lecture 20
play

Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 12, 2023 •270 likes •1.67k views

. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang March 28th, 2013 Hyun Min Kang Uniformly Most Powerful Test Biostatistics 602 - Statistical Inference ..

  1. , X . . Example . .. . . .. . .. Pr . . .. . . .. . i.i.d. Pr Pr Note that X i March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . n X n , and n .. c n X Pr c n n X . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . 5 / 1 .. .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known, testing H 0 : θ ≤ θ 0 vs X 1 , · · · , X n H 1 : θ > θ 0 . LRT test rejects H 0 if x − θ 0 σ / √ n > c . ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n > c β ( θ ) = ( X − θ + θ − θ 0 ) = σ / √ n > c

  2. , X .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. i.i.d. Example Note that X i March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . n X n , and n . c n X Pr Pr Pr Pr . . .. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . 5 / 1 . . . . .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. . . .. . . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known, testing H 0 : θ ≤ θ 0 vs X 1 , · · · , X n H 1 : θ > θ 0 . LRT test rejects H 0 if x − θ 0 σ / √ n > c . ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n > c β ( θ ) = ( X − θ + θ − θ 0 ) = σ / √ n > c ( X − θ σ / √ n + θ − θ 0 ) σ / √ n > c =

  3. . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . n , and March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . n X , X . Note that X i Pr Pr Pr Pr i.i.d. Example .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . 5 / 1 . .. . . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known, testing H 0 : θ ≤ θ 0 vs X 1 , · · · , X n H 1 : θ > θ 0 . LRT test rejects H 0 if x − θ 0 σ / √ n > c . ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n > c β ( θ ) = ( X − θ + θ − θ 0 ) = σ / √ n > c ( X − θ σ / √ n + θ − θ 0 ) σ / √ n > c = ( X − θ σ / √ n > c − θ − θ 0 ) = σ / √ n

  4. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . Pr March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang Pr Pr Pr i.i.d. . Example . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . 5 / 1 . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known, testing H 0 : θ ≤ θ 0 vs X 1 , · · · , X n H 1 : θ > θ 0 . LRT test rejects H 0 if x − θ 0 σ / √ n > c . ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n > c β ( θ ) = ( X − θ + θ − θ 0 ) = σ / √ n > c ( X − θ σ / √ n + θ − θ 0 ) σ / √ n > c = ( X − θ σ / √ n > c − θ − θ 0 ) = σ / √ n Note that X i ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) , X ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 / n ) , and X − θ σ / √ n ∼ N (0 , 1) .

  5. . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . Because the power function is increasing function of March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . Therefore the LRTs are unbiased. always holds when , Pr . Example (cont’d) . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. 6 / 1 .. . . .. . . Therefore, for Z ∼ N (0 , 1) ( Z > c + θ 0 − θ ) σ / √ n β ( θ ) =

  6. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . Example (cont’d) Pr always holds when . Therefore the LRTs are unbiased. Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. 6 / 1 . Therefore, for Z ∼ N (0 , 1) ( Z > c + θ 0 − θ ) σ / √ n β ( θ ) = Because the power function is increasing function of θ , β ( θ ′ ) ≥ β ( θ )

  7. . .. . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . Example (cont’d) Pr Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . 6 / 1 .. . .. . .. . . Therefore, for Z ∼ N (0 , 1) ( Z > c + θ 0 − θ ) σ / √ n β ( θ ) = Because the power function is increasing function of θ , β ( θ ′ ) ≥ β ( θ ) always holds when θ ≤ θ 0 < θ ′ . Therefore the LRTs are unbiased.

  8. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . Definition March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang function of another test in C . . . . . Uniformly Most Powerful Test (UMP) . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . 7 / 1 Let C be a class of tests between H 0 : θ ∈ Ω vs H 1 : θ ∈ Ω c 0 . A test in C , with power function β ( θ ) is uniformly most powerful (UMP) test in class C if β ( θ ) ≥ β ′ ( θ ) for every θ ∈ Ω c 0 and every β ′ ( θ ) , which is a power

  9. • A UMP test is ”uniform” in the sense that it is most powerful for • For simple hypothesis such as H . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . c . March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang test always exists. , UMP level and H every . in this class. c test has the smallest type II error probability for any UMP level . . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . 8 / 1 UMP level α test Consider C be the set of all the level α test. The UMP test in this class is called a UMP level α test.

  10. • A UMP test is ”uniform” in the sense that it is most powerful for • For simple hypothesis such as H . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. c . March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang test always exists. , UMP level and H every . in this class. . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . 8 / 1 UMP level α test Consider C be the set of all the level α test. The UMP test in this class is called a UMP level α test. UMP level α test has the smallest type II error probability for any θ ∈ Ω c 0

  11. • For simple hypothesis such as H . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . in this class. March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang test always exists. , UMP level and H . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . 8 / 1 .. . . .. . . UMP level α test Consider C be the set of all the level α test. The UMP test in this class is called a UMP level α test. UMP level α test has the smallest type II error probability for any θ ∈ Ω c 0 • A UMP test is ”uniform” in the sense that it is most powerful for every θ ∈ Ω c 0 .

  12. . . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . in this class. Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . 8 / 1 . . . .. . .. .. UMP level α test Consider C be the set of all the level α test. The UMP test in this class is called a UMP level α test. UMP level α test has the smallest type II error probability for any θ ∈ Ω c 0 • A UMP test is ”uniform” in the sense that it is most powerful for every θ ∈ Ω c 0 . • For simple hypothesis such as H 0 : θ = θ 0 and H 1 : θ = θ 1 , UMP level α test always exists.

