is there something in between sugra and strings
play

Is there something in between SUGRA and Strings? Olaf Hohm Double - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Is there something in between SUGRA and Strings? Olaf Hohm Double Field Theory Siegel (1993), Hull, Zwiebach (2009), O.H., Hull, Zwiebach (2010 ), O.H., Siegel, Zwiebach (2013 ) Exceptional Field Theory de Wit, Nicolai (1986),


  1. Is there something in between SUGRA and Strings? Olaf Hohm ‚ Double Field Theory Siegel (1993), Hull, Zwiebach (2009), O.H., Hull, Zwiebach (2010 – ), O.H., Siegel, Zwiebach (2013 – ) ‚ Exceptional Field Theory de Wit, Nicolai (1986), O.H., Samtleben (2013 – ) ‚ Bossard, Kleinschmidt (2015) Ashoke Sen (2016) Florence, October 2016 1

  2. Plan of the talk: ‚ Duality-covariant Geometry of DFT/ExFT ‚ Generalized Scherk-Schwarz Compactification & Consistency of Kaluza-Klein ‚ Higher-derivative α 1 Corrections ‚ Consistent theory beyond supergravity? 2

  3. Duality-covariant Geometry of DFT/ExFT (Hidden) duality groups of SUGRA/Strings for toroidal compactification: O p d, d q , E 6 p 6 q , E 7 p 7 q , E 8 p 8 q DFT/ExFT: extended coordinates to make dualities manifest Section constraint for doubled coordinates X M “ p ˜ x i , x i q ‚ strongly constrained: B M B M A “ 2˜ B i B i A “ 0 @ A, B : ˆ 0 ˙ 1 B M A B M B “ 0 η MN “ 1 0 B i “ 0 , up to O p D, D q , but explains hidden symmetry: ‚ solved by ˜ ✟ X M “ p Y M q , M “ 1 , . . . , 2 d x µ , x µ , ✟✟✟ � ñ unbroken O p d, d q ! ˜ � � ‚ weakly constrained in full string (field) theory: level-matching B M B M A “ 0 , non-trivial string product consistent theory for massless fields plus their KK/winding modes? 3

  4. Generalized Geometry of DFT Generalized Lie derivatives for Generalized metric H MN p g, b q P O p D, D q ` ˘ ` ˘ B M ξ P ´B P ξ M B N ξ P ´B P ξ N p L ξ H MN “ ξ P B P H MN ` H PN ` H MP “ ‰ C “ p L ξ 1 ξ 2 ´ p Gauge algebra C-bracket: ξ 1 , ξ 2 L ξ 2 ξ 1 B i “ 0 : ˜ δg “ L ξ g , δb “ d˜ ξ ` L ξ b Ñ Courant bracket in Gen. Geom. “ ‰ “ ‰ ` ˘ ξ 1 ´ 1 ξ 1 ` ˜ ξ 1 , ξ 2 ` ˜ ` L ξ 1 ˜ ξ 2 ´ L ξ 2 ˜ i ξ 1 ˜ ξ 2 ´ i ξ 2 ˜ “ ξ 2 ξ 1 , ξ 2 2 d ξ 1 ˆ 1 ˙ B ξ i ` B ij ξ j , exact term by B -shifts: ˜ ξ i Ñ ˜ h B “ P O p D, D q 0 1 ξ M 1 “ h MN ξ N @ h P O p D, D q C-bracket: ñ Any diff. & b -field gauge invariant theory compatible with Gen. Geom. ñ only DFT makes O p d, d q manifest Ñ constrains α 1 corrections! 4

  5. Scherk-Schwarz Compactification & Consistency of Kaluza-Klein Ansatz in terms of twist matrix U p Y q in duality group & ρ p Y q H MN p x, Y q “ U MK p Y q U NL p Y q H KL p x q A µM p x, Y q “ p U ´ 1 q NM p Y q A µN p x q e ´ 2 φ p x,Y q “ ρ ´p n ´ 2 q p Y q e ´ 2 φ p x q ¨ ¨ ¨ Y -dependence factors out consistently Ñ geometric constraints on U , ρ “ X MNK U ´ 1 M U ´ 1 p L U ´ 1 N K with constant X MNK “ Θ Mα p t α q NK `¨ ¨ ¨ , Generalized Parallelizability ‚ Reduction fully consistent, including scalar potential, fermions, etc. ‚ U , ρ for spheres ñ consistency of AdS 4 ˆ S 7 [de Wit & Nicolai (1986)] , AdS 7 ˆ S 4 [Nastase, Vaman, van Nieuwenhuizen (1999)] and AdS 5 ˆ S 5 ‚ Non-geometric compactifications upon relaxing section constraint 5

  6. Higher-derivative α 1 corrections ‚ string theory: infinite number of higher-derivative α 1 corrections; O p d, d ; R q symmetry preserved [Sen (1991)] ‚ O p d, d ; R q α 1 -deformed [Meissner (1997), O.H. & Zwiebach (2011, 2015)] ˜ ¸ g ´ 1 g ´ 1 p p ´ p b g “ g ` α 1 pB g qpB g q ` α 1 pB b qpB b q`¨ ¨ ¨ H MN “ p , p g ´ 1 g ´ p g ´ 1 p b p p b p b ‚ Deformed gauge structure in DFT, K MN ” B M ξ N ´ B N ξ M “ ‰ M ` α 1 H KL ´ γ ´ η KL q K r 2 K 2 p γ ` ¯ ξ M P B M K 1 s LP 12 “ ξ 2 , ξ 1 C ‚ Uniquely determines O p α 1 q correction up to two parameters: [O.H. & Zwiebach (2014), Nunez & Marques (2015)] " γ ` “ 1 , γ ´ “ 0 bosonic string γ ` “ 1 γ ´ “ 1 2 , heterotic string 2 ‚ γ ` “ 0 , γ ´ “ 1 (HSZ): exactly duality and gauge invariant ñ infinite number of α 1 corrections! 6

  7. Consistent theory beyond supergravity? ‚ B M B M p φ 1 φ 2 q ‰ 0 without strong constraint ñ non-trivial product ÿ ` ˘ P 2 e i p P 1 ` P 2 q¨ X , δ p P 1 ¨ P 2 q φ 1 P 1 φ 2 φ 1 ‹ φ 2 p X q “ P 1 ,P 2 P Z 2 d ‚ Non-associative, but ‘associator’ total derivative p φ 1 ‹ φ 2 q ‹ φ 3 ´ φ 1 ‹ p φ 2 ‹ φ 3 q “ B M F M p φ 1 , φ 2 , φ 3 q ñ cubic theory consistent, beyond that: L 8 or A 8 algebra? [Zwiebach (1993), O.H., Hull & Zwiebach, unpublished] ‚ Theory for “SUGRA” fields plus their KK & winding modes? Yes: other massive modes can be integrated out [Sen (2016)] in some sense full string theory; amplitudes for mass. modes hidden ‚ One-Loop in ExFT with massive modes ñ improved UV behavior [Bossard & Kleinschmidt (2015)] 7

  8. Summary & Outlook ‚ DFT and ExFT make duality symmetries O p d, d q , E d p d q manifest ‚ strongly constrained theory fully background independent, reformulation of SUGRA ‚ very powerful formalism: consistency of KK truncations, higher-derivative α 1 corrections ‚ but at least on T d extended coordinates physical and real; consistent theory of SUGRA fields plus KK/winding modes from strings Can it be given explicitly? ‚ Consistent truncation with KK and winding modes? Ñ analogous to 5D SUGRA consistent truncation of IIB on AdS 5 ˆ S 5 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend