Large fmuctuations of the fjrst detected quantum return time Ruoyu - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

large fmuctuations of the fjrst detected quantum return
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Large fmuctuations of the fjrst detected quantum return time Ruoyu - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

R. Yin, K. Ziegler, F. Thiel and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033086 Large fmuctuations of the fjrst detected quantum return time Ruoyu Yin Bar Ilan University 20th Jan. 2020 RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 1 /


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • R. Yin, K. Ziegler, F. Thiel and E. Barkai,
  • Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033086

Large fmuctuations of the fjrst detected quantum return time

Ruoyu Yin Bar Ilan University 20th Jan. 2020

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 1 / 15

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Measurement Protocol

Repeated strong measurements until the fjrst success: ˆ U(τ) = exp(−iHτ) (ℏ = 1), ˆ D = |ψd⟩⟨ψd|

Outcome: a string of length n: “0, 0, 0, . . . , 1” (“0” for non-detection, and “1” for detection)

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 2 / 15

slide-3
SLIDE 3

If

  • First-detected “return” time (FDRt): |ψd⟩ = |ψin⟩
  • The system’s energy spectrum is discrete

Known results: (Grünbaum, Velázquez et al. 2013)

  • The FDR amplitude, the generating function(Z Transform):

φn = ⟨ψin| [ˆ U(τ)(1 − ˆ D) ]n−1 ˆ U(τ) |ψin⟩ , ˜ φ(z) =

⟨ψin| ∑∞

n=1 zn ˆ

U(nτ)|ψin⟩ 1+⟨ψin| ∑∞

n=1 zn ˆ

U(nτ)|ψin⟩

  • The system is recurrent
  • The mean: ⟨n⟩ = ∑∞

n=1 n|φn|2 = w ∈ Z, = the number of zeros {zi} of

˜ φ(z) [or the phases exp(iEkτ)] =winding number of ˜ φ(eiθ)

  • The variance:

Var(n) = ⟨ n2⟩ − ⟨n⟩2 =

w

i,j=1

2ziz∗

j

1 − ziz∗

j

  • Charge Theory: {zi} (excluding z0 = 0)

V(z) =

w

k=1

pk ln |eiEkτ − z| ⇒ stationary points F(z) =

w

k=1

pk eiEkτ − z ⇒ equilibrium points where pk = ∑gk

l=1 | ⟨ψin| Ekl⟩|2 =

⇒ charges on the unit circle.

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 3 / 15

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Example

H = −γ

7

x=0

[|x⟩⟨x + 1| + |x + 1⟩⟨x| − 2|x⟩⟨x|] . Ek/γ = 2 − 2 cos(πk/4)

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 4 / 15

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Schematics

Figure: Eight-site ring. τ = 1.

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 5 / 15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mechanism of Jumps of ⟨n⟩ and Diverging Var(n)

Some zero(s) approach the unit circle:

  • Mean: when the zero(s) “reach” the unit circle, it(they) does(do) not

count into ⟨n⟩ (canceled out)

  • Var(n): when the zero(s) is(are) approaching to the unit circle =

⇒ vanishing denominator (1 − ziz∗

j ) =

⇒ diverging var(n) “Signature” to jumps of the topological number From basic knowledge of electrostatics:

  • some “weak” charge(s) (“Shrinking”, Grünbaum, Velázquez et al.

2013): L1 point in sun-earth system

  • charges merging (“Fusion”, Grünbaum, Velázquez et al. 2013):

neighboring stars

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 6 / 15

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Perturbation Method

F(z) =

w

k=1

pk eiEkτ − z = 0 ⇒ critical zero zc Var(n) ∼ 2|zc|2 1 − |zc|2

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 7 / 15

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Perturbation Method

Triple-Charge Theory: Symmetric Scenario

Var(n) ∼ ∑

σ=±

2|zσ

d|2

1 − |zσ

d|2 +

( 2z+

d (z− d )∗

1 − z+

d (z− d )∗ + c.c.

) ,

  • M

Var(n) ∼ 16(p0 + 2p)2 p 1 τ 2 (¯ E+ − ¯ E− )2 , the mixing term M is fjnite.

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 8 / 15

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Perturbation Method

Zeno Regime–Lower Bound

Var(n) ≥ (w − 1) [ 2 cot2 (∆Emτ/2) − w + 2 ]

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 9 / 15

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Time-Energy Uncertainty Principle

Assume ∆Emτ ≪ ℏ (∆Em)2(∆tdet)2 ≳ 8(⟨n⟩ − 1)ℏ2, where ∆Em = Emax − Emin, ∆tdet = √ ⟨(nτ)2⟩ − ⟨nτ⟩2 = τ √ Var(n) In the mathematical limit ⟨n⟩ = w = 1, the particle is detected at the fjrst attempt for any sampling time τ. ∆tdet = 0 The presence of the factor ⟨n⟩ − 1 is physically reasonable.

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 10 / 15

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Example

Eight-Site Ring

(A) (C) (B) (D)

A B B C

D C D B C D

A B C B

D C D B C D

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 11 / 15

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Another Example

Interacting-Boson Model

H = −J 2(ˆ a†

l ˆ

ar + ˆ a†

al) + U(ˆ n2

l + ˆ

n2

r), ˆ

nl,r = ˆ a†

l,rˆ

al,r E0 = 3U − √ U2 + J2, E1 = 4U, E2 = 3U + √ U2 + J2.

2 4 6 8 10 U 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Overlaps

Figure: |ψin⟩ = |2, 0⟩, and J is set as 1. The green curve represents p0, and the blue/red is p1/p2. U is large, the ground state is almost |1, 1⟩.

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 12 / 15

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Another Example

2 4 6 8 10 U 101 102 103 104 Var(n)

Figure: J = 1, τ = 3

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 13 / 15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary

  • Diverging Var(n) accompany isolated jumps of ⟨n⟩
  • We quantify the magnitude of large fmuctuations of fjrst detected

return time based on four scenarios: single-weak charge, two-charge merging, three-charge merging, Zeno regime

  • Topology-dependent time-energy uncertainty relation

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 14 / 15

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank You!

  • R. Yin, K. Ziegler, F. Thiel and E. Barkai,
  • Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033086(Editors’ Suggestion)

RY, KZ, FT, EB 20/01/2020 Marseille 2020: QS & QW 15 / 15