  13. • (Sufficiency) Any test that satisfies 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 is a UMP level • (Necessity) if there exist a test satisfying 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 with k . . and kf x if f x R x R that satisfies . Theorem 8.3.12 - Neyman-Pearson Lemma R c . Neyman-Pearson Lemma . .. . . .. . . .. x kf x if f x every UMP level March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . A Pr X A satisfying Pr X test satisfies 8.3.1 except perhaps on a set A test (satisfies 8.3.2), and .. test is a size then every UMP level , test , Then, R Pr X and For some k . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 9 / 1 Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where the pdf or pmf corresponding the θ i is f ( x | θ i ) , i = 0 , 1 , using a test with rejection region

  14. • (Sufficiency) Any test that satisfies 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 is a UMP level • (Necessity) if there exist a test satisfying 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 with k . . x R that satisfies . . Theorem 8.3.12 - Neyman-Pearson Lemma . Neyman-Pearson Lemma .. if f x . . .. . . .. . . .. R c For some k kf x test satisfies 8.3.1 except perhaps on a set A March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . A Pr X A satisfying Pr X every UMP level . test (satisfies 8.3.2), and test is a size then every UMP level , test , Then, R Pr X and . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. 9 / 1 Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where the pdf or pmf corresponding the θ i is f ( x | θ i ) , i = 0 , 1 , using a test with rejection region x ∈ R if f ( x | θ 1 ) > kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 1) and

  15. • (Sufficiency) Any test that satisfies 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 is a UMP level • (Necessity) if there exist a test satisfying 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 with k . . . Theorem 8.3.12 - Neyman-Pearson Lemma . Neyman-Pearson Lemma . .. . R that satisfies .. . . .. . . .. .. . . and For some k test satisfies 8.3.1 except perhaps on a set A March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . A Pr X A satisfying Pr X every UMP level . test (satisfies 8.3.2), and test is a size then every UMP level , test , Then, R Pr X .. . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . 9 / 1 . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where the pdf or pmf corresponding the θ i is f ( x | θ i ) , i = 0 , 1 , using a test with rejection region x ∈ R if f ( x | θ 1 ) > kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 1) and x ∈ R c if f ( x | θ 1 ) < kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 2)

  16. • (Sufficiency) Any test that satisfies 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 is a UMP level • (Necessity) if there exist a test satisfying 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 with k . . Neyman-Pearson Lemma . .. . . .. . Theorem 8.3.12 - Neyman-Pearson Lemma .. . . .. . . .. . . . . satisfying Pr X March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . A Pr X A test satisfies 8.3.1 except perhaps on a set A .. every UMP level test (satisfies 8.3.2), and test is a size then every UMP level , test R that satisfies . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . 9 / 1 Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where the pdf or pmf corresponding the θ i is f ( x | θ i ) , i = 0 , 1 , using a test with rejection region x ∈ R if f ( x | θ 1 ) > kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 1) and x ∈ R c if f ( x | θ 1 ) < kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 2) For some k ≥ 0 and α = Pr ( X ∈ R | θ 0 ) , Then,

  17. • (Necessity) if there exist a test satisfying 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 with k . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . Neyman-Pearson Lemma . Theorem 8.3.12 - Neyman-Pearson Lemma satisfying Pr X March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . A Pr X A test satisfies 8.3.1 except perhaps on a set A . every UMP level test (satisfies 8.3.2), and test is a size then every UMP level , test R that satisfies . .. .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . 9 / 1 Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where the pdf or pmf corresponding the θ i is f ( x | θ i ) , i = 0 , 1 , using a test with rejection region x ∈ R if f ( x | θ 1 ) > kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 1) and x ∈ R c if f ( x | θ 1 ) < kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 2) For some k ≥ 0 and α = Pr ( X ∈ R | θ 0 ) , Then, • (Sufficiency) Any test that satisfies 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 is a UMP level α

  18. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . . March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang test R that satisfies . Theorem 8.3.12 - Neyman-Pearson Lemma .. . Neyman-Pearson Lemma . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . 9 / 1 . . .. . . . .. . Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where the pdf or pmf corresponding the θ i is f ( x | θ i ) , i = 0 , 1 , using a test with rejection region x ∈ R if f ( x | θ 1 ) > kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 1) and x ∈ R c if f ( x | θ 1 ) < kf ( x | θ 0 ) (8 . 3 . 2) For some k ≥ 0 and α = Pr ( X ∈ R | θ 0 ) , Then, • (Sufficiency) Any test that satisfies 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 is a UMP level α • (Necessity) if there exist a test satisfying 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 with k > 0 , then every UMP level α test is a size α test (satisfies 8.3.2), and every UMP level α test satisfies 8.3.1 except perhaps on a set A satisfying Pr ( X ∈ A | θ 0 ) = Pr ( X ∈ A | θ 1 ) = 0 .

  19. • Suppose that k • Suppose that . f f f Calculating the ratios of the pmfs given, . vs. H H Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma . f . . .. . . .. . . .. .. f f rejects H if x March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang Pr x Pr x Pr reject . or x test .. , and UMP level , then R k . Pr reject H test always rejects H . Therefore UMP level , and , then the rejection region R . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . 10 / 1 Let X ∈ Binomial (2 , θ ) , and consider testing

  20. • Suppose that k • Suppose that .. f f f f Calculating the ratios of the pmfs given, Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma . . f . .. . . .. . . .. . f . .. rejects H if x March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang Pr x Pr x Pr reject . or x test , then the rejection region R , and UMP level , then R k . Pr reject H test always rejects H . Therefore UMP level , and . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . 10 / 1 Let X ∈ Binomial (2 , θ ) , and consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 = 1/2 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 = 3/4 .

  21. • Suppose that k • Suppose that . Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . Calculating the ratios of the pmfs given, , and , then the rejection region R or x March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang Pr x Pr x Pr reject . rejects H if x .. test , and UMP level , then R k . Pr reject H test always rejects H . Therefore UMP level . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. 10 / 1 . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . .. . Let X ∈ Binomial (2 , θ ) , and consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 = 1/2 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 = 3/4 . f (0 | θ 1 ) f (1 | θ 1 ) f (2 | θ 1 ) f (0 | θ 0 ) = 1 f (1 | θ 0 ) = 3 f (2 | θ 0 ) = 9 4 , 4 , 4

  22. • Suppose that . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . . March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang Pr x Pr x Pr reject or x . rejects H if x test , and UMP level , then R k Calculating the ratios of the pmfs given, Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . 10 / 1 .. . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . Let X ∈ Binomial (2 , θ ) , and consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 = 1/2 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 = 3/4 . f (0 | θ 1 ) f (1 | θ 1 ) f (2 | θ 1 ) f (0 | θ 0 ) = 1 f (1 | θ 0 ) = 3 f (2 | θ 0 ) = 9 4 , 4 , 4 • Suppose that k < 1/4 , then the rejection region R = { 0 , 1 , 2 } , and UMP level α test always rejects H 0 . Therefore α = Pr ( reject H 0 | θ = θ 0 = 1/2) = 1 .

