Jeff Walz, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Concordia - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

jeff walz ph d professor of political science concordia
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Jeff Walz, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Concordia - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jeff Walz, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Concordia University Wisconsin Cookies for All! Or is this Misleading? Brownie Simulation What is Politics? How Politics and Government Work Lessons about Politics and Government


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Jeff Walz, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Concordia University Wisconsin

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cookies for All!

 Or is this Misleading?  Brownie Simulation

 What is Politics?  How Politics and Government Work  Lessons about Politics and Government

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Simulations Defined

 Bromley (2013)  “Collaborative activities when students

take on roles and make decisions accordingly.”

 A Staple of Political Science courses  How useful in other disciplines?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Discussion Outline

 Types & Sources of Simulations  Walz Examples  Strengths of Simulations  Weaknesses of Simulations  Assessment Process  Simulations in Your Disciplines:

Reflections and Ideas (by table)

 Q and A

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Types of Simulations (based on duration)

 One class  Multiple Class  Semester-long  Other: Model UN (club or organization)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sources of Simulations

 Colleagues  Discipline Literature  Looking “out the window” for own ideas  Use of Technology

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Walz Simulations

 Brownies  Alabama Literacy Test  Starburst Coalition  Balancing the Budget (video clip)  1960 Presidential Debate  Presidential Cabinet

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Strengths of Simulations

 Raymond and Usherwood (2013) (and

Walz)

 Fun!  Student Engagement  Change of Pace  Increased Learning  Enhanced Student Motivation  Peer-to-Peer Insights

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Weaknesses of Simulations

 Raymond and Usherwood (2013) and

Bromley (2013) (and Walz)

 Overused; consider case studies,

enhanced lectures, large group discussion, small group work, in-class writing

 Insufficient Assessment  Risk: Will it Work?  Planning Time

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Assessment Process (based on Raymond and Usherwood 2013)

 Current: Did the students seem

engaged? Did it appear the students learned something?

 State specific objectives or desired

  • utcomes.

 Align simulation to assessment regime.  Debriefing and feedback to students  Big picture: Did it work? Should I keep

it? Should I tweak it?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Simulations in Your Disciplines: Reflections and Ideas (by table)

 Would simulations be feasible in my

field? Why or why not?

 If yes, what resources do I need?  Where might I get simulation ideas in my

discipline?

 Other thoughts and observations

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Thank you!!