inlet boundary conditions for two equation hybrid les
play

Inlet boundary conditions for two-equation hybrid LES-RANS models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Inlet boundary conditions for two-equation hybrid LES-RANS models [2] Lars Davidson Lars Davidson, www.tfd.chalmers.se/lada Go4Hybrid, Final meeting, Berlin, 2015 Research Question 1. I want to use a k DES model 1.1 How do I prescribe


  1. Inlet boundary conditions for two-equation hybrid LES-RANS models [2] Lars Davidson Lars Davidson, www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Final meeting, Berlin, 2015

  2. Research Question 1. I want to use a k − ω DES model 1.1 How do I prescribe inlet values on k and ω ? 1.2 What about the URANS region? Should I prescribe k and ω from a steady RANS solution? 2. The proposed method is to add commutation terms in the k and ω equations. 3. The commutation terms read (∆ goes from ∆ RANS to ∆ LES ) www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 2 / 30

  3. Research Question 1. I want to use a k − ω DES model 1.1 How do I prescribe inlet values on k and ω ? 1.2 What about the URANS region? Should I prescribe k and ω from a steady RANS solution? 2. The proposed method is to add commutation terms in the k and ω equations. 3. The commutation terms read (∆ goes from ∆ RANS to ∆ LES ) ◮ k equation: − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u 1 k ∂ ∆ (sink term) ∂ x 1 www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 2 / 30

  4. Research Question 1. I want to use a k − ω DES model 1.1 How do I prescribe inlet values on k and ω ? 1.2 What about the URANS region? Should I prescribe k and ω from a steady RANS solution? 2. The proposed method is to add commutation terms in the k and ω equations. 3. The commutation terms read (∆ goes from ∆ RANS to ∆ LES ) ◮ k equation: − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u 1 k ∂ ∆ (sink term) ∂ x 1 ◮ ω equation: ω ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u 1 k ∂ ∆ (source term) k ∂ x 1 www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 2 / 30

  5. Research Question 1. I want to use a k − ω DES model 1.1 How do I prescribe inlet values on k and ω ? 1.2 What about the URANS region? Should I prescribe k and ω from a steady RANS solution? 2. The proposed method is to add commutation terms in the k and ω equations. 3. The commutation terms read (∆ goes from ∆ RANS to ∆ LES ) ◮ k equation: − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u 1 k ∂ ∆ (sink term) ∂ x 1 ◮ ω equation: ω ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u 1 k ∂ ∆ (source term) k ∂ x 1 4. The method can also be used in embedded LES (i.e. at the RANS-LES interface) www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 2 / 30

  6. The Zonal k − ω Hybrid RANS-LES PDH Model ◮ In the LES region, the model reads � ∂ k �� � k 3 / 2 ∂ k ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i k + ∂ ν + ν t = P k − f k ∂ x i ℓ t ∂ x j σ k ∂ x j � ∂ω �� � ∂ω ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i ω ω k P k − C ω 2 ω 2 + ∂ ν + ν t ν t ∂ k ∂ω = C ω 1 f ω + C ω ∂ x i ∂ x j σ ω ∂ x j ∂ x j ∂ x j k � ∂ ¯ � ∂ ¯ k u i + ∂ ¯ u j u i P k = ν t ν t = f µ ω, , ℓ t = C LES ∆ dw ∂ x j ∂ x i ∂ x j ∆ dw = min (max [ C dw d w , C w ∆ max , ∆ nstep ] , ∆ max ) www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 3 / 30

  7. The Zonal k − ω Hybrid RANS-LES PDH Model ◮ In the LES region, the model reads � ∂ k �� � k 3 / 2 ∂ k ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i k + ∂ ν + ν t = P k − f k ∂ x i ℓ t ∂ x j σ k ∂ x j � ∂ω �� � ∂ω ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i ω ω k P k − C ω 2 ω 2 + ∂ ν + ν t ν t ∂ k ∂ω = C ω 1 f ω + C ω ∂ x i ∂ x j σ ω ∂ x j ∂ x j ∂ x j k � ∂ ¯ � ∂ ¯ k u i + ∂ ¯ u j u i P k = ν t ν t = f µ ω, , ℓ t = C LES ∆ dw ∂ x j ∂ x i ∂ x j ∆ dw = min (max [ C dw d w , C w ∆ max , ∆ nstep ] , ∆ max ) ◮ The length scale, ∆ dw , is taken from the IDDES model [9]. www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 3 / 30

  8. The Zonal k − ω Hybrid RANS-LES PDH Model ◮ In the LES region, the model reads � ∂ k �� � k 3 / 2 ∂ k ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i k + ∂ ν + ν t = P k − f k ∂ x i ℓ t ∂ x j σ k ∂ x j � ∂ω �� � ∂ω ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i ω ω k P k − C ω 2 ω 2 + ∂ ν + ν t ν t ∂ k ∂ω = C ω 1 f ω + C ω ∂ x i ∂ x j σ ω ∂ x j ∂ x j ∂ x j k � ∂ ¯ � ∂ ¯ k u i + ∂ ¯ u j u i P k = ν t ν t = f µ ω, , ℓ t = C LES ∆ dw ∂ x j ∂ x i ∂ x j ∆ dw = min (max [ C dw d w , C w ∆ max , ∆ nstep ] , ∆ max ) ◮ The length scale, ∆ dw , is taken from the IDDES model [9]. ◮ In the RANS regions, ℓ t = k 1 / 2 / ( C k ω ). www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 3 / 30