  23. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. . Calculating the ratios of the pmfs given, March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang Pr x Pr x Pr reject Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . 10 / 1 . .. .. . . .. . Let X ∈ Binomial (2 , θ ) , and consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 = 1/2 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 = 3/4 . f (0 | θ 1 ) f (1 | θ 1 ) f (2 | θ 1 ) f (0 | θ 0 ) = 1 f (1 | θ 0 ) = 3 f (2 | θ 0 ) = 9 4 , 4 , 4 • Suppose that k < 1/4 , then the rejection region R = { 0 , 1 , 2 } , and UMP level α test always rejects H 0 . Therefore α = Pr ( reject H 0 | θ = θ 0 = 1/2) = 1 . • Suppose that 1/4 < k < 3/4 , then R = { 1 , 2 } , and UMP level α test rejects H 0 if x = 1 or x = 2 .

  24. . .. . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma Calculating the ratios of the pmfs given, Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . 10 / 1 .. . . .. . .. . Let X ∈ Binomial (2 , θ ) , and consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 = 1/2 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 = 3/4 . f (0 | θ 1 ) f (1 | θ 1 ) f (2 | θ 1 ) f (0 | θ 0 ) = 1 f (1 | θ 0 ) = 3 f (2 | θ 0 ) = 9 4 , 4 , 4 • Suppose that k < 1/4 , then the rejection region R = { 0 , 1 , 2 } , and UMP level α test always rejects H 0 . Therefore α = Pr ( reject H 0 | θ = θ 0 = 1/2) = 1 . • Suppose that 1/4 < k < 3/4 , then R = { 1 , 2 } , and UMP level α test rejects H 0 if x = 1 or x = 2 . α = Pr ( reject | θ = 1/2) = Pr ( x = 1 | θ = 1/2) + Pr ( x = 2 | θ = 1/2) = 3 4

  25. • If k . . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . .. . Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma (cont’d) Pr reject Pr x the UMP level test always not reject H , and Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . 11 / 1 .. .. . . .. . . • Suppose that 3/4 < k < 9/4 , then UMP level α test rejects H 0 if x = 2

  26. • If k . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma (cont’d) the UMP level test always not reject H , and Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . 11 / 1 . .. . . .. . . .. • Suppose that 3/4 < k < 9/4 , then UMP level α test rejects H 0 if x = 2 α = Pr ( reject | θ = 1/2) = Pr ( x = 2 | θ = 1/2) = 1 4

  27. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . Example of Neyman-Pearson Lemma (cont’d) Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . 11 / 1 • Suppose that 3/4 < k < 9/4 , then UMP level α test rejects H 0 if x = 2 α = Pr ( reject | θ = 1/2) = Pr ( x = 2 | θ = 1/2) = 1 4 • If k > 9/4 the UMP level α test always not reject H 0 , and α = 0

  28. . n x i i n exp f x f x x i exp i f x n i.i.d. X i Example - Normal Distribution . .. . . .. . . exp i .. n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang x i i n n exp x i i x i x i i n exp x i i n x i i n exp .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . 12 / 1 . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 .

  29. . X i exp x i i n exp f x f x n i.i.d. Example - Normal Distribution i . .. . . .. . . .. . n x i .. i March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang x i i n n exp x i n exp x i i n exp x i i n x i i n . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . 12 / 1 .. . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . − ( x i − θ ) 2 [ 1 { }] ∏ f ( x | θ ) = 2 πσ 2 exp 2 σ 2 i =1

  30. . . exp n i.i.d. X i Example - Normal Distribution . .. . .. exp . . .. . . .. . . exp n . x i March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang x i i n n exp i i n x i i n exp x i i n x i .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. 12 / 1 . . . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . . . .. ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . − ( x i − θ ) 2 [ 1 { }] ∏ f ( x | θ ) = 2 πσ 2 exp 2 σ 2 i =1 { ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 } − f ( x | θ 1 ) 2 σ 2 = { } f ( x | θ 0 ) ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 − 2 σ 2

  31. . . Example - Normal Distribution . .. . . .. . .. i.i.d. . . .. . . .. . . .. n . exp March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang x i i n n x i exp i n x i i n exp exp exp .. X i . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. 12 / 1 . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . − ( x i − θ ) 2 [ 1 { }] ∏ f ( x | θ ) = 2 πσ 2 exp 2 σ 2 i =1 { ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 } − f ( x | θ 1 ) 2 σ 2 = { } f ( x | θ 0 ) ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 − 2 σ 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 [ ∑ n ∑ n ] − = + 2 σ 2 2 σ 2

  32. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . exp March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang x i i n n exp . exp exp exp n i.i.d. .. Example - Normal Distribution .. X i . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . 12 / 1 . . . .. ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . − ( x i − θ ) 2 [ 1 { }] ∏ f ( x | θ ) = 2 πσ 2 exp 2 σ 2 i =1 { ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 } − f ( x | θ 1 ) 2 σ 2 = { } f ( x | θ 0 ) ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 − 2 σ 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 [ ∑ n ∑ n ] − = + 2 σ 2 2 σ 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 − ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 [∑ n ] = 2 σ 2

  33. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. exp March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang exp exp exp exp . n .. X i Example - Normal Distribution . .. . . i.i.d. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . 12 / 1 .. . . .. . . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . − ( x i − θ ) 2 [ 1 { }] ∏ f ( x | θ ) = 2 πσ 2 exp 2 σ 2 i =1 { ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 } − f ( x | θ 1 ) 2 σ 2 = { } f ( x | θ 0 ) ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 − 2 σ 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 [ ∑ n ∑ n ] − = + 2 σ 2 2 σ 2 i =1 ( x i − θ 0 ) 2 − ∑ n i =1 ( x i − θ 1 ) 2 [∑ n ] = 2 σ 2 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n [ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ] = 2 σ 2

  34. . . .. . . .. . . .. . Example (cont’d) .. . . .. . . .. . exp . Pr March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k X i i n k n x i i n log k x i i n . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . 13 / 1 . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . UMP level α test rejects if 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n [ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ] > k 2 σ 2

  35. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. .. . . n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k X i i Pr .. k x i i n exp Example (cont’d) . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 13 / 1 . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. UMP level α test rejects if 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n [ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ] > k 2 σ 2 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n ⇒ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ⇐ > log k 2 σ 2

  36. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k X i i Pr . n exp Example (cont’d) . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 13 / 1 . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . UMP level α test rejects if 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n [ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ] > k 2 σ 2 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n ⇒ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ⇐ > log k 2 σ 2 ∑ x i > k ∗ ⇐ ⇒ i =1

