Initially Prepared Plan Initially Prepared Plan for the for the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
initially prepared plan initially prepared plan for the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Initially Prepared Plan Initially Prepared Plan for the for the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 10, 2023 417 likes •1.15k views

Initially Prepared Plan Initially Prepared Plan for the for the Panhandle Water Planning Area Panhandle Water Planning Area Amarillo, Texas Amarillo, Texas August 9, 2005 August 9, 2005 CONSULTANTS: CONSULTANTS: Freese and Nichols, Inc.

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Amarillo, Texas Amarillo, Texas August 9, 2005 August 9, 2005

Initially Prepared Plan Initially Prepared Plan for the for the Panhandle Water Planning Area Panhandle Water Planning Area

CONSULTANTS: CONSULTANTS: Freese and Nichols, Inc. Freese and Nichols, Inc. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Texas Cooperative Extension Texas Cooperative Extension Bureau of Economic Geology Bureau of Economic Geology

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why Senate Bill One & Two? Why Senate Bill One & Two?

  • 1995-1996 Drought
  • Sixth drought in 50 years
  • SB1 passed in 1997
  • $6 Billion Estimated Economic Losses
  • Nearly 300 Entities with Threat to Water Supplies
  • Large cities suffered the least throughout the

drought

  • Continued Drought in 2001 and beyond
  • SB2 passed in 2001
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interest Groups Represented Interest Groups Represented

Membership Includes:

– Municipalities – River Authorities – Counties – Public – Environmental – Electrical Generating Utilities – Water Utilities – Water Districts – Industrial – Small Business – Agriculture – Higher Education

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Interest Name

Public Janet Guthrie Counties Judge Vernon Cook Municipalities Dan Coffey David Landis Industries Bill Hallerberg Denise Jett Agricultural Frank Simms Janet Tregellas

  • B. A. Donelson

Rudie Tate Environmental Grady Skaggs

  • Dr. Nolan Clark

Inge Brady Small Businesses Rusty Gilmore

  • Elec. Generation Utilities

Gale Henslee River Authorities Jim Derington Water Districts Richard Bowers

  • C. E. Williams

Bobbie Kidd John C. Williams Water Utilities Charles Cooke High Education John Sweeten

Members of the Panhandle Water Planning Group Members of the Panhandle Water Planning Group

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Water User Groups Water User Groups

Water User Groups (WUGs)

All Uses by City, County, River Basin & Region For each decade 2010-2060

Manufacturing Steam Electric Power Mining Livestock Municipal

– Cities – County Other

Irrigation

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Request copy from TWDB Adopted December 12, 2001 by TWDB

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What Goes Into a Regional Plan? What Goes Into a Regional Plan?

  • 50 year planning period
  • Determine Population and Water Demands
  • Determine Existing Supplies
  • Determine Water Surplus or Needs
  • Social & Economic Impact of Not Meeting Needs
  • Develop Plans to Meet Needs
  • Consideration of Conservation Efforts (SB2)
  • Evaluate Water Management Strategies to Meet Needs
  • Evaluate WMS impact on Water Quality (SB2)
  • Identify Ecologically Unique Streams and Rivers
  • Identify Unique Sites for Reservoir Construction
  • Propose Legislative Policy Recommendations
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Irrigation 38% Municipal 36%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Surface Water Versus Groundwater Use Surface Water Versus Groundwater Use

Greater than 55% groundwater 45 to 55% groundwater and surface water Greater than 55% surface water

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Population and Water Use Population and Water Use

5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Water Use (AFY) 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 Population

Water Use (1997 Plan) Water Use (2002 Plan) Water Use (2005 Plan) Population (TWDB-1997) Population (RWPG-2002) Population (RWPG 2004)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Planning Area Description Planning Area Description

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Planning Area Description Planning Area Description

21 COUNTIES IN PWPA 21 COUNTIES IN PWPA

  • Armstrong
  • Hall
  • Ochiltree
  • Carson
  • Hansford
  • Oldham
  • Childress
  • Hartley
  • Potter
  • Collingsworth
  • Hemphill
  • Randall
  • Dallam
  • Hutchinson
  • Roberts
  • Donley
  • Lipscomb
  • Sherman
  • Gray
  • Moore
  • Wheeler
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Planning Area Description Planning Area Description

Population Projections Population Projections

100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 SB1 SB2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Planning Area Description Planning Area Description

Economy Economy

Economy

– Agribusiness – Manufacturing – Petroleum – Tourism

Major Water Use

– Irrigation – Agricultural Production – Food Processing and Kindred – Petroleum Refining – Chemical and Allied Products – Electric Power Generation

slide-18
SLIDE 18

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Supply (AFY) Meredith Palo Duro Greenbelt Run-of-the-River

