ITE San Francisco Bay Area Section Pre se nte d b y Randy Durre nb - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ite san francisco bay area section pre se nte d b y randy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ITE San Francisco Bay Area Section Pre se nte d b y Randy Durre nb - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

T he I -80 I nte g ra te d Co rrido r Mo b ility (I CM) Pro je c t ITE San Francisco Bay Area Section Pre se nte d b y Randy Durre nb e rg e r F e b ruary 21, 2013 IT E Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry


slide-1
SLIDE 1

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

T he I

  • 80 I

nte g ra te d Co rrido r Mo b ility (I CM) Pro je c t

ITE – San Francisco Bay Area Section

Pre se nte d b y Randy Durre nb e rg e r F e b ruary 21, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Presentation Outline

  • I

ntro duc tio n / Ba c kg ro und

  • Pro je c t E

le me nt Stra te g y

  • Vide o
  • Ope ra tio ns a nd De live ry

Stra te g y

  • Curre nt Sta tus
slide-3
SLIDE 3

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Project Location – I-80 and San Pablo Avenue (SR 123)

I-80 Mainline San Pablo Ave.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

  • Ra nke d a s o ne o f the mo st c o ng e ste d

c o rrido rs in the re g io n, a ppro xima te ly 300,000 ve hic le s pe r da y

  • Ove r 20,000 ve hic le -ho urs o f de la y pe r da y
  • I

nc o nsiste nt le ve l o f se rvic e (C to F )

  • Va ria b le spe e ds (sto p & g o to 65 mph)
  • Un-re lia b ility o f tra ve l (20 to >60 min)
  • Hig h inc ide nt ra te s: o ve r 2,000 inc ide nts

a nnua lly

Why the I-80 Corridor?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Recurring Congestion & Loss of Capacity

slide-6
SLIDE 6

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Accident Profile – Westbound

(Ave ra g e o f o ne a c c ide nt pe r da y during pe a k ho ur)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Project Stakeholders

Alameda County Transportation Commission AC Transit Contra Costa Transportation Authority Western Contra Costa Transit Authority City of Emeryville West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee Water Emergency Transportation City of El Cerrito California Department Of Transportation BART City of Hercules California Highway Patrol Amtrak City of Pinole Federal Highway Administration Contra Costa County City of Richmond Federal Transit Administration City of Albany City of Oakland Metropolitan Transportation Commission City of Berkeley City of San Pablo Authority

slide-8
SLIDE 8

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

I-80 ICM Strategies

F r e e way Manage me nt

  • L

ane Use Sig ns

  • Variab le Adviso ry Spe e d

Sig ns

  • I

nfo rmatio n Display Bo ards

  • CMS/VMS

Ar te r ial Manage me nt

  • T

railb laze r Sig ns

  • T

raffic Sig nal I nte rc o nne c t

  • Multijurisdic tio nal Sig nal

Co o rdinatio n

  • Syste m De te c tio n
  • CCT

V Came ras

T r ansit Manage me nt

  • T

ransit Sig nal Prio rity fo r AC T ransit and We stCAT

  • Ramp Me te r Prio rity
  • Co mparative T

ransit T rave l T ime s

  • Park-n-Ride Co mpatib ility

T r ave le r Info r matio n

  • CMS/VMS
  • I

nfo rmatio n Display Bo ards

  • Hig hway Adviso ry Radio
  • 511 and E

ast Bay SMART Co rrido r I nte g ratio n

Inc ide nt Manage me nt

  • F

re e way and Arte rial Strate g ie s to Manag e I nc ide nt T raffic

  • Use s T
  • o ls fro m all Syste ms
  • Co o rdinatio n le d b y

Caltrans

Sur ve illanc e / Mo nito r ing

  • F

re e way and Arte rial De te c tio n

  • CCT

V Came ras

  • Mo nito r Mainline and

Ramp E nd-o f-Que ue

Adaptive Ramp Me te r ing

  • Syste mwide Me te ring

Alg o rithm

  • Advanc e d Que ue

De te c tio n

  • HOV Pre fe re nc e
slide-9
SLIDE 9

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

  • Co rrido rwide :
  • T

raffic Ope ratio ns Syste m (T OS)

  • Adaptive Ramp Me te ring
  • E

nd-o f-Que ue Warning (Variab le Adviso ry Spe e d Sig ns – VASS)

  • I

nfo rmatio n Display Bo ards

  • T

railb laze r Sig ns

  • We stb o und Only:
  • L

ane Manag e me nt: Ce ntral to Po we ll

Variable Advisory Speed Sign (VASS) Lane Management and VASS Information Display Board Existing CMS Approximate Sign Structure Location

Selected Alternative

slide-10
SLIDE 10

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

SFO via 40 min SFO via 30 min Ashby Ave 8 min Travel Time Trend Hayward via 25 min Hayward via 15 min Accident at 98th Ave

880

80

880 580 880

SFO via 40 min SFO via 30 min to SFO 63 min EXIT Central Avenue Departure Times: 7 min, 22 min, 37 min Parking Available

80

880

University Ave TRAVEL TIME Carquinez Bridge 32 min Accident at Gilman Trend OK for all

80

San Jose

San Francisco Dublin Concord

Vallejo

80 680 680 580 880 580

Information Display Board (IDB)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Project Video

Google: i-80 icm

slide-12
SLIDE 12

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

System Integration

slide-13
SLIDE 13

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

  • I

nte g ra te a g e nc y sub syste ms

  • Utilize e xisting

ne two rks

  • I

nte g ra te tra ffic inc ide nt ma na g e me nt re spo nsib ilitie s

High-Level Integration Approach

slide-14
SLIDE 14

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Incident Response Strategies – Arterials

  • T

ra ilb la ze r Sig ns

  • I

nc ide nt T iming Pla ns

  • CCT

V Ca me ra s

slide-15
SLIDE 15

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

  • L

a ne Use Sig ns

  • CMS/ VMS
  • VASS
  • Ra mp Me te rs
  • De te c tio n / CCT

V Ca me ra s

Incident Response Strategies – Freeways

slide-16
SLIDE 16

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

  • No a c tive dire c tio n fo r drive rs to use

a lte rna te ro ute s

  • Ca ltra ns will c o ntro l lo c a l tra ffic sig na ls

during inc ide nts using pre -a ppro ve d timing pla ns

  • Ca ltra ns wa nts a n E

ASY b utto n

  • Pro vide no tific a tio n to a ll a g e nc ie s whe n

stra te g ie s a re de plo ye d

  • Po st-inc ide nt de b rie f
  • All sta ke ho lde rs ha ve sig ne d MOU

Key Incident Management Concepts

slide-17
SLIDE 17

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Delivery Strategy

Procurement Package Freeway Construction Projects Arterial Construction Projects System Integration

PROJECT 1: System Integration

DEFERRED

slide-18
SLIDE 18

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Current Status

  • Pro je c t 1 – Syste m I

nte g ra tio n: Ong oing

  • Pro je c t 2 – Ma te ria l Pro c ure me nt: E

va luating Ma te r ia l Submittals

  • Pro je c t 3 – T

ra ffic Ope ra tio ns Syste m: Constr

uc tion Comple te

  • Pro je c t 4 – Ada ptive Ra mp Me te ring : Unde r

Constr uc tion

  • Pro je c t 5 – Ac tive T

ra ffic Ma na g e me nt: Unde r

Constr uc tion

  • Pro je c t 6 – Sa n Pa b lo Arte ria l & T

ra nsit: Constr

uc tion Comple te in Apr il 2013

slide-19
SLIDE 19

IT E – Sa n F ra nc isc o Ba y Are a Se c tio n F e b rua ry 21, 2013

Que stio ns?