  37. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . Example (cont’d) exp n Pr Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . 13 / 1 . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. UMP level α test rejects if 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n [ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ] > k 2 σ 2 0 − θ 1 ) 2 + 2 ∑ n ⇒ n ( θ 2 i =1 x i ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) ⇐ > log k 2 σ 2 ∑ x i > k ∗ ⇐ ⇒ i =1 ( n ) ∑ X i > k ∗ | θ 0 α = i =1

  38. . .. . .. . . .. . . . X i . .. . . .. . . Example (cont’d) X .. k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . where Z n n Z n Pr k X i i n Pr n X .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . 14 / 1 . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. Under H 0 , N ( θ 0 , σ 2 ) ∼

  39. . . .. . . .. . . .. . Example (cont’d) .. . . .. . . .. . X i . k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . where Z n n Z X Pr k X i i n Pr n X . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. 14 / 1 . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . Under H 0 , N ( θ 0 , σ 2 ) ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) ∼

  40. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. Example (cont’d) .. k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . where Z n n Z X i Pr k X i i n Pr X . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . 14 / 1 .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . Under H 0 , N ( θ 0 , σ 2 ) ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) ∼ X − θ 0 σ / √ n ∼ N (0 , 1)

  41. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . .. . X i March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang Pr Pr X Example (cont’d) . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . 14 / 1 . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. Under H 0 , N ( θ 0 , σ 2 ) ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) ∼ X − θ 0 σ / √ n ∼ N (0 , 1) ( n ) ∑ X i > k ∗ | θ 0 = α i =1 Z > k ∗ / n − θ 0 ( ) σ / √ n = where Z ∼ N (0 , 1) .

  42. if X .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang n z n k , or equivalently, reject H Example (cont’d) X i test reject if Thus, the UMP level n z n k .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. 15 / 1 k ∗ / n − θ 0 σ / √ n = z α

  43. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang n z n if X .. k , or equivalently, reject H X i test reject if Thus, the UMP level n Example (cont’d) . . .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 15 / 1 . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . k ∗ / n − θ 0 σ / √ n = z α ( ) σ k ∗ √ n = θ 0 + z α

  44. . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . Example (cont’d) n Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . 15 / 1 .. . . .. . .. . k ∗ / n − θ 0 σ / √ n = z α ( ) σ k ∗ √ n = θ 0 + z α Thus, the UMP level α test reject if ∑ X i > k ∗ , or equivalently, reject H 0 if X > k ∗ / n = θ 0 + z α σ / √ n

  45. . . Neyman-Pearson Lemma on Sufficient Statistics . .. . . .. . .. Corollary 8.3.13 . . .. . . .. . . . . . k g t March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T and For some k if g t . S c t and k g t if g t S t satisfies .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . 16 / 1 Consider H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 : θ = θ 1 . Suppose T ( X ) is a sufficient statistic for θ and g ( t | θ i ) is the pdf or pmf of T . Corresponding θ i , i ∈ { 0 , 1 } . Then any test based on T with rejection region S is a UMP level α test if it

  46. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. k g t March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T and For some k if g t Neyman-Pearson Lemma on Sufficient Statistics S c t satisfies . . Corollary 8.3.13 . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. 16 / 1 Consider H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 : θ = θ 1 . Suppose T ( X ) is a sufficient statistic for θ and g ( t | θ i ) is the pdf or pmf of T . Corresponding θ i , i ∈ { 0 , 1 } . Then any test based on T with rejection region S is a UMP level α test if it t ∈ S if g ( t | θ 1 ) > k · g ( t | θ 0 ) and

  47. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . For some k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T and satisfies . . . Corollary 8.3.13 . Neyman-Pearson Lemma on Sufficient Statistics . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . 16 / 1 Consider H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 : θ = θ 1 . Suppose T ( X ) is a sufficient statistic for θ and g ( t | θ i ) is the pdf or pmf of T . Corresponding θ i , i ∈ { 0 , 1 } . Then any test based on T with rejection region S is a UMP level α test if it t ∈ S if g ( t | θ 1 ) > k · g ( t | θ 0 ) and t ∈ S c if g ( t | θ 1 ) < k · g ( t | θ 0 )

  48. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . Corollary 8.3.13 March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang satisfies . . . . Neyman-Pearson Lemma on Sufficient Statistics . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . 16 / 1 . . .. . . .. . . Consider H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 : θ = θ 1 . Suppose T ( X ) is a sufficient statistic for θ and g ( t | θ i ) is the pdf or pmf of T . Corresponding θ i , i ∈ { 0 , 1 } . Then any test based on T with rejection region S is a UMP level α test if it t ∈ S if g ( t | θ 1 ) > k · g ( t | θ 0 ) and t ∈ S c if g ( t | θ 1 ) < k · g ( t | θ 0 ) For some k > 0 and α = Pr ( T ∈ S | θ 0 )

  49. . . kg T x g T x x R The rejection region in the sample space is Proof . .. . f x .. . . .. . . .. . By Factorization Theorem: i .. By Neyman-Pearson Lemma, this test is the UMP level March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T X R Pr X test, and kf x h x g T x f x x h x kg T x h x g T x x R i . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . 17 / 1 = { x : T ( x ) = t ∈ S }

  50. . .. By Factorization Theorem: R The rejection region in the sample space is Proof . .. . . . i . .. . . .. . . .. f x h x g T x . By Neyman-Pearson Lemma, this test is the UMP level March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T X R Pr X test, and kf x i f x x h x kg T x h x g T x x R .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. 17 / 1 = { x : T ( x ) = t ∈ S } = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) }

  51. . . Proof . .. . . .. . .. R . . .. . . .. .. . The rejection region in the sample space is By Factorization Theorem: . test, and March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T X R Pr X By Neyman-Pearson Lemma, this test is the UMP level R kf x f x x h x kg T x h x g T x x .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . 17 / 1 .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . .. = { x : T ( x ) = t ∈ S } = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) } f ( x | θ i ) = h ( x ) g ( T ( x ) | θ i )

  52. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. test, and March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T X R Pr X By Neyman-Pearson Lemma, this test is the UMP level Proof kf x f x x R By Factorization Theorem: R The rejection region in the sample space is . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . 17 / 1 .. . .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . . = { x : T ( x ) = t ∈ S } = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) } f ( x | θ i ) = h ( x ) g ( T ( x ) | θ i ) = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) h ( x ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) h ( x ) }