  9. The Zonal k − ω Hybrid RANS-LES PDH Model ◮ In the LES region, the model reads � ∂ k �� � k 3 / 2 ∂ k ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i k + ∂ ν + ν t = P k − f k ∂ x i ℓ t ∂ x j σ k ∂ x j � ∂ω �� � ∂ω ∂ t + ∂ ¯ v i ω ω k P k − C ω 2 ω 2 + ∂ ν + ν t ν t ∂ k ∂ω = C ω 1 f ω + C ω ∂ x i ∂ x j σ ω ∂ x j ∂ x j ∂ x j k � ∂ ¯ � ∂ ¯ k u i + ∂ ¯ u j u i P k = ν t ν t = f µ ω, , ℓ t = C LES ∆ dw ∂ x j ∂ x i ∂ x j ∆ dw = min (max [ C dw d w , C w ∆ max , ∆ nstep ] , ∆ max ) ◮ The length scale, ∆ dw , is taken from the IDDES model [9]. ◮ In the RANS regions, ℓ t = k 1 / 2 / ( C k ω ). ◮ The interface between LES and RANS regions is chosen at a fixed grid line ( y + ≃ 500) www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 3 / 30

  10. Varying filter size ◮ When filter size in LES varies in space, an additional term appears in the momentum equation. ◮ The reason? the spatial derivatives and the filtering do not commute. ◮ For the convective term in Navier-Stokes, for example, we get ∂ v i v j = ∂ � (∆ x ) 2 � ( v i v j ) + O ∂ x j ∂ x j ◮ Ghosal & Moin [4] showed that the error is proportional to (∆ x ) 2 ; hence it is usually neglected. www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 4 / 30

  11. Commutation error in k equation ◮ In zonal 1 hybrid RANS-LES, the length scale at the RANS-LES interface changes abruptly from a RANS length scale to a LES length scale. ◮ Hamda [5] found that the commutation error at RANS-LES interfaces is large. ◮ For the k equation the commutation term reads ∂ u i k = ∂ ¯ u i k − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u i k ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ ∆ 1 the interface is chosen at a location where the RANS and LES length scales differ www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 5 / 30

  12. Commutation term: physical meaning ∂ u i k = ∂ ¯ − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u i k u i k ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ ∆ ◮ Consider a fluid particle in a RANS region moving in the x 1 direction and passing across a RANS-LES interface. www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 6 / 30

  13. Commutation term: physical meaning ∂ u i k = ∂ ¯ − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u i k u i k ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ ∆ ◮ Consider a fluid particle in a RANS region moving in the x 1 direction and passing across a RANS-LES interface. ◮ The filterwidth decreases across the interface, i.e. ∂ ∆ /∂ x 1 < 0 www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 6 / 30

  14. Commutation term: physical meaning ∂ u i k = ∂ ¯ − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u i k u i k ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ ∆ ◮ Consider a fluid particle in a RANS region moving in the x 1 direction and passing across a RANS-LES interface. ◮ The filterwidth decreases across the interface, i.e. ∂ ∆ /∂ x 1 < 0 ◮ k decreases when going from RANS to LES ⇒ ∂ ¯ u 1 k /∂ ∆ = ( k LES − k RANS ) / (∆ LES − ∆ RANS ) > 0 � �� � � �� � < 0 < 0 www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 6 / 30

  15. Commutation term: physical meaning ∂ u i k = ∂ ¯ − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u i k u i k ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ ∆ ◮ Consider a fluid particle in a RANS region moving in the x 1 direction and passing across a RANS-LES interface. ◮ The filterwidth decreases across the interface, i.e. ∂ ∆ /∂ x 1 < 0 ◮ k decreases when going from RANS to LES ⇒ ∂ ¯ u 1 k /∂ ∆ = ( k LES − k RANS ) / (∆ LES − ∆ RANS ) > 0 � �� � � �� � < 0 < 0 ◮ ⇒ The commutation term > 0 www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 6 / 30

  16. Commutation term: physical meaning ∂ u i k = ∂ ¯ − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u i k u i k ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ ∆ ◮ Consider a fluid particle in a RANS region moving in the x 1 direction and passing across a RANS-LES interface. ◮ The filterwidth decreases across the interface, i.e. ∂ ∆ /∂ x 1 < 0 ◮ k decreases when going from RANS to LES ⇒ ∂ ¯ u 1 k /∂ ∆ = ( k LES − k RANS ) / (∆ LES − ∆ RANS ) > 0 � �� � � �� � < 0 < 0 ◮ ⇒ The commutation term > 0 ◮ ⇒ The commutation term < 0 on the right-side of the k equation. www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 6 / 30

  17. Commutation term: physical meaning ∂ u i k = ∂ ¯ − ∂ ∆ ∂ ¯ u i k u i k ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ x i ∂ ∆ ◮ Consider a fluid particle in a RANS region moving in the x 1 direction and passing across a RANS-LES interface. ◮ The filterwidth decreases across the interface, i.e. ∂ ∆ /∂ x 1 < 0 ◮ k decreases when going from RANS to LES ⇒ ∂ ¯ u 1 k /∂ ∆ = ( k LES − k RANS ) / (∆ LES − ∆ RANS ) > 0 � �� � � �� � < 0 < 0 ◮ ⇒ The commutation term > 0 ◮ ⇒ The commutation term < 0 on the right-side of the k equation. ◮ Hence, the commutation term at the RANS-LES interface reduces k . www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 6 / 30

  18. Commutation term at the RANS-LES interface u ′ ¯ RANS LES v ′ ¯ 2 δ w ′ ¯ y L x www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada Go4Hybrid, Berlin, 2015 7 / 30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend