100-x)SiO2 glasses

Reducing Reducing ‘ ‘network polymerization network polymerization’ ’ usually increases CTE usually increases CTE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-26

The The ‘ ‘borate anomaly is evident in CTE data for borate glasses borate anomaly is evident in CTE data for borate glasses

xR2O·(100-x)B2O3 glasses

BØ3→ BØ4

  • Na+

BØ4

  • Na+→BØO2

2-(2Na+)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-27

xTiO2·(100-x)SiO2 glasses Ultralow expansion (ULE)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-29

Shelby 1997

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-30

Li-Zn-borosilicates (Donald, et al.

  • J. Mat. Sci., 24 3892 (1989)

glass Glass- ceramics α−β cristobalite transition residual glass

slide-31
SLIDE 31

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-31

Brief CTE Case Study: Li-aluminosilicate glass-ceramics

slide-32
SLIDE 32

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-33

Li2O-Al2O3-nSiO2: β-spodumene/β-quartz solid solutions

slide-34
SLIDE 34

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-34

Low thermal expansion Low thermal expansion due to open tetrahedral due to open tetrahedral crystalline networks crystalline networks

slide-35
SLIDE 35

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-35

From Beall, “Glass-Ceramics, in Commercial Glasses (Advances in Ceramics, 18), 1986

‘Corning ware’: (1-2 μm)

‘Transparent’ glass-ceramic (~0.1 μm)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-36

http://www.pgo-online.com/intl/katalog/curves/zerodur_dkurve.html

Zerodur- ultralow expansion glass-ceramics

slide-37
SLIDE 37

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-37

8-m mirror blank (45-tons of glass, melted at 1700 K)- Schott/Mainz

http://grus.berkeley.edu/~jrg/MATERIALS/node9.html

slide-38
SLIDE 38

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-38

European Southern Observatory ‘Very Large Telescope’ Paranol, Chile

slide-39
SLIDE 39

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-39

Quench Hot-to-Cold (cold surface, hot center) Surface in Tension Rapid Heat: Cold-to-Hot (hot surface, cold center) Surface Compression

Thermal Shock: T<Tg (no relaxation)

Initial, uniform temperature Decoupled response Coupled response

slide-40
SLIDE 40

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-40

For a plate cooled symmetrically at Φ°C/s, the planar stresses are given by

σx= [E/3(1-ν)]ΦL2α(ρ·Cp/K)

where L is the half-thickness of the plate, ρ is density, Cp is heat capacity and K is thermal conductivity; E is elastic modulus and ν is the Poisson’s ratio.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-41

PEITL, O. & ZANOTTO, E. D. "Thermal Shock Properties of Chemically Toughened Borosilicate Glass".

  • J. Non-Cryst. Solids v. 247/1-3 (1999)

39-49

Thermal Shock

Thermal Shock Resistance:

ΔT=m[σf/α·E][K/ρ·Cp]1/2 Where m is a constant and σf is the tensile strength.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-42

Heat Capacity Heat Capacity

slide-43
SLIDE 43

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-43

Heat Capacity (C)

  • Amount of heat (Q) required to change the temperature

by one degree of a fixed amount of material

  • Units for C: calories/(g·°C), calories/(mole·°C),

Joules/(kg·°C), Joules/(mole·°C); recall that 1 cal=4.18 J

– Cp (constant pressure), Cv (constant volume)

  • Specific Heat: (C-material)/(C-water at 15°C), although

sometimes defined as ‘heat capacity per g material’

  • Solids: C depends on phonon vibrations

Liquids: contributions from configurational entropy

  • Typically measured by differential scanning calorimetry
  • At room temperature, there is little compositional

dependence for Cp~900 J·kg-1·K-1

slide-44
SLIDE 44

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-44

Heat capacity increases monotonically above Tg- related to structural rearrangements in the supercooled liquid (configurational heat capacity)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-45

From C. A. Angell, Science, 267, (1995), 1924.