  53. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . Pr X March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang S Pr T X R test, and .. By Neyman-Pearson Lemma, this test is the UMP level R By Factorization Theorem: R The rejection region in the sample space is Proof . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . 17 / 1 . .. . . .. = { x : T ( x ) = t ∈ S } = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) } f ( x | θ i ) = h ( x ) g ( T ( x ) | θ i ) = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) h ( x ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) h ( x ) } = { x : f ( x | θ 1 ) > kf ( x | θ 0 ) }

  54. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. . The rejection region in the sample space is March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang R By Factorization Theorem: R Proof . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. 17 / 1 . . . . .. . .. .. = { x : T ( x ) = t ∈ S } = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) } f ( x | θ i ) = h ( x ) g ( T ( x ) | θ i ) = { x : g ( T ( x ) | θ 1 ) h ( x ) > kg ( T ( x ) | θ 0 ) h ( x ) } = { x : f ( x | θ 1 ) > kf ( x | θ 0 ) } By Neyman-Pearson Lemma, this test is the UMP level α test, and = Pr ( X ∈ R ) = Pr ( T ( X ) ∈ S | θ 0 ) α

  55. . . g t n . , where T X is a sufficient statistic for T i.i.d. X i Revisiting the Example of Normal Distribution .. n . . .. . . .. . . .. i exp .. exp March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang t n exp t t n n t t exp n t exp g t g t n i . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . 18 / 1 ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 .

  56. . . i g t i.i.d. X i Revisiting the Example of Normal Distribution . .. . .. exp . . .. . . .. . . n t . n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang t n exp t t exp i n t exp n t exp g t g t n .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . 18 / 1 ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . T = X is a sufficient statistic for θ , where T ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 / n ) .

  57. . . Revisiting the Example of Normal Distribution . .. . . .. . .. i.i.d. . . .. . .. .. . . X i exp . t March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang t n exp t n g t exp n t exp n t exp g t .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . 18 / 1 .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . T = X is a sufficient statistic for θ , where T ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 / n ) . − ( t − θ i ) 2 1 { } g ( t | θ i ) = 2 σ 2 / n √ 2 πσ 2 / n

  58. . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . t March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang t n exp t n . exp exp exp exp i.i.d. X i Revisiting the Example of Normal Distribution .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . 18 / 1 .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . T = X is a sufficient statistic for θ , where T ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 / n ) . − ( t − θ i ) 2 1 { } g ( t | θ i ) = 2 σ 2 / n √ 2 πσ 2 / n { } − ( t − θ 1 ) 2 g ( t | θ 1 ) 2 σ 2 / n = g ( t | θ 0 ) { } − ( t − θ 0 ) 2 2 σ 2 / n

  59. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . exp March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang t n exp exp . exp exp i.i.d. X i Revisiting the Example of Normal Distribution . .. . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 18 / 1 . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . T = X is a sufficient statistic for θ , where T ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 / n ) . − ( t − θ i ) 2 1 { } g ( t | θ i ) = 2 σ 2 / n √ 2 πσ 2 / n { } − ( t − θ 1 ) 2 g ( t | θ 1 ) 2 σ 2 / n = g ( t | θ 0 ) { } − ( t − θ 0 ) 2 2 σ 2 / n { 1 ( t − θ 1 ) 2 − ( t − θ 0 ) 2 ]} [ = − 2 σ 2 / n

  60. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. exp March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang exp exp exp exp .. i.i.d. X i Revisiting the Example of Normal Distribution . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. 18 / 1 . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known. Consider testing H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs. H 1 : θ = θ 1 where θ 1 > θ 0 . T = X is a sufficient statistic for θ , where T ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 / n ) . − ( t − θ i ) 2 1 { } g ( t | θ i ) = 2 σ 2 / n √ 2 πσ 2 / n { } − ( t − θ 1 ) 2 g ( t | θ 1 ) 2 σ 2 / n = g ( t | θ 0 ) { } − ( t − θ 0 ) 2 2 σ 2 / n { 1 ( t − θ 1 ) 2 − ( t − θ 0 ) 2 ]} [ = − 2 σ 2 / n { 1 ]} θ 2 1 − θ 2 [ = − 0 − 2 t ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) 2 σ 2 / n

  61. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. . .. . . .. .. log k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k t X t . n k exp Revisiting the Example (cont’d) . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. 19 / 1 . . .. . . UMP level α test reject if { 1 ]} θ 2 1 − θ 2 [ − 0 − 2 t ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) > 2 σ 2 / n

  62. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . log k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k t X k .. exp Revisiting the Example (cont’d) . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . . 19 / 1 . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . UMP level α test reject if { 1 ]} θ 2 1 − θ 2 [ − 0 − 2 t ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) > 2 σ 2 / n 1 − ( θ 2 1 − θ 2 [ ] ⇐ ⇒ 0 ) + 2 t ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) > 2 σ 2 / n

  63. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . Revisiting the Example (cont’d) exp k log k Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . 19 / 1 . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. UMP level α test reject if { 1 ]} θ 2 1 − θ 2 [ − 0 − 2 t ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) > 2 σ 2 / n 1 − ( θ 2 1 − θ 2 [ ] ⇐ ⇒ 0 ) + 2 t ( θ 1 − θ 0 ) > 2 σ 2 / n k ∗ ⇐ ⇒ X = t >

  64. Pr X z n .. . .. . . .. . . . Pr reject H . .. . . .. . . Revisiting the Example (cont’d) . . n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k z n k k k Z Pr n k n X Pr .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 20 / 1 Under H 0 , X ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) . k ∗ satisfies

  65. z n . . .. . . .. . . .. . Revisiting the Example (cont’d) .. . . .. . . .. . Pr X . n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k z n k k k Z Pr n k n X Pr .. . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . 20 / 1 . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . Under H 0 , X ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) . k ∗ satisfies Pr ( reject H 0 | θ 0 ) = α

  66. z n . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . Revisiting the Example (cont’d) . n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k z n k k .. Z Pr n k n X Pr . .. . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . 20 / 1 .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . Under H 0 , X ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) . k ∗ satisfies Pr ( reject H 0 | θ 0 ) = α Pr ( X > k ∗ | θ 0 ) α =

  67. z n . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k z n n . k Z Pr Pr Revisiting the Example (cont’d) . .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 20 / 1 . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. Under H 0 , X ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) . k ∗ satisfies Pr ( reject H 0 | θ 0 ) = α Pr ( X > k ∗ | θ 0 ) α = σ / √ n > k ∗ − θ 0 ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n =

