Information Programme Forum 3-4 June 2015 Michelle Hamer SANBI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

information programme
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Information Programme Forum 3-4 June 2015 Michelle Hamer SANBI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme Forum 3-4 June 2015 Michelle Hamer SANBI Overview of presentation Background and history of the FBIP The strategic and business plan: Vision, objectives and proposed outputs


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme

Forum 3-4 June 2015 Michelle Hamer SANBI

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview of presentation

  • Background and history of the FBIP
  • The strategic and business plan: Vision,
  • bjectives and proposed outputs
  • Funding grants – what these are; main

themes; assessment criteria; and critical aspects for proposals

  • Outputs from funded projects – what must be

delivered from projects?

  • Other considerations
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background and history

  • Where did the FBIP come from?
slide-4
SLIDE 4

2011: Programmes that generate / disseminate fundamental

biodiversity information

SAEOL: co-ordinated, value added information about species SABIF: databases: primary data /species

  • ccurrence in space

and time

SABI

systematics /

taxonomy

SA-IBOL: DNA barcode

reference library for

identification of species Funded by DST Funded by DST & NRF NO CONSISTENT FUNDING, BUT KEY STRATEGIC PROJECTS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background and history

DST requested that an integrated programme for foundational biodiversity information be developed in order to:

  • a. Reduce transaction costs
  • b. Increase impact of the investment
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background: Timelines for Programme Development

  • Task Team – convened in May 2011 to draft concept. Included SABIF, SABI,

SAIBOL, SAEOL, NRF, DST, ARC, GEOBON, SAEON.

  • Concept presented to SABI and SABIF Steering Committees in May and

June 2011.

  • Presented to DST EXCO for approval in September 2011.
  • Task Team reconvened in February 2012 to further develop and refine

concept.

  • Concept revised, request for seed funding submitted to DST in February

2012.

  • Programme was approved by DST for implementation in April 2013.
  • Presented to SABI Forum in May 2012.
  • Some revision to concept document after meeting between M. Hamer,

DST, NRF in response to queries.

  • First call for grants and grant allocation: through 2013.
  • Steering Committee established and first meeting - 2014
  • 2014: some delays with finalising funding contract – no call
  • 2015: funding allocated – call issued and first Forum held
slide-7
SLIDE 7

The FBIP

  • Rationale for the programme
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rationale for the FBIP: biodiversity provides goods and services that sustain life and provide economic opportunities Foundational biodiversity information = what have we got? What is it? Where does it occur? What does it do / what is important about it?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Scope of FBIP

Data / knowledge generation, mobilization and co-ordination:

  • Species occurrence (biodiversity surveys, capture of data from specimens

in collections),

  • Species identity (DNA barcoding, other identification tools),
  • Population abundance (quantified surveys),
  • Genetic diversity (phylogenetic distance, population genetics)
  • Species attributes – photos / illustrations, biology, importance to people

including cultural significance, functional role in ecosystem, interactions with other species.

  • Critical for monitoring and reporting on the state of biodiversity, and for

understanding and mitigating the impacts of global change on biodiversity

  • Important for sustainable use of biodiversity.
  • Plants, animals, microbes; indigenous and alien invasive species, all

habitats (aquatic and terrestrial).

  • Foundational because it forms the basis of so many other aspects of

biodiversity research and decision-making.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Biodiversity survey, inventory and description

Ability to identify species:

Database: what species we have, distribution in space and time, abundance

  • Management of key natural assets to provide

goods and services - bioeconomy, and mitigation of the impacts of global change Job creation; service delivery Monitoring, bioprospecting, agriculture; data for global change understanding; science based decision- making for sustainable development Value chain for biodiversity knowledge

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Problem statement

  • Researchers who generate foundational biodiversity

information and those practitioners who use this type

  • f information generally work in isolation from each
  • ther, resulting in misalignment in what information is

generated and what is needed and used.

  • The uptake of foundational data by practitioners

further up the value chain closer to the science- society and science-policy interfaces is low – difficult to access data / knowledge. Data remain with researchers or within institutions. Even if in public repositories – difficult to use.

  • Funding for foundational biodiversity information is

not easy to attract on a sustained basis.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Challenges that we need to address

  • Alignment of needs with what is produced
  • Providing access to co-ordinated data that is

needed

  • Placing programme in context of national and

funding agent priorities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Biodiversity survey, inventory and description

Ability to identify species; Database: what species we have, where they occur and when they were collected; Information about species: harmful, useful, threatened, alien, appearance

  • Management of key natural assets to provide

goods and services Job creation; service delivery Critical for managing and rehabilitating ecosystems

Understanding what species are in ecosystems (name), abundance; what they do in the ecosystem (how they contribute to functioning), whether they are widespread or have narrow distributions

Critical for green economy

How do we identify the species? What is its distribution and abundance? What are its close relatives that might also have useful properties? Is there genetic diversity that could be beneficial / detrimental ?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Users of Foundational Biodiversity Information

DEA – Strategic Environmental Assessments (large infrastructure projects), protected area expansion, wildlife trade and game industry – policy; rehabilitation projects DAFF – fisheries, aquaculture decisions and policy, biosecurity – pests and pathogens in imports and exports; ARC - new crops, monitoring pests, parasites, pathogens Enforcement (SAPS, Green Scorpions)– forensics – entomology, illegal trade in wildlife Health - pharmaceuticals, path labs, GPs, traditional healers Public – gardeners, learners, citizen scientists, NGOs Industry – agriculture, horticulture, development applications; biotechnology

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Overall aim of the FBIP

  • The intention of the FBIP is to generate,

manage and disseminate appropriate foundational biodiversity information as the basis for research which can catalyse the bio- economy, and for decision-making which will promote human well-being.

  • Overall themes: global change and the bio-

economy (green economy)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Objective

Outputs

  • 1. Generate knowledge and

mobilise existing data to address priority knowledge / information gaps identified by consultation / involvement of relevant stakeholders who use and apply foundational biodiversity information in decision-making for sustainable use and development  Expanded inventory of SA’s species  Documented genetic and phylogenetic diversity for priority species  DNA barcodes / sequences for identifying species / taxa  A database that documents distribution

  • f species in space and time

 Consolidated relevant information for priority species

  • 2. Uptake of knowledge generated

for application in research and decision-making  Measured and monitored use of outputs from FBIP for decision-making, or in green economy, or by other researchers

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 3. Contribute content to an

integrated information management and dissemination system to provide long-term access to outputs from the FBIP. (how this is achieved still under discussion)

:

Databases compiled for:  National inventory of South African species  Species pages for South African species including photographs / illustrations, information on biology, ecological role and interactions, links to DNA barcode / sequence data, distribution maps, indigenous knowledge, existing and potential use, threat status, population trends and literature through the Biodiversity Heritage Library.  Primary data sets on specimen identity, date

  • f collection, locality of collection, collector

details, origin of record and where possible

  • ther data such as habitat description,

biological notes, abundance. .

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 4. To attract, develop and up skill people

to ensure appropriate capacity for biodiversity information and knowledge generation, dissemination and application.  Young researchers produce outputs of strategic objective 1.  Postgraduate students trained through grants.  Professionals in field trained to use new technologies in foundational biodiversity information generation, management and dissemination.  Users of information trained in its use.

  • 5. To develop an understanding of best

practices for ensuring that foundational biodiversity knowledge generated and information disseminated are taken up for use and application in decision- making and sustainable use (bioeconomy).  Publication/s on uptake of data using different approaches for identifying priorities and for feeding data through to users.

  • Publicity / communication strategy

for promoting use – based on the findings of studies done.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Funding grants

  • Main mechanism for achieving objectives
  • Administered by NRF through their granting

process

  • Competitive process, with proposals scored by

a panel

  • Context: global change and the bioeconomy
  • Call process and time frames will be addressed

by Lita Pauw

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Types of grants

1. Large, integrated and collaborative projects (3 year projects, up to R2 million / year) (2 new projects can be selected for funding this year) Themes:

  • 1. Resolution of taxonomic problems, and documenting distribution and

abundance of plant and animal species used for medicinal purposes in South Africa.

