Indefinite linear matrix pencils and the multi-eigenvalue problem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

indefinite linear matrix pencils and the multi eigenvalue
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Indefinite linear matrix pencils and the multi-eigenvalue problem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Indefinite linear matrix pencils and the multi-eigenvalue problem Hasen Mekki ZTRK University of Reading Based on joint work with Michael Levitin August, 2017 IWOTA 1 / 37 Outline Pencils 1 A matrix pencil example 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Indefinite linear matrix pencils and the multi-eigenvalue problem

Hasen Mekki ÖZTÜRK

University of Reading

Based on joint work with Michael Levitin August, 2017 IWOTA

1 / 37

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

1

Pencils

2

A matrix pencil example

3

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

2 / 37

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pencils

Pencils

3 / 37

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Pencils

Self-adjoint pencils

Let P = P (λ) := T0 + λT1 + λ2T2 + . . . + λmTm, be a family of (bounded) operators in a Hilbert space H, which depends on a spectral parameter λ ∈ C, with self-adjoint operator coefficients Tj = (Tj)∗ , j = 1, . . . , n. Such a family is called a self-adjoint (polynomial) operator pencil. I shall only deal with a linear self-adjoint operator pencil written as P (λ) = T − λS.

4 / 37

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pencils

Spectrum of a linear pencil

λ0 is an eigenvalue of P if there exists x ∈ H {0} such that P (λ0) x = 0, i.e., if 0 is an eigenvalue of P (λ0). The spectrum is the set of values λ0 for which there is no bounded inverse P (λ0)−1, i.e. if 0 ∈ SpecP (λ0). For a linear pencil, the eigenvalue problem becomes (T − λS) x = 0, and if S is invertible, then it reduces to the eigenvalue problem for a (non-self-adjoint) operator S−1T; S−1Tx = λx.

5 / 37

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pencils

If either T or S is sign-definite, then the problem may be reduced to the one for a self-adjoint operator S−1/2TS−1/2, and the spectrum is real. If, however, both T, S are sign-indefinite, then the spectrum may be non-real.

6 / 37

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A matrix pencil example

A matrix pencil example

7 / 37

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A matrix pencil example

Example - A matrix pencil [DaLe]

Fix an integer n ∈ N, N = 2n, and define the N × N classes of matrices H(N)

c

and S, where H(N)

c

:=       c 1 1 c ... ... ... 1 1 c       , S := In −In

  • where c ∈ R is a parameter and In is the identity matrix.

The behavior of eigenvalues of the linear operator pencil P := P (λ) = H(N)

c

− λS as N → ∞ was studied by Davies & Levitin(2014).

8 / 37

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A matrix pencil example

Example - A matrix pencil [DaLe]

If |c| ≥ 2, then Spec (P) ⊂ R. Spec (P) is invariant under the symmetry c → −c. Spec (P) is symmetric with respect to Re λ = 0 and Im λ = 0. Davies & Levitin studied the asymptotic behaviour of eigenvalues of P for large n;

For c = 0, |Im λ| ∼ 1 nY0 (|Re λ|) . For 0 < c < 2, |Im λ| 1 nYc (|Re λ|) .

Functions Y0 and Yc are explicit (though rather complicated), and have logarithmic singularities at Re λ = 0.

9 / 37

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A matrix pencil example

Example - A matrix pencil [DaLe]

Video time!

10 / 37

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A matrix pencil example

Spec (P) for c = √ 5/2 and n = 500, 250, 99.

11 / 37

slide-12
SLIDE 12

A matrix pencil example

∪250

m=100Spec (P) for c =

√ 5/2

12 / 37

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A matrix pencil example

Conjecture

Asymptotic and numerical evidence suggest the following: Let c > 0. If λ ∈ Spec (P (λ)) R, then c < 2 and |λ ± c| < 2. This can also be translated in terms of Chebyshev polynomials via explicit expression for det

  • H(N)

c

− λS

  • :

Let σ, τ ∈ C, Im (σ) = Im (τ) > 0. If, for some n ∈ N, Un+1 (σ) Un+1 (τ) + Un (σ) Un (τ) = 0, then |σ| < 1 and |τ| < 1.

13 / 37

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

14 / 37

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Pencil to Parametric problem

Recall the pencil P; H(N)

c

− λS =            c − λ 1 1 ... ... ... c − λ 1 1 c + λ ... ... ... 1 1 c + λ            . Denote α = λ − c, β = −λ − c.

15 / 37

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Pencil to Parametric problem

We will act by P on vectors which we will write as (u1, . . . , un, vn, . . . , v1)T . Then

  • H(n)

− αIn B B H(n) − βIn − → u − → v

  • = −

→ 0 , where B = B∗ with Bnn = 1 and all other entries of B are zeros.

16 / 37

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Pencil to Parametric problem

We first generalize to the following: for any κ > 0, let B = κP, P = P∗, P = 1,

  • H(n)

− αIn κP κP H(n) − βIn − → u − → v

  • = −

→ 0 . (1) which is a special case of A − αI1 C C ∗ D − βI2 − → u − → v

  • = −

→ 0 , (2) where, in general, − → u ∈ H1 and − → v ∈ H2, A, D are self-adjoint operators in H1, H2, respectively, C is a linear operator from H2 to H1, α, β ∈ C are spectral parameters.

17 / 37

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Two-parameter Matrix Eigenvalue problem

Denote M = A C C ∗ D

  • ,

so that the problem

  • M −

αI1 βI2 − → u − → v

  • = −

→ 0 , (3) where − → u ∈ H1 and − → v ∈ H2. (α, β) ∈ C2 a multi-eigenvalue (or a pair-eigenvalue) of M if there exists a non-trivial solution − → u − → v

  • ∈ H of (3).

We denote by Specp (M) the spectrum of pair-eigenvalues of M. If α, β ∈ R, then (α, β) is called as a real pair-eigenvalue, and

  • therwise it is a non-real pair-eigenvalue of (3).

18 / 37

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

β (α) problem

The equation (3) can be re-written as

  • (A − αI1) −

→ u = −C− → v , (D − βI2) − → v = −C ∗− → u . If α / ∈ Spec (A) and β is an eigenvalue of

  • D − C ∗ (A − αI1)−1 C
  • ,

then (α, β) ∈ Specp (M). Note: α and β are interchangeable.

19 / 37

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Restrictions

Now, suppose that H1, H2 are finite dimensional, and therefore we are dealing with matrices. Additionally dim H1 = dim H2. C has rank 1, or C = κP, where κ > 0 and P is a projection on a

  • ne-dimensional subspace span {−

→ ϕ } of H,

20 / 37

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Notations

The restriction of X on the space of vectors orthogonal to − → ϕ will be denoted by X⊥,⊥. Eigenvalues of A and D will be denoted by

  • α1

  • α2 ≥ . . . ≥

αn,

  • β1

  • β2 ≥ . . . ≥

βn, respectively. Eigenvalues of A⊥,⊥ and D⊥,⊥ will be denoted by

  • α1

  • α2 ≥ . . . ≥

αn−1,

  • β1

  • β2 ≥ . . . ≥

βn−1, respectively.

21 / 37

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Remark

All numerical examples will be related to

  • H(n)

− αI κP κP H(n) − βI − → u − → v

  • = −

→ 0 . All theoretical results will be related to A − αI κP κP D − βI − → u − → v

  • = −

→ 0 .

22 / 37

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Spectral picture for n = 7

23 / 37

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Spectral picture for n = 7

Blue curves are all real eigencurves β (α), α ∈ R. Red curves are graphs of Reβ (Reα) for eigenpairs such that Im (α + β) = 0, which keeps all (α, β) ∈ R2 in the picture and some complex pair-eigenvalues. Lemma Blue and red lines intersect iff d dαβ (α) = −1.