  68. z n . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . k March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang k z n Pr .. Pr Revisiting the Example (cont’d) . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. 20 / 1 . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. Under H 0 , X ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) . k ∗ satisfies Pr ( reject H 0 | θ 0 ) = α Pr ( X > k ∗ | θ 0 ) α = σ / √ n > k ∗ − θ 0 ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n = Z > k ∗ − θ 0 ( ) σ / √ n =

  69. z n . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . Revisiting the Example (cont’d) Pr Pr k Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . 20 / 1 . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. Under H 0 , X ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) . k ∗ satisfies Pr ( reject H 0 | θ 0 ) = α Pr ( X > k ∗ | θ 0 ) α = σ / √ n > k ∗ − θ 0 ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n = Z > k ∗ − θ 0 ( ) σ / √ n = k ∗ − θ 0 σ / √ n = z α

  70. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . Revisiting the Example (cont’d) Pr Pr n Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . 20 / 1 . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. Under H 0 , X ∼ N ( θ 0 , σ 2 / n ) . k ∗ satisfies Pr ( reject H 0 | θ 0 ) = α Pr ( X > k ∗ | θ 0 ) α = σ / √ n > k ∗ − θ 0 ( X − θ 0 ) σ / √ n = Z > k ∗ − θ 0 ( ) σ / √ n = k ∗ − θ 0 σ / √ n = z α σ k ∗ = θ 0 + z α

  71. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . . March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang theorems are stated according to the definition. Note: we may define MLR using decreasing function of t . But all following . Definition .. . Monotone Likelihood Ratio . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. 21 / 1 . . .. . . .. . . A family of pdfs or pmfs { g ( t | θ ) : θ ∈ Ω } for a univariate random variable T with real-valued parameter θ have a monotone likelihood ratio if g ( t | θ 2 ) g ( t | θ 1 ) is an increasing (or non-decreasing) function of t for every θ 2 > θ 1 on { t : g ( t | θ 1 ) > 0 or g ( t | θ 2 ) > 0 } .

  72. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . . March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang theorems are stated according to the definition. Note: we may define MLR using decreasing function of t . But all following . Definition .. . Monotone Likelihood Ratio . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. 21 / 1 . . .. . . .. . . A family of pdfs or pmfs { g ( t | θ ) : θ ∈ Ω } for a univariate random variable T with real-valued parameter θ have a monotone likelihood ratio if g ( t | θ 2 ) g ( t | θ 1 ) is an increasing (or non-decreasing) function of t for every θ 2 > θ 1 on { t : g ( t | θ 1 ) > 0 or g ( t | θ 2 ) > 0 } .

  73. • If T is from an exponential family with the pdf or pmf . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. t March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . is a non-decreasing function of Then T has an MLR if w exp w . h t c g t Example of Monotone Likelihood Ratio . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . 22 / 1 • Normal, Poisson, Binomial have the MLR Property (Exercise 8.25)

  74. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . Example of Monotone Likelihood Ratio Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . 22 / 1 • Normal, Poisson, Binomial have the MLR Property (Exercise 8.25) • If T is from an exponential family with the pdf or pmf g ( t | θ ) = h ( t ) c ( θ ) exp [ w ( θ ) · t ] Then T has an MLR if w ( θ ) is a non-decreasing function of θ .

  75. t is an increasing function of t . Therefore, g t .. h t c t exp w h t c g t g t Proof . . t . . .. . . .. . . .. exp w c c g t March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . function of is a non-decreasing non-decreasing function of t , and T has MLR if w is a w . exp w and w , then w is a non-decreasing function of If w t w exp w . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . 23 / 1 Suppose that θ 2 > θ 1 .

  76. t is an increasing function of t . Therefore, g t . Proof . .. . . .. . . c .. . . .. . . .. .. c w exp w is a March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . function of is a non-decreasing non-decreasing function of t , and T has MLR if w g t .. w exp w and w , then w is a non-decreasing function of If w t . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. 23 / 1 . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . Suppose that θ 2 > θ 1 . g ( t | θ 2 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 2 ) exp [ w ( θ 2 ) t ] = g ( t | θ 1 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 1 ) exp [ w ( θ 1 ) t ]

  77. t is an increasing function of t . Therefore, g t . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . . Proof . is a March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . function of is a non-decreasing non-decreasing function of t , and T has MLR if w g t .. w exp w and w , then w is a non-decreasing function of If w . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . 23 / 1 .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . Suppose that θ 2 > θ 1 . g ( t | θ 2 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 2 ) exp [ w ( θ 2 ) t ] = g ( t | θ 1 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 1 ) exp [ w ( θ 1 ) t ] c ( θ 2 ) = c ( θ 1 ) exp [ { w ( θ 2 ) − w ( θ 1 ) } t ]

  78. t is an increasing function of t . Therefore, g t . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . . non-decreasing function of t , and T has MLR if w March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . function of is a non-decreasing is a . g t w exp w Proof . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. 23 / 1 . . .. . Suppose that θ 2 > θ 1 . g ( t | θ 2 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 2 ) exp [ w ( θ 2 ) t ] = g ( t | θ 1 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 1 ) exp [ w ( θ 1 ) t ] c ( θ 2 ) = c ( θ 1 ) exp [ { w ( θ 2 ) − w ( θ 1 ) } t ] If w ( θ ) is a non-decreasing function of θ , then w ( θ 2 ) − w ( θ 1 ) ≥ 0 and

  79. . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . Proof Hyun Min Kang Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 March 28th, 2013 .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . 23 / 1 . . .. . . .. . Suppose that θ 2 > θ 1 . g ( t | θ 2 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 2 ) exp [ w ( θ 2 ) t ] = g ( t | θ 1 ) h ( t ) c ( θ 1 ) exp [ w ( θ 1 ) t ] c ( θ 2 ) = c ( θ 1 ) exp [ { w ( θ 2 ) − w ( θ 1 ) } t ] If w ( θ ) is a non-decreasing function of θ , then w ( θ 2 ) − w ( θ 1 ) ≥ 0 and exp [ { w ( θ 2 ) − w ( θ 1 ) } t ] is an increasing function of t . Therefore, g ( t | θ 2 ) g ( t | θ 1 ) is a non-decreasing function of t , and T has MLR if w ( θ ) is a non-decreasing function of θ .

