Iron in crystalline silicon solar cells: fundamental properties, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Iron in crystalline silicon solar cells: fundamental properties, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Iron in crystalline silicon solar cells: fundamental properties, detection techniques, and gettering Daniel Macdonald, AnYao Liu, and Sieu Pheng Phang Research School of Engineering The Australian National University, Canberra Outline
2
- Origins of Fe in multicrystalline Si ingots
- Chemical states and recombination activity of Fe in silicon
- Measuring [Fei] by QSSPC and PL imaging
- Gettering of Fe during ingot growth and cell fabrication:
– Internal gettering – at GBs, dislocations and within grains – External gettering by P, Al and B diffusions
Outline
3
- One of the most common
metal contaminants
- Total Fe concentration,
measured by NAA before and after P gettering
- Comes from the crucible,
not the feedstock
- Typically between
1012 -1015 cm-3
Origins of Fe in multicrystalline Si ingots
Macdonald et al. 29th IEEE PVSC New Orleans (2002)
4
- Concentration increases
towards top - segregation
- Also increases at bottom –
solid-state diffusion from crucible
- Only a small fraction is
interstitial - around 1%
- Remainder is precipitated
(or substitutional)
- The dissolved fraction has a
much larger impact on lifetime
Origins of Fe in multicrystalline Si ingots
0.1 1 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 keff = 0.65 B keff < 0.05 keff < 0.05 interstitial Fe Impurity concentration (cm-3) Fraction from top of ingot total Fe
Macdonald et al. J. Appl. Phys. 97 033523 (2005)
5
Recombination activity of interstitial Fe in silicon
conduction band valence band FeB0/+ (EV+0.1 eV) FeB0/- (EC-0.26 eV) Fei
0/+ (EV+0.38 eV)
- Interstitial Fe (Fei) introduces a deep donor level
- Positively charged in p-type Si - mobile at RT -
forms pairs with ionised acceptors.
- Two FeB levels – acceptor and donor
- Pairs break under illumination – only Fei present
in working cells
Courtesy of J. Schmidt, ISFH
6
Recombination activity of Fe in p-type silicon
- Different energy levels and capture cross sections - different lifetime
curves
- SRH modelling on left, QSSPC data on right (trapping restricts range)
10
12
10
13
10
14
10
15
10
16
10
17
1 10 100 crossover point
1 Ω.cm p-type Si
FeB lifetime Carrier lifetime (µs) Excess carrier density ∆n (cm
- 3)
Fei lifetime
Macdonald et al. J. Appl. Phys. 95 1021 (2004)
7
Detecting Fei using FeB pairing
- Manipulating the SRH equations
shows that:
- Zoth and Bergholz developed a
famous method based on SPV
- Extended to other methods (uW-
PCD and QSSPC)
- Very sensitive (similar to DLTS)
- Only works in p-Si
- Must avoid the crossover point
10
11
10
12
10
13
10
14
10
15
10
16
10
17
10 100 1000
crossover point QSSPC SPV Fe
i lifetime
FeB lifetime Auger lifetime µW-PCD
Carrier lifetime (µs) Excess carrier concentration (cm
- 3)
p-Si, N
A=10 16cm
- 3, [Fe
i]=10 12cm
- 3
− × =
FeB Fe i
i
C Fe τ τ 1 1 ] [
8
Detecting Fei using FeB pairing
- Pre-factor C is a function of
doping and excess carrier density.
- In true low injection, C becomes
constant – ideal measurement region.
- Not accessible to QSSPC or
uW-PCD (trapping effects).
10
9
10
11
10
13
10
15
10
17
- 1x10
- 13
1x10
- 13
2x10
- 13
3x10
- 13
4x10
- 13
5x10
- 13
6x10
- 13
N
A= 3x10 16cm
- 3
1x10
16
3x10
15
1x10
15
3x10
14
1x10
14
1/C (µs cm
- 3 )
Excess carrier density ∆n (cm
- 3)
− × =
FeB Fe i
i
C Fe τ τ 1 1 ] [
Macdonald et al. J. Appl. Phys. 95 1021 (2004)
9
Iron imaging with photoluminescence (PL)
- Band-to-band PL imaging - rapid and highly-resolved method for
low-injection lifetime imaging – no trapping effects.