  • 2. Biological control: identification of potential biocontrol agents through being

able to identify the pest / pathogen / alien and its origin, the identification of natural predators / pathogens of it, and close relatives of the host and potential agents.

  • 3. Coordinated surveys for soil organisms and identification of functional roles

in agri-ecosystems and natural areas and the co-ordination of existing information on soil organisms in South Africa.

  • 4. Biodiversity functionality. Better understanding of key functional attributes
  • f different species in ecosystems, and the key interactions between them,

focusing on terrestrial regulatory services systems . Regulatory services include invasion resistance, pollination, climate regulation, carbon sequestration, pest and disease control in agricultural systems.

  • 5. Multi-taxa surveys of strategic geographic areas (eg. new or proposed

protected areas, areas targeted for development, areas with high levels of dependence on biodiversity for livelihoods, areas of importance for providing ecological infrastructure).

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Types of grants

  • 1. Small projects

Number will depend on funding availability. R3.5 million available this year. 1 year projects – R50,000 to R200,000

  • The data / knowledge should be clearly and directly

linked to the main focus of the Programme (bio- economy and global change), but it may fall outside of the five themes for the large projects.

  • Grants can be used for taxonomic research,

mobilisation of primary data (specimen records), generation of DNA barcodes, compiling species information or for data management / dissemination innovations.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Small projects

2 year projects – up to R1 million over 2 years

  • Strategic biodiversity surveys that contribute to more than
  • ne of the above outputs and with a more limited scope

than those covered in the large, integrated team project grants can also be submitted under this call in 2015. The surveys should cover a clearly defined geographic area or taxon for which diversity, distribution and / or abundance data are required for conservation / sustainable use / management activities. Biodiversity surveys must align with the global change or bioeconomy focus of the FBIP as detailed in the Programme Framework document

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Critical success factors for large projects

  • Must include postgraduate training.
  • Must include a minimum of five team members from a minimum
  • f three institutions, but teams that involve all relevant

specialists will be favoured.

  • Project teams must include at least one young researcher

(younger than 40 at the time of application).

  • Must identify specific users of the knowledge generated and

information co-ordinated and must indicate how engagement with users has been or will be addressed to ensure that data needs are met in terms of what is generated and mobilized and how it is accessed by users.

  • Must indicate the impact of the project on understanding and

mitigation of global change and / or the bio-economy.

  • Must generate primary biodiversity data sets.
  • Must contribute to the compilation of species pages for the EoL.
  • Must provide specimens for barcoding or produce DNA

barcodes.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Taxonomy and digitisation

Molecular research

Citizen science

Decision support tools Applied Research & Monitoring Blue Economy Science based management & policy

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Key Elements in the SeaKeys Team

  • 17 Institutes (incl. 9 Research

dept’s, 4 end user groups)

  • 13 Co-Investigators
  • 16 Collaborators
  • 5 Young researchers
  • 14 Students
  • 3 Citizen platforms
  • Capacity Building Group
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Data & knowledge to Decision making & Benefits

Coral taxonomy & barcoding Bleaching monitoring Incl Deep Cold Water Corals

  • Global change

understanding & management Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management Kingklip population genetics Fisheries stock assessment

  • Fisheries

Management

  • Food Security
  • Offshore Marine

Protected Area establishment Nudibranch Research Nudibranch Atlas to test ecosystem maps

  • Bioprospecting

successes

  • Scuba Tourism
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Planned Project Impacts

  • New working groups eg. Marine Barcoding,

Invasives, Monitoring, Capacity building

  • New research teams and local and international collaborations
  • Improved museum collections, curations and capacity
  • National species lists for 14 groups
  • New maps for threatened species, ecosystem types and sensitive areas
  • Critical knowledge for species red-listing, ecosystem classification,

description and mapping, MPA design & management, fisheries, seabed mining and petroleum management

  • Marine bioprospecting successes collated, Marine Ecotourism links
  • Strengthened Ocean Economy
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Critical factors for small projects

  • Projects must identify specific users of the knowledge

generated / information co-ordinated and must indicate how the data will be made accessible.

