Langdale Dock Langdale Dock Langdale Dock Langdale Dock - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Langdale Dock Langdale Dock Langdale Dock Langdale Dock Alternative Approval Alternative Approval Alternative Approval Alternative Approval Process Process

July 2011 July 2011

Background Background g

 Spring 2009

Spring 2009 -

• BC Ferries announces that private boats

BC Ferries announces that private boats will no longer have access to the Langdale float due to will no longer have access to the Langdale float due to safety, security and liability issues. safety, security and liability issues.

 March 14, 2009

March 14, 2009 -

• Open house at the Gambier

Open house at the Gambier C it H ll ith BC F i C it H ll ith BC F i Community Hall with BC Ferries. Community Hall with BC Ferries.

 On March 31, 2009

On March 31, 2009 -

• BC Ferries agrees to defer closure

BC Ferries agrees to defer closure to October 2009 pending a review of options by the to October 2009 pending a review of options by the to October 2009 pending a review of options by the to October 2009 pending a review of options by the SCRD. SCRD.

 April 20, 2009

April 20, 2009 – The inaugural meeting of the Langdale The inaugural meeting of the Langdale p g g g g g g Access Working Group (LAWG) is held. Access Working Group (LAWG) is held.

 April 25, 2009

April 25, 2009 – – SCRD public meeting at the Gambier SCRD public meeting at the Gambier C it H ll t i ti C it H ll t i ti Community Hall to review options. Community Hall to review options.

Options Options Options Options

1

Maintain Status Quo Maintain Status Quo

1.

• 1. Maintain Status Quo

Maintain Status Quo

1.

• 1. Continue to provide access to the Stormaway float

Continue to provide access to the Stormaway float

2.

• 2. Construct separate float for private boats

Construct separate float for private boats p p p p

2.

• 2. New float north of Langdale terminal.

New float north of Langdale terminal.

1 Construct new float and walkway

Construct new float and walkway

1.

• 1. Construct new float and walkway

Construct new float and walkway

2.

• 2. Use YMCA float (subject to agreement)

Use YMCA float (subject to agreement)

3

Use existing facilities Use existing facilities

3.

• 3. Use existing facilities

Use existing facilities

1.

• 1. Hopkins Landing

Hopkins Landing

2.

• 2. Gibsons Marina

Gibsons Marina

Conclusions Conclusions

1.

• 1. A

A new float at a different location would be costly new float at a different location would be costly, , involve involve a lengthy environmental process and would not a lengthy environmental process and would not likely address the needs of boaters and others likely address the needs of boaters and others likely address the needs of boaters and others. likely address the needs of boaters and others.

2.

• 2. Hopkins

Hopkins Landing Landing and and Gibsons Marina Gibsons Marina are not practical are not practical

• ptions, and
• ptions, and in the case of Hopkins there is no adjacent

in the case of Hopkins there is no adjacent

• ptions, and
• ptions, and in the case of Hopkins there is no adjacent

in the case of Hopkins there is no adjacent parking and potential conflicts with swimmers. parking and potential conflicts with swimmers.

3.

• 3. The impact of the closure of the Stormaway float

The impact of the closure of the Stormaway float would be lessened by expanding the Stormaway hours would be lessened by expanding the Stormaway hours

• f operation.
• f operation.

4 Options to retain access to the Storma a float or

Options to retain access to the Storma a float or

4.

• 4. Options to retain access to the Stormaway float or

Options to retain access to the Stormaway float or attached an alternative float are subject to the attached an alternative float are subject to the agreement of BC Ferries. agreement of BC Ferries. g

5.

• 5. BC Ferries has committed to maintain 24 hour

BC Ferries has committed to maintain 24 hour emergency access to the Stormaway float. emergency access to the Stormaway float.

Background cont. Background cont. g

 May 7, 2009

May 7, 2009 – – staff submitted a report to the SCRD staff submitted a report to the SCRD Board summarizing options to address the issue of Board summarizing options to address the issue of Board summarizing options to address the issue of Board summarizing options to address the issue of access to the Langdale terminal. access to the Langdale terminal.

 July 2009

July 2009 SCRD staff members of the LAWG and SCRD staff members of the LAWG and

 July 2009

July 2009 – SCRD staff, members of the LAWG and SCRD staff, members of the LAWG and

• ther interested parties attempted to quantify the use of
• ther interested parties attempted to quantify the use of

the Stormaway dock in support of funding applications. the Stormaway dock in support of funding applications. y pp g pp y pp g pp

 August 2009

August 2009 – – BC Ferries develops a possible option BC Ferries develops a possible option for a separate float near the existing Stormaway float. for a separate float near the existing Stormaway float. p g y p g y

 September 2009

September 2009 – – staff report to the SCRD Board staff report to the SCRD Board concerning the option of a constructing a new float concerning the option of a constructing a new float near the Stormaway float. near the Stormaway float.

Background cont. Background cont. g

 September 2009

September 2009 – – staff make preparations to move staff make preparations to move forward with a feasibility study forward with a feasibility study forward with a feasibility study. forward with a feasibility study.

 During 2009 and 2010 there were efforts to obtain

During 2009 and 2010 there were efforts to obtain federal and provincial funding for a separate remote federal and provincial funding for a separate remote federal and provincial funding for a separate remote federal and provincial funding for a separate remote dock connected to the terminal parking lot. Funding dock connected to the terminal parking lot. Funding requests at the federal and provincial level were not requests at the federal and provincial level were not successful. successful.

 November 2009

November 2009 – – SCRD, the LAWG and BC Ferries SCRD, the LAWG and BC Ferries begin the process of developing a license agreement begin the process of developing a license agreement that will govern the operation of the new dock. that will govern the operation of the new dock.

Background cont. Background cont. g

 January 2010

January 2010 – – the SCRD approves the draft agreement the SCRD approves the draft agreement and directs staff to move towards a final agreement. and directs staff to move towards a final agreement.

 March 2010

March 2010 – – BC Ferries presents a new proposal BC Ferries presents a new proposal whereby they will construct and maintain a new dock whereby they will construct and maintain a new dock subject to a License Agreement with the SCRD. subject to a License Agreement with the SCRD.

Proposed Float Proposed Float

Background cont. Background cont. g

 June 2010

June 2010 – – ongoing discussions with BC Ferries

• ngoing discussions with BC Ferries

concerning liability and indemnity provisions in the concerning liability and indemnity provisions in the concerning liability and indemnity provisions in the concerning liability and indemnity provisions in the agreement. agreement.

 April 5 2011

April 5 2011 final meeting with BC Ferries on final meeting with BC Ferries on

 April 5, 2011

April 5, 2011 – final meeting with BC Ferries on final meeting with BC Ferries on License Agreement. License Agreement.

 April 28 2011

April 28 2011 – SCRD Board approves draft License SCRD Board approves draft License

 April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011 SCRD Board approves draft License SCRD Board approves draft License agreement and directs staff to undertake the Alternative agreement and directs staff to undertake the Alternative Approval Process (AAP). Approval Process (AAP). pp ( ) pp ( )

License Agreement License Agreement g

 Based on the lease between BC Ferries and the B.C.

Based on the lease between BC Ferries and the B.C. Based on the lease between BC Ferries and the B.C. Based on the lease between BC Ferries and the B.C. Transportation Financing Authority. Transportation Financing Authority.

 Term

Term – 20 years + 10 year option. 20 years + 10 year option. y y p y y p

 Fee

Fee -

• $35,000 per year + SCRD expenses for total

$35,000 per year + SCRD expenses for total estimated cost of $40,280. estimated cost of $40,280.

 BC Ferries retains control of the terminal including the

BC Ferries retains control of the terminal including the new float. new float.

 BC Ferries accepts all costs and liability.

BC Ferries accepts all costs and liability.

 Any operational issues will be referred to the SCRD’s

Any operational issues will be referred to the SCRD’s y p y p Public Wharves Advisory Committee or other standing Public Wharves Advisory Committee or other standing committee. committee.

License Agreement cont. License Agreement cont. g

 Destruction of the dock may result in termination of

Destruction of the dock may result in termination of h the agreement. the agreement.

 After 5 years either party may terminate the agreement.

After 5 years either party may terminate the agreement.

 BC Ferries would be able to terminate the agreement if

BC Ferries would be able to terminate the agreement if the SCRD or parties related, are in breach. the SCRD or parties related, are in breach. N f 10 i i f i l il N f 10 i i f i l il

 No access from 10 minutes prior to ferry arrival until

No access from 10 minutes prior to ferry arrival until 10 minutes after ferry departure (20 minutes for first 10 minutes after ferry departure (20 minutes for first and last ferry trips) and last ferry trips) and last ferry trips). and last ferry trips).

 Permitted uses are for loading and unloading of

Permitted uses are for loading and unloading of passengers and baggage passengers and baggage passengers and baggage. passengers and baggage.

License Agreement cont. License Agreement cont. License Agreement cont. License Agreement cont.

 Limited moorage time.

Limited moorage time. Limited moorage time. Limited moorage time.

 No uses that would compete with BC Ferries or Route

No uses that would compete with BC Ferries or Route 13 (excludes unscheduled water taxis). 13 (excludes unscheduled water taxis). ( ) ( )

Alternative Approval Process (AAP) Alternative Approval Process (AAP) pp ( ) pp ( )

 Required in order to establish a function and tax area

Required in order to establish a function and tax area t f th l t f th fl t t f th l t f th fl t property owners for the annual costs of the new float. property owners for the annual costs of the new float.

 Annual cost of up to $40,280 (2032) includes:

Annual cost of up to $40,280 (2032) includes:

 $35 000 annual lease fee

$35 000 annual lease fee

 $35,000 annual lease fee

$35,000 annual lease fee



1,500 staff support (2012 costs + 20 years inflation) 1,500 staff support (2012 costs + 20 years inflation)



3,780 administration (2012 costs + 20 years inflation) 3,780 administration (2012 costs + 20 years inflation) 3,780 administration ( 0 costs 0 years inflation) 3,780 administration ( 0 costs 0 years inflation)

 Participation includes Area F islands only.

Participation includes Area F islands only.

 Rate would be $12.19 per $100,000 of assessed value in

Rate would be $12.19 per $100,000 of assessed value in $ p $ , $ p $ , 2012 (assuming a mid 2012 (assuming a mid-

• 2011 implementation) falling to $7.79

2011 implementation) falling to $7.79 in 2013. in 2013.

Alternative Approval Process (AAP) Alternative Approval Process (AAP) Alternative Approval Process (AAP) Alternative Approval Process (AAP)

 Property owners who are not in

Property owners who are not in favour favour of the

• f the

 Property owners who are not in

Property owners who are not in favour favour of the

• f the

proposed function complete an elector response proposed function complete an elector response form form form. form.

 The SCRD may proceed with the new function

The SCRD may proceed with the new function unless 10% of electors of the area indicate their unless 10% of electors of the area indicate their unless 10% of electors of the area indicate their unless 10% of electors of the area indicate their

• pposition.
• pposition.

If 10% f l h h SCRD If 10% f l h h SCRD

 If 10% of electors oppose, then the SCRD

If 10% of electors oppose, then the SCRD would have the option to go to referendum. would have the option to go to referendum.