kane county and the river valley workforce investment
play

Kane County and The River Valley Workforce Investment Board R OCH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kane County and The River Valley Workforce Investment Board R OCH E L L E J. D A N I E L S A T T OR N E Y / CON SU L T A N T 5301 N 36 t h Cour t H ol lywood, F l or i da 3302 1 9 54 2 05 2 582 dani el sr j@aol .com Background Over


  1. Kane County and The River Valley Workforce Investment Board R OCH E L L E J. D A N I E L S A T T OR N E Y / CON SU L T A N T 5301 N 36 t h Cour t H ol lywood, F l or i da 3302 1 9 54 2 05 2 582 dani el sr j@aol .com

  2. Background  Over 25 years of experience in the area of Workforce Development  Represent the Broward Workforce Development Board, Inc. in Florida and their management team  Consult nationwide as well as with the US Department of Labor on workforce issues  Provide training to boards and one-stops  Wrote the original implementation policies for the State of Illinois  Represent states and local areas with respect to audit and monitoring findings

  3. Workforce Investment Act 3  Strong role for Boards & Private Sector  State and Local Flexibility  Streamlined Services – One Stop  Universal Access  Empowering Individuals  Increased Accountability & Performance  Connections Between School and Work

  4. Strong role for Boards & Private Sector 4  Boards are majority Private Sector  Boards are appointed by chief local elected official(s)  Other members  Economic Development  Education  Organized labor  Community based organizations  Representatives of other workforce funding streams

  5. Strong role for Boards & Private Sector 5  Select and terminate one stop operators in partnership with local elected officials  Policy makers  Determine aspects of eligibility for adults and dislocated workers  Approve schools and courses of training  Select youth providers  Localize labor market information  Ambassadors for workforce in the community

  6. State and Local Flexibility 6  Where the law is silent  States may make policy  Local boards may make policies  States may ask for waivers  To better serve individuals targeted by the legislation  To effectuate better collaboration

  7. Streamlined Services - Universal Access 7  One stop career centers are the lynch pin of the system  Individuals are projected to change jobs 9 times over the life of their working lives  One stop for all workforce services  One stops provider services to all workers  Self help services – for everyone  Job search  Online courses – resumes, GED, employability skills , occupational skills  Referral to other workforce services  Intensive services

  8. Empowering Individuals 8  Select their own course of training  Choices of  Classroom training – individual training accounts  On the job training  Customized training

  9. Accountability - Performance 9  Started with 17 measures now  3 adult  3 youth  Performance  Entered employment  Wage  Retention  Boards can add measures  Fiscal accountability

  10. The Study 10  Purpose Look at the current structure  Make recommendations   For Continuous Improvement  Program and Fiscal Compliance  Identify strengths and weaknesses of the current system  Methodology Review the Inter governmental agreement  Review River Valley Workforce Board Documents  Review Fiscal Agent/One Stop   Monitoring Reports  Audit Report  Five Year Plan and Modifications Met or Spoke with   River Valley Workforce Board Members and staff  KCDEE Staff  County Chairs Visited Kane County One-Stop 

  11. Context of Study and Recommendations 11  Lagging economy  About 5 million dollars to spend on workforce services for Kane, Dekalb and Kendall Counties  Need to use the funds strategically  Pending Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization  Expect more cuts to domestic programs  KCDEE is isolated  Co-located in Kane County with IDES but operate in separate areas

  12. Context of Study and Recommendations 12  State monitoring reports make many recommendations for improvement to the one-stop  Annual audit with some issues  Board is needs to be the policy maker with guidance from Chief Elected Official(s) as appropriate  KCDEE / one-stop could use a face lift

  13. Context of Study and Recommendations 13  The Fiscal Agency status move to the board from the one-stop  Allow KCDEE (one stop) to focus on participants  Allow board to assume policy role  Retain board staff within the county  County finance would still maintain bank accounts and disburse funds  Move KCDEE to Office of Community Reinvestment (OCR)  Ahead of the curve on expected changes to legislation  OCR oversees community services grants  OCR shares a similar target population to that of KCDEE  Allow for cost efficiencies in providing client services  Allows for integration – mandatory one stop partner  Allow for rebranding of KCDEE to River Valley workNet in alignment with state branding of one stop centers

  14. Recommendations 14  Executive Committee, Subcommittee reviewed the recommendations  Voted to accept the recommendations and move them to the Council of Elected Officials for their approval

  15. Context of Study and Recommendations 15  Council of Elected Officials met and voted to  Amend intergovernmental agreement  To make the workforce board and staff the fiscal agent  To allow for KCDEE to be located within the county where • Effectiveness would be strengthened • Eliminate overlap and duplication of services

  16. Next Steps 16  Workforce Board staff will step in to manage the budget and make recommendations regarding investment of resources  Up to HR Committee to take next step

  17. PURPOSE OF STATE’S ATTORNEY’S DRAFT SAO a ske d to re vie w a nd c o mme nt. Pro vide le g a l a dvic e . No t a dvo c a ting po lic y. Sug g e ste d a lte rna tive la ng ua g e to a tte mpt to imple me nt Co unty Bo a rd’ s inte nt to the g re a te st e xte nt po ssib le . *T his pre se nta tio n hig hlig hts the ma jo r issue s pre se nte d in the Sta te ’ s Atto rne y dra ft, b ut do e s no t a ddre ss a ll o f the Sta te ’ s Atto rne y’ s sug g e stio ns.