- Allows low-injection Fe imaging - similar to original SPV technique
- Two PL images required, before and after breaking FeB pairs.
1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1 10 100 1000
100% Fei : 0% FeB 75% : 25% 50% : 50% 25% : 75% 0% : 100% Auger lifetime crossover point QSSPC SPV PL imaging µW-PCD
Carrier lifetime (µs) Excess carrier concentration ∆n (cm
- 3)
p-Si, NA=1016cm-3, [Fei]+[FeB]=1012cm-3
Macdonald et al. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 073710 (2008)
10
Recombination activity of Fe in n-type silicon
- Neutral charge state in n-type – less attractive for minority carriers
compared to p-type.
- Higher lifetime in n-type in low- to mid-injection.
- Possible incentive for using n-type substrates…
1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 n-type FZ Si ND=2.4x1015cm-3 [Fei]=3.8x1012cm-3 p-type FZ Si NA=2.8x1015cm-3 [Fei]=3.4x1012cm-3 Recombination lifetime (µs) Excess carrier concentration (cm-3)
10
10
10
11
10
12
10
13
10
14
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 n-type p-type
Effective lifetime τFe+intrinsic (µs) Interstitial Fe concentration [Fei ] (cm
- 3)
NA/D = 10
16 cm
- 3, 0.1 suns illumination
Macdonald and Geerligs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 4061 (2004)
11
Fe images on mc-Si
- Wafer 20% from bottom
- f ingot
- High [Fei] (1013 cm-3)
- Internal gettering of Fe
during ingot cooling at GBs, dislocation clusters
Liu et al. Progress in PV, 19 649 (2011)
12
Fe images on mc-Si
- Wafer from near very
bottom of ingot
- Moderate [Fei] (1012 cm-3)
- Small grains
- Fewer dislocation
clusters
- Lower [Fei] within grains
– presence of precipitation sites
Liu et al. Progress in PV, 19 649 (2011)
13
Fe images on mc-Si
- Wafer from middle of
ingot
- Low [Fei] (1011 cm-3)
- Reduced gettering at
GBs (due to precipitation starting at lower T)
Liu et al. Progress in PV, 19 649 (2011)
14
Internal gettering of Fe at GBs during ingot cooling
- Line-scans of PL images with resolution of 25 microns
- 1D diffusion/capture model – 2 free parameters – diffusion length of Fei LD(Fei) and
precipitation velocity P of the GB
- Have to take care of PL artifacts!
– Image smearing in the CCD camera - use point-spread function de-convolution – Carrier spreading in the sample – use low-lifetime – i.e. high [Fei] samples)
Liu and Macdonald, IEEE JPV 2, 479, (2012)
15
Internal gettering of Fe at GBs during ingot cooling
- Same GB on different wafers reveals diffusion length of Fei LD(Fei) depends on initial [Fei]
- Lower [Fei] means that precipitation begins later during cooling
- Modelling ingot cooling time reveals data can only be explained if precipitation at GBs
commences after super-saturation ratio of about 50 is reached!
Liu and Macdonald, IEEE JPV 2, 479, (2012)
16
Internal gettering of Fe at GBs during annealing
- Annealing at low temps can drive further precipitation at GBs, and within
grains.
- Higher temperatures tend to homogenise the dissolved Fe
17
- At 600 ºC, [Fei] is far above
solubility limit:
- Strong super-saturation
- Drives precipitation at GBs,
and within grains
- At 800 ºC, [Fei] is approx equal to
the solubility limit:
- No precipitation
- At 900 ºC and above, [Fei] is
below solubility limit:
- No precipitation
- Homogenization by diffusion
- Dissolution of precipitates
also possible
Internal gettering of Fe at GBs during annealing
18
Internal gettering of Fe at GBs during annealing
- 500 C annealing for various times
- 1D diffusion/capture model:
- Widening denuded zone
- Reduced intra-grain [Fei]
19
- At fixed temp annealing, diffusion
length of Fe can be calculated from literature values.
- Very good agreement with fitted
values (500 ºC)
- A method to measure diffusivity?
Internal gettering of Fe at GBs during annealing
20
- After homogenization on left, after 14 hour anneal at 500 °C on right.
- Precipitation rate varies from grain to grain.
Internal gettering of Fe within the grains
21
- Precipitation rate varies despite initial Fe concentrations being similar
Internal gettering of Fe within the grains
22
Final [Fei] with respect to intra grain dislocation density, after annealing at 500oC for 14.5 hours Microscope image of a defect etched mc-Si wafer
Internal gettering of Fe within the grains
- Less Fe precipitation in grains of low dislocation density
- Average distance between dislocations is less than Fe diffusion length
- Dislocations act as nucleation sites for Fe precipitation within grains
23
External gettering of Fei by P, Al and B diffusions
- Fe-implanted, annealed, mono FZ p-Si, detected by QSSPC.
implant Fe anneal P, B or Al diffusion
24
P , 8 5 C P , 8 C P , 7 5 C P , 8 5 + 6 5 C
- 0.01
0.1 1 10 100 Percentage of Fe remaining (%)
Phosphorus gettering of Fei
- P gettering removes between 90-99% of Fe – better at lower temp
- Adding a post-getter anneal improves gettering further – segregation ratio
improves
Phang and Macdonald, JAP 109, 073521 2011
25
Phosphorus gettering of Fei
- Driving in P diffusion reduces gettering effectiveness
- Very heavily doped region (>1020 cm-3) required for best gettering
Phang and Macdonald, IEEE JPV accepted
26
Aluminium gettering of Fei
- Al gettering removes more than 99.9%!
- However, typical BSF firing is too short for Al gettering to rear side…
P, 850 C P, 800 C P, 750 C P, 850 + 650 C Al, 850 C, 55 min Al, 750 C, 55 min Al, 750 C, 15 sec
- 0.01
0.1 1 10 100 Percentage of Fe remaining (%)
Phang and Macdonald, JAP 109, 073521 2011
27
Boron gettering of Fei
- B gettering very effective if Boron Rich Layer (BRL) is present.
- However, BRL is oxidised in-situ to allow low Joe - re-injects Fe into base.
- Even a low temp anneal does not help much…
P, 850 C P, 800 C P, 750 C P, 850 + 650 C Al, 850 C, 55 min Al, 750 C, 55 min Al, 750 C, 15 sec B, 950 C +BRL B, 950 C no BRL B, 950+650 no BRL
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Percentage of Fe remaining (%)
Phang et al., IEEE JPV 3, 261, 2013
28
Boron gettering of Fei
- One solution is to remove the BRL at low temp by etch-back
- Preserves gettering
- Allows lower Joe
Phang et al., IEEE JPV 3, 261, 2013
29
Boron gettering of Fei
- Another idea is to overlay a light phosphorus diffusion – ‘buried emitter’.
- Gives very good gettering
Phang and Macdonald, IEEE JPV accepted
30
Conclusions
- Fe is common in mc-Si wafers, both dissolved and precipitated
- Dissolved iron more active in p-type than n-type due to charge state
- QSSPC allows very sensitive [Fei] measurements
- PL allows spatially resolved Fe imaging
- Gettering of dissolved Fe is critical for mc-Si cells
- Internal gettering at GBs, dislocations and in intra-grain regions
- Strong super-saturation required
- External gettering via P, B or Al diffusions can be very effective
- Al and B more effective than P
- However, B diffusions require the presence of a BRL
Acknowledgements: this work has been supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC).