FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
WORL
RE OUR S
I
STITU E
BLUE , FOREST
CONSERVATION
Intr
- duction to the
Fores t Resilience Bond
August 2020
Intr oduction to the Fores t Resilience Bond August 2020 WORL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND Intr oduction to the Fores t Resilience Bond August 2020 WORL BLUE , FOREST RE OUR S CONSERVATION I STITU E Summary Accelerating pace of wildfires Forest restoration is preventative solution, but lacks
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
WORL
RE OUR S
I
STITU E
BLUE , FOREST
CONSERVATION
August 2020
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
► Accelerating pace of wildfires ► Forest restoration is preventative solution, but lacks funding ► Forest Resilience Bonds (FRBs) = proven public-private partnerships to finance/fund restoration with market-rate returns
– Decrease risk of severe wildfire – Environmental & climate benefits – Support & protect rural communities
► Investors include Rockefeller Foundation, Moore Foundation, Calvert Impact Fund and AAA Insurance ► Proven partnership with USFS – First solution to finance public lands management at scale ► Robust Pipeline of future projects
Page 2
OF ALARM
Heat, drought-parched brush fuel ferocious fire
THE ARIZONA REPUBLIC ~
AiGAH,;1n,j;;;c.....,. iiiiio , -------- CONTIJfUOU,: COVIMOI AT .uatn'I.AL-COM'IlIB D ENVER POST
ios
}\nget~, (£{~~
~adn
8'nbepenbent Joutnal
'AN INFERNO LIKE
YOU'VE NEVER SEEN'
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Page 3
□ □ ■
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Low Moderate High 2018 USFS Wildfire Hazard Potential
► 58M acres at high-medium
wildfire risk
► $76B-$130B long term annual
wildfire health risk ► 65% of CA water supply originates in forested watersheds ► Over $220B property at extreme risk ► CA forests becoming net carbon emitters
Page 4
RESILIENCE BOND
1890 1993
Photo Credit: George E. Gruell, Fires in the Sierra Nevada, 2001
Page 5
RESILIENCE BOND
► Mechanical and hand thinning ► Prescribed fire ► Meadow restoration ► Invasive plant removal ► Native aspen regeneration ► Road decommissioning
Page 6
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Overgrown Restored
8
ILIE
$424 million USFS 2017 Restoration Budget1 Highest Priority Projects: $11B Total Market for Restoration3: $58B Assuming an industry average of $1,000/acre, the need for restoration on USFS land is $58 billion, or 136x current funding
1. USFS Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Overview ($40 million for CFLRP and $384.1 million for hazardous fuel reduction) 2. USFS Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Overview (58 million acres at “high or very high risk of severe fire” @ $1,000/acre)
FOREST RES NCE BOND
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Page 9
Shared Resources
Wlld(lre Severity Community Resilience
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Page 10
Investors FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
...
Inbound Cash Flow
0.J
Implementation Partners
c:- ■
:l
Beneficiaries
... Resource Flow
Fire Sup
press,on ater Benefits
Page 11
► North Yuba River Watershed, Tahoe NF, California ► $4M FRB ► Restoration work 2019 – 2022 ► Restoring 7,114 acres => protecting 15,000 acres ► Key partnerships: USFS, CA State and Yuba Water Agency ► Market rate investors earn 4%, 1% for PRI lenders
RESILIENCE BOND
*
CALIFORNIA REPUBLICR_ Cl
.,CKEFELLER FOUNDATION
MOORE
FOUNDATION.
=
Impact Capital
~ nee
FOREST RESILIENCE
BOND
'll~Ql§~J
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Investors
Service Loan Agreements
Green = cash flows Orange = contracts
Contract Loan Agreement Grant Stewardship Agreement Agreement
Page 12
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Page 13
► Protect 50k acre-feet of water ► Generate 70k MWh of hydropower ► Avoid 50k metric tons of CO2 emissions ► Create 79 jobs in local rural communities ► $8.8M value to water agency
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Page 14
Tahoe National Forest
“Typically, a large restoration project such as Yuba would take
complete it within three years. This means a healthier, more resilient forest before insects, disease or wildfire negate our planning and before our communities are adversely impacted.”
Page 15
► Start with initial FRB of $4M - $10M ► Scale to future FRBs of $100M+
– Same watershed – Same stakeholders – Same contracts
► Cornerstone for sustainable rural development
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Page 16
Description of Engagement Level National Forests Expressed interest in FRB Lassen, Inyo, San Bernardino In preliminary conversations Klamath, LTMBU, Stanislaus, Sierra Project area defined, beneficiary engagement
Eldorado, Tahoe (Trapper Project) Active project in place Tahoe (Yuba Project)
Trapper Project (30k acres) Yuba Project (15k acres) Crystal Basin Project (32k acres) FOREST RESILIENCE
BOND
Page 17
8
DECENT WORK ANO ECONOMIC GROWTH6
CLEA WATER ANO SA ITATIOSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
G~ ALS
17 PARTNERSHIPS
FOR THE GOALSFOREST RESILIENCE BOND
18
A
BLUE 0 FOREST
CONSERVATION
Financial Innovation for Sustainable Solutions
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE
NATIONAL O
U.S. Endowment
OREST
F O u O AT 10
for Forestry and Communities
natural
capital
PROJECT
Stanford
Water in the West
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
19
THE
~
=i~ KEFELLER
FOUNDA TION
GORDON AND BETTY
FOUNDATION
sprf ng
point.
ClimateWorks
FOUNDATION
tU)
rt
=i Calvert
Impact Capital"
Insurance
Bella Vista
FOUNDATION
WEYERHAEUSER FAMILY
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
Page 20
20
► Work with COIN (and directly with insurers) to include more insurance investors in future projects/funds ► Partner with insurance companies on joint research projects to better understand, quantify and ultimately help mitigate wildfire risks ► Develop new finance products (not insurance products) to allow for insurers to opt in to supporting wildfire risk reduction ► Federal partners can be hard to work with, especially for the private sector, let us help!
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
zach@blueforest.org
FOREST RESILIENCE BOND
WORLD RESOURC S NSTITUTE
A
BLUE 0 FOREST
CONSERVATION