  18. I. WHO IS GOVERNED BY THE ETHICS ORDINANCE? T he Co unty Bo a rd inte nds tha t the Ordina nc e a pply to a ll e le c te d o ffic ia ls e xc e pt the Circ uit Cle rk a nd Sta te ’ s Atto rne y. Se c tio n 7: Co unty-wide E le c te d Offic e rs All c ounty- wide e le c te d offic e r s of Kane County shall be subje c t to this Or dinanc e with the e xc e ption of the State 's Attor ne y and the Cle r k of the Cir c uit Cour t to ohibite d by law. the fulle st e xte nt not othe r wise pr

  19. CIRCUIT CLERK AND STATE’S ATTORNEY Attor ne y Ge ne r al E thic s Or dinanc e Guide With re spe c t to c o untie s, ne ithe r the Sta te 's Atto rne y no r the Circ uit Cle rk will b e sub je c t to the pro visio ns o f the Mo de l Ordina nc e . T he se o ffic e rs a re Sta te , no t c o unty, o ffic e rs. T he e xe mptio n o f tho se o ffic e rs will g e ne ra lly e xte nd to the ir sta ffs, a s we ll.

  20. SECTIONS THAT MAY APPLY TO OTHER ELECTED OFFICIALS • Se c tio n 2: Pro hib ite d Po litic a l Ac tivitie s • Se c tio n 3: Gift Ba n • E a c h g o ve rnme nta l e ntity …sha ll a do pt a n o rdina nc e o r re so lutio n tha t re g ula te s, in a ma nne r no le ss re stric tive tha n Se c tio n 5-15 a nd Artic le 10 o f this Ac t, (i) the po litic a l a c tivitie s o f o ffic e rs a nd e mplo ye e s o f the g o ve rnme nta l e ntity a nd (ii) the so lic iting a nd a c c e pting o f g ifts b y a nd the o ffe ring a nd ma king o f g ifts to o ffic e rs a nd e mplo ye e s o f the g o ve rnme nta l e ntity. 5 I L CS 430/ 70-5.

  21. SECTIONS THAT DO NOT APPLY TO OFFICERS WITH INTERNAL CONTROL AUTHORITY • Se c tio n 8: T ra ining • Se c tio n 10: Co ntra c to r Disc lo sure • Se c tio n 11: Offic e r Disc lo sure • Se c tio n 12: Co nflic t o f I nte re st • Se c tio n 13: F uture a nd F o rme r E mplo yme nt • Se c tio n 14: Use o f Pro prie ta ry o r Co nfide ntia l I nfo rma tio n. • Se c tio n 16: L o b b ying . • Se c tio n 17: Disc lo sure • Se c tio n 18: Pro hib itio n o n Se rving o n Bo a rds a nd Co mmissio ns • Se c tio n 19: E mplo yme nt o f F a mily Me mb e rs • Se c tio n 20: Re pre se nta tio n o f T hird Pa rtie s • Se c tio n 21: Dua l Pe nsio n.

  22. SECTIONS THAT PRESENT IMPLEMENTATION OR PRACTICAL PROBLEMS • Sta te ’ s Atto rne y’ s func tio n re q uire s funding (Se c tio n 4.2) • Sc o pe o f SAO inve stig a to ry func tio n ne e ds to b e c la rifie d • Se c tio n 4.5 inve stig a tio ns • Sub po e na s a nd e mplo ye e c o o pe ra tio n (5 th Ame ndme nt) • Se c tio n 10: Co ntra c to r Disc lo sure • Wo rding is c o mplic a te d a nd b urde ns ve ndo rs. • So me pa rts o f Se c tio n 12: Co nflic t o f I nte re st • So me pa rts o f Se c tio n 14: Use o f Pro prie ta ry o r Co nfide ntia l I nfo rma tio n. • e xe mpt fro m disc lo sure unde r F OI A, o nly c ha ng e • So me pa rts o f Se c tio n 16: L o b b ying . • Pa ra g ra ph 1 is a mb ig uo us • So me pa rts o f Se c tio n 20: Re pre se nta tio n o f T hird Pa rtie s • So me o f the la ng ua g e is unc le a r

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend