Research to Practice
A case study by Dr Su Wild-River Initially presented as a postdoctoral research discussion paper. Updated for www.wild-river.com.au
Research to Practice A case study by Dr Su Wild-River Initially - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Research to Practice A case study by Dr Su Wild-River Initially presented as a postdoctoral research discussion paper. Updated for www.wild-river.com.au Overview A PhD that led to consultancy projects, an applied environmental risk
A case study by Dr Su Wild-River Initially presented as a postdoctoral research discussion paper. Updated for www.wild-river.com.au
Inspired by policy liaison work that raised questions of whether new environmental protection laws had delivered beneficial practical
in the first years of the Environmental Protection Act
half an hour
weeks.
protection laws approximate environmental risk minimisation
and residual risk
calibrated using good communication.
Inherent and Residual Environmental Risk
Residual risk: the likelihood and consequences of environmental harm occurring, taking account of risk control measures Inherent risk: the likelihood and consequences of environmental harm from the activity if there were no risk control measures in place.
Risk Management Matrix 1: minor chemical storage
Likeli- Consequences hood 1(negligible) 2(minor) 3(severe) 4(major) 5(catastrophic) A (certain) 8(M) 16 (M) 32 (H) 64 (VH) 128 (E) B(likely) 4 (L) 8(M) 16 (M) 32 (H) 64 (VH) C(moderate) 2 (N) 4 (L) 8(M) 16 (M) 32 (H) D(unlikely) 1 (N) 2 (N) 4 (L) 8(M) 16 (M) E(rare) 0 (N) 1 (N) 2 (N) 4 (L) 8(M)
B2:8 E1:0
Figure 6: Risk Reduction by ERA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 1 , m e t a l w r k s 5 2 , t a n n e r y 1 2 ,
l r e f / p r
6 , s u g m i l l 3 8 , l a n d d e v 6 , c h e m m f t 7 , r a i l f a c 7 , c h e m s t
7 8 , c h e m /
l r e c 6 5 , s a w m i l l 3 2 , m e a t p r
8 5 , r e g w s t t r t 7 6 , r e g w s t d s p 7 4 , g e n w s t d s p 1 9 , e x t r
k 5 7 , a s p h a l t 1 1 , p e t r
s t r g 4 , p
l t r y f a r m 1 4 , S T P 2 2 , a b s v b l s t a u t
e c 3 , p i g f a r m 8 3 , w s t t f r 6 , c
c b t c h 1 5 , W T P s p r a y p n t 2 8 , m t r v c l w k s h p 2 4 , m e t a l c
t 2 3 , b l r m a k i n g
ERA
Log (Mean Risk)
Potential 95 98
Which activities need regular inspections? Which statutory authority should be responsible?
Best-practice. What defines it and how is it retained?
adequate and how do you target hazards for improvement? Non-compliance. When does an activity need to make improvements and what would they be?
representation on EMPC
Consultancy project 3: ANU environmental risk assessment
Total environmental risk, ANU
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
1998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004
Total CERAM score Inherent Residual
Soil
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004CERAM scroe
Soil - inherent Soil - residualNoise
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004CERAM score
Noi se - i nher ent Noi se - r esi dualAn 8% reduction in environmental risk - ANU
Stormwater drains take rain straight to the creek Two types of drains leave every building at the ANU Many wastes can go to sewage, but
the stormwater drains Sewage drains take waste for treatment
BCC, CSIRO, Queensland Government, Uni of Sydney, Queensland University of Technology
Trademarks – environmental risk assessment and risk management
publications to major publishing company
some earlier research findings that have not yet been widely published.
Investment ($) Environmental risk reduction (CERAM units)
50 100 150 200 250 300 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 Primary production Refinement Waste management Servicing Manufacture