  80. . . . . is an MLR family. Then . . Theorem 8.1.17 . Karlin-Rabin Theorem .. vs H . . .. . . .. . . .. 1 For testing H , the UMP level . test is given March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . t Pr T t where by rejecting H if and only if T , the UMP level test is given vs H 2 For testing H . . . t Pr T t where by rejecting H is and only if T . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . 24 / 1 Suppose T ( X ) is a sufficient statistic for θ and the family { g ( t | θ ) : θ ∈ Ω }

  81. . . Karlin-Rabin Theorem . .. . . .. . .. Theorem 8.1.17 . . .. . . .. . . . . . by rejecting H if and only if T March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . t Pr T t where test is given . , the UMP level vs H 2 For testing H . . . . is an MLR family. Then .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . 24 / 1 Suppose T ( X ) is a sufficient statistic for θ and the family { g ( t | θ ) : θ ∈ Ω } 1 For testing H 0 : θ ≤ θ 0 vs H 1 : θ > θ 0 , the UMP level α test is given by rejecting H 0 is and only if T > t 0 where α = Pr ( T > t 0 | θ 0 ) .

  82. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang . . . is an MLR family. Then . . . Theorem 8.1.17 . Karlin-Rabin Theorem . .. .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . 24 / 1 Suppose T ( X ) is a sufficient statistic for θ and the family { g ( t | θ ) : θ ∈ Ω } 1 For testing H 0 : θ ≤ θ 0 vs H 1 : θ > θ 0 , the UMP level α test is given by rejecting H 0 is and only if T > t 0 where α = Pr ( T > t 0 | θ 0 ) . 2 For testing H 0 : θ ≥ θ 0 vs H 1 : θ < θ 0 , the UMP level α test is given by rejecting H 0 if and only if T < t 0 where α = Pr ( T < t 0 | θ 0 ) .

  83. n is an increasing function in . Let X i t exp n g t n . , and T X is a sufficient statistic for T X i.i.d. Example Application of Karlin-Rabin Theorem n . .. . . .. . . .. . n exp .. n March 28th, 2013 Biostatistics 602 - Lecture 20 Hyun Min Kang property. . Therefore T is MLR where w t exp w h t c t t exp n exp n t exp n n t . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . 25 / 1 ∼ N ( θ, σ 2 ) where σ 2 is known, Find the UMP level α test for H 0 : θ ≤ θ 0 vs H 1 : θ > θ 0 .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Lecture # 5 - Monday, Aug 30th In this lecture I reviewed the previous lecture 4, and then

Lecture # 5 - Monday, Aug 30th In this lecture I reviewed the previous lecture 4, and then

Lecture # 5 - Monday, Aug 30th In this lecture I reviewed the previous lecture 4, and then reviewed the final point of lecture #3: Hennigs logical approach to tree inference is valid as logic, but we have a hard time using it because our data

660 views • 7 slides
Algorithms (2IL15) Lecture 13 Wrap-up lecture 1 TU/e Algorithms (2IL15) Lecture 13

Algorithms (2IL15) Lecture 13 Wrap-up lecture 1 TU/e Algorithms (2IL15) Lecture 13

TU/e Algorithms (2IL15) Lecture 13 Algorithms (2IL15) Lecture 13 Wrap-up lecture 1 TU/e Algorithms (2IL15) Lecture 13 Part I of the course: Optimization Problems we want to find valid solution minimizing cost (or maximizing

904 views • 20 slides
In 2020SP, this lecture and lecture 20 are both optional extra material CS 5412/LECTURE 17 Ken

In 2020SP, this lecture and lecture 20 are both optional extra material CS 5412/LECTURE 17 Ken

In 2020SP, this lecture and lecture 20 are both optional extra material CS 5412/LECTURE 17 Ken Birman LEAVE NO TRACE BEHIND Spring, 2020 HTTP://WWW.CS.CORNELL.EDU/COURSES/CS5412/2020SP 1 THE PRIVACY PUZZLE FOR I O T We have sensors

1.04k views • 65 slides
Recall last lecture ... Lecture 8 Also last lecture: Painter's Algorithm More Hidden Surface

Recall last lecture ... Lecture 8 Also last lecture: Painter's Algorithm More Hidden Surface

Recall last lecture ... Lecture 8 Also last lecture: Painter's Algorithm More Hidden Surface Removal Sort polygons in depth. Use the farthest vertex in each polygon as the sorting key. Efficient Painter - binary space partition (BSP)

563 views • 6 slides
Plan Lecture 1 - String diagrams and symmetric monoidal categories Lecture 2 -

Plan Lecture 1 - String diagrams and symmetric monoidal categories Lecture 2 -

Plan Lecture 1 - String diagrams and symmetric monoidal categories Lecture 2 - Resource-sensitive algebraic theories Lecture 3 - Interacting Hopf monoids and graphical linear algebra Lecture 4 - Signal Flow Graphs and recurrence

1.2k views • 61 slides
Where are we at - Topic overview Lecture 1A: Security requirements/features Lecture 7A

Where are we at - Topic overview Lecture 1A: Security requirements/features Lecture 7A

Where are we at - Topic overview Lecture 1A: Security requirements/features Lecture 7A Threatens Privacy Threatens Try to achieve Lecture 2B: Network threats Lecture 3A: Attacks on Lecture 6A: Security Protocols Web servers, malware

381 views • 25 slides
Lecture Capture Introduction to Lecture Capture Learning Outcomes What will lecture capture

Lecture Capture Introduction to Lecture Capture Learning Outcomes What will lecture capture

ISDS &amp; Digital Business Skills Lecture Capture Introduction to Lecture Capture Learning Outcomes What will lecture capture actually do? What happens before a lecture? What happens during a lecture? What does the button do?