  • Proposals must indicate how the project will impact on

understanding and mitigation of global change and / or the bio-economy. Ie. What will change because the project is done and why will this matter?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Score cards

(details provided in FBIP Framework document)

Concept documents for large projects

  • 1. Track record, including leadership / project

management 20%

  • 2. Concept alignment to Programme and

themes 20%

  • 3. Feasibility: workplan included

30%

  • 4. Outputs and Impacts: What are the

anticipated outputs? What will the impact of the outputs be on global change understanding and / or the bio- economy? Are these realistic? 30%

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Score cards

(these are detailed in the FBIP Framework document)

Large projects

  • 1. Track record (applicant and team)

10%

  • 2. Capacity development

10%

  • 3. Proposal quality (clear aim and objectives, clear

understanding of programme and outputs, clear activities that address the objectives 20%

  • 4. Feasibility: clear workplan with defined activities,

roles, deadlines / time frames; budget 30%

  • 5. Impact: stated and realistic? users defined; format

for dissemination of data / knowledge. Will there be a change because of project? 30%

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Score card

Small projects and surveys

  • 1. Track record of applicant

10%

  • 2. Proposal: Is there a clear aim and objectives that align with a problem

statement and with the objectives of the Programme?

20%

  • 3. Feasibility: Is there a detailed workplan with reasonable timeframes

for activities and outputs? Are the roles and contributions of all participants specified? Is the budget reasonable considering the proposed activities and

  • utputs?

30% 20%

  • 4. Impacts: Have the impacts on global change and / or the bio-economy

been specified? Are these realistic? Have the users of the knowledge / information been identified? Has consideration been given to the format in which the knowledge / information will need to be made accessible (even if this is not done by the project)?

20%

slide-33
SLIDE 33

For all projects ….

  • Outputs must be specified and quantified
  • Eg. How many records / DNA barcodes / species pages?
  • Expectation is that these outputs will be provided to

SANBI – different to other NRF-funded projects.

  • For some types of data this is not possible – but

reference numbers for a public repository where the data have been lodged will be required, with details of the data (eg. taxon name, collection locality, date collected, type of material, type of data, and repository and reference (eg. BOLD or Genbank)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Data release guidelines for FBIP

(document available on request but will be on website soon)

  • Individuals and institutions must agree to make the data produced

from FBIP grants available six months after the completion date of the project as stated in the proposal.

  • In the event of the open dissemination of data posing a risk to a

student thesis, the data provision to the FBIP can be delayed for

  • ne to two years on request to the FBIP. It should be emphasized

however, that this is not the preferred mechanism.

  • In the instance of data produced by a student that is withheld from

public release the data must still be provided to the FBIP when the project ends.

  • Where data are considered to be sensitive (the GPS co-ordinates of

a collection locality for a species threatened by over-collecting) or confidential (eg. name of human subjects from which disease samples were taken), then GPS co-ordinates can be disseminated at a coarse scale or the names of human subjects must be removed from data sets. These or similar restrictions must be stated by the grantholder when data are submitted to the FBIP.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Data submission and reporting

  • This is critical to the sustainability of the

funding programme. If programme targets are not met, then programme is unlikely to continue.

  • The FBIP Steering Committee took a decision

that grantholders who had not submitted data from a previous grant would not be able to access a new grant until the data have been submitted.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Some other considerations

  • Ethical considerations. This section is compulsory on

the application submission form.

  • Not only research on humans that has ethics issues.

Not sufficient to say that the project will get ethical clearance from the institution’s ethics committee.

  • Permitting issues – all research done must be legally

compliant – which means that the correct permits must be obtained. (Karin Behr’s presentation)

  • Also consider impacts on populations, unintentional

transfer of organisms / disease.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Still being discussed …

  • How we co-ordinate / integrate all the data and

provide access to this (species occurrence / specimen data; species pages)

  • What do we do with the microbe data – this does

not fit the approaches for plants and animals (or could it?)

  • What do we consider as DNA barcoding and how

do we ensure useable DNA barcode data? These questions will be discussed in the working group sessions to be held tomorrow.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Thank-you!!!

  • Participants in the FBIP and at the Forum
  • DST for funding and guidance
  • NRF for administrative support and processes

for grants

  • SANBI – for hosting the FBIP co-ordination
  • FBIP Steering Committee – valuable input