24 / 37

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Characteristic equation

Theorem If α / ∈ Spec (A) and β / ∈ Spec (D), then the characteristic equation for (α, β) ∈ Specp (M) is κ2 (A − αIn)−1 − → ϕ , − → ϕ (D − βIn)−1 − → ϕ , − → ϕ

  • = 1,

(4) which implies β

′ = −κ2

  • (A − αIn)−2 −

→ ϕ , − → ϕ (D − βIn)−1 − → ϕ , − → ϕ 2

  • (D − βIn)−2 −

→ ϕ , − → ϕ

  • ,

and therefore dβ

dα < 0 on each real branch of β (α), α ∈ R.

25 / 37

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Mesh

R1,3 R2,1 R1,2 R1,4 R3,1 R2,2 R3,2 R2,3 R4,1 R1,1 Α

  • 1

Α

  • 2

Β

  • 1

Β

  • 2

Α

  • 1

Α

  • 2

Β

  • 1

Β

  • 2

26 / 37

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Spectral picture for n = 7

27 / 37

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

n = 4 and particular values of κ

28 / 37

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Chess Board Structure for n = 6

Figure : Superimposing the values of κ from 0.001 to 10 with the step-size of 0.1.

29 / 37

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Chess Board Structure

Chess Board Theorem: Suppose that Spec (A) Spec (A⊥,⊥) = ∅ and Spec (D) Spec (D⊥,⊥) = ∅. Then all real pair-eigenvalues (α, β) of M lies in the region Rp,q where p + q is even, i.e. (α, β) ⊂ R2 ⇒ (α, β) ∈ Rp,q.

30 / 37

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

When α ∈ Spec (A)

Lemma Suppose α = αi ∈ Spec (A), i = 1, . . . , n, and let − → ψi be an eigenfunction corresponding to the eigenvalue αi of A. Assume that − → ϕ , − → ψi

  • = 0.

Then, for any κ ∈ R {0}, (α, β (α)) ∈ Specp (M)

  • β (α)

∈ Spec (D⊥⊥) , and additionally for α ≈ αi, there exists one (α, β (α)) ∈ Specp (M) such that β (α) → ±∞ as α → α±

i .

31 / 37

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

As κ → 0

32 / 37

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

As κ → 0

Theorem Let κ → 0. Then for every i ∈ {1, . . . , n} and every β ∈ R, there exists a sequence

  • (αk, βk) ∈ Specp (M)
  • k such that

αk → αi, βk → β, similarly for every i ∈ {1, . . . , n} and every α ∈ R, there exists a sequence

  • (αk, βk) ∈ Specp (M)
  • k such that

αk → α, βk → βi.

33 / 37

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

As κ → +∞

34 / 37

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

As κ → +∞

Theorem Let κ → ∞. Then for every j ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1} and every β ∈ R, there exists a sequence

  • (αk, βk) ∈ Specp (M)
  • k such that

αk → αj, βk → β, similarly for every j ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1} and every α ∈ R, there exists a sequence

  • (αk, βk) ∈ Specp (M)
  • k such that

αk → α, βk → βj. In addition, there exists one non-real family of pair-eigenvalue (α, β) of M such that α = β.

35 / 37

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

Modified problem: Non-real collisions

36 / 37

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Multi-Parametric Eigenvalue Problem

  • E. Brian Davies and Michael Levitin, Spectra of a class of

non-self-adjoint matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications 448, 55-84 (2014).

  • C. Tretter, Spectral Theory of Block Operator Matrices and

Applications, Imperial Collefe Press, London, UK, 2008. Atkinson, F. V., 1968. Multiparameter spectral theory. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 74(1), 1-27. Atkinson, F. V., 1972. Multiparameters eigenvalue problems. Academic Press. E.B. Davies, Linear Operators and their Spectra, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007.

37 / 37