Interpreting WBR in terms of middle ear mechanics and contrasting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interpreting wbr in terms of middle ear mechanics and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interpreting WBR in terms of middle ear mechanics and contrasting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interpreting WBR in terms of middle ear mechanics and contrasting Tympanometry with WBR Robert Withnell Ph.D. Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences Indiana University, IN. Patricia S. Jeng Ph.D Mimosa Acoustics Champaign, IL. Pierre


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Interpreting WBR in terms of middle ear mechanics and contrasting Tympanometry with WBR

Robert Withnell Ph.D. Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences Indiana University, IN. Patricia S. Jeng Ph.D Mimosa Acoustics Champaign, IL. Pierre Parent M.S. Mimosa Acoustics Champaign, IL.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Wideband reflectance (WBR) and tympanometry both provide a measure of the impedance of the middle ear. Tympanometry has been the standard tool for assessing middle ear function for many years. WBR provides a precise, broad spectrum assessment of middle ear

  • function. WBR patterns can be interpreted in terms of the mechanics
  • f the middle ear, pathology producing predictable alterations in

WBR patterns. WBR and tympanometry will be discussed in terms of

  • i. how they work, ii. what they measure, and iii. the relationship

between WBR and tympanometry.

ABSTRACT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Human Ear

Suzuki & Takeshima, 2004, JASA, 116(2)

  • Hearing thresholds are frequency-dependent
  • Outer and middle ear contribute significantly to

this frequency-dependence (Dallos, 1971)

  • Sound is filtered by the outer and middle ear

before being received by the cochlea

Human audiogram

http://www.learningthroughlistening.org

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Filtering Sound

  • High-pass filter

– spring + friction – e.g., eardrum = spring, motion of

eardrum in air produces friction

  • Low-pass filter

– mass + friction – e.g., ossicles = mass, motion in

air of middle ear space = friction

  • Tuned filter

– mass + spring + friction – e.g., middle ear of lizard

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Lizard Middle Ear

Werner et al, 2002, J. Exp. Biol. 205

  • A simple mass-spring

system with a single resonant frequency

  • Lizard middle ear

consists of only one

  • ssicle (not three)
  • Lizard middle ear

simpler than human middle ear with a narrower frequency response

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Human Middle Ear

Reflected Sound Transmitted Sound Incident Sound

  • A broad-band

frequency response

Hypothetical middle ear frequency response

slide-7
SLIDE 7

How do we get from here here ? to

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A simple interpretation

A tuned filter A bank of tuned filters friction elements masses springs spring mass friction

Lizard Middle Ear Human Middle Ear

Damping produces a broad transfer function

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Middle ear and Reflectance

Reflected Sound Transmitted Sound Incident Sound

  • The amount of sound reflected from the eardrum is determined

by the impedance mismatch between the ear canal and the middle ear

  • We can examine this reflected sound energy using

– Power Reflectance

  • with our middle ear model (and a value for Zo)

Zo=c A

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Power Reflectance

Stiffness dominated region

  • f middle ear

POWER REFLECTANCE MIDDLE EAR TRANSFER FUNCTION

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Power Reflectance

  • role of damping in the middle ear -

Stiffness dominated region

  • f middle ear

POWER REFLECTANCE MIDDLE EAR TRANSFER FUNCTION First local resonance of middle ear @ approx 1 kHz As damping decreases, response becomes peakier in plateau region Plateau region of middle ear transfer function

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Power Reflectance

  • increase in stiffness of middle ear -

POWER REFLECTANCE MIDDLE EAR TRANSFER FUNCTION Power reflectance results from a subject with otosclerosis (Allen et al., 2005)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Power Reflectance

  • decrease in stiffness of middle ear -

POWER REFLECTANCE MIDDLE EAR TRANSFER FUNCTION Power reflectance results from a subject with middle ear disease as a child (Mimosa data)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Power Reflectance

  • what about OME? -

MIDDLE EAR TRANSFER FUNCTION POWER REFLECTANCE Power reflectance results from a subjects with otitis media with effusion (Allen et al., 2005) mostly INCREASE in M.E. stiffness middle ear not fluid-filled

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Power Reflectance

  • Acoustic Leak -

If eartip is not acoustically sealed in ear canal, sound at low frequencies leaks out, affecting the calculation of reflectance Acoustic leak No acoustic leak, eartip inserted correctly Foam tip gradually expanding, reducing acoustic leak

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Measuring the impedance mismatch between the ear canal and middle ear

Zsource Zload

Calibrate to find this Do not know this

A simple volume

Sound travels along ear canal TYMPANOMETRY POWER REFLECTANCE

  • Measure sound in ear canal
  • Pressurize ear canal (make Zme really big)

and measure sound again

  • From two measurements of sound, obtain

Yme (admittance of middle ear)

  • Yme = Ye ─ Yec

Measure this (sound pressure in ear canal) Measure this (sound pressure in ear canal) Obtain Ye and R

TYMPANOMETRY

slide-17
SLIDE 17

WBR vs Tympanometry

Increasing static pressure in ear canal = increasing stiffness of middle ear 250 Hz probe tone

slide-18
SLIDE 18

WBR vs Tympanometry

Increasing static pressure in ear canal = increasing stiffness of middle ear 1000 Hz probe tone

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Power Reflectance

  • Provides a broad spectrum measure of the impedance

mis-match between the ear canal and middle ear

  • Does not require static pressure changes in the ear

canal

  • The reflectance transfer function alters predictably with

middle ear pathology