Interference Between Camera Conditions in Laparoscopic Surgery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interference between camera conditions in laparoscopic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interference Between Camera Conditions in Laparoscopic Surgery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interference Between Camera Conditions in Laparoscopic Surgery Simulation Noah J Wheeler and Martina I Klein Texas Tech University Houston - 5/3/123 Laparoscopic surgery Long thin graspers inserted through incisions Surgical field


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Interference Between Camera Conditions in Laparoscopic Surgery Simulation

Noah J Wheeler and Martina I Klein Texas Tech University

Houston - 5/3/123

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Laparoscopic surgery

  • Long thin graspers inserted through incisions
  • Surgical field viewed via camera and monitor
  • Poses perceptual-motor challenges

Photo: www.defence.gov

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Camera placements

0 Degrees Surgeon

Grasper Movement Movement on Monitor

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Camera placements

45 Degrees Surgeon

Grasper Movement Movement on Monitor

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Camera placements

90 Degrees Surgeon

Grasper Movement Movement on Monitor

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Camera placements

135 Degrees Surgeon

Grasper Movement Movement on Monitor

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Camera placements

180 Degrees Surgeon

Grasper Movement Movement on Monitor

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Camera placements

225 Degrees Surgeon

Grasper Movement Movement on Monitor

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • The results of our previous research

○ Peak error lies between 90 and 135 degrees (1)

Work we have done

  • 1. Wheeler, Klein, & Craig, 2012
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Previous related work

  • Other laparoscopic research

○ Experts' peak error lies closer to 180 degrees (1)

  • 1. Ames, Frisella, Yan, Shulam, & Landman, 2006
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Otmar Bock

  • Rotated visual feedback (1)

○ Participants used different processes ■ Less than 113 degrees ■ Greater than 113 degrees ○ These two types of processes interfered with each other

  • Used a 2D task
  • 1. Bock, Abeele, & Eversheim, 2003
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Objectives

  • Long-term goal

○ To improve surgical performance

  • Objective of this study

○ To see if interference occurs between camera conditions

  • Central hypothesis

○ Experience with camera rotations less than 113 degrees will interfere with performance in camera conditions greater than 113 degrees

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rationale

  • Provide the basis for research that improves

flexibility

○ Ensure equivalent performance in all camera locations ○ Surgeons sometimes have to switch multiple times between camera port placements (1)

  • Development of training programs

○ Support camera switching ○ Decrease movement error

  • 1. Ferzli & Fingerhut, 2004
slide-14
SLIDE 14

This work will be . . .

  • Innovative

○ Applies basic movement research to the laparoscopic training environment

  • Beneficial

○ Provide possible explanation of variance in surgeons' performance ○ Set the stage for the development of training programs ■ Decrease injury due to surgical lacerations ■ Decrease operation times ■ Improve patient outcomes

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Methods

Participants:

  • 19 males 23 females
  • Normal or corrected to

normal vision

  • Ages 18 to 23

Task: Target pointing task in a laparoscopic simulator using a model surgical grasper. Data collection: Electromagnetic motion tracker recorded tip of model grasper at 240 Hz. Procedure:

  • 2 familiarization blocks
  • 14 practice blocks
  • 1 experimental block
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Methods - Apparatus

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Design

Familiarization Blocks (2) Practice Blocks (14) Experimental Block (1) Direct view of task 45 degrees 135 degrees 180 degrees 225 degrees Direct task view 135 degrees 180 degrees 225 degrees

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Measurement

Deviation (d) Ideal Observed Target

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Results - RMSE

Control Pre-exposed to 45 degrees

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Results - Time

Control Pre-exposed to 45 degrees

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions

Theoretical implications:

  • Previous experience with

visuomotor distortions alters the relationship between visuomotor rotations and performance Practical implications:

  • Training programs for

surgeons Future directions:

  • See if experts exhibit similar

patterns

Photo: www.chronogram.com

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Questions?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

References

Ames, C., Frisella, A. J., Yan, Y., Shulam, P., & Landman, J. (2006). Evaluation of laparoscopic performance with alteration in angle of vision. Journal of Endourology, 20, 281-284. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Bock, O., Abeele, S., & Eversheim, U. (2003). Human adaptation to rotated vision: Interplay of a continuous and a discrete

  • process. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 528-532.

Ferzli, G., & Fingerhut, A. (2004). Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized

  • method. Journal Of The American College Of Surgeons, 198(1), 163-173. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Wheeler, N. J., Klein, M. I., & Craig, C. (2012). Camera placement in simulated laparoscopic surgery influences

  • performance. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 56, 1346-1350.