Planning Area Description Planning Area Description

Surface Water Supplies Surface Water Supplies

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Planning Area Description Planning Area Description

Ground Water Supplies (1.25%) Ground Water Supplies (1.25%)

500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Supply (AFY) Ogallala Blaine Seymour

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Senate Bill 1 vs. Senate Bill 2 Senate Bill 1 vs. Senate Bill 2

500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am

  • unt (ac-ft/yr)

SB 1 Demand SB 2 Demand SB 1 Supplies SB 2 Supplies

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Groundwater Availability Groundwater Availability Modeling Modeling

1.25% Availability Management Policy Future Conditions Simulation Uncertainty in Results 50-ft Intervals

– White Denotes <50ft

slide-22
SLIDE 22

1950 1950

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1960 1960

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1970 1970

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-25
SLIDE 25

1980 1980

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-26
SLIDE 26

1990 1990

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2000 2000

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2010 2010

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2020 2020

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2030 2030

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2040 2040

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2050 2050

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-33
SLIDE 33

2060 2060

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-34
SLIDE 34

1950 1950

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-35
SLIDE 35

1960 1960

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-36
SLIDE 36

1970 1970

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-37
SLIDE 37

1980 1980

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-38
SLIDE 38

1990 1990

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-39
SLIDE 39

2000 2000

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-40
SLIDE 40

2010 2010

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-41
SLIDE 41

2020 2020

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-42
SLIDE 42

2030 2030

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-43
SLIDE 43

2040 2040

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-44
SLIDE 44

2050 2050

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-45
SLIDE 45

2060 2060

OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS

SHERMAN SHERMAN DALLAM DALLAM HANSFORD HANSFORD OCHILTREE OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB LIPSCOMB MOORE MOORE HARTLEY HARTLEY HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON ROBERTS ROBERTS HEMPHILL HEMPHILL POTTER POTTER OLDHAM OLDHAM CARSON CARSON GRAY GRAY WHEELER WHEELER RANDALL RANDALL ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG DONLEY DONLEY COLLINGSWORTH COLLINGSWORTH

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Water Quality Water Quality

Areas of Concern Areas of Concern

30 mi

N

NO3 area of concern Dockum Ogallala Blaine Blaine Seymour Cl area of concern Dockum Ogallala

Perryton Pampa RRA Lefors Dodson Wheeler

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Water Management Strategies Water Management Strategies

Evaluation:

– Quantity, reliability, and cost; – Environmental factors; – Water resources and other water management strategies; – Agricultural and natural resources; – Political and socioeconomic issues – Consideration of Conservation

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Water Management Strategies Water Management Strategies

Strategies:

– New Groundwater Wells – Conservation – Reuse – NPET – Improved Irrigation Equipment – Conservation Tillage – Precipitation Enhancement – Voluntary Transfer from Other Users – Palo Duro Reservoir Project – Utilize Existing Water Rights

slide-49
SLIDE 49

County Summaries County Summaries

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Armstrong County Armstrong County

Water User Group Strategy

Claude No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands in this Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category County Population

1,850 1,900 1,950 2,000 2,050 2,100 2,150 2,200 2,250 2,300 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

County Supplies & Demands

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Carson County Carson County

County Supplies & Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

Water User Group Strategy

Groom, Panhandle, Skellytown, White Deer No Shortages Identified Hi Texas Water No Shortages Identified County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing New Groundwater Wells, Reuse, Conservation Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

County Population

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Childress County Childress County

County Supplies & Demands

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

Water User Group Strategy

Childress No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands in this Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

County Population

7,400 7,500 7,600 7,700 7,800 7,900 8,000 8,100 8,200 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Collingsworth County Collingsworth County

County Supplies & Demands

20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

Water User Group Strategy

Wellington No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands in this Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Demands in this Category Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category County Population

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Dallam County Dallam County

County Supplies & Demands

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) 1.25% Available Supply Shortage

Water User Group Strategy

Dalhart, Texline New Groundwater Wells, Conservation County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Irrigation NPET, Improved Irrigation Equipment, Conservation Tillage, Precipitation Enhancement Manufacturing No Demands in this Category Livestock Voluntary Transfer From Other Users, Conservation Mining No Demands in this Category Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

County Population

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Donley County Donley County

Water User Group Strategy

Clarendon No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands in this Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category County Population

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

County Supplies & Demands

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Gray County Gray County

County Supplies & Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

Water User Group Strategy

Pampa, Lefors, McLean No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Shortages Identified Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

County Population

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Hall County Hall County

Water User Group Strategy

Memphis (Shortage < 10 AFY) No Strategy Required County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation NPET, Improved Irrigation Equipment, Conservation Tillage, Precipitation Enhancement Manufacturing No Demands in this Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining (Shortage < 10 AFY) New Groundwater Wells Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

County Population

3,650 3,700 3,750 3,800 3,850 3,900 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

County Supplies & Demands

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) 1.25% Available Supply Shortage

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Hansford County Hansford County

Water User Group Strategy

Gruver, Spearman No Shortages Identified County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Palo Duro Reservoir Project, Conservation Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing (Shortage < 10 AFY) No Strategy Required Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

County Population

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

County Supplies & Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Hartley County Hartley County

County Population

5,200 5,300 5,400 5,500 5,600 5,700 5,800 5,900 6,000 6,100 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

Water User Group Strategy

Dalhart New Groundwater Wells, Conservation County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Irrigation NPET, Improved Irrigation Equipment, Conservation Tillage, Precipitation Enhancement Manufacturing (Shortage < 10 AFY) No Strategy Required Livestock Voluntary Transfer From Other Users, Conservation Mining No Demands in this Category Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

County Supplies and Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Hemphill County Hemphill County

County Population

2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 3,100 3,200 3,300 3,400 3,500 3,600 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

County Supplies & Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

Water User Group Strategy

Canadian No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Shortages Identified Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Demands in this Category Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Hutchinson County Hutchinson County

County Supplies & Demands

20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

Water User Group Strategy

Borger, Fritch No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Shortages Identified Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Demands in this Category Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category County Population

19,000 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 25,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Lipscomb County Lipscomb County

County Supplies & Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

Water User Group Strategy

Booker No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Shortages Identified Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands in this Category County Population

2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 3,100 3,200 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Moore County Moore County

County Supplies & Demands

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) 1.25% Available Supply Shortage

Water User Group Strategy

Cactus, Dumas, Sunray New Groundwater Wells, Palo Duro Reservoir Project, Conservation County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Irrigation NPET, Improved Irrigation Equipment, Conservation Tillage, Manufacturing New Groundwater Wells, Reuse, Conservation Livestock Voluntary Transfer From Other Users, New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power New Groundwater Wells, Reuse, Conservation

County Population

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Ochiltree County Ochiltree County

Water User Group Strategy

Perryton No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands In This Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands In This Category County Population

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

County Supplies & Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Oldham County Oldham County

County Population

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

Water User Group Strategy

Vega No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands In This Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands In This Category

County Supplies & Demands

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Potter County Potter County

County Population

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

Water User Group Strategy

Amarillo New Groundwater Wells, Conservation County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing New Groundwater Wells, Reuse, Conservation Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining New Groundwater Wells, Reuse, Conservation Steam Electric Power No Shortages Identified

County Supplies and Demands 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) 1.25% Available Supply Shortage

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Randall County Randall County

Water User Group Strategy

Amarillo Utilize Existing Water Rights Canyon No Shortages Identified Lake Tanglewood New Groundwater Wells, Conservation County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing New Groundwater Wells, Reuse, Conservation Livestock Voluntary Transfer From Other Users, New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Mining (Shortage < 10AFY) No Strategy Required Steam Electric Power No Demands In This Category

County Population

20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

County Supplies & Demands

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Amount (ac-ft/yr) 1.25% Available Supply Shortage

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Roberts County Roberts County

County Population

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

Water User Group Strategy

Miami No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands In This Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands In This Category

County Supplies & Demands

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Sherman County Sherman County

County Population

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

Water User Group Strategy

Stratford New Groundwater Wells, Conservation County-Other New Groundwater Wells, Conservation Irrigation NPET, Improved Irrigation Equipment, Conservation Tillage, Precipitation Enhancement Manufacturing No Demands In This Category Livestock Voluntary Transfer From Other Users, Conservation Mining New Groundwater Wells, Reuse, Conservation Steam Electric Power No Demands In This Category

County Supplies & Demands

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) 1.25% Available Supply Shortage

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Wheeler County Wheeler County

County Population

4,950 5,000 5,050 5,100 5,150 5,200 5,250 5,300 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060

Water User Group Strategy

Shamrock, Wheeler No Shortages Identified County-Other No Shortages Identified Irrigation No Shortages Identified Manufacturing No Demands In This Category Livestock No Shortages Identified Mining No Shortages Identified Steam Electric Power No Demands In This Category

County Supplies & Demands

20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Am ount (ac-ft/yr) Demand 1.25% Available Supply

slide-71
SLIDE 71

QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS?

Stefan Schuster Stefan Schuster

10814 Jollyville Road, Building 4, Suite 100 10814 Jollyville Road, Building 4, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78759 Austin, Texas 78759 Phone: (512) 617 Phone: (512) 617-

  • 3121

3121 Fax: (512) 451 Fax: (512) 451-

  • 7956

7956

sks@freese.com sks@freese.com