Melt Melt Fragility Fragility

Fragile Strong Tg/T

Log (viscosity in poise)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-46

At low temperatures, heat capacity of electrical insulators described by the Debye relationship (θD is Debye Temp):

( )

3 4

5 12

D B v

T Nk C θ π =

3 / 1 3 2

] / 6 )[ / ( V N k

D

B D

ν π θ h =

where νD is related to the vibrational (phonon) energies of the chemical bonds. Glasses do not follow the Debye relationship and appear to have ‘excess’ heat capacity as T → 0 K.

  • glasses have additional low

frequency vibrational modes, including the ‘Boson peak’

slide-47
SLIDE 47

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-47

Thermal Conductivity Thermal Conductivity

slide-48
SLIDE 48

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-48

Heat Transfer in Glasses & Melts Heat Transfer in Glasses & Melts

  • Up to 300°C: Conduction dominates
  • Above 300°C: Conduction and Radiation
  • Above 800°C: Radiation and Convection,

conduction is less important

slide-49
SLIDE 49

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-49

Thermal conductivity (K) defined by Fourier’s Law: Heat flux = -(thermal conductivity) x (temperature gradient) Φ (watts/m2) = -Kc (watts/m·K) x dT/dx (K/m) Temperature Kc (w/m·K) 20°C 600°C 1200°C 1.0 1.5 2.0 Phonon excitation mechanism

  • low conductivity compared to

crystals

  • Little dependence on

composition

slide-50
SLIDE 50

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-50

Phonon-mediated thermal conductivity of glass is (relatively) independent of composition…

  • K increases with temperature (for

glasses) because of an increase in heat capacity….

slide-51
SLIDE 51

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-51

Radiative Radiative conductivity conductivity

(KR): energy transfer by photons

Below 600°C: blackbody radiation at wavelengths (>2.5μm) where glass absorbs; heat must conduct by phonons Above 1000°C: Blackbody radiation is transmitted by glass- heat conducts radiatively

from Beerkens (1997)

slide-52
SLIDE 52

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-52

Radiative Radiative conductivity conductivity (KR): energy transfer by photons

α σ 3 / 16

3 2 T

n KR =

n=refractive index σ=Stefan’s constant T=temperature α=absorption coef. Note: KR>>KC and KR is reduced for melts with large absorbance (from transition metal ions: Fe2+, Cr3+, etc)

KR~0.05 KR~0.16 KR~0.18 KR~0.025

slide-53
SLIDE 53

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-53

Implications for how glass melts can be heated

  • Clear melts absorb λ>4.5μm (surface heating)
  • Heat emitted from surface penetrates into melt
  • Shorter wavelengths are absorbed deeper in the melt
  • Heat transferred by radiation→ absorption→

transmission→ re-radiation→ re-absorption cascade

  • Clear melts can be heated to depths of 4-5 feet
  • Colored (absorbing) melts must be shallower, or must

employ auxiliary heat sources to avoid cold spots

slide-54
SLIDE 54

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-54

Heat Transfer by Convection Heat Transfer by Convection

  • Heat transfer (watt/m2) by melt flow currents
  • Becomes significant when v>>~5x10-6 m/s

– in melters, v~10-3 m/s

T v cp

conv

Δ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = Φ ρ

ρ=density (kg/m3) cp=specific heat (J/(kg·°C) v=melt velocity (m/s) ΔT=temperature gradient

slide-55
SLIDE 55

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-55

Melting end Conditioning

Batch melting fining Bridge wall Cooling and homogenizing forehearth throat Major convective flows in tank furnace

(Wooley, Engineered Materials Handbook, 4 (1991 ), 386)

Shadow wall

slide-56
SLIDE 56

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-56

www.tpd.tnl.nl

Thermal and transport modeling

  • Temperature distributions
  • Combustion space
  • tank
  • Flow patterns
slide-57
SLIDE 57

FS08 Richard K. Brow brow@mst.edu Melt properties part 2-57

Summary Summary

  • Thermal properties are related to bond-strengths

– Potential well determines CTE – Heat capacity / thermal conductivity (glass) depend on phonon energies

  • Melt properties (surface tension, thermal conductivity and

viscosity) depend on composition and define processing conditions