527 views • 18 slides
CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How

CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How

CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How can we predict binary or categorical variables? {0,1}, {True, False} {1, , N} Last lecture Will I purchase this product? (yes) Will I click

1.74k views • 60 slides
CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How

CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How

CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How can we predict binary or categorical variables? {0,1}, {True, False} {1, , N} Last lecture Will I purchase this product? (yes) Will I click

850 views • 46 slides
CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How

CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How

CSE 158 Lecture 4 Web Mining and Recommender Systems More Classifiers Last lecture How can we predict binary or categorical variables? {0,1}, {True, False} {1, , N} Last lecture Will I purchase this product? (yes) Will I click

839 views • 58 slides
Usability of Programming Languages Lecture 4 - directed by your research interests Lecture

Usability of Programming Languages Lecture 4 - directed by your research interests Lecture

Overview Practical experimental course lectures are only introductory Lecture 1 - theoretical principles classic approaches l h current trends in leading research. Lecture 2 - candidate research methods advantages and

499 views • 15 slides
Introduction to AI &amp; Intelligent Agents This Lecture Chapters 1 and 2 Next Lecture

Introduction to AI &amp; Intelligent Agents This Lecture Chapters 1 and 2 Next Lecture

Introduction to AI &amp; Intelligent Agents This Lecture Chapters 1 and 2 Next Lecture Chapter 3.1 to 3.4 (Please read lecture topic material before and after each lecture on that topic) What is Artificial Intelligence? Thought

636 views • 31 slides
Introduction to Numerical Optimization Biostatistics 615/815 Lecture 14 Lecture 14 Course is

Introduction to Numerical Optimization Biostatistics 615/815 Lecture 14 Lecture 14 Course is

Introduction to Numerical Optimization Biostatistics 615/815 Lecture 14 Lecture 14 Course is More Than Half Done! If you have comments they are very welcome y y Lectures Lecture notes Weekly Homework Midterm

795 views • 42 slides
Lecture 12: Clustering 1 6.0002 LECTURE 12 Re Reading Chapter 23 6.0002 LECTURE 12 2 Mach Ma

Lecture 12: Clustering 1 6.0002 LECTURE 12 Re Reading Chapter 23 6.0002 LECTURE 12 2 Mach Ma

Lecture 12: Clustering 1 6.0002 LECTURE 12 Re Reading Chapter 23 6.0002 LECTURE 12 2 Mach Ma chine e Lea earn rning Paradigm Observe set of examples: training data Infer something about process that generated that data Use

847 views • 36 slides
Lecture Outline Regeltechniek Previous lecture: Stability and transient response. Lecture 4

Lecture Outline Regeltechniek Previous lecture: Stability and transient response. Lecture 4

Lecture Outline Regeltechniek Previous lecture: Stability and transient response. Lecture 4 Basics of Feedback Control Robert Babu ska Today: Steady-state response. Delft Center for Systems and Control Faculty of Mechanical

388 views • 7 slides
Psycholinguistics Lecture 2 By Dr.Chelli Lecture Objectives At the end of this lecture, students

Psycholinguistics Lecture 2 By Dr.Chelli Lecture Objectives At the end of this lecture, students

Psycholinguistics Lecture 2 By Dr.Chelli Lecture Objectives At the end of this lecture, students will be able to: Discuss the different stages in the history of psycholinguistics Identify the scholars in the field of psycholinguistics

589 views • 28 slides
Audience perspectives on misinformation and low trust Nic Newman, Senior Research Associate

Audience perspectives on misinformation and low trust Nic Newman, Senior Research Associate

Audience perspectives on misinformation and low trust Nic Newman, Senior Research Associate REUTERS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF JOURNALISM @risj_oxford | #DNR19 Concern about what is real or fake on the internet This has risen 12 percentage

475 views • 13 slides
MONTANA EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR DROPOUTS PRESENTED BY ERIC MEREDITH DATA ANALYST OPI WHAT IS

MONTANA EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR DROPOUTS PRESENTED BY ERIC MEREDITH DATA ANALYST OPI WHAT IS

MONTANA EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR DROPOUTS PRESENTED BY ERIC MEREDITH DATA ANALYST OPI WHAT IS IS THE MONTANA EWS? A statistical model that can use readily available school, student, and other live data to identify students who are at

363 views • 19 slides
Further TUCP and False River Barrier Comments Tim Stroshane Policy Analyst Restore the Delta

Further TUCP and False River Barrier Comments Tim Stroshane Policy Analyst Restore the Delta

Further TUCP and False River Barrier Comments Tim Stroshane Policy Analyst Restore the Delta June 24, 2015 State Water Resources Middle River, Control Board Wing Levee Sacramento, CA Road, 2013 Tuesday, June 23, 2015 1 Good afternoon,

260 views • 15 slides
RAPID: Minimizing the Spread of False Rumors in Social Media during a Disaster US Researchers:

RAPID: Minimizing the Spread of False Rumors in Social Media during a Disaster US Researchers:

RAPID: Minimizing the Spread of False Rumors in Social Media during a Disaster US Researchers: Collaborators in Japan: Yasuaki Sakamoto Yuko Tanaka Stevens Institute of Technology National Institute of Informatics Margaret Chen Hidehito

303 views • 8 slides
Breakthroughs in Face Recognition Capability via Deep Learning and GPUs Prof. Neil M. Robertson

Breakthroughs in Face Recognition Capability via Deep Learning and GPUs Prof. Neil M. Robertson

Breakthroughs in Face Recognition Capability via Deep Learning and GPUs Prof. Neil M. Robertson Dr. Steven Lu Dr. Guosheng Hu Dr. Sankha Mukherjee , Dr. Rolf Baxter Dr. Yang Hua Dr. Yuan Yang Dr. Elyor Qodirov Soumya Ghosh Face Recognition

1.29k views • 27 slides
Leveraging multiple endpoints in small clinical trials Robin Ristl Section for Medical

Leveraging multiple endpoints in small clinical trials Robin Ristl Section for Medical

Leveraging multiple endpoints in small clinical trials Robin Ristl Section for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna EMA FP7 small-populations workshop, March 2017 1

519 views • 15 slides
ICIS/ECHO Update Becky Cripe Data Management Unit Chief Water Protection Forum November 8,

ICIS/ECHO Update Becky Cripe Data Management Unit Chief Water Protection Forum November 8,

ICIS/ECHO Update Becky Cripe Data Management Unit Chief Water Protection Forum November 8, 2017 A Brief History Lesson Missouri Clean Water Information System (MoCWIS) came online late 2007-2008 Houses all permit, compliance,

410 views • 19 slides
62-302, Florida Administrative Code. Id. . at 2. 1 App. B at B-3 to B-4 (emphasis added). As

62-302, Florida Administrative Code. Id. . at 2. 1 App. B at B-3 to B-4 (emphasis added). As

State Response to Comparison of Methods for Tracking Marsh Phosphorus Concentrations in Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Under the Consent Decree, December 20, 2006, TOC Meeting February 20, 2007 On December 19, 2006, the day before

215 views • 4 slides

More recommend