Interpretation of Probability February 14, 2013 Thursday, February - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interpretation of probability
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interpretation of Probability February 14, 2013 Thursday, February - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interpretation of Probability February 14, 2013 Thursday, February 14, 13 Thursday, February 14, 13 Thursday, February 14, 13 Correlation is not causation Solution: Controlled experiments Thursday, February 14, 13 In 1999, UK prosecutors


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Interpretation of Probability

February 14, 2013

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Correlation is not causation Solution: Controlled experiments

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-5
SLIDE 5

In 1999, UK prosecutors charged Sally Clark with murdering her two infant children, who had apparently both died in their sleep.

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Her defense: sudden infant death syndrome

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Expert witness: P(1 child dying of crib death) = 1/8550

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Expert witness: P(1 child dying of crib death) = 1/8550 P(both dying) = 1/8550^2 = 1/73 million

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The probability she is innocent is 1 in 73 million. Therefore, she must be guilty.

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The probability she is innocent is 1 in 73 million. Therefore, she must be guilty. What do you think?

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Error 1: P(innocent | both children dead) ≠ P(both children dead | innocent).

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Error 1: P(innocent | both children dead) ≠ P(both children dead | innocent). Error 2: No reason to believe the probabilities are

  • independent. (In fact, they likely aren’t:

susceptibility to SIDS is partly genetic.)

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Risk = expected value of losses

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Risk = expected value of losses = P(loss) x amount of loss

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Choose the option where you’re likely to lose the least (i.e., smallest expected value of loss)

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Risk = expected value of losses = P(loss) x amount of loss

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Risk = expected value of losses = P(loss) x amount of loss

May be tricky

Thursday, February 14, 13

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Risk = expected value of losses = P(loss) x amount of loss

Need to use consistent units. Doesn’t take into account loss-aversion.

Thursday, February 14, 13